Here is a quick synopsis of my current circumstances....
Due to the advance on me of the seasonal and holiday changes one must perform on one's web site I have been absorbed much in the preparations and updating of this site.
Due to continued Hacker interference on my site and at the terminals I use at the library I have had delay after delay affecting my production and communications.
While talking about communications....I just discovered last week that the carrier with whom I have had my phone account in New York City suddenly and without notice cut off my service. They have replied only to say in essence that if I want it back I will have to pay their premium service fee each month. They have said that if I want to have free service I will have to reapply for a new number. While having my account since Tue, 9 May 2000 15:10:22 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) I am floored by their sudden, terse and inhospitable conduct. I have not yet received a reply to my e-mail that requested supervisory intervention. I have informed them that I have Federal options I can pursue via an e-mail sent this morning to the prior account representative and also administrative supervision.
Now for the kicker....As of Friday, May 24, 2003 I was notified by a friend with whom I had stored my property that he was being forced to abandon his apartment and thus I would have to remove my property. I believe he was under duress and did not approve of the whole situation himself.
I was approached in the morning at a restaurant I frequent and asked for my set of the keys. I gave them to him and asked him to get some cut as he had no access to his. He indicated that the removal of my property was not for a while and looking at the calendar one would think that exit would not have to be made for at least a week in the least. He later returned with my set of keys and gave them to me as he had some backup keys in the apartment. I asked him to see if he has any friends who could give me any options for storage. He said his parents or a friend of his in Aurora were possibilities but he would check on them.
At around 5:50 AM Saturday he visited me at my protest bench site and woke me up notifying me that I would have to now have my property removed by late Sunday night. I asked how the options with his parents and friend panned out and he said that both were not possible.
I informed him that I could not "pull rabbits out of the hat" but that I would contact my options and try to do my best.
On Saturday around 1 PM I was approached by my friend and his apparently older brother closer to my age. I was introduced and suddenly "pounced" upon with a demand for the keys to the apartment. I was told that I had to be out in two hours and that he had a van ready to move my property to put it wherever I wanted to take it. I responded saying that I had no place to take it as of yet and was just in progress to get out e-mails so to find a place to relocate my property. I said that the short notice is improper. I believe I said that the very least should have been a week if hospitable. I believe that thirty days notice would be the legal context since the apartment was rented on that basis and I was there more than a month.
This would be the third move and sudden and terse verbal notices since March 7, 2003. I will explain those incidents later as time permits.
In any event the brother demanded the keys reinforcing the two hour demand and I refused him the keys. He said he would call the police and I responded telling him to do so. I informed him that if anything happened to my property I would be in court on Monday to obtain an injunction. I have held on that move until input from the police of which I am preparing a detailed contextual report intended to be submitted this afternoon or evening.
I informed him additionally that I have Federal papers in my property and if anything happened to them I would "get him for obstruction of justice". I said that I have already taken Judge Moy down to Federal court and in that context they are peons. I left it at that and we parted.
I have since not been approached. They know where I "hide out". I sure hope that they have not done anything stupid or invaded my privacy.
I continue to wait for response from my contacts for storage relocation while I prepare my report and complaint to the police.
On the "MVVSL&F" front she continues to avoid contact with me to set things straight. She continues her deafening silence. She has not withdrawn her charges.
I continue to prepare for a July 9, 2003 trial date with the anticipation of pretrial motions pending to remove this case from Dupage County. In the meantime I am attempting to prepare and serve additional subpoenas to the appropriate parties at the church so to secure contextual information in this case and to obtain the identities of witnesses to the "altercation" that provoked the false disorderly conduct charges of which I am charged.
That is it for now. I am off to finish my police report.
Your continued prayers and behind the scenes help are especially appreciated in these emergency times! Thank you!
More on these issues as time and circumstances permit!!!
-------------------
E-mail messages being sent out are not getting to their destinations. No e-mail failure notices are coming back. Some strategic e-mails seem to just evaporate on the Internet!
My store provider has not responded to e-mails sent on May 16, 2003 requesting information as to why I cannot access my account for earnings information and confirmation as well as the fact that it appears that my account may have just disappeared yet I continue to receive their database access as you see in my stores!
Another e-mail carrier has failed to respond to e-mails sent to the via their internal web page mail system. I have sent copies of those inquiries via generic e-mail addresses so to snag another avenue of communication.
A lot of negative things "happening" or being discovered in a short period of time!
I continue to look for alternative storage locations preferably central to the Naperville downtown area! The current demand to relocate has been mitigated until June 1 as it stands at this time. Certainly no time to lose to find solutions! Anyone with an offer or knowlege of secure alternative storage locations please e-mail me ASAP!!! Gratis or barter arrangements are requested. Very critical files and property necessary for litigation and business survival are at stake. There are about 20 parcels comprising about four average sized boxes and the rest book bags, duffel bags and store bags. The space needed consumes about a third of a standard sliding door walk-in closet in width and depth and half in height.
Donations are down folks. Your continued support especially in light of my pending defense litigation is and will be greatly appreciated! Please keep in mind that I have to do my own litigation, ligigation research and support which is very time consuming. Please keep in mind that even with pauperous filing priveleges preparation is still demanding on out of pocket expenses with copy work and supplies and transportation costs needed.
Food supplies are being supplimented with "pantry" sources but storage of those temporary items is currently proving to be a problem with the recent developments this last weekend!
Continued prayers especially in light of these very strange, bizarre and untimely circumstances is appreciated!
Of course this request is being read ONLY by my FRIENDS right???!!! The others really don't want to get caught up in the web of the Feds now do they!!!
Thanks,
Scott Huber
-------------------
This message was sent with High importance.
Friends,
Here is the latest. I am still in need of and looking for storage.
On Wednesday My storage friend just happened to stop into Starbucks where I have been “hanging out” of late. He had a vision problem since is normal glasses broke and he is using some old ones that distort his vision. He came into the store and apparently did not see me. He is not all there sometimes with the pressure his family is exerting on him.
He left the store without acknowledging me and so I went out in front and tapped him on the shoulder and got his attention at which time he at least said he did not see me.
He came back in and sat down with me and we talked. I told him I sensed that when he came with his brother in the lobby last Saturday that he was embarrassed by his brother’s conduct and he immediately and emphatically assented and agreed with my observations.
He said his brother should not have put me in a bind like that.
My storage friend, I have noticed, when in a bind and perhaps when not in a bind, tries to please everyone, in doing so he will stretch the truth or misrepresent something in the panic or good will. He wants to please and he sensed that when things go wrong because of his efforts he will immediately to me say “you don’t have to be my friend anymore”. He will repeat that several times on occasion as he sensed displeasure or rejection.
I don’t think he is deliberately devious but of the attitude of pleasing and he fudges to do it and also to avoid the flack from his family who scare the crap out of him in my opinion.
I asked him if his family is driving him to drink and he emphatically assented and said yes.
So after the chit chat we got down to “brass tacks” and said that I could go to the apartment. I said that I did not want to go there fearing criminal trespass charges from his family unless I had his permission in writing. He said no problemo. He said he would sign anything…in essence “bring it on”. So I went to the library and later we got together and he and I both signed a notice agreement that in essence said that I could access and use the facilities at his address thru June 1, 2003.
We went out there Wednesday afternoon and I got some of my food and pigged out and checked my property. He then had to leave and I went and took a shower and left later that evening. I had no confrontation with his family at all as they did not show up.
I went to talk with a friend at his store and related the events and showed him the document and he agreed at least it should mitigate any criminal trespass charges.
Now yesterday My storage friend met me unexpectedly at the library as he originally said he would see me on Friday not Thursday but that is My storage friend and his circumstances change like mine and he has no way to notify me prior so I roll with the flow with him just as I do with you and everything else.
My storage friend wanted to go out to the apartment. He apparently gave his keys to his brother thinking he would not need to go there anymore or his brother demanded them of him. I don’t know for sure which is the case but it seems to me that if he is paying the rent on the place he has legal rights to enter it. He told me that the rent comes out of his disability check. He told me his father manages that check. I do believe that if he was to use the apartment then his name would have to appear on the lease at the very least jointly with his parents.
In any event he left saying he would meet me there later. I told him I had to finish my work and I would be out as soon as possible. I left here at the library at about 4:00 PM and got there about 4:20 PM. As I was arriving in the parking lot I saw an older lady dragging a vacuum cleaner into the hallway from the driveway. I was not sure who it was but soon found out as I watched her and I hoped that she was not going into My storage friends apartment but unfortunately she did.
I immediately surmised that she was his mother. I did not see My storage friend anywhere and I figure he saw his parents arrive and disappeared. I walked into the apartment and was greeted by My storage friend’s mother extremely politely and she offered her hand. I greeted her and acknowledged her husband. They are in their 70s I would say. We initially had some friendly exchanges but the “honeymoon” was over in about two minutes. She laid into me like she owned the place. She talked as if she was the owner of the building. I had to drill them to make sure that I understood them on that. I finally got a straight answer saying that they owned the lease on the apartment.
I told the both of them that My storage friend and I have a written and signed agreement that I could access and use the facilities through June 1st and that I understood that I could use their family garage as a temporary storage until I could find other arrangements. She drilled me almost twenty times throughout the conversations as if I was not comprehending or something that I have to be out by June 1st. She tried to say I had to be out by or in essence on June first meaning turning over the keys first thing that day. I said that was not the agreement.
They then tried to assert that I was taking advantage of My storage friend. They played up his disability "card" and My storage friend’s father suggested and drilled me on the thought that I was impinging on My storage friend. I said not at all. I said this was an agreement between friends. I said that I had known My storage friend since 1999 and met him at the park as he was in liaison with the park police in some shape or form. ( I was leery of him that first year as to what he was up to knowing that certain of the park police were "laying" for me as I have related to you prior.)
I informed My storage friend’s folks that I never sought out My storage friend’s friendship but he sought out mine and I accommodated him. I related I would meet him at Burger King and lend him some cash for drinks although I did not say for what.
I acknowledged to them that I was aware of his drinking or alcohol problem and tried to discourage his drinking. I did relate the incident where I gave him a $5 bill to get change on his bike as I needed it for the washer / dryer at the apartment building. He came back with the change and something extra: a can of MGD beer. He sipped it in my presence but in no way was inebriated or drunk. I told them that I watched what I gave him from then on so to prevent his misuse of what I would give him.
They then worked on me saying that he is disabled. I said I was aware he had a disability but did not know specifically what it was: whether it was physical or other. They said that he has a mental disability…THEY SAY….I feel that My storage friend is a very intelligent and cognizant person. He is not a dummy. He knows when he is being cheated or fooled. I have joked with him and he follows me like a book. He LOVES my humor!!! 99% of the time he is right on the button with it and the will let me know explicitly ….that was a good one Huber or something like that and he will also let me know when it is baaad but laughs because he knows where I was going with it!!!
My storage friend’s mother got in my face literally several times. She is a firecracker and that is not talking about her figure!!! It got out of hand and I then had no choice but to let them know exactly where I was coming from and the spirit I was trying to conduct myself with them and thus said “I challenge you in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit and through Christ’s Blood”. My storage friend is Roman Catholic even if not necessarily a dedicated one so I figured that his parents most likely were also. She tried to blow me off and say in essence that I was pulling the religious stuff but I succinctly impressed them that I was "dead" serious. I pointed out that she was so polite and friendly when she first introduced her self and her reply was in essence “wasn’t that nice”! She then went back to war with me. You know Friends, the type husbands often call the “War Department”!
I got them, especially her, to cool her jets and suggested she do that as she was making a mountain out of nothing. I impressed on them that I was a human and that I could not pull rabbits out of the hats and that I was not yet a Moses parting the sea with a scepter. (I don't think Charlton Heston would want the competition anyway!!!)
I informed them that I was trying to work with them on this project realizing that the lease was up on June 1st. I said work with me on this. I related what happened with My storage friend on last Friday when he met me at Starbucks with the request for the keys leaving me with the impression that I had some time, at least through June 1st. I related that I was then approached by My storage friend on Saturday morning around 5:50 AM and that the window was reduced to my being out by late Sunday night. I related that I told My storage friend I would see what I could do. I related that My storage friend had suggested that My storage friend’s father might let me use their garage temporarily, (I may have mentioned the offer of his girl friend’s but am not sure). I related that suddenly My storage friend and his brother approached me Saturday afternoon in the library lobby demanding the keys with a two hour notice to be out of the apartment. I indicated he said he had a van to take my property wherever I wanted. I told them that I had no place to take it and that the imposition was totally unreasonable.
My storage friend’s mother did not like my knowledge on the subject as she was cleaning around listening partially and had a mind set that I was being contentious with her and responded to me in that way. I let her know that she was driving her son to drink. She took offense and wanted my stuff out immediately. This happened a couple of times during the confrontation on various points I made. I knew she could not do that and she knew that also and did not force the issue. Her husband was analyzing me in the mean time. He was more level headed. He never yelled but would use incisive comments and questions.
Among his questions were - you knew My storage friend was disabled and I replied that I did not know in what way. He continued to pursue the idea that I was taking advantage of a mentally disabled person. I said My storage friend is a 40 year old man who makes his own decisions and made a legal agreement with me. I said I never got an inkling that he was mentally deficient in a way that would suggest that he could not carry on his own affairs and legal agreements. They did not argue with me on that but still made me to feel I took advantage of My storage friend. I don’t know why the My storage friend’s folks feel that way but they do and they refuse to analyze all the contextual facts it does appear.
In any event they did not contest the agreement any further. I informed My storage friend’s father I gave My storage friend an extra copy of the agreement for him explicitly prior. I implied by this I was not pulling any “fast ones” or anything of the sort. They finally went along with the agreement with the allowance of my using their garage as a temporary storage “up in the air”. My storage friend’s mother was resistive and immediately questioning how long is temporary. I replied saying that I might need it until I could find other help. She moaned and groaned and did not agree on that but My storage friend’s father was listening.
Several times they tried and did assert that I was taking up their time and they had things to do. I said I came out here to get some things. It appears to me that I have been stereotyped by them by someone else who has filled their ear about me. He claims that he did not know who I was when he walked in that one Tuesday night on or about April 29, 2003. I let him know he definitely unsettled me when he suddenly came in and I did not know who he was as he did not introduce himself and I surmised that he must be My storage friend’s father. He SAID that he did not know who I was. I said I introduced myself and told him what My storage friend had arranged with me.
I asserted back that I also have obligations and a schedule and things to do. I reasserted all I wanted to do was pick some things up and leave and got engaged with the conversation with them unexpectedly. My storage friend’s mother, throughout the conversation, was "moaning and groaning" while she was cleaning often running the vacuum cleaner which caused communications difficulties especially with My storage friend’s father and could be heard saying I was taking up an hour of their time and then later it was two hours of their time and I set the record straight about that saying that I left the library at around 4 PM and it takes me usually 15 minutes to get to the apartment. I said that would put me there at around 4:15 – 4:20 PM. I said it is now 4:52 PM and that is not two hours time it is more like 30 to 35 minutes. She said you have to be out on June first and intensely repeated that in an aggravated fashion and I repeated that now she had impressed that on me "20" times and I heard her the first time. I impressed them that I was 52 years old not some irresponsible kid in his teens.
My storage friend’s father commented that everyone has in essence to be responsible and follow the rules and deadlines and I said yes but government in this community and county don’t like they should.
I referenced my comments to my storage friend's brother about taking Judge Moy to Federal court and my “tango” with Francis Cuneo and that the politicos were beating me up and that is why I am in the state of affairs that I am. I related that I remember when Naperville was a quaint town of 35 thousand back in the late ‘70s as I used to "patrol" through Naperville on my way to Montgomery where I had an assignment as a security officer. I said that now it has been overtaken buy the privileged that "stick their thumbs up their noses and waive their fingers" and I demonstrated that gesture while saying it. I said they believe that they don’t have to follow the rules and people like me do and get stepped on because we are not one of them and thus I am fighting them and sit on my bench in Naperville to protest the abuse.
I told them that if they needed to get a hold of me that My storage friend knew where I was at. My storage friend’s mother jumped on me saying in essence that that does not help. I had to impress them that I was trying to be cooperative. They apparently did not want to rely on My storage friend. I realized that it was just another road block to communication so I told them that I could be usually found at the library, the bench,a fast food place or a copy shop noting the specific places..
We wrapped it up shortly after that and I left them with the understanding that I intended to work amicably with them on the June 1st deadline and their helping me with the temporary use of their garage to take the pressure off the impending deadline would be appreciated if I can’t get some other arrangements by then. I said that as the saying goes “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure! I told them I was networking through my friends, the church and where ever I could but it takes time to find people.
I told them that I had to get going too as I had choir practice to get to and I had seven miles to bike ahead of me. I told them that they expect me to be there on time!
I got my things that I needed and left.
So I am trying to find storage for a partial closet full of things. I have about 20 parcels. Four boxes and some book bags, duffel bags and bags Friends. Again as before any help or leads would be appreciated.
Thanks Friends.
Scott
A NEW QUOTE FOR MY QUOTES LIST ON PQ's MAIN PAGE:
"You know, people seldom go to the trouble of scratching the surface of things to find the inner truth."
- James Stewart as Alfred Kralik in THE SHOP AROUND THE CORNER (1940) From www.reelclassics.com
-------------------
No alternative storage options presented themselves as of 11:59 AM Sunday night thus I was forced to return my "vehicle" with my goods to the train station stall I have had them parked at this last year prior.
No static from Francis Cuneo the city prosecutor or the Naperville police occurred until approximately 8:20 AM this morning when I was rudely approached by, yes, Officer McGrath!!! He abruptly said to me, paraphrased, 'so you are up to your old games again' and I said what games? He said if your property is not out of here by tomorrow it is his! He said the spot I have it parked is not a storage! I said that it is not. I said it is a four wheeled vehicle parked like other vehicles. He repeated his demand / warning and I said you touch my property and we will be in federal court.
Officer McGrath is autocratic and does not believe that he has to follow the rules. He is clearly discriminating against my vehicle as opposed to other styles of vehicles. Vehicles are often parked for months without moving. My vehicle deserves the same consideration minimally!
My vehicle has not been left abandoned and is checked by me or one of my many agents frequently each 24 hour period as is required for vehicles or property located in the vicinity of the train station as per village ordinance. There has been no mention of "homeland security" issues. If it was a "homeland security" issue then all the bike boxes, newspaper boxes, motorcycles, trash barrels, deposit boxes, dumpsters, canteen trucks, parked vehicles, vehicular traffic including buses would equally have to be moved at least a block from the train station facilities and all "fat" people and people with "packages" would have to be searched for explosives. That is the issue here. Equal enforcement and protection of the law!!!
On March 19 at some time after approximately 8:30 AM my vehicle was stolen by order of Francis Cuneo and taken to the police station where it still sits with my property. Also taken without any legitimacy of a "homeland security" issue was my bicycle. There is no way it could have been construed a bomb or security risk! So you see the autocratic rule of Francis Cuneo and his legmen don't believe we all deserve and are guaranteed equal protection under the law.
It appears that they will again attempt this kind of insurrection again tomorrow. However, I will be sending shortly detailed letters to Mayor George Pradel and Chief David Dial in complaint and request for their intercession. The mayor has been sent two prior e-mail letters detailing context on the property issues and the causation of same. He apparently pulled the plug on Officer McGrath’s first threats back in October of 2002. He did not respond in writing to that e-mail even in acknowledgement of receipt.
Again around march 7, 2003 Officer McGrath threatened removal by March 12 and on March 12 I sent the mayor another e-mail for assistance again detailing the circumstances. I received no acknowledgement of receipt or answer this time either. On March 19 the property was stolen by Francis Cuneo's order by his legmen and the stolen property is in the police station as I was later informed by Officer McGrath. NOTE ALSO MY PROPERTY WAS TAKEN THE DAY BEFORE I WAS TO APPEAR IN COURT! CERTAINLY A DELIBERATE DISRUPTION TO MY COURT ACTIVITY AND AN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!!!
Anyone who can reinforce my rights in this circumstance and pick up a phone or e-mail to the mayor and the police chief will be greatly appreciated. Maybe they will acknowledge your inquiry and appeal!!!
I, at this time have no alternative but to park my property at this public station.
Please note that the M.O. is the same for my storage friend's father and Officer McGrath. They both trumpt up relatively "immediate" or short term response times to respond and comply within. Both are unfair, improper and violate normal time tested policy and procedure at the very least. These people expect me to literally pull "rabbits" out of hats I don't even possess "instantly”!!!
It is interesting to note that my storage friend's lease was not up on June 1, 2003 but as confirmed by him after my move his parents are breaking an apparent year lease and seeking another party to take up the balance. I was deliberately misled by my storage friend’s parents about that "little" detail.
Considering that I kept that apartment immaculate, as witnessed by my storage friend, it is sad that people must be so selfish to not extend to those less fortunate than themselves options that they know would be greatly appreciated knowing that if given proper or reasonable notice I could have been out for any new tenant. The additional time and use of facilities would have been greatly appreciated and it really was costing them nothing to help me!
As usual your prayers are greatly appreciated.
On another front.......
I was put through the "hoops" again at the Circuit Clerk's office even by the Chief Clerk himself, Joel A. Kagann. I was required to fill out the subpoenas at the counter. I had prior been able to secure sealed subpoenas Pro Se with no restrictions. Now when the chips are down and I need the flexibility to issue subpoenas on the "fly" I am being interfered with by the Clerk.
The Clerk said, while entertaining me in his personal office, that there would be no way to sanction Pro Se abuse where with the numbered attorney version of the form they can sanction an attorney by license suspension. I informed the Clerk that the courts also can sanction the Pro Ses also and effectively. He seems to think that because Pro Ses don't have a bar license we can't be penalized!!!
I asked him to show me the policy, rule or law requiring him to make me fill out each subpoena prior to him sealing it and he refused. He in essence said I am the Clerk and I decide what I will seal or not seal in my jurisdiction irrespective of what other similarly empowered jurisdictions enact.
It was clear to me that the Circuit Clerk wanted to know who I was subpoenaing and what specifically I was asking to be subpoenaed! Yes they were being nosy and for some reason seemed to need to know my moves in advance!!! When I entered the information on the subpoena that I was seeking the Clerk scoffed saying that the priests won't remember those details.
The kicker was that when I complied I was harraganged for taking too long to fill out the forms. I had ten subpoenas that I wanted to seal but was forced to prepare only three. The clerk was intense about telling me how to fill out the form and when I tried to tell him I was familiar with the process he over-talked me. This is not the first time this type scenario has occurred. There is clearly a bias to my use of the Circuit Clerk's office for normal and routine requests.
When I tried to point out problems with the way the Clerk was instructing me, one of his subordinates unknown to me called for Sheriff assistance.
I knew the officer that appeared and asked him what the special occasion was. He said he did not know but he was trying to find out. He instructed me to do as I was told by the clerk. The only problem with that is that if I had followed what the Clerk insisted upon I would have the priests attending a hearing and my intent was only to obtain records from them and that they should produce. I got that changed delicately.
The Clerk said that the subpoenaed parties may contest. I said let them. We can battle it out in court. I said I will just get a continuance for trial. The Clerk, Joel Kagann, said that I won't get a continuance. Interesting how the Clerk knows Judge Dockery's mind so well isn't it!
Needless to say motions will be filed before the trial date of July 9, 2003 including the one for change of venue out of Dupage County if I am not prevented. If necessary motions will be filed also to get the priests to be compelled to produce!
The head priest and two of his subordinates were given subpoenas this morning via the head priest at approximately 10:35 AM. There was some resistance and the head priest said he would discuss the subpoenas with their attorney. I said I have no problem with that.
I informed the priest that these were merely information subpoenas. No hearing or appearance would be necessary. Only a demand to produce the names, addresses and phone numbers of the parishioners that were present at the July 5, 2002 Mass would be needed. He said that it would be hard to remember who was there and I responded saying that they were his "regulars" and that should not be too hard to determine. He said he can't give out that information. I said in a court forum demand scenario it is proper!
Folks, the reason I had to subpoena these records is because the priests have been blowing off my "civilian requests" and it was necessary to show them that I mean business! If they fight release of this information they will just make this a long and drawn out and expensive affair especially for them and "MVVSF&L" with a possibility of obstruction of justice charges against them.
They know that there were others who saw the "altercation" for which I was charged and there has been no cooperation thus far to ferret out those witnesses that will show that I did not commit any disorderly conduct, prevent "MVVSF&L's" exit from the church narthex nor talk to her without her first talking to me. There was no violation of the law on my part and there was on theirs in a number of ways especially when they filed a false and malicious complaint against me. It appears at this time that the priests are aiding and abetting " MVVSF&L’s" and her girlfriend's unlawful acts.
It is my belief that the property disputes in the last week and the threat for tomorrow and the like have been designed to empty my pocket book, and that has nearly been done, and in effect be the causation of a default judgment being obtained against me for the charges perpetrated against me illegally. So you see I am being interfered with by these various and sundry parties!
Again your prayers are appreciated. Donations will greatly help at this time as the move Sunday severely drained my resources and the current threat threatens to put me in the "basement" for good! Thank you!
Please read the articles prior dated for context on the above account!!!
Our last Choir performances of this season in the Classical and Contemporary Choirs are at the 8:30 AM and 10:00 AM Masses respectively this Sunday June 8, 2003. If you want to see us in action be there. We have some snappy tunes we are performing!!! An informal Summer Choir will start after June 8, 2003 thru the last week of August! If you like to sing be there!
Last but not least check out our new Floral Possibilities page. It is an attempt to offer you something in the floral market. Note that the supplies are out but there is an e-mail inquiry option to make specific requests for your orders on each selection. I think that this is better than seeing nothing more than a blank page as you will find in the "Flowers" and "Flowers Direct" selections the provider is officially NOT showing. The selections I am providing come from a non-published database they have utilized in the past. You can also access the selections via this site's main or first page by clicking on the flowers!
-------------------
*6-10
I went to the station this morning at about 6:30 AM where my property my vehicle was parked and it is GONE!
It is clear that Officer Donol McGrath jumped the "gun"! This theft was not, nor was the March 19th theft, an issue of an abandoned mysterious "package" left at the station vicinity. It was a well known party's property that was stolen! Officer McGrath did not even inquire as to what my plans were. He just jumped to conclusions!!!
Jumping to conclusions, assuming and presuming seems to be a real problem with the politicos in the Naperville / Lisle / Downers Grove areas among others these days. It can be construed as deliberate defamation! I believe it has been deliberate defamation! You remember what our High School and College teachers and professors said about the word ASSUME!!!
It is clear that this is an EGO trip authority control group issue NOT an issue of an offense or violation of law, ordinance, policy, aesthetics or submission to authority! It is a train station not a country club!!! It is clear in my experience not only in Naperville but also in this Dupage County that the law is frequently and perhaps dominantly enforced to enhance, EGO power structures than it is for the EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW FOR ALL CITIZENS NOT JUST THE "RICH AND FAMOUS"!!!
As the scripture in the Bible says...Children obey your parents in the Lord for this is right....but it also says on the other "scale"....Fathers provoke not your children unto wrath!!!! It is a two way street folks and some "FATHERS" are going to have be reckoned with by their "CHILDREN"!!!
Apparently Saturday a sign was freshly affixed to a nearby post saying in essence that permission must be obtained to leave property: THAT MEANS ALL PROPERTY FOLKS....MOTORCYCLES, BICYCLES WHAT EVER!
Isn't it clear that this sign is unenforceable? Isn't it clear that it was intended for only one person in reality? Isn't it that person that has been regularly and abusively denied equal rights under the law in this county? Isn't it that these denials have forced that person's presence with his vehicle at this very train station! Who is fooling who here folks? Clearly this is willful and wanton premeditated discriminatory conduct and enforcement of law, policy and will!!! IT IS NOT WHAT THE SPIRIT OF THE LAW INTENDED!!!
Not only that, more specifically, it also appears that this sudden threat of removal issued Friday at about 8:20 AM was designed to interfere with my attendance to church and more specifically Classical and Contemporary Choirs this morning in addition to my Lisle litigation in the "MVVSF&L" and Naperville malicious claims against me. THERE UNDOUBTEDLY IS AN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE ISSUE HERE FOLKS!!!
Fortunately I had some grubbies in my bag on my tote that trails my bike and I put them on and threw everything that I had extra into the washer at the laundromat this morning before church.
I was able to get to church just in the nick of time for the 8:30 Mass and Classical Choir. I missed the preludes and practice at 8:00 AM however.
One thing is for sure, that "the Evil one is roaming about seeking whom he may devour"!!!
I am pursuing several options in dealing with the theft of my property on March 19, 2003 and apparently Saturday, June 7, 2003 by the City of Naperville and more specifically Francis Cuneo the City Prosecutor who, as I understand and have been informed ordered the HIT!.
It was certainly unnecessary and certainly catered to the sheltered Prima Donna element often present at "Club Naperville Train Station". It was certainly discriminatory conduct on the part of the Naperville Police Department and the City of Naperville to say the least.
Chief David Dial has strangely taken a VERY LOW PROFILE in all of this going all the way back to the first theft by Harold King of Lemont and Rent-A-Space of Fox Valley back in 1999 thru present! He has delegated and allowed unconcerned and hostile subordinates to unprofessionally blow my legal and police enforcement interests off in a disinterested fashion and yet held me apparently to very legalistic and distorted interpretations when someone "bats and eye" against me as in the property issue of present! My circumstances have obviously been bizarre and mysterious not to mention emergency even as if a tornado hit! The sensitivity in such emergencies has not been equally extended!!! I certainly have not received equal protection of the law!!!
Keep in mind that the destructive forces that have come to bear on me have been systematically undermining me and destroying my business, my financial stature, litigation, investigations, records and computer and Internet databases of evidence and INVADING MY PRIVACY for the last almost thirty years with the last 13 years here in Naperville being some of the most devastating and criminal.!!! Some of these intrusions have been by law enforcement under false pretenses as has Naperville!!!! I have records on file with the Federal Courts showing this pattern of conduct! Something is wrong here!
IT CERTAINLY HAS BEEN BY THE GRACE OF GOD THAT I HAVE ENDURED AND SURVIVED AS WELL AS I HAVE THUS FAR!!!However this subterfuge I am enduring does not stop it just gets worse!!! These are people who know better that commit these crimes!!!
The Method of Operation, (MO), cover-up is to commit the crimes and then manipulate the facts against me so to make me look unaccomplished, unreliable, incompetent, irresponsible, immoral, derelict, street urchin, homeless, vagrant and a mooch with a police record. Yes a police record and financial circumstances that have been politically created so to sock it to me down the line in further malicious legal, criminal and social actions.
This they do instead of noting a long time accomplished extremely frugal entrepreneurial self starter businessman that I am in the current business more than twenty years who has WORKED extraordinarily hard and produced an excellent product and track record in the electronics service industry implementing strong Christian Faith and Love principles in his work and social ethic who is presently taking all the short cuts for cost cutting so to be able to fight the atrocities that have inundated him especially the last thirteen years here in Naperville! Somehow my attackers' characterizations just don't ring true do they? They love to take things out of context!!!
They also fail to note my high credibility with the courts with my near nine out of ten win track record. LOOK AT THE COURT RECORDS!!! LOOK AT THE PAPER TRAIL. LOOK FAST AS THEY ARE TRYING TO DESTROY THOSE RECORDS ALSO!!!
The City doesn't believe I have a right to park my vehicle and keep it attended to like the other people. It is clear that the City does not believe in fair notice and proper and timely notice. They like to make things police matters especially malicious complaints when they are at best civil issues if anything at all and name me the "assailant".
It is strange how the "machinery" works just the opposite, that is to say police matters are made civil matters or just plain "blown off" if I am the complainant and thus I don't get the same police protection of the law! All this is just a sham and cover-up to allow my destruction as noted above!!!
More on this down the road.
Reading the newspapers in just the last couple of months I noted that Mayor George Pradel was looking for a motto for the City of Naperville!
Put on your seat belt, "it’s the law", Mr. Mayor and try this suggestion on for size.....
"Naperville the Home of Perfunctory Love and Justice!" What do you think Officer Friendly?
Folks, I will keep you posted as best I can. You never know what the "Good Ole Boys" from Naperville are going to be up to!!!
One thing for sure I am doing the "football dance" just waiting!!!
As I said before "I have yet begun to fight"!!!
In God's strength I'm "tough as nails" Mr. Francis Cuneo! We render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's only up to the point where Caesar follows the rules!!!
After all, if Mr. Francis Cuneo's family member's life was being "flushed down the toilet" in a similar predicament this would not be happening to them. I don't think he would take a much different positioning that I am!!! I know he would not be as respectful and polite as I have been!!!
Let me make one fact very certain in the minds of especially my critics: NONE OF THE PROPERTY,(most of which was third party), THAT I HAVE BEEN DISPOSESSED OF CURRENTLY OR EVEN BACK IN 1999 HAS BEEN ABANDONED BY ME. IT WAS STOLEN AND I WANT IT BACK INTACT AND I WANT SECURE QUARTERS TO PUT IT IN AT THE OFFENDERS EXPENSE AT LEAST UNTIL MY CIRCUMSTANCES ARE RESTORED TO THE AESTHETIC STANDARDS MY "RICH" CRITICS EXPECT ME TO LIVE WITHIN WHICH IS APPARENTLY THE SAME AS THEY,(OR DO THEY?)!!!
-------------------
-------------------
These are Advance Sheets Folks! Note revisions appear after the asterisks "*" throughout the document. Please be sure to periodically review these update pages throughout The Porcupine Quills for Revisions and Additions!!!
-------------------
*** PLEASE NOTE: DUE TO PRINTER FORMATTING DIFFERENCES "CLICK" HERE FOR A VERSION TO HIGHLIGHT AND PRINT!
