This following article is my opinion. I have a right to say what I feel, and I demand that both sides of a dicussion be voiced.

On Supersoaker.com, last year, you would have found Reservoir issue #2, talking about how great the CPS-1-3-5 blaster is. Simply do not believe it. This review praised every feature and generally avoided the hideous truth and made up for it in one-sided discussion. The hideous truth is, when matched against the blaster the 1-3-5 replaced, the 1700, it couldn't match the distance or the output. The 1x stream of the 1-3-5 against the 5x stream of the 1700? Or at most, the 5x streams of all the 1-3-5's nozzles against the 10x nozzle of the 1700? Every soakerman knows the CPS-1-3-5 has the reputation of being the worst CPS soaker ever made, disgracing the CPS-prefix. In the words of a fellow Water Militia member on the 1-3-5, " I was about to buy it, when I realized how terrible it was."

The review was twisted with admiration for this extremely BAD product(in my opinion) without even one hint of negativity. And possibly worst of all is that the Reservoir was written by the webmaster of Super Soaker Arsenal, the first real soaker fansite on the web!

Budgie from Aquazone called it 'soaker propaganda' and he was right. There is no way that you will ever find a bad review of a Super Soaker on there own site, so just how can you know if there is any truth to what they say? The day that SS.com posts a bad review of their gun and says "we could have done better" is the day that I will actually believe what they say. What would happen if Super Soaker sponsored a review that gave their product a bad rating? Well, don't spend time on it cause it won't happen.