Posts By: William D. Neumann
| Date | Post | Topic |
| 04/17/2009 | Nice but... | Generic Discrimination: Sorting and Partitioning Unshared Data in Linear Time |
| 02/09/2009 | What color is your box? | On the (Im)possibility of Obfuscating Programs |
| 02/09/2009 | He's pretty heavy, he's my BA | On the (Im)possibility of Obfuscating Programs |
| 11/26/2008 | Interesting, but... | Type-Checking Zero Knowledge |
| 09/12/2008 | A favorite from the world of crypto | Irresistible programs |
| 08/12/2008 | Mi(c|k)match | Text Processing by Functional Language? |
| 02/27/2008 | OCaml as well (sort of) | Chris Okasaki on Indentation Syntax |
| 10/25/2007 | non-determinism too | On the Importance of Purity |
| 10/25/2007 | My crypto is showing... | On the Importance of Purity |
| 10/25/2007 | Maybe and sort of | On the Importance of Purity |
| 10/25/2007 | Heh | On the Importance of Purity |
| 08/17/2007 | DEVONthink | Tools for (PhD) Researching |
| 05/20/2007 | Reliability, security, privacy, secrecy, etc. | Social Processes and Proofs of Theorems and Programs |
| 05/09/2007 | If it looks a bit like a duck... | LC for kids (alligators, oh my!) |
| 04/19/2007 | NANDoom | Thoughts about the Best Introductory Language |
| 04/18/2007 | One man's sexy is another man's meh. | Thoughts about the Best Introductory Language |
| 04/18/2007 | Popularity <> better for teaching or learning | Thoughts about the Best Introductory Language |
| 04/19/2007 | Books <> Learning programming either | Thoughts about the Best Introductory Language |
| 04/19/2007 | Raisins are good in oatmeal | Thoughts about the Best Introductory Language |
| 04/20/2007 | typewriter text | Thoughts about the Best Introductory Language |
| 04/20/2007 | More is more or less less, but less is more or less more | Thoughts about the Best Introductory Language |
| 04/09/2007 | It was a very good year | Early Programming Languages (A Logic Puzzle) |
| 02/08/2007 | You know what they say... | Programming Shorthands |
| 03/07/2007 | One thing I do feel has | Why people don't use functional programming? |
| 10/27/2006 | It'll be out... eventually? | Practical OCaml |
| 11/06/2006 | let practical_ocaml = Random.book () | Practical OCaml |
| 10/05/2006 | Yes, but... | Google Code Search |
| 09/22/2006 | Well, at least on OS X and | Why Johnny can't code |
| 05/31/2006 | Well worth it | yet another noob via "little lisper" and scheme |
| 05/27/2006 | Hare shirt? | Linspire chooses Haskell as preferred language |
| 05/04/2006 | Another TextMate user | Your favourite editor/IDE |
| 03/22/2006 | Not a luddite, just an idiot... | Programming: 50, 100 years from now |
| 03/22/2006 | Wow... how user friendly. | Programming: 50, 100 years from now |
| 03/22/2006 | Spare the rod, get lousy documents... | Programming: 50, 100 years from now |
| 03/23/2006 | Aim higher than mediocrity | Programming: 50, 100 years from now |
| 02/07/2006 | The growth and "neato" factors are big... | hypothetical question |
| 11/24/2005 | Beauty of the dots? | Code Reading |
| 10/05/2005 | Choose your monkeys wisely | "The Anatomy of a Loop" |
| 09/28/2005 | One more cup of coffee | ICFP Programming Contest 2005 Results |
| 08/12/2005 | Understandable? Flexible? | Concatenative Language Kont |
| 08/12/2005 | Faster than I am... | Concatenative Language Kont |
| 08/12/2005 | Time to get started then... | Concatenative Language Kont |
| 08/06/2005 | Used <> associated with. | Overloading - Syntactic Heroin? |
| 08/05/2005 | Byzantine syntax agreement | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
| 08/06/2005 | For certain definitions of "expressive"... | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
| 08/05/2005 | Useless anecdotes are the best kind of evidence... right? | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
| 08/05/2005 | Sort of stringy... | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
| 08/06/2005 | Minutia... | Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof. |
| 03/03/2005 | In addition... | Wanted: platform-independent Standard ML |
| 06/03/2005 | Something about sizzle and steak... | Issue One of The Monad.Reader, monthly Haskell eZine |
| 06/03/2005 | It's not pdf, per se | Issue One of The Monad.Reader, monthly Haskell eZine |
| 06/03/2005 | Some specifics | Issue One of The Monad.Reader, monthly Haskell eZine |
| 02/03/2005 | See you soon... | GCC Wiki |
| 02/05/2005 | I took the plunge... | GCC Wiki |
| 01/27/2005 | Could you elaborate? | "Popular vs. Good" in Programming Languages |
| 01/28/2005 | Much appreciated | "Popular vs. Good" in Programming Languages |
| 09/29/2004 | And those are just the major bugs... | "The Silver Bullet" |
| 07/03/2004 | And now for something completely different? | The Language Wars are Dead; Long Live the Language Wars! |
| 02/11/2004 | Re: OCaml, an Introduction | OCaml, an Introduction |
| LtU Topic Index Sorted by Date | LtU Topic Index Sorted by Topic | LtU Index of Post Authors | Zipped LtU Archive |