30

S.B. Karavashkin and O.N. Karavashkina

2. Statement of the problem

In order to concentrate just on the technique searching solutions for the non-linear problem, choose as a study model a rather simple 1D homogeneous finite line with unfixed ends (see Fig. 1) consisting of only three elements connected by the non-linear elastic constraints having the characteristic s(), where is the degree of the constraint transformation. Given the inertialess constraints, suppose that determines the total shift of both joint bodies for each constraint. We will see below that this outwardly natural shade will slightly change the standard form of the modelling differential equations, and this will make easier the search of solution of the problem.

Determining the pattern of the stiffness coefficient dependence on the constraint deformation degree, we will not diverge from the standard concept according to which the non-linear characteristic of an elastic constraint can be presented as a power series in [17, p. 327]

are sufficient. The cubic (not quadratic) term provides the similar value of the resetting force with positive and negative shifts" [17, p. 327]. Although, as we will show further, the limited distribution (2) does not have any effect on the approach itself to solving the problem (but only on the result conditioned by the correctly taken expansion coefficients in (2) in each specific problem), meanwhile we will use the conventional practice, and when expanding, confine ourselves to the cubic term. At the same time, we will not introduce an additional requirement of the smallness for s₃ in comparison with s₁ , because in the course of investigation we will reveal that such inherent in all asymptotic techniques condition is excessive in the approach we use.

Noting the above preliminary consideration and the results of [3], we can present the modelling system of differential equations as

We also will not complicate the regularity of the external force and take it in a simple harmonic form

supposing that in the future investigations this regularity can be essentially complicated with the remaining validity of the approach to solving the problem.

Finally, without limiting the generality, suppose that free vibrations are absent in the considered system, the more that "with the settled motion only non-damping forced vibrations are practically important" [18, p. 58].

Given (4) and all factors completing the definition of a model, (3) gains the complete determinacy and does not require any additional initial or boundary conditions. As we showed in [2]- [9] for different elastic line models, the completely determined systems of differential equations do not need completion of the definition, the same as the constants that need determination on the basis of initial or boundary conditions are absent in their solutions. In the absence of free vibrations and with the settled pattern of the external force (4), whichever pattern of the reaction of the line to this affection we obtain, the location of any element of the system will be uniquely determined by this reaction to the given external affection. Giving additionally the initial conditions with the chosen form of the modelling equations, we would simply double the conditions that we can obtain, substituting the value of the initial moment of time to the obtained solution.

As opposite to this, should we use as the modelling system of differential equations a conventional form (see e.g. [12, p. 227])

(where L = T - U  is the Lagrange function of the studied system, q_i and are the generalised co-ordinates and velocities of the ith element of the elastic system, and Q_i^d are the generalised dissipative forces), then the additional statement of the initial conditions would be justified by the indeterminacy of the modelling system (5) in relation to the specific studied system. However we can prove that in this case also, if the law of the generalised forces action on the system has been determined, the additional statement of initial conditions becomes excessive.

An opposite statement follows from the said. Should we give the additional initial conditions, we would have to remain the amplitude and the external force phase in (4) indefinite, and to determine these parameters on the basis of the yielded solution, matching them with the initial conditions of our problem.

The same concerns to the additional boundary conditions. Should we use (5) as a modelling system, the completing of its definition by the boundary conditions would be justified. However, as we showed in [2]- [9], in this case we would have to limit our studying by the frames of the matrix methods and characteristic equations. On the contrary, with the determined modelling system of a specific elastic line we gain the possibility to obtain the exact and complete analytical solutions that cannot be obtained by the matrix methods. However, with such specification of the system of differential equations, the necessity in additional boundary conditions falls, as they are taken into account directly in the system; one can make sure in it, seeing the system (3). The absence of constraints at the ends of an elastic line has led to the disappearance of the right-hand part summands determining the constraints of the first and third bodies with the previous and following bodies that are absent in a line correspondingly. With it the differential equations describing the dynamics of these non-existent bodies are absent too.

Thus, the form of record of the system (3) in conjunction with (4) is fully determined with the reference to the features of the studied elastic line, affecting external force and initial conditions.