ATTACHING TO GOD
- The Chohan of Ramana Lodge (9/04/01)
Greetings Fraters & Sorors:
The story of little Mary illustrates one way in which change brings growth. One day in Sunday school she was asked, "Who made you?"
After a moment's reflection, the little girl replied, "Well, God made a part of me?"
"Part of you?" The teacher was startled.
"God made me very little," she explained, "and I grew the rest myself."
Like little Mary, every one of us must see that we are responsible for our own growth. That's elementary. We need no PhD degree to realize that. God takes care of everything that's true. But what is our role then? To be taken cared of? If God would take care of all 4 billion people on earth -- with all their different woes and whims in life -- He'd simply grow crazy in a minute or two. Of course, nothing is impossible to Him. You could always say that. But who then is to be blamed for every calamity and misery that befall a man's life? God? Who is to be accounted for every man's success? God? Or, as the saying goes, a woman? And for every man's failure? God again? Maybe another woman.
Change is inevitable. And so is growth. But do we not retrogress when we have done malevolent acts?
In the ladder of evolution, even failures propel us towards growth. Win some, lose some. If you were a rich man who has no money now, you may have lost your money, but you surely have gained wisdom - at least knowledge of how it is feels to be a poor man. A sufi master once said, "When the heart weeps for what it has lost, the spirit laughs for what it has found." Change however is oftentimes awful. And only when the benefits of that change are ultimately realized that we welcome such change in our lives.
Change only becomes painful because of our ATTACHMENT to the status quo, to the past, to the future or to some ideal which did not or is yet to materialize. An Egyptian sage had said: "Life is a bridge, never build a house upon it." We're just crossing this bridge called Life. It is not our home. It is just a way to reach our home. Sooner or later judgment for ejection will be served against us.
Thus, a man of knowledge perfectly sees the temporal nature of everything and hence, shuns attachment. However, we all know for a fact that some of us in the mystical path mistake that attachment is the result of our dealing with material or sensual objects. It maybe money, wine, women, song or fame. Of course, this should not be the case. A diamond even mixed with rotten tomatoes shall never become rotten. In much the same way, a person who has realized his own buddha-nature moves into this world untouched by its impurities.
Thus, the mere fact that we are not married or not actually engaged in sexual relations does not necessarily mean that we have become UNATTACHED for attachment exists in the mind. It will follow us even if we leave our home, our kids, our wife, our job, our money - because it is within "us."
It may be true that it is difficult for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven, as Jesus said. But it is erstwhile true that there is no other sector in this whole wide world who thinks more of money than the poor - the poor can' think of nothing else, at least according to Mark Twain.
In reality, pursuing meditative practices nor attaining the kingdom of God does not depend on whether we are rich or we are poor. Or we are celibate or married. Or we are meat-eater or vegetarian. A friend of mine said it's better to be humanitarian than vegetarian. Well true. We can be celibate all our life, we can be vegetarian all our life, we can be ascetic all our life but that mere fact alone will not make us holy. "Holiness" exists in the mind. A cow dung is just as holy as Mecca or Bethlehem or the Bo tree. Isn't it true that God is EVERYTHING and is IN everything? So anything can be as holy as anything depending upon
each man's perception and valuation. This is because each person has his own concept of `holiness' which may be totally absurd to another.
It is our thoughts which we have to control. No less than the proponent of the theory of evolution, Charles Darwin, remarked: "The highest possible stage in moral culture is when we recognize that we ought to control our thoughts."
It is useless to go to the mountains or go into reclusion with the thinking that that means we are no longer attached. That we are a changed man now. That this is the only true path to holiness. In Zen, there is a saying that "the truth you'll find in the mountain is the truth that you bring there."
Thus, the only real change worth asking for is when in actuality we can see the universe in a grain of sand. To actually behold eternity in that single second. We may not be as poetic as William Blake, but that change, that shift in our consciousness, that transformation in our perception can only be brought about by becoming aware of our thoughts. By controlling our mind, our breath, our emotions - and focusing them on the indwelling Godforce resident in every cell of our body.
By doing so, we need not go to the mountains to effect a transformation within us. Or to meet some hermit who will initiate us. The masters are always ready to initiate us, but are we, ourselves, ready?
It is related that there came to the Indian saint, Sri Ramakrsna, a man who wanted to get initiated. He was tearfully begging Ramakrsna to show him God as his life is useless, meaningless and he has no other desire but to see God alone. Somewhat moved by the man's pleading, Ramakrsna then told the man: "Ok, I will show you God, follow me." They came to a river whereupon Ramakrsna told the man: "I will now show you God." In that instant Ramakrsna got hold of the man's head and submerged it underwater. A minute did not pass that the man struggled very hard to free from Ramakrsna's grasping hands. When he successfully freed himself from Ramakrsna's hold, he told him, "You'll have me killed!" To which Ramakrsna replied, "I thought you want to see God? What happened now to your God?"
Like that man, which is dearer to us:
our life or God? But of course, somewhere in the course of our reading we also come across with the admonition "if you see the buddha, kill the buddha!" And in another, there is likewise said that the loss of man's seminal fluid is tantamount to killing the buddha! Neophytes are ordinarily confused by these seemingly contradictory statements. The first one of course talks about our delusional mind which can create anything; while the other talks about the importance of a man's sexual energy to his spiritual progress.
Thus, we must do both: we have to kill the buddha and at the same time nurture, awaken the buddha in us. And suddenly - we are a changed man.