之前的數篇討論,都好像只提及思考通病之3,但是沒有提及思考通病之1,2,不是說1,2是最明顯,很常犯的嗎?怎麼好像比3更少犯錯呢?

其實1,2的例子太多,要講可以講多好多篇幅,但3是比較大影響,對結果特別重要,所以只提到3的情況,而沒有提及1,2而已!

就好像"兒童應該有選擇宗教的自由",別人對你講,你就把這句話當成問題,想這句話是否正確,不就犯了思考通病1了嗎?這句話其實是別人的結論,應該想這句話背後原來的問題是什麼,然後思考"那個問題"呀,問題應該是"何謂兒童的宗教自由"呀,對嗎?

又例如別人對你講"每個人都應該愛自己的種族,愛自己的國家",你又去想應不應該愛自己的種族,愛自己的國家,那你就犯了思考通病2啦!問題應該是"什麼是種族,什麼是國家"呀!但你連什麼是種族,國家都不知道,就去想應否愛種族,國家,那不就跟了別人的錯誤方向去思考,完全偏離了原本的問題了嗎?

如果你聽經濟學權威講"共產主義","資本主義"呀,你又去想這些理論是否正確,那你就同時犯了思考通病1,2啦!就算不理用錢對不對,起碼問題應該是"應該怎樣用錢來運作"呀?"共產主義","資本主義"不單不是問題本身,還引導人向了某兩個特定方向去思考'如何用錢'呢!何況用錢來運作絕對是錯的啦!

太多太多例子啦,實在好容易犯了這些通病而不自知.所以平時思考時要注意注意,不要因為我很少提及1,2,只提及3,而忽略了啊!

還有別人說你錯啦,應該這樣這樣想啦的,就如剛剛說的幾個例子那樣,去想我所講的,那你就大錯特錯啦!引至思考錯誤的,最重要的不是[思考的內容],而是[思考的方法].如果思考的方法不正確,思考的內容跟本不會有意思.我所講的三個思考通病,其實都是因為一般人只分析[思考的內容],而沒有分析[思考的方法]而產生的!

所以如果要知道自己的對錯,記得一定要留意[思考的方法],要正確的思考,記得一定要"先確定問題",否則,思考什麼都無用啦! *e*

 For the several articles discussed, seems only mention about the thrid common fault of thinking, but not mentioning the first two. Isn't it say that 1 & 2 is the most obvious, is often guilty of it? Why its fault seems less than 3?

In fact, too many examples for 1 and 2, you can talk about a lot more space, but 3 is relatively large impact on the results of particular importance, therefor only 3 is mentioned, but no mention of 1 & 2 only!

Like "Children should have the freedom of religious choice," others tell you, you put this sentence as a problem, think this sentence is it correct, do not thinking it made a common fault 1? This sentence is actually someone else's conclusion, it should be think the original question behind this statement is, and then thinking "that problem". The question should be "What is the child's religious freedom?", right?

Another example is someone to tell you, "everyone should love their own race, love their country," they think should or should not you love your race, love their country, then you are guilty of thinking common fault 2! Problem should be "what is race, what is country?"! But you even do not know what are race and countries,  and start think about should everyone love race, love country. Isn't it think with someone else's wrong direction, a departure from the original problem?

If you listen to economics authority about "communism", "capitalism", and think about these theories, then you are also guilty of thinking common fault, both 1 and 2! Even ignore the money rightness, at least, the problem should be "how to use money to operate?". "Communism", "capitalism" is not the problem itself, but also guide people to two certain specific directions to think about 'how to use the money'! not to mention money to operate with is absolutely wrong!

Too many examples, it is made​with great easy without being aware of these common fault. So pay more attention when think. Not because I rarely mention 1 & 2, only mention 3, and ignoring them!

There are others say that you're wrong, should think this way, just as few examples as just said, think about what I say, you're big big wrong! Lead to wrong thinking, the most important is not [thinking content], but [way of thinking]. If the method is not correct, thinking content is meaningless. And  the three common fault I talking about, in fact, are generated because most people only analysis [thinking content], but no analysis of the [way of thinking]!

So if you want to know you are right or wrong, remember to pay attention to [thinking method]. To correct thinking, remember to "first determine the problem", otherwise, think about anything are useless! *e*