Hello and welcome to the unofficial Brian De Palma website.
Here is the latest news:

De Palma a la Mod


De Palma Discussion


Recent Headlines
a la Mod:

Domino is
a "disarmingly
work that "pushes
us to reexamine our
relationship to images
and their consumption,
not only ethically
but metaphysically"
-Collin Brinkman

De Palma on Domino
"It was not recut.
I was not involved
in the ADR, the
musical recording
sessions, the final
mix or the color
timing of the
final print."

Listen to
Donaggio's full score
for Domino online

De Palma/Lehman
rapport at work
in Snakes

De Palma/Lehman
next novel is Terry

De Palma developing
Catch And Kill,
"a horror movie
based on real things
that have happened
in the news"

Supercut video
of De Palma's films
edited by Carl Rodrigue

Washington Post
review of Keesey book


Exclusive Passion

Brian De Palma
Karoline Herfurth
Leila Rozario


AV Club Review
of Dumas book


« September 2019 »
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30


De Palma interviewed
in Paris 2002

De Palma discusses
The Black Dahlia 2006


De Palma Community

The Virtuoso
of the 7th Art

The De Palma Touch

The Swan Archives

Carrie...A Fan's Site


No Harm In Charm

Paul Schrader

Alfred Hitchcock
The Master Of Suspense

Alfred Hitchcock Films

Snake Eyes
a la Mod

Mission To Mars
a la Mod

Sergio Leone
and the Infield
Fly Rule

Movie Mags


The Filmmaker Who
Came In From The Cold

Jim Emerson on
Greetings & Hi, Mom!

Scarface: Make Way
For The Bad Guy

The Big Dive
(Blow Out)

Carrie: The Movie

Deborah Shelton
Official Web Site

The Phantom Project

Welcome to the
Offices of Death Records

The Carlito's Way
Fan Page

The House Next Door

Kubrick on the

FilmLand Empire

Astigmia Cinema


Cultural Weekly

A Lonely Place

The Film Doctor


Icebox Movies

Medfly Quarantine

Not Just Movies

Hope Lies at
24 Frames Per Second

Motion Pictures Comics

Diary of a
Country Cinephile

So Why This Movie?

Obsessive Movie Nerd

Nothing Is Written

Ferdy on Films

Cashiers De Cinema

This Recording

Mike's Movie Guide

Every '70s Movie

Dangerous Minds


No Time For
Love, Dr. Jones!

The former
De Palma a la Mod

Entries by Topic
A note about topics: Some blog posts have more than one topic, in which case only one main topic can be chosen to represent that post. This means that some topics may have been discussed in posts labeled otherwise. For instance, a post that discusses both The Boston Stranglers and The Demolished Man may only be labeled one or the other. Please keep this in mind as you navigate this list.
All topics  «
Ambrose Chapel
Are Snakes Necessary?
Bart De Palma
Beaune Thriller Fest
Becoming Visionary
Betty Buckley
Bill Pankow
Black Dahlia
Blow Out
Blue Afternoon
Body Double
Bonfire Of The Vanities
Boston Stranglers
Bruce Springsteen
Capone Rising
Carlito's Way
Casualties Of War
Catch And Kill
Cinema Studies
Clarksville 1861
Columbia University
Columbo - Shooting Script
Conversation, The
Daft Punk
Dancing In The Dark
David Koepp
De Niro
De Palma & Donaggio
De Palma (doc)
De Palma Blog-A-Thon
De Palma Discussion
Demolished Man
Dick Vorisek
Dionysus In '69
Dressed To Kill
Edward R. Pressman
Eric Schwab
Fatal Attraction
Femme Fatale
Film Series
Frankie Goes To Hollywood
Fury, The
Genius of Love
George Litto
Get To Know Your Rabbit
Ghost & The Darkness
Happy Valley
Havana Film Fest
Hi, Mom!
Home Movies
Inspired by De Palma
Iraq, etc.
Jared Martin
Jerry Greenberg
Keith Gordon
Key Man, The
Laurent Bouzereau
Lights Out
Magic Hour
Magnificent Seven
Mission To Mars
Mission: Impossible
Montreal World Film Fest
Mr. Hughes
Murder a la Mod
Nancy Allen
Nazi Gold
Newton 1861
Noah Baumbach
Oliver Stone
Paranormal Activity 2
Parties & Premieres
Paul Hirsch
Paul Schrader
Pauline Kael
Peet Gelderblom
Phantom Of The Paradise
Pino Donaggio
Prince Of The City
Print The Legend
Raggedy Ann
Raising Cain
Red Shoes, The
Responsive Eye
Rie Rasmussen
Robert De Niro
Rotwang muß weg!
Sean Penn
Sensuous Woman, The
Snake Eyes
Sound Mixer
Star Wars
Stepford Wives
Stephen H Burum
Sweet Vengeance
Taxi Driver
The Tale
To Bridge This Gap
Toronto Film Fest
Treasure Sierra Madre
Tru Blu
Truth And Other Lies
TV Appearances
Untitled Ashton Kutcher
Untitled Hollywood Horror
Untitled Industry-Abuse M
Venice Beach
Vilmos Zsigmond
Wedding Party
William Finley
Wise Guys
Woton's Wake
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
You are not logged in. Log in
Monday, September 30, 2019
https://www.angelfire.com/de/palma/masticate.jpgIt was "Brian De Palma Week" last week over at the Philadelphia-based Cinema Seventy-Six. Writing about De Palma's video for Bruce Sprinsteen's Dancing In The Dark (1984), Ryan Silberstein notes how the first few shots of the video present Springsteen on stage, but without showing his face, which is revealed in the video once he begins singing. This strategy, which Silberstein links to the delayed reveal of Indiana Jones' face in Raiders Of The Lost Ark (1981), was also utilized by De Palma three years later, for Eliot Ness in The Untouchables. De Palma also gave Rebecca Romijn-Stamos the same treatment (albeit with the added slap in the face) at the beginning of Femme Fatale (2002), the opening shot of which shows a blurry reflection of her face on a TV screen.

There are also earlier instances in De Palma's cinema: a similar visual strategy is used for Nancy Allen's character (Kristina) in Home Movies (1979, pictured here), as James brings his fiancee home to meet the family. It is not until Denis, the film's De Palma surrogate played by Keith Gordon, sees Kristina walking toward him that we (Denis included) see her face for the first time.

Then there is the matter of the delayed reveal of Swan's face in Phantom Of The Paradise. When we first see Swan, it is a sort of parody of the opening scene of Francis Ford Coppola's The Godfather, although in this case, we do not see Swan's face until a later scene. And then there is the beginning of Hi, Mom! -- we see everything from Robert De Niro's (Jon's) point of view until he tells the landlord (Charles Durning) that he'll take the apartment. (The opening of the drapes here is echoed again at the end of the opening scene of Femme Fatale.)

Some of the films covered for Cinema Seventy-Six's De Palma week include Home Movies, The Black Dahlia, Phantom Of The Paradise, Dressed To Kill, and more. Some links and excerpts are below. But first, there was also a lengthy article about De Palma's Blow Out this week by Jimi Fletcher at VHS Revival:

The sound recording sequence is a joy – here we just luxuriate in the art of movie-making. Jack is out by the river, underneath a bridge, recording the natural sounds that he will end up using in the movie – first we hear the sound, then we follow Jack’s mic as it picks up on it, and then we see the source – a frog, a couple having a quiet talk (unlike the chat between the couple in The Conversation, this one’s absolutely harmless), an owl….and something we don’t see the source of – a strange buzzing, winding sound. What the hell is that? We soon find out that it’s Burke pulling and releasing the garrote on his wristband. One of Blow Out‘s main pleasures is giving us little clues and hints that only become truly apparent on a second viewing. It’s not the sort of thing that makes a first watch baffling, just the odd lovely touch that makes further viewings even more satisfying.

Ryan Silberstein on Dancing In The Dark
Brian de Palma’s direction seems to aim at one main thing: playing into Bruce Springsteen as a sexual icon. “Dancing in the Dark” is a single from the Born in the U.S.A. album, which has the iconic butt shot of Bruce in his jeans taken by Annie Leibovitz as its cover. The album, specifically the cover more than anything else, transformed Springsteen from a socially-conscious rocker into a pop icon. The sexiness of the image is drawing directly on Springsteen’s working class background with the wear on the jeans pocked, the tucked in plain white shirt, and the dusty ball cap. This masculinity in the image taps into the same energy that Ronald Reagan was using to give Americans a renewed feeling after the “crisis of confidence” from the 1970s as stated by President Jimmy Carter. Of course, as their clash over Reagan’s use of the album’s title track on his 1984 campaign stops shows, Springsteen was aligned with the blue collar union workers of the left as opposed to Reagan’s trying to lure them rightward with a combination of promises to stimulate the economy and family values.

As the song goes, you can’t start a fire without a spark, and that album cover is definitely the spark to the music video’s fire.

The video starts with a pan across Springsteen’s body from his foot up to his chest before cutting to a reverse shot. We don’t see Springsteen’s face for over 10 seconds into the video, which calls to mind the delayed introduction of Harrison Ford in Raiders of the Lost Ark. Even more striking is that it is shot entirely in closeups and medium shots for the first full minute (the runtime of the entire video is less than 4 minutes) before we get anything resembling a wide shot. This opening salvo puts Springsteen’s body front and center, his pants tight in all the right places, his short sleeves rolled up. De Palma embraces the singer’s inherent sex appeal, giving fans a better view of Springsteen on their tube televisions than they would get from most vantage points at a concert.

And Bruce is a perfect combination of sexy and goofball in this video, dancing with the microphone, smirking in between lines of the song, pointing at the audience. He’s channeling Elvis in every part of his body save his hips, since his dancing is almost entirely in his legs, arms, and shoulders. The epitome of white guy dancing. He isn’t performing at the camera, however, and only looks directly into the camera lens for a few seconds, almost accidentally. This is Springsteen in his element: it’s not about seeing crowds of people cheering him on so much as seeing the power that Springsteen has over his audience.

Gary M. Kramer on Home Movies
James is hilarious because DePalma skewers his toxic hypermasculinity. He mistreats Kristina, his fiancé, and, in a dumb subplot, makes her resist various temptations to prove herself worthy of his love. (He’s more in love with himself than with her). In one bizarre episode, James sniffs out the junk food Kristina consumed against his wishes. Graham goes all in here, giving a wildly physical performance and he’s fantastic. He often plays James like a live-action cartoon character. Just watch his bug-eyed expressions when he gets his jaw dislocated by his father in one scene. (This also leads to him making some mastication jokes). Or a bit where he saves Kristina from choking by removing a piece of meat from her throat with his tongue.

DePalma mines humor from exaggeration and absurdity, and while not all of the jokes land well—and the musical score is far too aggressive—the actors are committed. Allen, too, goes for broke, especially in a bit involving her sexual exchanges with a rabbit. Gordon is appealing in the trite role of a sensitive young man in love with his brother’s girlfriend. Unfortunately, multiple scenes of him in blackface—he’s disguised to take secret photos of his dad cheating on his mom with his nurse—are both unfunny and offensive.

Home Movies has a cheap, low-budget feel to it, but that contributes to its offbeat charm. DePalma may be in a laid-back, low-key mode here, but he still manages some stylish moments. The aforementioned choking scene, the fast food sniffing sequence, and the bit where Kristina is hit by the ambulance, have a darkly comic-horror tone to them.

Victoria Potenza on Dressed To Kill
Watching this film again I remembered how much I liked this film when I was younger. Around that time, I binged watch a bunch of Hitchcock films one summer and really got into thrillers so this stuck out as a staple for be growing up. I did not like horror much at the time but I loved mysteries and procedurals and it was exciting to revisit this and see all of the inspiration from Psycho. for this film. The twist is obviously similar to Psycho, but the way the film follows Kate around throughout her day and gets inside of her head feels like watching Marion Crane stealing money from her boss. The amateur detective team that tries to get evidence go undercover to dig up information is another similarity. Even the scene in the museum reminded me a little of the museum scene in Vertigo.

The biggest thing I noticed while watching it this time around was how much of it reminded me of a Hitchcock/Giallo hybrid. The mysterious black-gloved killer is of course a staple of those Italian horror films, but specifically it reminded me of films like Tenabrae, Deep Red, and The New York Ripper. So many Dario Argento films featured amateur detectives similar to Peter and Liz. Deep Red features a composer, medium, and reporter trying to solve a case and Tenabrae features a writer and his assistant trying to piece together the murderers, the killer in Tenabrae also uses a razor to kill his victims. The scene when Kate is entering the elevator and the killer is on the stairwell with the bright red light on them is straight out of an Argento film and now that I love horror so much I was excited to see De Palma appreciated these films too!

Andy Elijah on Casualties Of War
After severely threatening him, Meserve allows Erikkson to avoid taking part in the rape by standing guard on the perimeter of their camp. But rather than looking into the jungle for any moving figures, the camera keeps its point of view on the decrepit shack that serves as the scene of the crime. We, the viewers, watch in horror as each of the other four soldiers take their turn with the young girl. As hard as it is to watch, it is handled with taste and respect. De Palma, who never shied away from eroticism before, put none of it in the sequence.

It turns out not to just be the camera that is watching, but Erikkson himself. What is so rewarding about loving De Palma's filmography is seeing the auteuristic marks he always manages to insert–whether it be a studio for hire job or a passion project–and this moment of "seeing" falls right into his obsession with being a voyeur. Erikkson is made to be a witness to the crime, as is the viewer. It's as if we could be called to the stand to testify when everything is over. So many characters in De Palma films get themselves into trouble by finding something, or someone, from which they can’t look away. Where as in the past, it was perhaps a source of arousal, here, it is a horrible truth that can't be unseen.

Dan Scully on Phantom Of The Paradise
It wasn’t until very recently that I first saw Brian De Palma’s Phantom of the Paradise. Since my first viewing at Shame Files Live, I’ve gone on to watch it multiple times, both in a theater and at home, and every time it gets exponentially better. What a strange thing indeed for a silly, metatextual rock opera to emerge from the brain of a filmmaker once touted the “master of the erotic thriller.” Yet the more I watch Phantom, the more I think it might be the quintessential De Palma film. It’s certainly the only one I know of that feels like self-commentary — which is doubly special given that De Palma himself is no stranger to strong opinions on the nature of the film business.

So what is De Palma saying with Phantom? Well, before I get ahead of myself, let me share with you the one thing that has always stuck with me about his work. De Palma’s camera always seems to be hiding from the actions it’s capturing. What I mean is that my favorite filmmakers typically tend to make their camera invisible to the audience. To me, a great shot is one I don’t think about unless I’m actively analyzing it. It’s for this reason that I fucking HATE shaky cam. A smart shot is not one that announces the director’s presence, but rather one that draws the viewer into the reality of the film. Typically, this means that the performers are tasked with the thankless job of ignoring a camera that is all up in their business. De Palma takes a much different approach. His camera is certainly not present to the audience...but neither is it to the performers. Instead, it feels like surveillance. It‘s like De Palma is spying on his own movie. I can’t think of another filmmaker who does that (maaaaybe Jonathan Demme?).

This style is certainly appropriate given his own history with surveillance as an adolescent — baby De Palma rigged a camera system to catch his father in marital infidelity. In this instance, the camera HAD to be hidden.

Phantom of the Paradise, however, is the only film in De Palma’s body of work that brings the camera into the narrative explicitly by having the performers directly address it during certain sequences. It happens quite a few times, but the most striking example is during Phoenix’s audition for the Paradise. As she chicken dances her way through Special To Me, she makes direct eye contact with the camera and sings as if she’s giving a private performance to viewers of the film. It’s a striking moment that shows the audience exactly what the intended tone of the film should be. Phoenix doesn’t necessarily know she’s in a movie, but the movie itself sure as hell knows just what it is. This sets the table for the thematic questions posed throughout the duration of the film.

Matthew McCafferty on The Black Dahlia
Another part of the problem with the initial reception of this film was the success of 1997’s L.A. Confidential. Both L.A. Confidential and The Black Dahlia were adapted from novels written by James Ellroy. These two novels were part of a small series of crime books that Ellroy wrote, all based in 1940s and 1950s Los Angeles. So when The Black Dahlia was coming out in 2006, expectations were high. Another Ellroy novel adaptation — and better yet — directed by Brian De Palma. It had to be great. The hype quickly turned to disappointment, which quickly turned to negative reviews.

Again, I understand that The Black Dahlia will never be mistaken as one of De Palma’s best movies. But De Palma does deliver an enjoyable crime thriller once you connect the dots with the plot. And the ending itself actually wraps up pretty nicely. The actual Black Dahlia murder case was never solved, but this film is based off of the novel, which mixes in fact and fiction. So you do end up with some resolutions on motives and other aspects of the plot if you stick it out to the end.

Separating myself from the hyped-up expectations that were attached to this during its initial release in 2006 turned out to be a good thing. If you avoided this film like me over the years, put aside the negative noise from its reputation and give it shot.

Garrett Smith on Blow Out


I also really like the way Terry's life starts to become a slasher movie in some sense. His life starts to look and feel like the "trash" that he works on, and I think this is one of the most effective ways De Palma illustrates Terry's experience of being inside a conspiracy theory. Conspiracy theories are often constructs we create to help explain what we think is so unfair, it has to otherwise be impossible. While it ultimately seems like Terry's fears are well founded, his paranoia leads to what might be considered a "bleeding over" of his work into his real life.

But here's where I have to be clear about why I've brought The Conversation into this... well, conversation. Blow Out is a thriller full of literal thrills. Thrilling cinematography and sound design, thrilling plot reveals and performance moments, thrilling pacing and editing. And yet, I never quite felt the deep paranoia that I believe I'm meant to recognize in Terry's experience of all of this. Whereas The Conversation, in its obsession with minutiae and methodical storytelling which can feel a bit slow, is ultimately a movie that makes me feel as insane as the main character by the end. This never quite got there for me, and I think it may be because this seems much more definitive in its conclusions than The Conversation does. While I find the idea of proving once and for all that politics are corrupt from top to bottom appealing, it seems more in line with what we know about paranoid types and conspiracy theories for someone to be left fully broken by even investigating that notion, and for us to never know which pieces, if any, were true.

That said, Terry is certainly left broken by this experience. And the end of the movie is truly chilling. Without spoiling it, I will simply say that the final moment in which we see what all of this has ultimately amounted to is so disturbingly reductive of the experience itself that it's practically a punchline. A dark, hollow joke that lines up nicely with what I just said about The Conversation. So I hope you'll take that minor criticism with the grain of salt it's meant to be garnished with.

Posted by Geoff at 7:51 AM CDT
Updated: Monday, September 30, 2019 5:21 PM CDT
Post Comment | View Comments (21) | Permalink | Share This Post

Monday, September 30, 2019 - 5:02 PM CDT

Name: "Harry Georgatos"

A joy to read all these essays.

Sunday, October 6, 2019 - 8:40 PM CDT

Name: "neil"

Watched MI and it hasn't aged well. The story doesn't stand up that well and were better stories in the tv series. MI2 and MI3 also have aged badly with 3 having the worse script in the franchise. The MI franchise became a prestige franchise with Ghost Protocol, Rogue Nation and Fallout. Those last 3 movies are a masterful 5 course meals which I can't say for the first 3.  Why De Palma associated himself with the David Koepp script boggles the mind. Koepp isn't a good writer at the end of the day. Carlito's Way is a great script because Koepp was working from a great novel. The first Mission really is below average.

Sunday, October 6, 2019 - 8:51 PM CDT

Name: "Geoff"
Home Page: https://www.angelfire.com/de/palma/blog

I wholeheartedly disagree-- MI holds up very well. As far as the screenplay, De Palma brought Koepp on as the screenwriter after hammering out a sort of structure with Steven Zaillion-- De Palma worked closely with Koepp on this screenplay (it wasn't something Koepp had written independently of De Palma, they worked in tandem).

Sunday, October 6, 2019 - 8:54 PM CDT

Name: "Geoff"
Home Page: https://www.angelfire.com/de/palma/blog

To add to what I wrote above about De Palma working on the story and then script together with Zaillion and then Koepp-- it is for those very reasons that Mission: Impossible has De Palma's personality woven into it, in terms of plot, set pieces, and visual layering.

Sunday, October 6, 2019 - 10:29 PM CDT

Name: "neil"

it needed mindbending sequences which the film hasnt. a very light film when it comes to action, a trap the last 3 didnt fall into. MI and MI3 are failed scripts.

Monday, October 7, 2019 - 6:38 PM CDT

Name: "anonymous"

" MI needed mindbending sequences which the film hasnt. a very light film when it comes to action, a trap the last 3 didnt fall into. MI and MI3 are failed scripts."


This is nonsense, IMO. 


The Langley break-in scene is one of the greatest silent suspense-scenes of the past 50 years.

The aquarium-scene? Pure visual build-up of tension.


You want an over-the-top action scene, the finale delivers a rare Ense of speed. 

Monday, October 7, 2019 - 7:25 PM CDT

Name: "$$$"

the problem with the first movie it had a highly predictable villian. There's not much of a story apart from finding the traitor and recovering the NOC disk. This is the type of simple story that could have been in a 50 minute episode. The story with The Syndicate and Tha Apostles in Rogue Nation and Fallout is creative writing on an epic level which is not what can say about a flat script that was the original. MI and MI3 should have gotten the Razzie for woeful writing. Thank God for Christopher McQuarrie writing and directing. The Venice Opera set-piece in Rogue Nation is even better then what De Palma did with CIA heist set-piece in the first, and that's saying something.

Monday, October 7, 2019 - 11:48 PM CDT

Name: "neil"

good set-pieces with flat moments.

Tuesday, October 8, 2019 - 7:58 AM CDT

Name: "Dr. Nix"

I think we have found a mole here in Langley. 

Neil - are there any De Palma films that you do like? 

Tuesday, October 8, 2019 - 9:58 PM CDT

Name: "neil"

sisters, phantom of the paradise, carrie, obsession, dressed to kill, blow out, scarface, body double, the untouchables, casualties of war, raising cain, carlito's way, femme fatale and the black dahlia.


murder a la mod, greetings, the wedding party, get to know your rabbit, the fury, home movies, wise guys, the bonfire of the vanities, mission impossible, snake eyes, mission to mars, redacted, passion and domino 

Wednesday, October 9, 2019 - 5:34 PM CDT

Name: "Ć rni FriĆ°riksson"

I love MI:1. But to change the subject. Anyone think the fact that right after they showed the Blow Out poster in Joker there was a slow motion scene was a nod to De Palma or a coincidence?

Wednesday, October 9, 2019 - 5:44 PM CDT

Name: "Geoff"
Home Page: https://www.angelfire.com/de/palma/blog

You mean "Blow Out" on the marquee? (If they had the poster somewhere, then I missed it.)

No, I think that would be coincidence-- there is a lot of slow motion in JOKER.

There is the elevator scene, though (the first one), and when his neighbor and her daughter first get on the elevator with Arthur, I immediately thought of the little girl and her mom on the elevator with Kate Miller... but then really there was nothing in the JOKER elevator scene that seems of particular reference to DTK, either.

Wednesday, October 9, 2019 - 5:54 PM CDT

Name: "Ć rni FriĆ°riksson"

Ok, the poster was quiet obviuos, outside a cinema towards the end of the film. It surely was a message of some sort. :)

Wednesday, October 9, 2019 - 6:00 PM CDT

Name: "Geoff"
Home Page: https://www.angelfire.com/de/palma/blog

Okay, I'll have to look again-- the marquee is also near the end of the film, a cinema currently showing BLOW OUT and ZORRO, THE GAY BLADE. I also saw a poster for EXCALIBUR as the camera moved down from the marquee, but did not catch any other posters (but it would make sense, since that theater is showing BLOW OUT that very night). 

Wednesday, October 9, 2019 - 6:12 PM CDT

Name: "Geoff"
Home Page: https://www.angelfire.com/de/palma/blog



Wednesday, October 9, 2019 - 9:39 PM CDT

Name: "Geoff"
Home Page: https://www.angelfire.com/de/palma/blog

I think there might be a Blow Out poster to the right of that Excalibur poster, as the camera is moving forward (prior to that shot above), possibly.

Thursday, October 10, 2019 - 4:33 AM CDT

Name: "Harry Georgatos"

After Neils rantings with MISSION:IMPOSSIBLE I watched it again. It holds up really well and a good extension of the tv show. Moves efficiently. Cool soundtrack. Great set-pieces and cinematography. Not even Hitchcock could have visually improved with what De Palma has done. These sequels are epic outdoor Missions where De Palma's movie is comparmentalised and more of a psychological thriller.

Saturday, October 12, 2019 - 2:20 AM CDT

Name: "neil"

the scenes inbetween the set-pieces are flat and uninspired and makes this film sexless and boring. 

Saturday, October 12, 2019 - 7:53 AM CDT

Name: "Geoff"
Home Page: https://www.angelfire.com/de/palma/blog

I disagree with you, Neil-- MI is a movie that flows with cold paranoia and low-key calculation in between several great set pieces. I love the way there is so much happening underneath the surface.

Saturday, October 12, 2019 - 10:03 PM CDT

Name: "Neil"

Cold war paranoia on a bland level.

Wednesday, October 30, 2019 - 1:14 AM CDT

Name: "JJ Abely"

I'd hardly call it "bland." It's too graphically distinct from shot-to-shot for that. And it has a delightful Vanessa Redgrave scene that makes you wish De Palma had worked with her as a leading lady years previous. 

View Latest Entries