Site hosted by Build your free website today!
</htmmeans Archives on:
OVERPOPULATION, Toxic GROWTH and Ecological collapse

World Population at 8 a.m., Tue., Nov. 26, 2019, Calif. PST, was

8 billion, 045 million 090 thousand,

well past the "tipping point" after exploding fast past
8 BILLION ON July 7 2019

      Any date : A  never-ending cover-up  by media loyal to their rich   GROWTH loving owners may fool you, but due CERTAINLY to the OVERGROWTH of human POPULATION, habitat, business, and dependence on excess and often toxic technology - the eco-system we CAN'T live without is NOW collapsing.
   Q: So why are the criminally capitalist media still covering up the GRAVITY, EXTENT and CAUSE of this crisis? A:Continued profit flow depends on continued GROWTH and the insiders who run the world don't want you to think about stopping GROWTH, no matter what it does to the world we live in. SO, WHILE OUR ECO-WORLD COLLAPSES, nothing is being done about it, and no politician, media chief, or scientist has the wit or courage to talk about anything but the weather.
   Our entire eco-world is CERTAINLY COLLAPSING NOW DUE TO TOXIC OVERGROWTH of the human population and its encampment.
  We're NOW adding hundreds of people a minute, over 317 thousand a day, over a million every 3 days, OVER 100 million a year, and therefore OVER a billion a decade; and THAT GROWTH ITSELF GOES ON GROWING, in spite of the convenient 1992 metaphysical fantasies of embedded "scientists" about IRRELEVANTLY diminishing PERCENTAGE growth rates,   because REAL human NUMBERS keep going UP faster from a REALLY EVER-GROWING NUMERICAL BASE, as do the consequences.  Current buzz references to "climate change," may be more than language abuse, but they're only about symptoms.
-Glen Roberts
   Estimates above of how many more humans are born than die are derived from U. of NC's World Population Clock, ; itself a robotically derived estimate.

There were over 8 billion humans on 7 July 2019,
    5 months ahead of the expected jump date!

      July 11, 2019:   Do I believe that? Do you? Does the University of North Carolina World Population counting department? I invite you, if your computer reads "Java" code, to go to ANY world population clock and watch the numbers go up. Do you believe that, every time they click up, someone has gone out and recounted the world population? Come on! Nobody EVER counts the world population. But the world MISleaders who sponsor most population fiction WANT you to accept what THEY consider low ENOUGH numbers (right now, which shouldn't be expected to make sense, since THEY are terribly confused). But I also told you long ago that I use the highest estimates I can find, because I've talked to numerous people in 29 countries who've told me, "This place is bigger than that; the brochure that's based on is at least out of date." Also, I've WALKED PERSONALLY through numerous shanty towns where I know no census taker would dare to park his car, and I know that almost ALL population counts are ESTIMATES that THEY think YOU can be counted on to believe.
-Glen Roberts

The Word Overpopulation Defined

Be calm. This is simply the correct definition of the word overpopulation.

   That CAN'T be clearer, but since I can find no evidence in the media that very many editors, politicians, or people the establishment considers smart understand it, I'll make what can't be clearer even clearer. (1) Overpopulation is not a state of becoming; it's a state of being. (2) An OVERPOPULATED WORLD is not getting overpopulated; it's already overpopulated. (3) So the solution is not slower growth, or even no growth; THE SOLUTION IS (wrinkle your brow, clinch your teeth, think hard) TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN THE WORLD UNTIL THERE ARE NO LONGER TOO MANY OF THEM.   Got it?
   OK. Your only remaining defense now is to ask, "What does the word world mean?" (I gave you that, in case you didn't think of it); and, as if you were perplexed, "How many people are too many?"; and finally, a little angrily, "But what can be done about it?" I'll answer the first two questions immediately (just past the bottom line of this box after ONE ALL IMPORTANT NOTE,   and I'll answer the last question in the RED-INK NEW NEWSFLASH at the bottom of what used to be this page.

ONE ALL-IMPORTANT NOTE: Understanding of all 4 definitions of overpopulation below must include a realization (you can't avoid it) that too many people need a HUMAN ENCAMPMENT that takes more space and weighs more heavily on the eco-system than its billions of tenants.

Definition of the word world:

    The word world, in the context of a discussion of overpopulation, means NOT the planet we live on (which isn't what needs "saving"), OR the globe (which is NOT warming), but the
eco-system we live within (i.e. humanity's eco-world), which rides the planet a little above and below the surface like a passenger (as we do), which must be what may be warming along the planet's surface (on average) - among other things going wrong with it that Al Gore finds it inconvenient to mention, including, seemingy at least, some currently drastic climatic irregularity AND ALSO a LOT of other phenomena not yet put TOGETHER by embedded media (though obviously more important together than separately as each subject finally becomes p.c.), which obviously (not just seemingly but certainly) ADD UP TO
i.e. the world we actually live in, rather than on. Understanding of this definition and the next four definitions in carefully correct English is critically important.

FOUR DEFINITIONS of the word overpopulation, all emphasizing and clarifying the phrase, too many people - Overpopulation is:

    (1) TOO MANY PEOPLE to balance and interact harmoniously with the other species and elements
in an eco-system which, to remain healthy and viable, requires all the elements in its make-up to balance and interact with all the other elements harmoniously;
     (2) TOO MANY PEOPLE to provide each and every one of them the best life practically possible in a less populated world, just in case we ever have a one-world Civilized State that actually tries to do that.
     (3) TOO MANY PEOPLE for the world to be as aesthetically comfortable as it once was and still could be - or as beautiful as it once was and still could be - or to leave room outside their way-overgrown, over-crowded, noisy, tasteless, poisonous encampment for the luxuriously spacious natural world of clean air and soil and water and mountains and vast empty plains and forests and streams and seas teeming with abundant wild life that I WANT IN MY WORLD.

     Right now, ALL OF THOSE DEFINITIONS AND THE LINES THEY DRAW ARE ALREADY ACADEMIC, since, to anybody but an insensitive entrepreneur with a vested interest in growth, a politician trying to be all things to all and especially all rich constituents, a pseudo progressive trying to be politically correct, a dolt suckered by the insiders' media, or a religious person in rigid denial of a real world with actual spacial size and limitations, ALL THREE OF THOSE LINES HAVE OBVIOUSLY ALREADY BEEN CROSSED. The first two lines were crossed hundreds or even thousands of years ago, for sure before Columbus was pushed west by population pressure but probably way before that. The third line was crossed over 100 years ago and too obviously not to notice it in the last 50 years - so that, right now, overpopulation clearly enough means:

    (4) NOW (8.045) BILLION PEOPLE in a world just right for a fraction of that number, i.e. l/60th to l/100th of that number, by which I mean that there are currently 60 to 100 X too many people on Earth ALREADY.

      Of course, there are other definitions not worth numbering: 

    (0) MORE THAN THE OPTIMUM POPULATION. This definition (to which, as a double entendre, I'm assigning a zero - 0) was adopted by pseudo progressives in the early 90's and apparently meant either: all we can get in, as if a not quite critical mass would be ideal, OR: as many as we can stand before everyone finally realizes the world is overpopulated and is democratically willing to finally do something about it. 
    Of all the politically correct garbage smothering us since 1990, that has to be the closest to actually insane. It has to be technically mad to WANT to live in a world any MORE crowded than this - or to suppose that any crazy cosmic ethic requires that we go for the most the world can stand or the most it is politically correct to stand. The optimum population idea was and is nothing more respectable than a politically correct concession made by pseudo progressives to minorities they fear offending, who are hypocritically presumed to be culturally incapable of growing past their tradition of proliferating quail-like families.
        (0+) A REALISTIC OPTIMUM POPULATION would be a number comfortably and safely BELOW definitions #1 and #2 above - a ceiling that would provide a comfortable buffer zone obviously. But the optimum population concept is fundamentally flaky since, in fact, while there clearly can be and are too many people, there's no sensible reason to strive for as many people as we can supposedly accomodate, and there is no such thing as too few people. If the human population were to die out, so what? I won't waste space on any of the loony-tunes population theories of religious lumpen resisting science. -Glen Roberts   

RED-INK NEW NEWS FLASH: Our eco-system is NOW no longer healthy and viable (see definition #1). That's why it's NOW visibly falling apart. And the best life practically possible (see definition #2) has to include a VIEW down any street of open green hills; an over ABUNDANCE of nearby wilderness full of unstressed wildlife; crystal clear air and water and unpolluted soil; AND a main street in everybody's hometown that not only ISN'T a strip mall but would look good on a Christmas card (see definition #3). 

     If I just lost you, you deserve to be lost. Go to another website and look at real estate and super-spa ads or play video games full of freeways and crashing car images. Archives on:

2008; 2009; 2010; 2011; 2012; 2013; 2014; 2015; 2016

This site may exceed
the objective truth tolerance limits
of some readers.