Lambda the Ultimate Weblog Topics
Last Updated 07/17/2012

Posts By: Dave Lopez

  Date    Post    Topic  
12/16/2009Re: Criminal PenaltiesWhy API Design Matters
12/03/2009I'm not buying it eitherTwo Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software
10/16/2009F#Erik Meijer's MSDN Channel 9 lecture series on functional programming
10/17/2009I blame SunErik Meijer's MSDN Channel 9 lecture series on functional programming
10/17/2009It does run on LinuxErik Meijer's MSDN Channel 9 lecture series on functional programming
10/17/2009No need for name-callingErik Meijer's MSDN Channel 9 lecture series on functional programming
10/17/2009Can I play?Erik Meijer's MSDN Channel 9 lecture series on functional programming
09/17/2009Noop: Google Language for the JVMNoop: Google Language for the JVM
09/17/2009Whatever...Noop: Google Language for the JVM
07/16/2009....andUnladen Swallow: LLVM based Python compiler
05/29/2009Tool supportQuestions Five Ways
05/29/2009F# in Visual Studio 2010 by defaultQuestions Five Ways
05/02/2009HOPLConversations with the Creators of Major Programming Languages
04/24/2009Still in stealth mode?Intentional tool released
04/26/2009You have bits or notIntentional tool released
04/26/2009we"ll see what mps has to offerIntentional tool released
04/23/2009How can it be positive?Andrej Bauer on PLD
04/08/2009No multiple inheritance in Java, C#, VB.NETWhy are objects so unintuitive?
04/08/2009Possible things of interestWhy are objects so unintuitive?
03/31/2009The problem with DylanPLOT: Programming Language for Old Timers
03/11/2009There needs to be much more study on thisInfluence of cognitive models on programming language design
01/18/2009Much easier readingWhat Are The Resolved Debates in General Purpose Language Design?
12/29/2008There isn't one2008 In Review - What Happened with Programming Languages?
12/11/2008JetBrains releases MPS (Meta Programming System)JetBrains releases MPS (Meta Programming System)
09/30/2008Infoq had some coverage onMicrosoft Oslo
10/10/2008More from InfoWorldMicrosoft Oslo
09/17/2008The title is misleading and you have to RTFATwilight of the GPU
06/22/20081. makes code shorter. IWriting a new language - ideas?
06/20/2008Not the problemScaling Type Inference
06/13/2008WonderfulFunctional Programming in the ACM CS Curriculum
06/13/2008Ain't gonna happenFunctional Programming in the ACM CS Curriculum
06/13/2008stop saying java sucks and do something about itFunctional Programming in the ACM CS Curriculum
05/25/2008Microsoft also supports aHOPL-III: A History of Erlang
03/15/2008F#Languages best suited for scientific computing?
03/09/2008Ruby and Python no, but...Applied Metamodelling: A Foundation for Language Driven Development
01/15/2008Great postUnderstanding category theory and its practical applications
01/16/2008Who's Nobody?Prediction for 2008
01/16/2008Cross-platform means morePrediction for 2008
01/16/2008That said... cross platformPrediction for 2008
01/03/2008Dylan could've been a contenderWhy Did Symbolics Fail?
12/16/2007Psychologypoll: syntax
09/09/2007Interesting[ANN] Vodka: Join concurrency, multimethods and generators (thesis project)
08/18/2007Or wite some great tooling for itcreating my own programming language
05/11/2007Sun isn't even in the marketSun's new JavaFX Script language
05/17/2007Has lock-in ever been the case?Sun's new JavaFX Script language
05/09/2007Great post"The language of the future is javascript"
05/11/2007Java built in?"The language of the future is javascript"
05/11/2007A future maybe"The language of the future is javascript"
05/12/2007Several issues"The language of the future is javascript"
05/02/2007Parrot is vaporware andMicrosoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/03/2007Yeah, and I'll still call it vaporMicrosoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/03/2007That's the competitorMicrosoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/22/2007Better tell the implementor thenMicrosoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/02/2007Silverlight developmentMicrosoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/02/2007It's just a reiterationMicrosoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/03/2007WrongMicrosoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/04/2007It's not that difficultMicrosoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/09/2007After further reflectionMicrosoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/11/2007The mother of all languagesMicrosoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/11/2007Again and againMicrosoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/15/2007Last ditch effortMicrosoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/16/2007Should've used Nemerle as an argumentMicrosoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/16/2007XAML is the DSLMicrosoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/16/2007So you want Common Lisp and...Microsoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/03/2007Python Interactive ShellMicrosoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/04/2007Neither is the Vic 20Microsoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/04/2007Ahh, Blogger cynicismMicrosoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/04/2007Everybody has a "point"Microsoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/04/2007It doesn't matterMicrosoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
05/04/2007Ruby or Python is too complex?Microsoft's new Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR)
04/26/2007My hand at the blame gameArc in action (a.k.a. it's aliiiiive!)
04/27/2007Functional Objects went open sourceArc in action (a.k.a. it's aliiiiive!)
04/25/2007"I am not trying toAlmost invisible upgrade
04/30/2007One size doesn't fit allThoughts about the Best Introductory Language
03/30/2007RE: Good toolsExpect New Major Language Within Five Years
03/01/2007"Recent Post" funkiness"Recent Post" funkiness
02/24/2007Hooks need not applyDao, a new programming language
02/12/2007Software EngineeringAlmost everything happened in the Golden Age, right?
02/03/2007A new Squeak?Steps Toward The Reinvention of Programming
02/03/2007Associated videoSteps Toward The Reinvention of Programming
02/08/2007Some more information about this projectSteps Toward The Reinvention of Programming
01/27/2007NopeRalf Lammel: Stop dysfunctional programming
01/11/2007More computer science video lecturesBerkeley Webcast Courses
02/19/2007BingoWhy people don't use functional programming?
02/21/2007Huh?Why people don't use functional programming?
01/07/2007MessagingSimon Peyton Jones: Beautiful concurrency
12/13/2006[Community] As another neutral bystander[Redux] The Polyadic pi-Calculus: a Tutorial (1991) Robin Milner
12/09/2006Not 10 minutes ago...Commercial Users of Functional Programming 2006
12/09/2006Back to the Want Ads of YesteryearCommercial Users of Functional Programming 2006
11/12/2006GemCutter? - or Java meets HaskellFunctional programming and software engineering
10/03/2006NiceAn Incremental Approach to Compiler Construction
10/02/2006Smalltalk or Lisp isn't expressive enough for you?Tim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs
10/02/2006No I don't knowTim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs
10/02/2006Not talking about code generationTim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs
10/02/2006NopeTim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs
10/02/2006So it's all about JavaTim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs
10/02/2006from what i remember fromTim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs
10/03/2006EncapsulationTim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs
10/03/2006"I obviously get that RubyTim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs
10/03/2006"Java doesn't IDE needTim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs
10/03/2006See yaTim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs
10/04/2006ByeTim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs
10/03/2006BloatTim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs
10/04/2006Yes, inferior modeTim Bray: Dynamic-Language IDEs
09/10/2006SlateMisc News
09/10/2006Python compiler rewrite in C#Misc News
09/10/2006Thanks for the heads upMisc News
08/21/2006Type inferenced support in IDEsClosures for Java or money back
08/23/2006DifferenceClosures for Java or money back
08/23/2006Response to wrong person?Closures for Java or money back
08/23/2006Follow your own adviceClosures for Java or money back
08/23/2006Your standard templateClosures for Java or money back
08/31/2006And so you stop straying offtopicClosures for Java or money back
08/31/2006Strength of completion parserClosures for Java or money back
09/01/2006What story?Closures for Java or money back
09/04/2006And once againClosures for Java or money back
09/04/2006And they are another storyClosures for Java or money back
09/06/2006Obviously Ruby isn't languagesClosures for Java or money back
09/09/2006YesClosures for Java or money back
09/10/2006There was no personal insultClosures for Java or money back
08/15/2006Yes, but only in KoreaDSLs and AOP
08/09/2006JavaLisp Lovers, how would you fix Lisp or bring it up to date?
07/14/2006NemerleA Core Calculus for Scala Type Checking
07/14/2006I wasn't trying to suggestA Core Calculus for Scala Type Checking
06/24/2006Why not DPetition for adding garbage collection to C++.
06/24/2006Are you kidding?Petition for adding garbage collection to C++.
06/24/2006Interfaces have nothing to do with header filesPetition for adding garbage collection to C++.
06/24/2006header files represent thePetition for adding garbage collection to C++.
06/24/2006Big differencePetition for adding garbage collection to C++.
06/24/2006It's pretty much the point thoughPetition for adding garbage collection to C++.
06/24/2006More likely than OcamlPetition for adding garbage collection to C++.
06/18/2006We have Boo and NemerleLang .NET Symposium Registration Now Open
06/18/2006but the real questionLang .NET Symposium Registration Now Open
06/06/2006No warm fuzzies for OOPWhat is covariant signature transformation?
05/28/2006Not so sure about thatBuried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff
05/29/2006Incremental/Interactive developmentBuried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff
05/29/2006Speaking of flexibilityBuried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff
05/29/2006I don't need no stinkin' compilerBuried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff
05/29/2006UnknowingBuried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff
05/29/2006Try reading this timeBuried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff
05/30/2006more re:Buried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff
05/30/2006Manly men use notepadBuried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff
05/29/2006Uhh, noBuried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff
05/29/2006Last time i checked, macrosBuried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff
05/29/2006More contextBuried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff
05/30/2006Huh, what?Buried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff
05/30/2006that's the worstBuried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff
05/30/2006let's try this once again.Buried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff
05/29/2006Shh, don't tell them it's statically typedBuried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff
05/31/2006RE: What Gives?Buried Treasure - No Fluff Just Stuff
05/27/2006For those that believe weLinspire chooses Haskell as preferred language
05/21/2006Refactor mercilessly until you're begging for mercyEthnographic Study of Copy and Paste Programming Practices in OOPL
05/21/2006Code FoldingEthnographic Study of Copy and Paste Programming Practices in OOPL
05/21/2006An individual's perception of codeEthnographic Study of Copy and Paste Programming Practices in OOPL
05/22/2006Yep, it is and thus easy C&PEthnographic Study of Copy and Paste Programming Practices in OOPL
05/23/2006False Dichotomies-R-UsEthnographic Study of Copy and Paste Programming Practices in OOPL
05/10/2006Because they don't dieThe Nature of Lisp (a tutorial)
05/10/2006Lisp isn't Ruby and Algol isn't CThe Nature of Lisp (a tutorial)
05/12/2006And implementationsThe Nature of Lisp (a tutorial)
05/04/2006Vi plugin for VSYour favourite editor/IDE
05/04/2006Stuck in the early 80sYour favourite editor/IDE
08/27/2006What about a spellchecker?Your favourite editor/IDE
05/04/2006Are prototypes a more natural way of thinking about objectsWhat do you believe about Programming Languages (that you can't prove (yet))?
01/19/2007... So, you have to killWhat do you believe about Programming Languages (that you can't prove (yet))?
04/20/2006HmmLang .NET 2006
04/20/2006So....Lang .NET 2006
04/20/2006The conspiracy modelLang .NET 2006
04/20/2006WrongLang .NET 2006
04/20/2006You don't get it!Lang .NET 2006
04/10/2006Whiners galoreWard Cunningham podcast: Smalltalk, little languages, XP, typing and future of software
04/06/2006GPL doesn't force you to GPL your codeEiffel Studio adds GPL version
04/10/2006What about glibcEiffel Studio adds GPL version
04/10/2006Just look at the big commercial distrosEiffel Studio adds GPL version
11/05/2009Not sure how this thread got re-startedEiffel Studio adds GPL version
04/05/2006Modules vs Packagespublic vs. published interfaces
03/25/2006Ruby 2.0Gosling vs. Dynamic Languages
03/25/2006I enjoyed your thoughtsThe Problem With Parsing - an essay
03/15/2006People Oriented SoftwareJOT: On The Next Move in Programming
03/15/2006The academic bubbleProgramming: 50, 100 years from now
03/16/2006Cut out the middle manProgramming: 50, 100 years from now
02/28/2006ParrotJon Udell: Multi-language runtimes
02/24/2006Busted linkIntroduction to the Java EE 5 Platform
10/25/2009OOP promised a lotThe Next Mainstream Programming Languages
08/16/2007That pesky real world keeps on creeping inThe Next Mainstream Programming Languages
02/05/2006GreatPackaging Data And Methods
01/27/2006OS integration to the environmentPromising OS's from a Programming Language Perspective
01/24/2006Good stuffBeyond LINQ: A Manifesto For Distributed Data-Intensive Programming
01/25/2006GreatBeyond LINQ: A Manifesto For Distributed Data-Intensive Programming
01/25/2006I do really wish, though,Beyond LINQ: A Manifesto For Distributed Data-Intensive Programming
01/27/2006About PatentsBeyond LINQ: A Manifesto For Distributed Data-Intensive Programming
01/27/2006Microsoft should officially support Linux/Unix...?Beyond LINQ: A Manifesto For Distributed Data-Intensive Programming
01/27/2006The business brains atBeyond LINQ: A Manifesto For Distributed Data-Intensive Programming
01/22/2006Geekiness?Choice of OS of LtU readers
01/21/2006"Hardcore" languagesLisp is sin
01/05/2006Why limit yourself to StallmaAuld Lang Alice
06/08/2006Coupling and StateReturn of the Global Variables?
12/12/2005All the roads lead to Lisp(Smalltalk)Back to the future...
05/29/2009Is non-beautiful code boilerplate-ridden code?Code Reading
05/29/2009It's much more than formattingCode Reading
11/09/2005Prototype based OOPrototype based OO
11/09/2005LuaPrototype based OO
11/09/2005Faking itPrototype based OO
11/09/2005InterestingClassification according to type vs function - An anecdote
11/04/2005Nice rant, but offtopicTutorial on Good Lisp Programming Style
10/30/2005More of a nostalgia rantDoes Visual Studio Rot the Mind?
10/22/2005I know I'm not really in theBruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java
10/22/2005A large part of the book seemBruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java
10/22/2005Multiple assignment is also aBruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java
10/23/2005BTW, the IDEs handle all theBruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java
10/25/2005What's an IDEBruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java
10/25/2005Indeed, but it's hardly a reaBruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java
12/19/2005Eckel's defense of PythonBruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java
12/22/2005The video is not a mythBruce Tate: Technologies that may challenge Java
10/20/2005BotheringC#: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow: An Interview with Anders Hejlsberg
09/16/2005Is there VB without VS?Most Productive FP Lang?
09/18/2005free as in choiceMost Productive FP Lang?

LtU Topic Index Sorted by Date LtU Topic Index Sorted by Topic LtU Index of Post Authors Zipped LtU Archive


Chris Rathman/ Chris.Rathman@tx.rr.com