Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
FORUM ARCHIVE: shouldn't you all be adding... - Posted Wed Aug 30 12:59:29 BST 2000 by Anonymous

Worst comedy series ever
Fri Mar 31 10:27:02 BST 2000
Sally Phillips
Wed Apr 12 10:48:10 BST 2000
The point of Simon Pegg
Thu Apr 20 16:40:30 BST 2000
Message to scornful creators of this WEBSITE
Mon May 1 22:42:08 BST 2000
MARK LAMARR IS SHIT
Sat May 13 22:24:12 BST 2000
TV Cream
Tue May 30 18:05:02 BST 2000
Baddiel & Skinner Unplanned
Tue May 30 22:56:45 BST 2000
Hey Guys I think the jokes gone far enough
Fri Jun 9 13:58:13 BST 2000
Wasted Talent: A Testament
Thu Jun 15 08:45:39 BST 2000
The Herring and The Lee
Wed Jun 7 00:05:59 BST 2000
Who for Doctor Who?
Wed Jul 19 20:34:45 BST 2000
Contempt, Fear & Loathing
Mon Jun 26 10:30:23 BST 2000
Time Gentlemen Please: An open letter to Richard Herring, Al Murray and Stewart Lee
Mon Jul 24 17:27:30 BST 2000
Best comedy songs
Wed Jul 26 22:31:12 BST 2000
So ya want comedy, huh?
Thu Aug 10 14:10:10 BST 2000
help help help
Wed Aug 23 11:01:14 BST 2000
Dr Who: Invasion of the Dinosaurs
Ep 1 in Colour !

Sat Aug 26 11:35:00 BST 2000
The way ahead
Sun Aug 27 21:28:50 BST 2000
Out Of The Trees
Wed Aug 30 00:18:51 BST 2000
LIVE FORUM SITCOM! Add a line!
Sat Sep 2 00:35:49 BST 2000
The All New 11 O'Clock Show
Posted Mon Oct 2 23:28:40 BST 2000
TGP strand#94
Tue Oct 3 16:40:52 BST 2000
Backwards Thread!
Thu Oct 12 20:04:01 BST 2000
Thread from 1990
Fri Oct 13 14:03:15 BST 2000
www.notbbc.co.uk/corpses
Mon Nov 6 14:45:41 GMT 2000
Corpses do TVGH
Fri Nov 10 13:11:45 GMT 2000
"That's better in a way."
Sat Jan 6 22:48:06 GMT 2001
NME disappearing up its own PR
Fri Mar 30 08:28:46 BST 2001
Exciting New Programmes From The
Powerhouse Of Creativity That Is E4

Tue Jul 24 17:17:03 BST 2001
Post Your Charlie Brooker
gossip here

Tue Aug 14 12:00:48 BST 2001

shouldn't you all be adding to the out off the trees thread? Posted Wed Aug 30 12:59:29 BST 2000 by Anonymous



Subject: Re: shouldn't you all be adding to the out off the trees thread?
Posted By Anonynonynonymous on Wed Aug 30 13:02:38 BST 2000:

No

Subject: Re: shouldn't you all be adding to the out off the trees thread?
Posted By Bean Is A Carrot on Wed Aug 30 13:20:24 BST 2000:

I saw Julia Morris in Edinburgh. She was better than I thought she'd be, but not brilliant. However she was far, far better than the blonde, American, bimbo she was on the same bill as who did a series of jokes about how much she likes to suck men off. PUUURRLLLEEAAASSSEEEE!!!!

And Brendan Burns came across as extremely crass and offensive on that show, he swore too much and "guess what you're the star of my next 10 wanks" is not a classy line.

Oh dear, I sound a bit like Mary Whitehouse here. What I mean is that swearing and sex talk is fine, as long as it's FUNNY and not offensive.

Subject: Re: shouldn't you all be adding to the out off the trees thread?
Posted By Bean Is A Carrot on Wed Aug 30 13:25:55 BST 2000:

I actually meant to send that one to the Don't Fear The Corpses thread. I'll do that now.

This forum can be confusing sometimes!

Subject: Re: shouldn't you all be adding to the out off the trees thread?
Posted By Sam D on Wed Aug 30 15:19:31 BST 2000:

Theres not much to add. It is a disgrace.

Subject: Re: shouldn't you all be adding to the out off the trees thread?
Posted By The New Schmoo on Wed Aug 30 23:33:57 BST 2000:

Yes, but it's even more of a disgrace that people don't seem to be that bothered about it.

Subject: Re: shouldn't you all be adding to the out off the trees thread?
Posted By Bent Halo on Wed Aug 30 23:47:27 BST 2000:

Precisely.

Subject: Re: shouldn't you all be adding to the out off the trees thread?
Posted By Sam D on Thu Aug 31 10:34:23 BST 2000:

Well the e-mail address is on the missive.
Lets e-mail him and tell him what we think, then.
Having a go at people on here for not being bothered ain't gunna solve much, baby.

Subject: Re: shouldn't you all be adding to the out off the trees thread?
Posted By TJ on Thu Aug 31 10:42:55 BST 2000:

Yes it it, because we can persuade people not to actually buy the script when he published 'revised extracts' from it in a £20 book.

Subject: Re: shouldn't you all be adding to the out off the trees thread?
Posted By The Blues Project on Thu Aug 31 10:44:53 BST 2000:

and we don't speak for the corpses, so we shouldn't be emailing him on their behalf without consulting them first

Subject: Re: shouldn't you all be adding to the out off th
Posted By jason hazeley on Thu Aug 31 10:56:29 BST 2000:

i think we should e-mail him direct. 'out of the trees' is just never, never going to be published in its complete form. there's no programme to tie it to any longer and not enough inherent python interest in the project to keep all these tiny little publishers in money.

i'd like mr yoakum to at least engage in some dialogue about this. and can we get douglas adams' and bernard mckenna's opinions? they, after all, wrote it too.

j xxx

Subject: Re: shouldn't you all be adding to the out off th
Posted By hazeley again on Thu Aug 31 11:32:58 BST 2000:

actually, i might be wrong. since mr yoakum has managed to publish 'jake's journey' and the 'the concrete inspector' or whatever, he might well publish it. wicked. then we can all pay £20 for an appallingly designed book.

j xxx

Subject: Re: shouldn't you all be adding to the out off th
Posted By cunt saboteur on Thu Aug 31 11:33:53 BST 2000:

have a word with him at mrpither12@aol.com.

Subject: Re: shouldn't you all be adding to the out off the trees thread?
Posted By Sam D on Thu Aug 31 12:10:55 BST 2000:

>Yes it it, because we can persuade people not to actually buy the script when he published 'revised extracts' from it in a £20 book.

Fair point, but thats not what was being said.
The comments made were along the lines of "Shouldn't you all be adding to the Out of The Trees thread" and not "don't buy the script when it comes out"... Posting to the thread and saying how terrible it was, simply got "but no one seems bothered"-type responses, so my only other thought on the subject would be to e-mail yoakum.

The Blues Project thinks its not our place to do this, and perhaps this also is a fair point.. so what next?

I'm not trying to be awkward, so I won't buy it if it comes out over-priced. Chances are if it hadn't been mentioned here, I probably would have never thought of looking for it, and unfortunately I never mamaged to read it before it was withdrawn.

Perhaps Jason could post it on the forum in installments!


Forum Archive: The Jim Yoakum Affair
 Thread 1 
 Thread 2 
 Thread 3 
 Thread 4 
 Thread 5 
 Thread 6 
 Thread 7 
 Thread 8 
 Thread 9 
 Thread 10 
 Thread 11 
 Thread 12 
 Thread 13 
© 2000 forum archive