Topic: Eye Care
| « | November 2010 | » | ||||
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | ||||
According to TwinCities.com, Ophthalmologist David Eilers of St. Pauls, MN, allegedly complained to 1-800 contacts "that the calls were a waste of his time. They interrupted business. He wondered why they couldn't just have a human call. In a lawsuit filed in federal court this week, the contact seller claims Eilers' protests soon went beyond mere complaints. The doctor 'has intentionally and willfully sought to impede his competitor, plaintiff 1-800 Contactsend_of_the_skype_highlighting, by violating state and federal statutes, engaging in intentional interference with plaintiff's prospective business relations, and purposefully committing business defamation,' the suit claims."
"Older adults who wear multifocal contact lenses to correct problems with near vision, a very common condition that increases with age, may have greater difficulty driving at night than their counterparts who wear glasses, says a new study [published in Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science]," according to post on Sify. "The study suggests that wearing multifocal contact lenses resulted in significantly slower driving speeds at night than wearing progressive addition glasses, which authors reported a reduced ability to recognize road hazards." There were other findings as well.
At the end of each seminar, ABO/NCLE asks attendees to evaluate it based on four questions: Was this course a worthwhile investment of time and energy, was the instructor organized and knowledgeable, will your job performance improve as a result of this course, and were the printed outcomes of the course me? There's one additional question: Should the course continue to be approved for CE? Again the seminars for OpticalCEUs received excellent evaluations. See for yourselves.
A pubicity release from Consumer Reports notes: "Consumer Reports surveyed more than 30,000 bespectacled readers about their most recent purchase of a pair of eyeglasses and found that Costco topped the Ratings of eyeglass retailers, which included large chains, independent local optical shops, and private doctors offices....Costco Optical earned the highest score for overall satisfaction among chains, and also beat out most of its competitors for price -- a pair of glasses cost a median of $157 compared with a median of $211 at independent optical shops and $212 at eye doctors' offices."
Several points are not mentioned in the press release. Average price makes little sense; price will depend on what type of frame and lenses the individual selects. Another point: With more than 400 locations, making its optical department the fourth largest in the U.S., one can logically assume that more of CR's readers went to Costco than to any 100 independent practices, skewing the results.
The analysis goes on: "It's a scenario that's played out in other states around the country with varying degrees of success. Optometrists say they should be able to perform certain surgical procedures, administer injections and prescribe some drugs." Ophthalmologists say no.
The Kamra inlay, a treatment option for presbyopia, was featured in multiple lectures at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO), according to a press release from its developer, AccuFocus Inc.
As part of the Correction of Presbyopia Around the World lecture, Dr. Gunther Grabner, professor of ophthalmology at the Paracelsus University of Salzburg, presented three years of data showing that 97 percent of patients with the inlay achieved J3 or better with a mean uncorrected near vision acuity (UNVA) of J1. Moreover, 91 percent of patients achieved intermediate uncorrected visual acuity (UIVA) of 20/32. This means people with the inlay can read the computer screen, see road signs and read the newspaper without glasses or contact lenses.
A California doctor told the Orange County Register that "according to recent research with VSP eye doctors, 33 percent reported that nearly one-third or more of their patients suffer from digital device related vision problems. The most common include eye strain (82 percent), dry or irritated eyes (74 percent), fatigue (70 percent) and headaches (61 percent)."
A British company is marketing a device called Blink Now, which reportedly encourages blinking when looking at a screen, thereby reducing the fatigue.Solution?