兒童權利之宗教自由
Topic: 4實例 Live eg
請先看<提示>.

香港政府跟隨國際人權,保護人權,包括兒童權利,其中包括宗教自由.
但宣傳只講有,叫大人給小孩宗教的自由,但卻沒有做任何事去保障.

事實是父母信什麼,小孩便被迫信什麼,雖然他們沒有真的"被迫",但父母從來沒有樣子女知道自己有權選,便叫子女跟着做,去拜神,去教會,甚至未懂事已經幫他做入教儀式,或者說自己是信這個教,配偶子女便要信這個教,這樣都算有自由嗎?

問題是什麼?錯在那裡?怎麼改?請想想,再看下文.
__________

就用我的正確思考方法來試吧:[先確定問題,直接思考問題本身,逐步追尋問題的根源,找出解決問題根源的方法,再反方向逐步推論,看是否能解決原本的問題.]

首先確定問題,問題應該是:"如何保護兒童的宗教自由",對不對?

有了問題,我們便可以逐步追尋問題的根源:要知道如何保護,我們先要知道"何謂兒童的宗教自由",兒童的宗教自由就是"有權自己選擇,自己決定信什麼宗教,還是不信任何宗教,而不受成人阻礙或影響",對不對?

那為什麼要有這個自由,沒有又會怎樣?是因為"不是自己選擇,自己決定,便會不知道為何,只是由小到大所接觸身邊人事是這樣,便以為應該這樣,不知對錯,便成盲目信仰,不能接受其他意見,嚴重會導致宗教衝突",對不對?

追尋到問題的根源了嗎?還有更深入的一層問題根源嗎?暫時想不到,應該沒有了吧!

那要怎樣解決,保護?

請每次先看此文 Please read this article first everytime
Topic: 2提示 Hint

請記住: 我講的都是錯的,不要信我,信自己的思考,分析. 請每次只看一篇,然後慢慢詳細思考,分析,不要思考我的意見,而是思考問題本身.

Remember: All I said is wrong, do not believe me, believe your own thinking and analysis.
Please read one article everytime, and then more slowly thinking, analysis, do not think my views, but thought the question itself.

總結 Summary
Topic: 3我見 My View

怎麼樣?大家有沒有得到自己的結論,或者發現自己的錯誤?是否改得到?
又有沒有發現原來我都有錯?如有,請話我知,謝謝.

無論怎樣,請記住我的<提示>: 我講的都是錯的,不要信我,信自己的思考,分析.不要思考我的意見,而是思考問題本身.

<我見>到此已經完成,以後將會從<實例>開始,將<我見>的思考方法應用在各方面的問題,嘗試將日常的錯誤糾正.

看我如何將爭論數千年的問題,用三兩下手勢解決吧! *.*

How? Did you got their own conclusions, or find their own mistakes? Able to correct?
Or found out that I have wrong? If yes, please, let me know, thank you.

No matter what, remember my <Hint>: All I said is wrong, do not believe me, believeyour own thinking and analysis. Do not think my views, but thought the question itself.

<My View> this has been completed, will start from <Live eg> after , use <My View> the way of thinking applied to all aspects of the problem, try to correct the daily error.

See how I solve problems, which debated for thousands of years, like simple problem! *.*

分析自己對錯 Analysis of their own right or wrong
Topic: 3我見 My View

有了正確的思考方法,又知道了常犯的思考通病,那就要運用來分析自己的對錯.

當思考完一個問題後應該想想:
1. 自己是否用正確的方法來思考?
2. 有沒有犯了3個思考通病?
3. 如果發覺有以上錯誤,就要再重新思考過.
4. 重新思考之後,就再分析1及2,直至沒有再錯為止.
5. 然後,再張自己的結論,跟別人的結論比較,看是否一樣.
6. 如果不同,就要再用1及2分析,看到底自己及別人有沒有犯1或2的錯誤.
7. 最後,就可以知道,到底是自己對還是別人對,與及誰錯在那裏.

好像很浪費時間吧!但不這樣,又如何真正解決問題呢? >/<

With the correct way of thinking, and they know a common fault of thinking, it should use to analyze their own right or wrong.

When thinking about a problem should think about After:
1. If they are the right way to think about?
2. Have committed three thinking common fault?
3. If it is found the above error, we must re-thought about.
4. After re-consideration, then re-analysis 1 and 2 until no further wrong so far.
5. Then, let their own conclusions, compared with the conclusions of others, to see if the same.
6. If not, then 1 and 2 will analyze to see in the end there themselves or others committed 1 or 2 errors.
7 Finally, you know, in the end who correct and who is wrong at which part.

Seems to be a waste of time! But did not, and how to really solve the problem? >/< 

錯誤思考方法 Wrong way of thinking
Topic: 3我見 My View

錯的方法當然數之不盡,但一般人通常都會犯上三種通病,而不自知.所以大部分人都會堅持自己是對,而與人爭論不休,到最後都無結論,變成所謂的"觀點與角度"的情況.

思考通病:
1. 思考別人的說話當作思考問題本身.(別人的說話跟本不是原本的問題,這亦是最明顯的通病.)
2. 跟隨別人的錯誤方向去思考.(跟著別人的思考方向,就會偏離原本的問題,這亦是很常犯的通病.)
3. 根據沒有先行肯定對錯的論點作為思考的基礎.(這是最不明顯的通病,但亦對結果的影響最重要.)

又是很簡單吧!那你自己又有沒有犯上呢? @.@

Wrong of course, countless ways, but most people usually make the mistake of three kinds of fault, without knowing it, so most people will insist that he is right, while debating with people, have no conclusion to the last, into the so-called "point of view and point of view," situation.

Common fault of thinking:
1. Thinking about someone else's words as the problem itself. (Someone else's words is not the original problem, which is also the most obvious common fault.)
2. Follow someone else's wrong direction to think. (Follow the direction of other people's thinking, it will depart from the original problem, which is very often make a common fault.)
3. Using not pre confirmed argument as the basis of thinking. (This is the least obvious common fault, but also affect the results of the most important.)

Is easy! Have you made these fault?  @.@

思考方法 Way of Thinking
Topic: 3我見 My View

何謂"正確"?何謂"錯誤"?
就我自己思考所得,只有一種正確方法,另外有三種通病.當然可能還有,如果各位有其他,請留言讓大家參詳.

正確思考方法:
非常簡單,就是"先確定問題,直接思考問題本身,逐步追尋問題的根源,找出解決問題根源的方法,再反方向逐步推論,看是否能解決原本的問題."

確定問題 ---> 追尋問題根源 ---> 問題根源
   ^                                          |
   |                                           |
   |                                           V
解決原本問題 <--- 逐步推論 <--- 解決方法

很簡單吧!好像人人都知,但又是否真的做得到?
三種思考通病呢?再想想啦! -;-

What is the "right"? what is "wrong "?
In my own thinking, with only a right way, there are three other common fault. Of course there may be, if you have other, please leave a message for our reference.

The correct way of thinking:
Very simple, it is "first to identify question, directly think the question, step by step search for the root of the problem, identify the root of the problem and its solution, and then gradually infer the opposite direction to see if can solve the original question. "

identify question ---> search root of problem ---> root of problem
          ^                                                                    |
          |                                                                     |
          |                                                                     V
solve the original question <--- gradually infer <--- solution

Very simple! Like everyone to know, but it really can do?
Three common faults of thinking? Think it! -;-

原因 Reason
Topic: 3我見 My View
大家想到什麼?有自己的答案嗎?
處理事情或問題,做錯了,為什麼會錯了?當然是想法錯了.何解想法會錯?是思考的問題,用了錯誤的思考方法,結果得出錯誤結論,跟據錯誤結論而行,當然會做錯.所以錯誤的起因,就是用了錯誤的思考方法而成.那麼何謂"正確的思考方法"?怎樣才知道自己用了錯誤的思考方法呢?請大家再試試思考,看看又有什麼結論? =.=

You think? has its own answer?
Deal with things or problems, wrong, wrong, why? of course, the idea was wrong. How come the wrong ideas? The problem is thought, thinking with the wrong method, the wrong conclusion, action according to wrong conclusions, of course, wrong. Therefore, the cause of the error, is to use the wrong way of thinking. Then, what is the "right way of thinking? " How do I know their thinking with the wrong approach? Please try again thinking, see what conclusion? =.=

從事實引證 Proof from the facts
Topic: 4實例 Live eg

所有於"我見"之見解將會用歷史或社會事實作為例子,由淺入深,解釋,證明,讓大家看到錯誤如何發生,如何改正及解決.

All the "My View" the view will use historical or social fact as example, shallow to deep, interpretation, proof, let us see how the error occurred, and how to correct and resolve.

開始 Start
Topic: 3我見 My View
錯誤從何而起?請大家細心,慢慢思考,不要心急,先得出自己的結論,再看下去,否則,便有可能被我影響,得到相似的結論,而不能真正獨立思考.
一天,兩天,一星期,都不是問題.若真的想不到,無問題,我明白原因,下文將有章節提及,請繼續看,但切不可只想幾分鐘,幾十秒,甚至幾秒,好嗎? >=<

Error come from? please carefully, slowly thinking, do not hurry, the first draw your own conclusions, then read on, otherwise, there may be me, to get similar results, but can not really think independently.
One day, two days, a week, not a problem. If that can not think, no problem, I understand the reasons mentioned below, there will be chapters, please continue to read, but do not just think a few minutes, tens of seconds, and even a few seconds , right? >=<

大家好 Hello everybody
Mood:  happy
Topic: 1序 Prologue
這些都是我的一點見解,如果認為有意思,請讓更多人分享,及協助翻譯成其他語文,謝謝.
歡迎評論及留下個人見解,但不歡迎作無謂對罵及非理性言論,並保留刪除任何留言之權利,多謝合作.

These are my little opinion, if that is interesting, please let more people share, and help translate into other languages​​, thank you.
Welcome comments and leave personal opinion, but not welcome to make unnecessary name calling and irrational remarks, and reserves the right to delete any message, thank you. (english version by google translate with minimum correction, may be incorrect.)