Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Recent GM games (# 4)

Home Up Recent GM games (#5)

  (Click  HERE  to go to my {actual} page for "Chess DownLoads.")  

  Copyright A.J. Goldsby, 2013.  All rights reserved. 


GM E. Bacrot (2653) - GM J. Lautier (2663) 
[D20]
 ch-FRA Playoff, (rapid) 
Val d'Isere, FRANCE  (Game # 1), 
31.08.2002

[A.J. Goldsby I]

This game was annotated for the (possible) inclusion in the electronic magazine: "The Week In Chess."  (TWIC)  (By Mark Crowther  &  London's Chess Center.)   Or for publication in my web pages.  --->  No other usage is allowed!!!
  {Copyright 2002, A.J. Goldsby.}  

***

  The notes of Mr. Crowther's are used with his full permission.   


I use the normal symbols that  Informant  or  ChessBase  also uses, but they are (more-or-less) turned on their sides, like the smiley face.  :)  

Click  HERE  to see a detailed explanation of the symbols that I use.  

 This page is  TEXT - ONLY,  so you will definitely need a chess-board.   

Click  here  to see this game briefly annotated, but in a  java-script  (re-play)  format ... so that you can study it. 
(This is good,  especially if you don't have a chessboard handy!!) 

Replay this contest on the popular "chess games" server. 


This game was part of a rapid-playoff for the Championship of France. 

White plays a nice attack. 

See  GM Robert Byrne's  comments in the magazine,  'Chess Life'
(His column, "The 65th Square." January, 2003 issue. Page # 22.) 

***

1.d4 d52.c4 dxc4;   
The Queen's Gambit Accepted. 

In the Q.G.A, Black gives up the center - instead of holding it. Black gets much freer piece play, but White's initiative can be dangerous. 

     [ The Queen's Gambit Declined runs: 
        2...e63.Nc3 Nf64.Bg5, etc.  and is much more common at the master level. ].  

3.e4!?,  
This move has a funny history. 

It is ancient. (I have found examples of it that are over 200 years old!)

It was first played - in an important game - in the great  MacDonnell  vs. LaBourdonnais matches. (See the book, "The Complete Chess Addict," {by Mike Fox and Richard James},  and their list of the "Sixty Greatest Games."  This is game #1 in that list.) 

For many years it was thought that this move was inaccurate - it was condemned by literally dozens of pundits. 

***

  • "A beginner's move," writes the early author,  James Mason. (1849-1905) 
    {James Mason was an Irishman who was both a strong player; and wrote in 
      newspapers, magazines, and also authored a key book.} 

  • "A move which is today considered grossly inferior." - GM Ruben Fine
     (Writing for "Chess Review.") {Fine was - much later - to repeat many of these 
      ideas in a popular book, "The World's Great Chess Games."} 

  • "Too abrupt an advance," says the writers,  GM Savielly Tartakower  
      &  James du Mont.  (In the book: "500 Master Games of Chess.")  

***

Yet by the 1980's and 1990's, this line was the height of GM fashion. (!) 
(A search of any on-line database will reveal hundreds of modern examples of this particular line.) 

I have always thought that the move, 3.e4, here was perfectly legitimate. And it would seem Master practice today would bear this opinion out. 

     [  The main line here - but which is fairly old, examples of GM play can be found 
        that were played over 50-to-75 years ago - is the continuation:  3.Nf3 Nf6;  
        4.e3 e6
;
  5.Bxc4 c5;  etc. {Diagram?}   and White usually maintains a slight 
       edge here in most of these variations.  [ See NCO; page # 386.]  

        A good (modern!) example of this line (by transposition) is the game:  
        GM Vladimir Kramnik - GM Vassily Ivanchuk
        Russia vs. "The Rest of The World."   Moscow/RUS/2002. (1/2, 40)  ].  

3...e5!;  
The correct response, Black attacks vigorously in the center. 

  '!' - GM Ruben Fine. 
(Many others have given this move an exclam as well.) 
 [ See the book, "The World's Great Chess Games," edited by  GM Ruben Fine.  1951. ] 

     [ Also playable is: 3...Nf6!?; "~" {Dg?}  with fair play. ].  

4.Nf3!,  
GM Huzman - when annotating a game in my database - gives this move an exclam. This is correct, as the move basically  (in the main lines), involves playing a gambit. (It is also the main line in several books I have on the Q.G.A.) 

*****

      [ The famous 'partie' went:  4.d5!? f5!?;  {Diag?}  Black anticipates Nimzovich ... 
         by attacking the base of the Pawn chain here.  (The move >= 4...Nf6!;  {Diagram}  
          is a little more precise here.)    5.Nc3 Nf66.Bxc4 Bc5; {Diagram?}  "Black's 
         position is freer,"  says GM Ruben Fine.  7.Nf3 Qe7;  {Diagram?}  This position is 
         close to equal.  {Actually White may be a little better.}  8.Bg5?!, (Maybe - '?') {D?} 
         This is an error, and overlooks a tactic. Qc2 was much better.  ( Now White should   
          correctly play: >= 8.Qc2!, "+/=" {Diagram?}   with just a very small advantage.  
          (I have done extensive analysis of this position and even computer- vs-computer  
           tests.) {A.J.G.} )   Now Black combines against f2 and c4.  8...Bxf2+!9.Kf1!?,  
         {Diagram?}  While this is considered the correct move by several writers, I think  
         it is inaccurate.   ( 9.Kxf2! Qc5+; 10.Ke1 Qxc4; 11.Nxe5 Qa6; "~" {Diagram?}   
          The position is unclear, or at best - Black has a tiny advantage. ("=/+") )   
         9...Bb6!10.Qe2 f4!11.Rd1!? Bg4, "=/+"  {Diagram?}  Black is clearly better, 
         (maybe "/+");  he has a fairly significant advantage in this position. He went on 
         to win a very, very brilliant game. 

         Louis C. de LaBourdonnais  -  Alexander MacDonnell; 
         Match - ENGLAND  vs. FRANCE 1834.  (Game # 50)   
         GM Ruben Fine  calls the above encounter  ...  
         the FIRST truly  IMMORTAL  game of chess!! 

***

         The continuation:  4.dxe5?! Qxd1+5.Kxd1 Nc6;  "=/+"  {Diagram?} 
          hands the initiative over to Black.  ]

*****

4...Bb4+;  
This is OK, it certainly is very playable. (It is the main line, according to several books I have.) 

But according to a study of my database - and games I have downloaded from several online databases - the move  4...exd4;  is probably more reliable. (Statistically speaking.) 

*****

     [  The book,   "Nunn's Chess Openings,"   gives the line:  4...exd4;  
         5.Bxc4, 
{Diagram?}    
        
Most books give this as the main line, but it is NOT the only move 
         that White can play in this position. 

***

         a.)  GM Robert Byrne  gives the following line:  5.Nxd4, Bc56.Be3, Nf6; 
                7.Qa4+!?,  I guess this is best.  (7.f3!?, Nc6!; is strong for Black. - R.B.)    
                7...Nbd7
;  Nc3, 0-0;  {Diagram?}  ... "is good for Black."  - GM R. Byrne
                - Byrne in  'Chess Life.'   (The column, "The 65th Square." 
                  January, 2003 issue, page # 22.) 

         b.)  GM Byrne  also gives the following line as well:  5.Qxd4, Qxd46.Nxd4, Nf6; 
                7.Nc3, Bc5!?; 8.Ndb5, Na6!?9.Bf4!?, Be610.Bxc7, 0-011.Bd6, Rfd8;  
                12.Bxc5, Nxc513.Nc7, Rac814. Nxe6, Nxe615.f3, Nd414.Nxe6, Nxe6; 
                15.f3, Nd416.0-0-0, b5; "<=>"  {Diagram?}   
                ... "is at least equal for Black." - GM R. Byrne.  
                Zilberman - Bagirov;  U.S.S.R; 1985.  - GM Robert Byrne  in  'Chess Life.' 
                (The column, "The 65th Square."  January, 2003 issue;  page # 22.)  

                Not to be mean-spirited, but there is plenty of room in Byrne's analysis, 
                (and quoted games); for improvement.  

***

          5...Bb4+; ('!?')  {Diagram?}  
          This is also not the only move that Black can play here. 

           ( Black can also try:  5...Nc6+;  6.0-0, Be6;  7.Bb5, Bc5;  8.Nbd2, Nge7;     
             9.Ng5!?, This looks like a waste of time, to me.  I would try instead to try and    
             win back the d-pawn.  9...Qd7;  10.Nxe6, Qxe6;  11.Nb3, Qd6; 12.Bf4!?, Qxf4;     
             13.Nxc5, 0-0; "=/+" {Diagram?}  Black appears to be just a little better here.    
              Magai - Ganguly;  Calcutta, IND;  2001. )      

         6.Nbd2 Nc67.0-0 Nf68.e5 Nd59.a3!?,  {Diagram?}  
         This is sharp, but is it best?  

***

         ( Maybe Nb3 is better?  "Modern Chess Openings"  gives the continuation: 
             9.Nb3!? Nb6; 10.Bg5!? Be7;  The end of the column.  11.Bxe7 Qxe7;  
             12.Bb5 Bd7;  13.Bxc6 Bxc6;  14.Nfxd4 Bd5;  15.Qg4! 0-0!; "~"  {Diagram?}  
             MCO stops here and calls this position unclear.    
            GM I. Sokolov  - GM R. Huebner;  Haifa/ISR/1989.    

           [ See MCO-14; page # 452, column # 19, & also note # (e.). ]   

            But after the move: 16.Rfe1!, "+/="  {Diagram?}  White has a small, ...   
             - but secure -  advantage in this position. {A.J.G.} )    

***

        (Returning to the NCO analysis.) 
        9...Be710.Qb3,  {Diagram?}  Once again, a very forcing move.   (10.Nb3!?)   
        10...Na511.Qa4+ c6;  {Diagram?}  The end of the line/row.  12.Ba2 b5;  
        13.Qxd4 Be614.Ne4!? h6; "~"  {Diagram?}  GM John Nunn  labels this as 
        "unclear," I think White is probably a tad better here, in this position. ("+/=")  
        (Just looking at this position shows that White has a little more space, and 
          is much better organized/centralized.)  
        [ See NCO;  page # 380, line/row # 7, note # 42. ] 
        (Nunn quotes no game here. A search of  ChessBase's  on-line database 
         reveals ... no significant matches - in this position.)   ].  

*****

 

5.Nc3!?{Diagram?}  
While this is not a 'TN' - it is a fairly unexplored move ... at least by the standards of today's opening theory. 
(I think this move is a favorite of  GM's  AlburtBareev, and  Dreev.) 

     [  Instead of this, the openings reference book,  "Nunn's Chess Opening's"  
        gives the continuation:  5.Bd2 Bxd2+6.Qxd2 exd47.Nxd4 Qe78.f3 Nf6;  
        9.Bxc4 0-010.Nc3, "+/="  {Diagram?}  Nunn stops here and evaluates this 
        position as White being just slightly better here. (I concur.)  

        [ See NCO;  page # 380, line/row # 6, & notes # 33-36. ]  

        Nunn quotes no games here, but this is probably the encounter: 
        GM Ulf Andersson  - GM Yasser Seirawan;  
        Tilburg, 1990.  (1-0, 45)  
        (Both players are top GM's. White won a nice game.)  ].   

 

5...exd4;   
This is logical here, Black wishes to reduce White's central influence ... as much as possible.  

     [  Also playable is:  5...Nf6!?; "~"   {Diagram?}  
        (See NCO for a complete analysis of this line.)  ].  

6.Nxd4 Ne7!?;  
Black wishes to develop safely - and as quickly as possible. 

While there is nothing terribly wrong with this approach, it is not the most aggressive - and probably will allow the first player to gain the initiative.  (Maybe - '?!')  

(Perhaps Black was trying to get away from his opponent's rather well-known 'book' knowledge?) 

The move  ... Qe7;  has a much better reputation here. 
(According to standard opening theory. Also according to a detailed search of the database, this move {statistically speaking} is both more popular and  more successful.) 

I have noticed - that at the very highest level of Master play - that one miscue such as this, (Black's failure to play ...Qe7 here); can often permanently and adversely affect one's game. (As is the case here. Of course at the lower levels of play, I doubt if such a  development - as we have here - would even be noticed by the average amateur.) 

***

NOTE:  I am not saying that ...Ne7 is unplayable!!  
(There are certainly many more places where the second player could seek improvements in this particular encounter.)   

  I am saying this is a major fork the theoretical road. An thus far ... the results have been predominantly in the first 
  player's favor. (After ...Ne7.) 

***

     [  Probably better was:  >/=  6...Qe7; ('!')  7.Bxc4 Nf68.0-0 0-09.Bg5!?,  {Diag?} 
        I am not sure about this move.    (Maybe better is: 9.Re1, "=")      9...Bxc3;  
        10.bxc3!?,  {Diagram?}  This might be a try for an edge, but could be a tad risky. 
          (Maybe safer was: 10.Bxf6, "=").     10...Qc511.Bxf6 Qxc4; "~" {Diagram?}  
        Nunn labels this as unclear, maybe Black is just a tiny bit better here.  ("=/+") 

        [ See NCO;  page # 380, line/row # 6, and note # 34. ]  

        Nunn  quotes no games here, but this is probably the contest: 
        GM G. Hertneck - GM H. Westerinen;  
        FIDE (Men's) Olympiads, Manila/PHI/1992. (56)  ].   

For the next few moves, both sides just sensibly continue to bring their pieces out. 
7.Bxc4 0-0
8.Be3 Nbc6!?;   
Straight-forward development cannot be bad. 

But maybe Black could have tried ...c5 here? 

     [ 8...c5!? ].  

9.Ndb5 Bd7;  ('!?')  
"9. ..Ba5  and  9. ..Be6;  have both been played here."  - Mark Crowther

     [ 9...Ba5!? ].  

10.a3, (!)  {Diagram?}  
I really like this, White forces the second player to make an immediate decision about his Bishop on b4. 

"The beginning of a good plan." - GM R. Byrne

     [ 10.Qh5!? ].  

10...Ba5!?;  
White gains a significant edge after this move, but perhaps Black already has difficulties equalizing here.  

     [  White is also better after:  10...Bxc3+11.Nxc3 Ne5!?12.Be2 b6;  
         13.f4 N5c614.0-0, "+/="  {Diagram?}  
          with a fairly nice advantage ... for the first player here.  ].  

11.b4 Bb6;  
Black is losing space, and slowly getting boxed in. 

     [ 11...a6!? ].  

12.Bxb6 axb613.f4 Na7!?;   
This move is correct - at least according to opening theory. 

I think this move only serves to compound Black's problems ...  
 the Rook on a7 will be out of play for the foreseeable future. 

     [  Maybe  13...Qc8!?; "~" {Diagram?}   was worth a try? 

        Black could also consider: 13...Kh8!?; "~"  {Diagram?} 
        The main idea being to meet the pawn advance f5, with ...f6.  ].  

14.Nxa7 Rxa715.0-0, "+/="  (White is clearly a little better.)   
White has emerged from the opening with virtually no weaknesses and a nice advantage in space.  In addition, Black's Knight on e7 has some difficulty in finding a good square.  

 This position has been reached in GM praxis several times before.   
Most notably:  A. Vizmanavin - V. Bagirov;  Podolsk/RUS/1992. and   L. van Wely - R. Huebner;  Klooster's Ter Apel/NED/1997.  (White won BOTH games!!)  

     [  White could consider: 15.Qh5!?;  {Diagram?}  (difficult play) 
         or also  15.Qb3!?,  {Diagram?}  with an interesting game.  ].  

15...Ng6!?;  
Black is trying to get this poor fellow back into the game. 

But g6 hardly seems the best square for this piece. 

     [  Maybe a mite safer is: =  15...c616.Kh1, "+/="  {Diagram?}  
        and White is still a little better. 

        Another try is:  15...Bc6!?;  {Diagram?}  but White is still a little better. ].  

16.Qf3!?,  
This is simple and good. White masses on the King-side, where he has more space. 
(Tarrasch would have probably approved.)

"The first new move." - Mark Crowther

     [  I prefer 16.a4, "+/="  {Diagram?}  with a small advantage for White 
         in this position. {A.J.G.} 

         Also playable is:  16.Qd4, "+/="  16...Ba4?!;  {Diagram?}  
         This looks like a mistake to me.   (Better had to be: >= 16...Bc6;  when   
           17.Qf2, "+/="  {Diagram?}  and White has a small advantage.)  
         17.Qxd8 Rxd818.Bb5! Bb3!?19.Rfb1, "+/"  {Diagram?}  
          White has a clear advantage here. (White eventually won.)  

          GM L. Van Wely - GM R. Huebner;  R/Ter Apel/NED/1997.  (1-0, 57).  ].   

White continues to seek some opportunities on the K-side.  
16...c617.Qg3 Qc7;  
"White has a very nice position with lots of pressure and Black doesn't have a lot of counterplay."   - Mark Crowther.  

18.h4!? Ne719.a4!,   
White grabs even more territory. 

      [ 19.Qg5!? ].

19...Qd6!?;  
This allows White a small combination, but it is difficult to suggest a valid improvement for Black here. 

"Black is short of options, this move brings about complications which turn out badly for him." - Mark Crowther.  

(The losing move? Maybe, maybe not. It is certainly a very critical juncture in this contest!) 

     [  Black's other two options were: 19...c5!?20.b5 Raa821.h5, "+/=" {Diag?} 
         and White maintains a nice edge.  

         Or Black can try:  >= 19...b5!?(Maybe - '!')  {Diagram?}  
         This appears to be Black's best chance here.   20.axb5 Rxa121.Rxa1 c5;  
         22.b6,  {Diagram?}  This appears forced.   ( Definitely not:  22.bxc5?? Qxc5+;    
           23.Kh2 Qxc4;  which wins for Black.  ("-/+") )    22...Qxb623.b5 Qf6;  
         24.e5 Qf525.Bd3 Qg4; "~"  {Diagram?}   Black has nearly equalized. 
         At worst White's advantage is actually very small. ("+/=") {A.J.G.}  ].  

GM R. Byrne calls White's next move ... "a nice idea." 
20.Rad1! Qxb4!?(Maybe - '?!')   
Black continues his bid for freedom and counterplay ... but it might have been wiser to simply retreat. 

     [  Probably better was:  20...Qc7; {Diag?}  although White retains an edge.  ]

21.Bxf7+! Rxf722.Rxd7,   
"The seventh rank is once again a happy hunting ground." - GM R. Byrne. 

22...Ra8;   
Black tries to re-activate his Rook. 

     [  The continuation:  22...Qc5+!?23.Kh2 Ng6!?24.Rd8+ Rf825.Rxf8+, 
         25...Nxf826.f5, "+/" {Diagram?}  gives White  ... 
         quite a sizeable advantage here. 

         The continuation:  22...Ng623.Rxf7 Kxf724.f5, "+/="  {Diagram?}  
         also looks pretty good for White.  ].   

23.Rfd1 Raf8;  
Black is probably now losing. (Or at least a little worse.) 

     [  Mark Crowther  -  writing for his chess column in Barbados - looks at 
        the line:  23...b524.axb5 Ra325.Rd8,  {Diagram?}  This is ok, but ... 
          (25.R1d3, "+/"  {Diagram?}  {A.J.G.}    25...Rf826.f5!?,  {Diagram?}  
        This is interesting.   (Or White could play: 26.Rxf8+ Kxf8;  27.Rd3, "+/"   
           {Diagram?} {A.J.G.})     26...Rxc3; {Diagram?}  Black grabs the free horse. 
           (If 26...Qxc3; 27.Qb8 Qc5+; 28.Kh2 Nd5; 29.exd5 cxb5; {Diagram?}   
           is probably winning for White. (Mark Crowther)  White should now play   
           30.f6!, "+/-" {Diagram?} White should win. {A.J.G.}  Maybe Black should   
           try 26...Qc5+!?; instead?  {A.J.G.} )    27.Qb8 Nd5;  {Diagram?}  This looks 
        forced - Black must cover d8.   (27...Rxd8??; 28.Rxd8+ Kf7; 29.Rf8#)   
        28.exd5 cxd5; {Diagram?}  He (M.C.) stops here and says: "This looks like 
        Black's best chance."  - Mark Crowther.  Continuing this line just one or 
        two moves further reveals:  29.Rxf8+ Qxf830.Qxb7, "+/"  {Diagram?}  ...
        & White is clearly better. (Maybe winning?)  {A.J.G.}   

        Another option is:  23...Qc5+!?24.Kh2, "+/"  {Diagram?}   
        White remains with a large and distinct edge ... no matter what Black plays 
        from here. White's large edge in space, his Rook on the 7th rank ... and total 
        command of the d-file, add up to a great game for the 1st player.  ].  

24.f5 Kh825.Kh2!,   
A nice piece of prophylaxis - White avoids any nasty, surprise checks on the g1-a7 diagonal. 

     [ 25.h5!? ].  

25...Qc526.Ne2!?,   
This piece also decides to head for the King-side ... to join the fracas there. 

      [  Another good continuation was:  26.Qc7!? Qxc327.Rxe7 Rxe728.Qxe7,   
          28...Qf629.Rd7, "+/"  {Diagram?}   (A Rook on the 7th rank!) 
          with a very large advantage in the endgame to follow.  ].  

26...Ng8?!(Maybe - '?')  {Diagram?}  
This is a mistake in an already difficult position. 

(Was Black low on time here? The computer's assessment - of this position, after over 30 minutes of analysis time - changes VERY significantly after this move!) 

     [  Black's only chance is:  26...Qc2[];  {Diagram?}  according to the computer. 
         (Although White holds a fairly large advantage in this position as well.)  
        And now White should simply play:  27.Nc3, "+/"  {Diagram?}  
        when White is clearly much better. 

        Some have suggested the line:  26...Nxf5!?; ('?!')  27.exf5 Qxf5;  
        28.Rxf7 Qxf729.Qg4, "+/-"  {Diagram?}
   but White should win. 
         (And without any great difficulties.)  ].   

27.Nf4("+/-")   
 ... and the second player throws in the towel. (Black Resigns.) 

White's play was a good model for exploiting a space advantage. 

This game is a stark warning:  GM Larry Evans  once stated that if you do not take up the initiative during the course of the game, your opponent almost certainly will. Black paid a high price for his rather tame and inaccurate opening. 

Copyright (c) A.J. Goldsby I.   Copyright (c) A.J. Goldsby, 2002
(Click  here  to go to my main {old Geo-Cities} home page.)

     [  White wins easily after:  27.Nf4 Nf628.Rxf7 Rxf729.Rd8+ Ng8[];  {Diag?} 
        This is the only move.   (29...Rf8?; 30.Ne6, "+/-")    30.Ne6 Qe731.Kh3!
        31...h6!?;  {Diagram?}
  Curiously - Black is almost in a form of total and 
        complete zugzwang.    (Or 31...g6; 32.h5! Rf6[]; 33.Qb8, "+/-"  winning.)   
        32.Qb8, "+/-" {Diagram?}  and the g8-Knight is lost.  ].  

 1 - 0 

(Code initially generated with the program,  ChessBase 8.0.) 


Home Up Next


 There is no site map, but you can click  here.  

  Click  here  to return to my  "Home Page." 

 Click  here  to return to my page for  "Recent GM Games." 
(Or click the "back" button on your web browser.)


This page was last updated on 01/04/13 .

  Copyright ()  A.J. Goldsby, 2013.  All rights reserved.