Critique of 1st Nephi
Up ] Evolving Monotheism ] A Biblical Study on Tongues ] Word of Faith Refute ] Test of a Prophet ] The Everlasting Home of the Damned ] A Foundation in Apologetics ] TULIPS ] Materialism ] Prayer of Jabez ] [ Critique of 1st Nephi ] Can a Christian Serve in the Military ] The Just War Concept ] Agasha Refuted ] Niscience and the Bible ] Looking for a Biblical Church ] Peter: The First Pope? ] Reformed Faith Worship ] Popes & Early Creeds ] Web-profile: Sykowingnut Website ]

 

Home
Up
Accepting Jesus Christ
Testimonies
Poetry
Questions & Answers
Sermons
Message Board
Links
Farewell Letter

Editor's note: Document was originally a booklet 

Critique of 1st Nephi

Introduction

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS), commonly known as the Mormons, is a religious group that claims to be the only true restored church of Christianity.  In addition, the LDS teaches unbiblical doctrines and also have three additional religious scriptures besides the Bible: the Pearl of Great Price, Doctrines and Covenant, and the most well known one of all, the Book of Mormon.  It is supposedly, "another testament of Jesus Christ".

                Often, a favorite tactic of the LDS, especially among missionaries, is to give a potential convert the Book of Mormon (we shall abbreviate it as BoM) and ask them to pray for a "burning bosom" to confirm that it's true.  They would use the BoM at Mormoni 10:3-5 and James1:5 in the Bible to support the legitimacy of this act.  But is this the right thing to do, and does the Bible really teaches us to pray for "burning bosoms" to confirm truth?

                Certainly, no.  Looking at James 1:5 again, we find that the passage is actually talking about wisdom, and the context deals with perseverance, not regarding confirmation of truth.  The LDS considers the "burning bosom" as the testimony of their church.  Personal and subjective testimony in itself isn't a bad thing; but there must be elements of objective facts too.  In this little booklet, we are not denying that God can have the power to penetrate lives and become very personal.  We are concerned with evaluating the objective testimony of the LDS.

                Let us look at Jesus' testimony as an example in John 5:31-37.  In this passage, we find Jesus giving three testimonies, or witnesses, to his claim of being the Christ:

  1. Verse 34: Testimony of John the Baptist and the purpose of that is so that some may believe

  2. Verse 36: Jesus' very works and ministry

  3. Verse 37and 39: God the Father, through His scriptures, testify of Jesus as savior

Thus, we will examine the claim of Mormonism objectively too, and welcome any LDS members to examine the claims of Jesus Christ.

                Given the limit of this booklet, we will evaluate only the first book to appear in the BoM.  The Book of 1st Nephi is a critical book, since this is where allegedly the Mormon story all began in 600 BC.  If it falls under examination, since this is the foundation of the Mormon story, then everything else in Mormonism falls too.

                Often, the writer is accused of being unloving and unfair.  What is the goal of having a booklet like this? The Bible in Jude1:3 commands that we should "earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered to the saints."  From this verse, we can see that the faith in which people can be saved has ALREADY been delivered to the saints, and "another testament of Jesus Christ" must surely be rejected.  Sometimes, LDS members do not realize that the BoM attacks Christianity too.  A look at 1Nephi 14 would clearly be an example of this. 

                We realize that LDS members are sincere people, and we love them and we will present them the truth in a loving manner.  Attention was paid to the sensitivity of LDS members.

                In addition, we recommend all would examine the verses referred to in this book in their proper context.  Quotes from the Bible are from the NIV.  It is the prayer of this writer that this booklet would lead some to the true Jesus.

Critique of 1st Nephi

Summary of 1Nephi

In order to critique 1Nephi, we must understand the story of 1Nephi.  It is a story of how one family, having a dad as a prophet name Lehi, tries to leave Jerusalem to escape the upcoming wrath of God and enter into a new promise land.  The book is recorded by Nephi, Lehi's youngest son.  Throughout the book, Nephi records visions received by his dad and himself.  They leave everything behind to enter the wilderness, but then Nephi and his brothers come back to get their property and some brass plates.  After a short adventure and convincing the family of Ishmael to come along also, the party enter into the wilderness.  Nephi along with his brother Laman, Lemuel and Sam, married the daughters of Ishmael.  Much hardship took place.  Two brothers, Laman and Lemuel was especially rebellious and harden hearted.  Problems occur often.  Finally, they got near the sea and God instructed Nephi to make a ship.  When they took off, Nephi got bounded by his brothers but God was able to release him.  Nephi makes more prophecy.  Eventually, they will find the promise land (and this is suppose to be the American continent).

Problems in 1Nephi

Under examination, the book of 1Nephi contain some problems that is too hard to ignore:

  1. Christ is the Same Forever
  2. Which Location?
  3. Filthiness is Not Clear
  4. Saved Forever, Not Temporary
  5. Lord's True Gospel
  6. Disarming the Counter-Attack
  7. Engraved in Brass or Stone?
  8. Prophecy Unfulfilled
  9. A False Prophet
  10. Hell Yes, Hell No
  11. Water Baptism
  12. Compass
  13. The Steel Connection
  14. Where Was Jesus Born?
Christ is the Same Forever
Back to Problems in 1Nephi
1Nephi 10:18 states concerning Christ, "For he is the same yesterday, to-day, and forever; and the way is prepared for all men from the foundation of the world, if it so be that they repent and come unto him." So from this BoM verse, we see that the way to come to him is the same forever, and never changing.  In the Bible, Hebrew 13:8 states the same thing.  Now, using the principle of progressive revelation, the second revelation is suppose to agree in it's teachings with that of the first revelation.  Progressive revelation means additional information revealed and not contradicting information. So, if the BoM (second revelation) contradict the Bible (first revelation), it's the BoM that is in trouble! Remember this principle as you are reading this booklet.  We will use this principle to refute 1Nephi and the BoM.

 

Which Location?
Back to Problems in 1Nephi
If some don't believe that the Bible according to Mormonism is a divine revelation, one just needs to look at the footnotes in the BoM.  Bible verses appear everywhere! One such footnotes is for 1Nephi 8:9-10.  In these 1Nephi verses, it describes a place that is footnoted supposedly to be the same place as the Bible's description in Matt. 13:38, Gen. 2:9 & Rev. 2:7.  It's interesting to note that, in the vain attempt of the LDS to make Mormonism appear "Christian", errors appear.  The applied verse of Matt. 13:38 is  actually describing a different place than Gen. 2:9 or Rev. 2:7! Matt. 13:38 has the world as it's location, while the two other verses describes the garden of paradise.  Though such mistake doesn't put LDS in total jeopardy, it does raise concern about possible verse abuse of the Bible...

 

Filthiness is Not Clear
Back to Problems in 1Nephi
But then the problem with the place described in 1Nephi as some kind of garden of paradise does not just end there.  Picking up the vision in 1Nephi 15:27, Nephi said, "the water which my father saw was filthiness...” Since there are footnotes trying to establish this river as being in the garden of paradise as that of the Bible's, we would expect it to have the same and not opposite description of the same place.  How could the water in 1Nephi be filthy then, when in the Bible at Rev. 22:1 it describes the river as clear?!

 

Saved Forever, Not Temporary
Back to Problems in 1Nephi
Continuing with the issue of 1Nephi's "garden of paradise", it's realized that the fruits on the tree are the fruit of eternal life (cf. Gen.3:22;Rev. 2:7 in the Bible and intro to 1Nephi Chapter 8 in the BoM). Only those who were saved were allowed to eat this fruit.  Yet, in 1Nephi, unsaved people ate the fruit of life, and were no longer saved, but fell away!  Christianity teaches once saved, always saved, but not 1Nephi.  Because there's a difference between the two revelations, Mormonism is the one in trouble due to the principle of progressive revelation.

 

Lord's True Gospel
Back to Problems in 1Nephi
Concerning the Lamb's seed, 1Nephi13:36 states, "in them shall be written my gospel, saith the Lamb, and my rock and my salvation."  The Bible also states that if anyone preaches another gospel, it isn't really any gospel at all (cf. Gal.1:6-7).  Does the BoM have the right gospel?  Their gospel is a gospel of works AND grace (cf. 2Nephi 25:23)  The Biblical gospel is one of grace alone (cf. Eph 2:8-9).  The LDS gospel is thus, a false gospel.  It fails to recognize grace alone for man's redemption from sin.  Works come as a fruit of grace (cf. Eph. 2:10), not a co-factor with grace.  We must thus come to God's grace alone, through faith alone in Christ alone.

 

Disarming the Counter-Attack
Back to Problems in 1Nephi
It happens often that an attack upon the Bible is made around this point.  "The Bible is accurate only as it is translated correctly" the LDS would charge.  Since the Bible is used to undermine the BoM, an attack on the Bible seems tempting.  It seems theoretical that in attacking the Bible  as inaccurate from the original manuscripts, the BoM is spared.  But we must realized that the Bible has one of the most reliable and accurate ancient manuscripts in history, which gave us many manuscripts in the original language for us to translate.  Many scholars in this field, whether Christians or not, would agree that the Bible is translated correctly.  There is original language Bible text to check verses that might not make much sense in English.  But the real issue here is actually whether the Bible is considered inspired in the views of the LDS and the BoM.  Since there are Bible verses in the footnotes of the BoM concerning truths in terms of God, doctrines and history, this legitimizes the Bible  enough as authoritative.  Thus a Biblical refutation of 1Nephi is indeed, very powerful in critiquing the BoM.

 

Engraved in Brass or Stone?
Back to Problems in 1Nephi
1Nephi 4:16 states, "And I also knew that the law was engraven upon the plates of brass."  The BoM gives the impression that the law mentioned in this verse is the law of the Bible since the footnote linked the law to Joshua 1:8, which referred to the Book of the Law (the Torah).  Other verses from 1Nephi also mentioned the Law as engraved in brass (1Nephi 4:24, 5:10-11,etc).  But here's another problem in 1Nephi with the Bible; turning to the Bible in 2Cor. 3:7, it states concerning the Law, or "the ministry that brought death", as being "engraved in letters on stone"!(italics are the author)  Hence, another difficulty with the BoM.
 
Prophecy Unfulfilled
Back to Problems in 1Nephi
1Nephi 5:18 prophesied (cf. 1Nephi 5:17) "that these plates of brass should go forth unto all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people who were of his seed."  However, this prophecy would never be fulfilled since these plates no longer exist!  The Bible mentions that presumptuous predictions that failed to be fulfilled come from man, not God!  Thus, 1Nephi is a product of man's imagination.  Of course, some would say that 1Nephi 5:17 refers to the BoM going out to all the nations today.  But there's still one more prophetic problem in 1Nephi.

 

A False Prophet
Back to Problems in 1Nephi
If we look at 1Nephi 5:19, Lehi (cf. 5:16-17) prophesied and "said that these plates of brass should never perish" and "neither should they be dimmed any more by time."  The brass plates no longer exist though!  We find Lehi prophecy unfulfilled.  The Bible says that "if what a prophet proclaims in the name of the LORD does not take place or come true, that is a message the LORD has not spoken.  That prophet has spoken presumptuously.  Do not be afraid of him." (Deut. 18:22)  Since Lehi was a false prophet, we must reject him, and since he was the prophet that begins everything in 1Nephi, we must also reject 1Nephi and consequently, the BoM too.

 

Hell Yes, Hell No
Back to Problems in 1Nephi
Not only does the LDS teachings have a problem with the Bible, but it's own BoM as well!  LDS missionaries sometimes teach that there is no hell.  Strangely, in 1Nephi 12:16 an angel interpreted a vision of the depths of a river as "the depths of hell".  Hell here, isn't a symbolism since it was an interpretation of a symbolic vision.  In addition, 1Nephi described hell as "hath no end" (1Nephi 14:3) and awful (15:35).

 

Water Baptism
Back to Problems in 1Nephi
1Nephi 20:1 mentions "the water of baptism".  It's interesting to note that baptism didn't exist between 588 through 570 BC, when this verse was written in!  Supposedly, 1Nephi 20 is the BoM version of Isaiah 48.  There is not mention of water baptism in it whatsoever.

 

Compass
Back to Problems in 1Nephi
1Nephi 16:10 describes "a round ball of curious workmanship" which is footnoted as being the same object referred to in 1Nephi16:16 and another part of the BoM, Alma 37:38.  Alma 37:38 mentions that this ball is called Liahona, or interpreted as compass.  In addition, 1Nephi 18:12 and 18:21 mentioned about this compass.  But compass weren't in existence yet!  Compass was invented in the 1000 AD.  Yet, these events in 1Nephi took place over 1, 500 years before!  For some reason unknown to the author, the BoM footnoted a verse in the Bible to support this Liahona object at Exodus 13:21.  Exodus 13:21 states, "By day the LORD went ahead of them in a pillar of cloud to guide them on their way and by night in a pillar offer to give them light, so that they could travel by day or night."  Nowhere is there a description of anything similar to a "two spindles" inside a ball, or namely, a compass!  Another thing that usually raises up with LDS defenders is the fact that the King James Version has the word "compass".  In context, this doesn't present us any problems since the word "compass" is used to describe a turning around direction.  Note: In Acts 28:13, the "fetched a compass" translated from the greek means to turn around, not to fetch a round metal ball object.  This author had the opportunity to look up this verse in a Greek interlinear translation to confirm this.

 

The Steel Connection
Back to Problems in 1Nephi

If we turn to 1Nephi16:18, we find Nephi in a situation in which he has to kill a man name

Laban, who had stolen his family's property.  1Nephi 4:9 records Nephi stating, "And I beheld his sword, and I drew it forth from the sheath thereof; and the hilt thereof was of pure gold, and the workmanship thereof was exceedingly fine, and I saw that the blade thereof was of the most precious steel."  Steel is also mentioned in 1Nephi 16:18.  These passages all took place between 600-592 B.C, as the BoM state.  But steel as we know it ("exceedingly fine" workmanship), wasn't invented until the mid-1800s!  Is the BoM then, a product of modern myth?

 

Where Was Jesus Born?
Back to Problems in 1Nephi

Another reason why we should reject the BoM is because of another contradicting problem with the first revelation (the Bible).  In Alma 7:10 it states, "And behold, he shall be born of Mary, at Jerusalem, which is the land of our forefathers, she being a virgin, a precious and chosen vessel..." Whereas the BoM teaches that Jesus was born at Jerusalem, the Bible teaches that Jesus is born at Bethlehem.  Matthew 2:4-5 states,"When he had called together all the people's chief  priests and teachers of the law, he asked them where the Christ was to be born.  'In Bethlehem in Judea,' they replied, 'for this is what the prophet has written'.

Conclusion

After a critique of the first book appearing in the Book of Mormon, the book of 1Nephi, we have to reject it upon these grounds:

  1. It contradicts the Bible, and since the Bible is the first revelation, 1Nephi is the one in trouble due to principle of progressive revelation.

  2. Two prophecy unfulfilled made by a major prophet in 1Nephi.

  3. It does not represent the true teachings and doctrines of the Bible nor the LDS itself!

  4. The mentioning of things that didn't exist until far beyond it's time.

What then, shall we do now?  We must reject the Book of 1st Nephi.  And since 1st Nephi lay the foundation for the rest of the Book of Mormon, the Book of Mormon must be rejected also.  Thus, the LDS system must be abandoned altogether.  Repent, and come to the true Jesus Christ as revealed in His Holy Word, the Holy Bible.  Hold onto His Word as the standard of truth.  Confess your sins to Him, and you shall be saved...He is waiting for you.

"Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest in your souls."-Matthew 11:29

COMPASS TOWARD TRUTH

(A personal heart to heart message from the writer)

                It might sound very hard to believe, but I tried so hard to write this as inoffensive to the individuals as much as possible.  It's my prayer that those who read this would know my heart and more importantly, the truth.  I didn't write this booklet just to wreck havoc and cause pain.  No.  I wrote this, believe it or not, out of love that those who are in the LDS would have the opportunity to come to the truth and be saved!

                When I started reading and critiquing 1Nephi, I saw a theme repeated throughout it- there was much message of repentance, and coming to God.  Hopefully, through this booklet, God would use this somewhat as a "compass" to lead many to repentance and to a saving knowledge of God.  So, as I write this from my heart to yours, I want to introduce you to someone you might have heard of before: Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior.

                Because of the fact that men are sinners, we are without any hope of true life whatsoever.  The evils of man and it's grotesque sins can be seen in the last century alone-the world wars, terrorism, genocides, rising crimes, etc.  Our transgression separated us from the righteous God who created us-hence, in our sins, we have become orphans.  His righteousness presented a situation that He would not be able to tolerate sin forever-for ultimately, there would be justice and judgment on us.  But God, in His love, and His great wisdom had a plan to save us.  Jesus Christ, the second person of the Godhead, came down two thousand years ago, and died on the cross for us.  He died on the cross, so that the ultimate punishment would fall on Him, rather than on us.  His death paved a way to come to the true God, with the barriers of sins removed.

                Serving as a compass towards truth, I would want to point to what Jesus said the night before He died, "I am way and the truth and the life.  No one comes to the Father except through me." (John14:6)  As a compass towards truth, I testify, and the Father through His Word prophetically  testify along with Jesus Christ own death and resurrection as a testimony that Jesus Christ is the WAY to God and salvation, and He is the TRUTH that sets us free and be accepted, and the LIFE to live for, for all eternally!

                I recognize that the actual decision in coming to accepting Jesus Christ as your personal Lord and Savior would be difficult.  That is why I'm giving my  e-mail(crazycyf@hotmail.com), my AIM screen name(Pulpitpastor) and my website (angelfire.com/rock2/team) to help any way I can, be it questions, emotional support, prayers or the desire to accept Him, but don't know how.

                May God bless all of you.  If you could, xerox this booklet and distribute it on, and do so with gentleness and respect.  That would be greatly appreciated.  If possible, e-mail me to let me know about it.

"For God so love the world that he gave his one and only son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have everlasting life."-John3:16

--JIMMY LI

[Last edited December 18, 2001]