In the "CAFR" (which shows the pension funds) we can see that: The State and Federal Judges are guaranteed to be in the millionaire boys retirement club, being guaranteed from 3 to 8 million dollars after serving from 1 to 2 years tenure. (Now you know why the laws are as they are throughout the country)...
Wake up and smell the roses...or shoul I say skunk weed...Disclosure of the "CAFR" for viewing and comprehension by the public will end their game Cold in its Tracks. When you see the total moneys, you can backtrack to see where they came from and where they are currently being used...
I guess the public can't see the trees through the forest, or is they can't see the forest through the trees. Or is it they can't see the mountain in front of them as the rocks from the mountain fall on them... Don't feel bad the "Boys" controlling this multi trillion dollar syndicated national financial takeover have spent billions to keep you in the dark and to distract your attention elsewhere.....They are smart and have accomplished their goal.
The "Budget Report" of which the media and government focuses the public's attention on shows, and is the expense side of, traditional governmental services WHICH THE MAJORITY OF THE PUBLIC IS AWARE OF, while the "CAFR" contains the profit side of Government owned businesses/Agencies and "Investments" which outside of the "budgetary Agencies" are restricted by statute for no tie or direct revenue accountability to the "Budgetary Basis". (WAKE UP)...The revenues I speak of are NOT off budget funds but revenues masterfully controlled and developed by the "Boys" outside of the public's awareness and view.
THE INTENTIONAL REFUSAL OF THE GOVERNMENT AND THE MEDIA (ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and national News Papers) TO MAKE SIMPLE AND CONSPICUOUSE MENTION OF THIS REPORT AND THE COMBINED REVENUE BEHIND IT COULD BE CLASSIFIED UNDER THE RICO ACT AS PERPETUATING AND ASSISTING A CRIMINAL SYNDICATE. SOME CASE LAW FROM ARIZONA WHICH SHOWS LAW PERTAINING TO DISCLOSURE AND EVIDENCES SILENCE FOR NON-DISCLOSURE AS BEING FRAUDULENT MISCONDUCT IS AS FOLLOWS:
A. "Silence can only be equated with fraud when there is a legal and moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading." U.S. vs Prudden, 424 F. 2d 1021, U.S. vs Tweel, 550 F. 2d 297, 299-300.
B. "Fraud may be committed by failure to speak, but a duty to speak must be imposed." Dunahay v. Struzik, 393 P.2d 930, 96 Ariz. 246 (1964).
C. "Fraud" may be committed by a failure to speak when the duty of speaking is imposed as much as by speaking falsely." Batty v. Arizona State Dental Board, 112 P.2d 870, 57 Ariz. 239. (1941).
D. "When one conveys a false impression by disclosure of some facts and the concealment of others, such concealment is in effect a false representation that what is disclosed is the whole truth." State v. Coddington, 662 P.@d 155, 135 Ariz. 480. (Ariz. App. 1983).
E. "Suppression of a material fact which a party is bound in good faith to disclose is equivalent to a false representation." Leigh v. Loyd, 224 P.2d 356, 74 Ariz. 84 (1952).
F. "When one conveys a false impression by disclosure of some facts and the concealment of others, such concealment is in effect a false representation that what is disclosed is the whole truth." State v. Coddington, 662 P.2d 155, 135 Ariz. 480 (Ariz. App. 1983).
G. "Fraud and deceit may arise from silence where there is a duty to speak the truth, as well as from speaking an untruth."
Morrison v. Acton, 198 F.2d 590, 68 Ariz.
27 (Ariz. 1948).
H. "Damages will lie in proper case of negligent misrepresentation of failure to disclose." Van Buren v. Pirna Community College Dist. Bd., 546 P.2d 821, 113 Ariz. 85 (Ariz. 1976).
I. "Where one under duty to disclose facts to another fails to do so, and other is injured thereby, an action in tort lies against party whose failure to perform his duty caused injury." Gegan v. First Nat. Bank, 101 P.2d 214, 55 Ariz. 320 (Ariz. 1940).
J. "Where relation of trust or confidence exists between two parties so that one places peculiar reliance in trustworthiness of another, latter is under duty to make full and truthful disclosure of all material facts and is liable for misrepresentation or concealment." Stewart v. Phoenix Nat. Bank, 64 P.2d 101, 49 Ariz. 34. (Ariz. 1937).
K. "Concealing a material fact when there
is duty to disclose may be actionable
fraud." Universal Inv. Co. v. Sahara
Motor Inn, Inc., 619 P.2d 485, 127 Ariz. 213.
(Ariz. App. 1980).
"Today Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered into Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond...whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing that every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willfully relinquished...guarantees of their well-being guaranteed to them by their World Government...".
Henry Kissinger, statement to the Bilderberger organization, Evian, France 5-21-92, from a tape recording by Swiss delegates.