This following article is my opinion. I have a right to say what I feel, and I demand that both sides of a dicussion be voiced.

On the review it talks of incredible soaking times. If you had a CPS-1200 with a .0003X nozzle, you'd be sitting for an hour shooting with just one charge. Great conservation! The word conservation only means it will take you longer to get rid of the EXACT SAME AMOUNT OF WATER. Think about it! Don't be taken in by hype! Come to the real source…

That's right. I used to own a 1-3-5 so I can say what I want about it! I bought a 1-3-5(for a severely reduced price I might add) and it was horrible. The trigger was extremely hard and by the time I would get all five nozzles shooting, the blaster would just about run out of water. I originally bought it as a challenge to myself to make it perform like a CPS-1700. It didn't happen. I tried modding it and eventually threw most of it away. Oh, I also thought the handle was uncomfortable.

What is the morale of this story? Don't believe everything you hear! I knew what I was doing, but I feel sorry for all the kids who bought a 1-3-5 after reading that review and thinking it was the best blaster in the world.

Sometimes I get tired of casual statements. Right now, Supersoaker.com has a statement on their site stating that the Monster series are the most powerful soakers ever. What a joke! Monsters have the lowest power-to-size ratio of any blaster ever made! (They also made this same claim about the SS-40)

My morals tell me it is wrong to mislead people with only half of the story, but businesses have the right to do so, which is why you have to be careful. And why am I spending so much time on this? I have made it GNG's life work to promote truth and expose what I think is not, and this is proof of that.