Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Main
Results
Upcoming Shows
Links
News
Contact Me
Columns
Biography

Federation Spotlight
Interviews
Reports
Appearances/Autographs
USA! Indy Mailing List

Indy in the Media

USA! Indy Message Board

School Spotlight

The Feature!

Live! Wrestling

TV/Radio Shows

USA! Indy Staff

 

USA Independant Wrestling

"Lose your hood?"


"Lose your hood?"


I'm always intrigued by people outside the business who say that they 'hate' it. There's never any real substance to their view point, just a lot of misdirected anger. There's obviously some kind of resentment among "mainstream" entertainers, the kind of
anger that can only come from liberal, hyper emotional elitists. Don't misunderstand, I'm very much in favor of discriminating taste; well though out, understood, logical choices and view points.

A friend of mine (I guess we're friends, but that's more of me being too nice of a person) said that he hated wrestling because "people think it's real".

Now this is coming from a person who's never been in the ring, never bumped, never
bled, and has absolutely no respect for the business. He is a student at a 100% performing arts college in Winston-Salem (and it's an excellent school, in terms of teaching the specific crafts they teach), and is stuck in this liberal, feel it don't think it, mind set.


That seems to be the attitude among a lot of persons in the entertainment community. The
idea is so bigoted, and hateful, that it just shows how ridiculous and non-factual liberal
America is. These people who claim to want everyone to do whatever they want, without
persecution, but want to dictate every part how you do it.

It also is very evident to me that it's not 'dislike' as much as it is jealousy, to want to have an audience that does believe. I can appreciate the fact that they are weighed down by this chip on their shoulder that grows larger every day.

Outside of the ring, one facet of my life is very involved in the theater, as an actor and as a writer. If I wrote, or acted in something, it might be 'art', but I'm just a normal guy (kind of), who's been given certain gifts, and I try to respect that. My initial goal that I sat out with was to make something; if that something is 'art' then okay, but I'm interested in the product, not the frills.

These characters (that hate wrestling) have to be "artists". Not that they wouldn't be,
but that having other people think that they're 'serious artists' is more important than the
product. Whether they're writers, dancers, actors, singers, whatever they are, they have
to attach unnessesary labels, because by themselves they're "just not enough".

If the solution was as easy as taking drugs, being in trouble with the law, participating part in lewd sexual behavior, then we could all be "real artists", or on Sports Center. And even the idea that this group of devients is dictating what is correct and what is incorrect is so beyond all reasonable explanation.

I'm sure there are some guys out there who think that's what the big stars do, so they
engage in it, pretending to be big time. But that's a path to ruin, and we're better than
that.

We're performers, we entertain people all over the world. People invite us into there
homes, they pay money every week to watch us, whether that's in armory's, high schools or coliseum's. They come to see us because we are real people. We'll talk to them, give
them autographs, whatever it is, we'll do it. This does get under my skin a little, no
point in lying.... I just believe that it's unacceptable to allow that train of thought to
continue.

We're performers, we're athletes, we're a family.
Take care,
JML

Previous Columns