[^^Fleeding home page]  [HYPER-SPACE (mfa)]  [SUB-SPACE (ma)]
ma: Scientist x Absurdist ()
See also:  [L/D]  [S/D]
See also:  [af/art3/pkda2001 - pizoig gaming projects]
(please page down if needed)
Cross Product Space




Abs x Abs

Abs x Art

Abs x Frc

Abs x Fut

Abs x Hum

Abs x Jazz

Abs x Sci

Abs x Spi

 
Art x Abs

Art x Art

Art x Frc

Art x Fut

Art x Hum

Art x Jaz

Art x Sci

Art x Spi

 
Frc x Abs

Frc x Art

Frc x Frc

Frc x Fut

Frc x Hum

Frc x Jazz

Frc x Sci

Frc x Spi

 
Fut x Abs

Fut x Art

Fut x Frc

Fut x Fut

Fut x Hum

Fut x Jazz

Fut x Sci

Fut x Spi

 
Hum x Abs

Hum x Art

Hum x Frc

Hum x Fut

Hum x Hum

Hum x Jazz

Hum x Sci

Hum x Spi

 
Jaz x Abs

Jaz x Art

Jaz x Frc

Jaz x Fut

Jaz x Hum

Jaz x Jazz

Jaz x Sci

Jaz x Spi

 
Sci x Abs

Sci x Art

Sci x Frc

Sci x Fut

Sci x Hum

Sci x Jazz

Sci x Sci

Sci x Spi

 
Spi x Abs

Spi x Art

Spi x Frc

Spi x Fut

Spi x Hum

Spi x Jazz

Spi x Sci

Spi x Spi






x-product: Scientist x ()

Jump down to:  {Abs}  {Art} {Frc} {Fut} {Hum} {Jazz} {Sci} {Spi}  

  

Absurdist x Absurdist

Self-Referential 

So would the absurdist view of abusurdity be reality (in a cynical/material sense)?

  

Futurist x Absurdist

   Futurist x Absurdist (time) ---> {Time Travel} 

Jump randomly to:  {x-product}  {Abs}  {Art} {Frc} {Fut} {Hum} {Jazz} {Sci} {Spi}  


Sci x Abs (qauntum) --> Schoredenger's Cat
-^_6

Biefly, the idea of Schrodenger's Cast is thus:

   A cat in enclosed in box that has a poison
   vial that will be broken if and when a 
   certain random radio-active particle is
   emmeited in the chamber and triggers the
   breaking of the vial.

   The question arises is this: Is the cat alive
   or dead? Until we actually look, we don't know
   whether the particle has been emmited or not.
   It might have been emitted the momemnt after
   we sealed the box, it it might not be emitted
   until long after the heat-death (EndGame) of
   the universe (estimated some 60 Billion years
   from now). 

   From a certain quantum theoretic POV (point of view)
   until we open the box, the cat is BOTH alive and
   dead - with equal probability.

Now, we enter the absurdist variables as follows:

   Taking into account the possible functional expansions
   of the so-called "der-Katz" -[der Katz]- (lecture extract)
   we proceed as follows:

   1) The learned professors (obviously "dog people"
      and not "cat people") manage finally (amid many
      scratches from the "subject") to place the cat
      in the chamber, secure it securely, and activate
      the radio-isotope-radiation-particle-emmittier-of-death,
      and repair to a near by pub to contemplate their
      "experiment".

   2) The janitor (which can be known by one of three names
      "Joe", "Sally", or "Toby") enters and opens the 
      experimental chamber (also rather less euphemistically
      refere tod as "the death box"). Using a "shishs"
      and "chik.-chik" series of coded verbal messages
      calms the cat.  

   3) Into the place of the cat device onto which is written
      on an index card the word "CAT". This is mounted on a
      stick that passes through the middle of the back of the
      card. Onto that backside, is an identical card which
      has the word "CAT" with a large "not" (/) mark. Thence,
      if and when the radio particle "fires" the card will
      rotate and at some time in the future after winding 
      first one way, then slowing, and then winding back
      the other way, will after some (undetermined number 
      of "oscillations") come to show either CAT or CAT
     
  
Now the follwoing questions arise:

1) Will the janitors (even if it is only ONE of the janitors;
   ie, Joe, Sally, Toby) be in time to save the cat and 
   install the device?

2) If as they are installing the device, the random-particle-of-death
   "fires", and they are all killed (the cat being taken as a 
   separate case - see below) is the experiment to be considered
   a success or not?  Does the phrase "excepting acts of God"
   in the insurance policy(s) of the janitor(s) apply or not?

3) Assuming the cat escapes but is then run over by one of the
   professors conducting the experiment to PROVE THE IN-DENIABILLITY
   of the CERTAINTY OF THE UN-CERTAINTY PRINCIPLE, does this
   negate the concept of destiny?

4) Is the entire experiment rendered "merely" theoretical by
   the fact, that if *anyone* who has ever tried to fit a
   cat into even a nice carrying case to take it to the vet,
   will attest - the probability of getting a cat into 
   an "experimental chamber" (even one without a vial of
   poison and a radio-nuclide chambre) - 'tain't gonna happen.

These concludes our presentation at this time.

transcribe by Frank  via   fleeding AT hotmail DOT com




Jump randomly to:  {x-product}  {Abs}  {Art} {Frc} {Fut} {Hum} {Jazz} {Sci} {Spi}  


  

Absurdist x Artist

Jump randomly to:  {x-product}  {Abs}  {Art} {Frc} {Fut} {Hum} {Jazz} {Sci} {Spi}  


  

Absurdist x Fractalist

Jump randomly to:  {x-product}  {Abs}  {Art} {Frc} {Fut} {Hum} {Jazz} {Sci} {Spi}  


  

Absurdist x Futurist

Jump randomly to:  {x-product}  {Abs}  {Art} {Frc} {Fut} {Hum} {Jazz} {Sci} {Spi}  


  

Absurdist x Humanist

Jump randomly to:  {x-product}  {Abs}  {Art} {Frc} {Fut} {Hum} {Jazz} {Sci} {Spi}  


  

Absurdist x Jazzist

Jump randomly to:  {x-product}  {Abs}  {Art} {Frc} {Fut} {Hum} {Jazz} {Sci} {Spi}  


  

Absurdist x Scientist

Jump randomly to:  {x-product}  {Abs}  {Art} {Frc} {Fut} {Hum} {Jazz} {Sci} {Spi}  


  

Absurdist x Spiritualist

Jump randomly to:  {x-product}  {Abs}  {Art} {Frc} {Fut} {Hum} {Jazz} {Sci} {Spi}  





Bargain Basement

Note: Prices as marked. All sales final until the beginning of time.
                        Returns will only be accepted after the end of time.