Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

The Lanhams of Maryland and the District of Columbia

Compiled by Dr. Howard G. Lanham

The following site contains lists of primary source mentions of persons named Lanham living in the State of Maryland or the District of Columbia (once part of Maryland). It is not a genealogy as such since there are many mentions that might belong to one of several people with the same name and since many of the mentions give no clue to the relationship between the individual and other Lanhams. Please click on this link for introductory and background material.

S



NOTES:
  1. The name Sarah Lanham born May 9, 1735 appears twice in the same basic entry in the parish record. The original text begins recording a series of children born to William and Alice Lanham, but then (after John, son of William) an entry mentioning John, son of Edward (no wife named) intrudes. Most of those transcribing the document have interpreted the children following the intrusion to have been additional children of Edward Lanham. Sarah appears twice among the various births, once before and once after the intrusion with the exact same birth date. It is difficult to know if this is an error or that both William and Edward Lanham happened to have a Sarah born the same day. William and Edward were closely associated with each other. They jointly patented the tract of land Lannums Delight in 1725. Sarah Lanham may be the widow of John Lanham, III.
  2. This unusual household appears to be a military unit with the senior noncommissioned officer as Sergeant Lannum. That would explain the large number of males all the same age and no females. The next name is "Colonel Lavall." Retired Colonel Jacint Laval (c.1762-1822) served as a military storekeeper and may be the Colonel Lavall of the census. As a military storekeeper he would have been associated with a military post. I do not know who Sergeant Lannum might have been.
  3. Usually, I would not consider the surname Lanahan a variation of Lanham or list it in this site. I am making an exception here because this appears to be the children of the late Benjamin Lanham and I believe the census taker took Lanham to be Lanahan. (This is not unusual when I see how my own name is misspelled.) The only problem is that Benjamin's widow was Lethe or Eletha and the head of this household is "M. Lanahan." B. Lanahan has the correct age for daughter, Bennetta. Stephen is correct for Stephen Decatur Lanham and the unusual name Grafton Lanahan corresponds to Grafton T. Lanham. Otherwise, these persons would all missing from the 1850 census. I should add the author descends from Stephen D. Lanham.
  4. Another source gives the year as 1911. (P.G. Co. Genealogical Society Bulletin, December 1980, page 41
  5. She generally appears as Mary Ellen (nee Henry) Lanham.
  6. She generally appears as Mary Ellen Lanham.
  7. This may be a daughter of Mary Lanham, who predeceased Susannah.


General Introduction to Site
Lanham Land Records
Index
Home