Lambda the Ultimate Weblog Topics
Last Updated 07/28/2010

Posts By: Jeff Cutsinger

  Date    Post    Topic  
02/16/2007Lisp webcomicLisp webcomic
05/11/2006I'm not a member of theCyclone 1.0 released.
02/06/2006hypothetical questionhypothetical question
01/31/2006Short AnswerPyPy
01/18/2006"Common Person" programmingLisp is sin
01/21/2006It's even easierNew for Python 2.5
09/14/2005This sounds so familiarVisual Basic and LINQ
09/02/2005AnnoyanceRuby on Rails: An Interview with David Heinemeier Hansson
08/18/2005Executive Summary pleaseNeko 1.0
08/19/2005Cool, thanksNeko 1.0
08/10/2005A decent measureExpressivity
08/05/2005I'm calling itOverloading - Syntactic Heroin?
08/04/2005Even assumingObjective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof.
08/10/2005You have a good pointObjective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof.
08/06/2005Easy thereObjective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof.
08/08/2005Let's measure your successObjective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof.
08/05/2005No.Objective scientific proof of OOP's validity? Don't need no stinkun' proof.
08/04/2005nothing new to jsA Lisp to JavaScript Compiler in 100 Lines
08/04/2005kind of neat but not really lispA Lisp to JavaScript Compiler in 100 Lines
08/03/2005How aboutA Java/Python hybrid?
07/29/2005Multiple inheritance isn't badA Typed Intermediate Language for Compiling Multiple Inheritance
07/28/2005maybeML without GC
07/28/2005Allow meA software engineering problem: how would functional programming solve it?
07/22/2005Tuareg ModeOn the Revival of Dynamic Languages
07/21/2005type inferencing is hardly coOn the Revival of Dynamic Languages
07/21/2005would it be possible to haveOn the Revival of Dynamic Languages
07/21/2005I don't think that partial evOn the Revival of Dynamic Languages
07/21/2005Not to be picky, I note thatOn the Revival of Dynamic Languages
07/21/2005smalltalk isn't any lazier than lispGrady Booch: Software Engineering Grand Challenges
07/11/2005Underestimates what typing can doStatic Typing Where Possible, Dynamic Typing When Needed
07/12/2005ContentlessStatic Typing Where Possible, Dynamic Typing When Needed
07/14/2005BootstrappingStatic Typing Where Possible, Dynamic Typing When Needed
07/16/2005bootstrappingStatic Typing Where Possible, Dynamic Typing When Needed
07/12/2005Originality is goodStatic Typing Where Possible, Dynamic Typing When Needed
08/18/2005I fail to seeStatic Typing Where Possible, Dynamic Typing When Needed
07/05/2005Malbolge figured out?Malbolge figured out?
07/03/2005LyXMartin Fowler on Language Workbenches and DSLs
06/27/2005Why templates?"dynamic" generative programming?
06/30/2005So are you saying that your i"dynamic" generative programming?
06/26/2005DT guysScottish Programming Language Seminar
06/21/2005Another issueWhy recursing is better than looping
06/22/2005We never said recursion was intuitiveWhy recursing is better than looping
06/23/2005yepWhy recursing is better than looping
06/20/2005Of courseBook stats
06/10/2005HP's DynamoHP's Dynamo
05/31/2005More clarificationWhat is so bad about compiling?
05/19/2005so sweetLLVM 1.5 has been released!
05/08/2005I believe he claims they takeGADTs + Extensible Kinds = Dependent Programming
07/22/2005Not really redundantGADTs + Extensible Kinds = Dependent Programming
07/26/2005Well.GADTs + Extensible Kinds = Dependent Programming
07/26/2005Pros and ConsGADTs + Extensible Kinds = Dependent Programming
05/01/2005responseCall for Papers: ACM Symposium on Dynamic Languages
05/02/2005not necessarily badWhat makes Centum a bad language?
05/02/2005Not so much criticismWhat makes Centum a bad language?
04/29/2005Hey, we can all quit thinking about PLsFrom Perl Monks: "pissed off about functional programming"
04/30/2005Sarcasm is easier to convey IRLFrom Perl Monks: "pissed off about functional programming"
05/08/2005Perhaps a simpler explanationFrom Perl Monks: "pissed off about functional programming"
04/26/2005Completely unwarranted jabWhy do they program in C++?
04/19/2005May I be cynical?Why Dependent Types Matter
02/20/2005Taking an analogy too farWhat are The Atoms of Programming Languages?
07/18/2005Ha haBitC, a new OS implementation language
01/05/2005Don't forget Single Assignment CThe Free Lunch Is Over: A Fundamental Turn Toward Concurrency in Software
12/10/2004Obligatory Lisp fan responseCasting SPELs in Lisp
11/18/2004You have it backwardsSkribe 1.2b released
11/19/2004skribe is staticSkribe 1.2b released
10/27/2004There is definitely obvious uScheme Language Standardization Process: R6RS Progress Report
09/22/2004Is an implementation on the way?Looking for Classic Types Thread
09/08/2004YeahThe Human-Language Interface
08/20/2004Video Lan ClientErlang the Movie
07/17/2004Optional dynamic ("duck") typingNew CLR Language: Boo
12/02/2003Re: The Revised C++ Language Design Supporting .NETThe Revised C++ Language Design Supporting .NET
11/04/2003Re: Bertrand Meyer on Software QualityBertrand Meyer on Software Quality

LtU Topic Index Sorted by Date LtU Topic Index Sorted by Topic LtU Index of Post Authors Zipped LtU Archive


Chris Rathman/ Chris.Rathman@tx.rr.com