Topic: Architecture / Chicago




Updated: Tuesday, 30 May 2006 1:01 AM CDT
Post Comment | View Comments (5) | Permalink | Share This Post
« | April 2005 | » | ||||
![]() |
||||||
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
1 | 2 | |||||
3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Saturday, 9 April 2005 - 9:16 AM CDT
Name:haha, random pictures put at the end. i look dorky with my glasses and childish with my smiles. you should look into what kant says about genius. i forget, and i think ted cohen had some beef with kant's definition. waa waa.
Wednesday, 13 April 2005 - 1:08 AM CDT
Name: anonI think the most remarkable aspect of these photos is that the building is, in fact, banal and imposing looking--a regrettable blight on Chicago's urban fabric. One must strain, as you do, to discern anything notable at all, and surely few people could honestly say that this is a beautiful building.
Wednesday, 13 April 2005 - 10:20 AM CDT
Name: TAKOTRON
True true, well put. I will try to put up a photo of the original scale model for the Promontory Apts, which shows the glass and steel design, which looks a little less "banal and imposing." Still, it's basically the kind of building one easily overlooks. At the time though, as an alternative to hanging a fake, neo-classical facade on a steel frame, its austerity and economy must have been striking. Here's a good quote from Mies himself that resonates with what you said:
"I don't want to be interesting, I want to be good."
Tuesday, 26 April 2005 - 11:23 AM CDT
Name: Hugh TowersMy god, how is that little Asian girl balancing the entire skyline on her head? I must protest - that is architecturally impossible!
Wednesday, 27 April 2005 - 9:42 PM CDT
Name: thenovakidsIt depends how well the head is engineered. This one seems to work pretty well.