Were the Albigenses Primitive 2x2's?

Introduction
Members of the 2x2s, especially workers, like to claim that their beliefs are "from the beginning"; however, the actual meaning of this statement is unacceptably vague. A common position is that the 2x2's are a remnant of the "true church" from Christ to apostolic times which remained in some fashion until becoming more prominent in the early 20th Century. Nathan Barker is one such person who favors this view, citing examples of very early groups of religious people as proof of the divine origins of the 2x2s. This article will deal specifically with the group known as the Albigenses, whom Barker asserts were 2x2 predecessors:
"In Languedoc and Provence in the South of France, there was a civilization in advance of that in other countries. The pretensions of the Roman church to rule been generally opposed and set aside there. The congregations of believers who met apart from the Catholic Church were numerous and increasing. They were often called Albigenses, a name taken from Albi, a district where there were many of them, but this name was never used by them, nor of them until a later period. They had intimate connections with the brethen---whether called Waldenses, Poor Men of Lyons, Bogomils, or otherwise---in the surrounding countries, where churches spread among the various people. 1206 A.D. at a conference of Montreal, the Albigenses made the following confession "That the Church of Rome was not the spouse of Christ, but the church of confusion, drunk with blood of martyrs. That the policy of the church of Rome was neither good, or holy, nor established by Jesus Christ." (Peter Allix, The ecclesiastic history of the ancient churches of Albigenses, 1821 edition first published in 1692)" (1)
Why Does It Matter?
In Matthew 16:18, Jesus promised Peter that the gates of hell would not prevail against His church, and He even promised that "I am with you always, even unto the end of the world" (Mt 28:20). In the original Greek text, the phrase is pasas tas hemeras, which means "all the days". So, since Jesus promised that His church would remain intact for all the days and therefore all generations, it becomes important to be able to establish a link from New Testament times to the present age. Otherwise, one is left in the untenable (and unbiblical) position of claiming that a total apostasy occurred, contrary to Christ's promise, until some alleged later time when the true gospel was "rediscovered".

Who Were the Albigenses?
In the early Middle Ages, a group developed and flourished in southern France near the town called Albi, which is how the name Albigenses was derived. They were also known as Cathars because their beliefs were a renewal of the Cathari - the name comes from the Greek katharos, meaning "pure". The label of Cathars was not unique to the Albigenses; it had been used as early as the 3rd Century to describe the Novatians, then the Manicheans, but it is usually applied to medieval dualistic sects. Interestingly, once the Albigensian theology is examined, it becomes clear that they were a grossly heretical sect who could actually be considered to even be non-Christian.

Albigensian Beliefs
The Albigensian/Cathar world view was dualistic, that is, they believed in a good deity and an evil deity. The evil deity is the one who produced the material world, and therefore all physical things were evil. Dominican scholar Bernard Gui wrote that they were guilty of:
"affirming that the creation of all visible and material things was not the work of God the Heavenly Father and the Lord Jesus Christ, but of the devil and Satan, the evil deity, whom you [Peter Auterius, and Albigense] call the God of this world, the Creator and Prince of this world" (2)
Pierre des Vaux de Cernay affirmed the Cathar belief in:
"two creators: viz., one of invisible things, whom they call the benevolent god, and another of visible things, whom they named the malevolent god. The New Testament they attributed to the benevolent god, but the Old Testament to the malevolent god, and rejected it altogether, except certain authorities which are inserted in the New Testament from the Old, which, out of reverence to the New Testament, they esteemed worthy of reception. . . They also call him [the Old Testament god] a homicide because he burned up Sodom and Gomorrah and destroyed the world by the waters of the deluge . . . They also affirmed that all the fathers of the Old Testament were damned, that John the Baptist was one of the greater demons." (3)
Because they believed all matter was evil, they denied Christ's Incarnation and subsequent death and Resurrection (4). Jesus was an angel, not God, and as a human man was merely an illusion (5). All marriage and sexual intercourse was evil because it could potentially generate another body which "trapped" the soul until it could be "liberated" by death; even those foods associated with sexual reproduction were forbidden, like meat, milk, eggs, and other animal produce (6).

There is one similarity with 2x2s, in that there were two types of members - the "perfect" (perfecti) and the "believers" (credentes). The perfecti traveled in pairs, observed the strict moral law described above, somewhat akin to the 2x2 workers. This is where the similarity ends, however. The means of salvation was to receive an initiation rite performed at the hands of one of the perfecti, called the consolamentum. It was usually performed on one's deathbed (7), and if one did not die immediately, they were known to hasten the dying process by smothering the person or starving him to death, known as the endura. They denied the existence of hell or purgatory, believing instead that every Albigense soul was saved, if only by a continuous reincarnation into a new body until purified (8).

"First it is to be known that the heretics held that there are two Creators; viz. one of invisible things, whom they called the benevolent God, and another of visible things, whom they named the malevolent God. The New Testament they attributed to the benevolent God; but the Old Testament to the malevolent God, and rejected it altogether, except certain authorities which are inserted in the New Testament from the Old; which, out of reverence to the New Testament, they esteemed worthy of reception. They charged the author of the Old Testament with falsehood, because the Creator said, "In the day that ye eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil ye shall die;" nor (as they say) after eating did they die; when, in fact, after the eating the forbidden fruit they were subjected to the misery of death. They also call him a homicide, as well because he burned up Sodom and Gomorrah, and destroyed the world by the waters of the deluge, as because he overwhelmed Pharaoh, and the Egyptians, in the sea. They affirmed also, that all the fathers of the Old Testament were damned; that John the Baptist was one of the greater demons. They said also, in their secret doctrine, (in secreto suo) that that Christ who was born in the visible, and terrestrial Bethlehem, and crucified in Jerusalem, was a bad man, and that Mary Magdalene was his concubine; and that she was the woman taken in adultery, of whom we read in the gospel. For the good Christ, as they said, never ate, nor drank, nor took upon him true flesh, nor ever was in this world, except spiritually in the body of Paul....

They preached that Holy Matrimony was meretricious, and that none could be saved in it, if they should beget children. Denying also the Resurrection of the flesh, they invented some unheard of notions, saying, that our souls are those of angelic spirits who, being cast down from heaven by the apostacy of pride, left their glorified bodies in the air; and that these souls themselves, after successively inhabiting seven terrene bodies, of one sort or another, having at length fulfilled their penance, return to those deserted bodies.

It is also to be known that some among the heretics were called perfect" or "good men;" others "believers" of the heretics. Those who were called perfect, wore a black dress, falsely pretended to chastity, abhorred the eating of flesh, eggs and cheese, wished to appear not liars, when they were continually telling lies, chiefly respecting God. They said also that they ought not on any account to swear.

Those were called "believers" of the heretics, who lived after the manner of the world, and who though they did not attain so far as to imitate the life of the perfect, nevertheless hoped to be saved in their faith; and though they differed as to their mode of life, they were one with them in belief and unbelief Those who were called believers of the heretics were given to usury, rapine, homicide, lust, perjury and every vice; and they, in fact, sinned with more security, and less restraint, because they believed that without restitution, without confession and penance, they should be saved, if only, when on the point of death, they could say a Pater noster, and received imposition of hands from the teachers.

As to the perfect heretics however they had a magistracy whom they called Deacons and Bishops, without the imposition of whose hands, at the time of his death, none of the believers thought that he could be saved; but if they laid their hands upon any dying man, however wicked, if he could only say a Pater noster, they considered him to be saved, that without any satisfaction, and without any other aid, he immediately took wing to heaven. (26)
They denied infant baptism, and in fact water baptism at all, since water being part of the physical world was considered evil. The consolamentum took place by the laying of hands of a perfecti on to the one being “baptized”. Here is an excerpt from the Cathar ritual:
The Transmission of the Lord's Prayer
If the believer has fasted and if the Christians [the perfect] have agreed to admit him to the Prayer, let them wash their hands, and such believers as are there shall do likewise. Andthen the leading Good Man [a perfecti], the one who ranks after the elder, shall make three bows to the elder and then prepare a table. Let him bow again three times: then let him spread a cloth on the table and again bow thrice. Then he shall put the Book [the Gospels] on the table and say: 'Bless us, have mercy on us'. Then, let the believer perform his melioramentum * and take the Book from the hand of the elder. And the elder should admonish him and preach to him from suitable texts. "from all this you must understand that in presenting yourself before the sons of Jesus Christ, you are confirming the faith and the teaching of the Church of God, as the Holy Scriptures give us to understand. For the people of God deserted the Lord God long ago. They departed from the wisdom and the will of their Divine Father, deceived by evil spirits and submitting themselves to them. And for these and many other reasons you must understand that Our Father wishes to have pity on his people and to receive them into His peace and harmony through the coming of His Son, Jesus Christ. Therefore, you are here in the presence of the disciples of Jesus Christ, in this place, where, as was shown before, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost dwell in spirit, so that you may receive the holy prayer that the Lord Jesus Christ gave to his disciples and so that your petitions and your prayers may be heard by Our Father. You must understand that if you wish to receive this holy prayer you must repent for all your sins and forgive all man. . . Moreover, if God gives you grace to receive this holy prayer, you should vow in your heart that you will keep it all the days of your life, according to the custom of the Church of God, in truth and chastity ** and in all other good virtues which God may vouchsafe you. We therefore pray the Good Lord, who made the disciples of Jesus Christ worthy to receive and hold to this holy prayer, that He will give to you also the grace of receiving and holding to it, for His honor and for your salvation'. "Have mercy on us."

And then the elder shall say the prayer and the believer shall repeat it after him.. Then let the elder say: "We give you this holy prayer, so that you receive it from God, and from us, and from the Church, and so that you may repeat it at any moment of your life, day and night, alone or in company, and so that you must never eat or drink without first saying this prayer. And if you should fail to do so, you must do penance for your fault." And the believer must answer: "I receive it from God, from you, and from the Church." Then he should perform his melioramentum and give thanks. Then let the Christians say a dobla *** with genuflexions and requests for grace and forgiveness, and the believer shall do the same. (25)

* melioramentum = an act of bowing 3 times before one of the "perfect" and receiving a benediction
** any act of intercourse, even between husband and wife, was considered adultery
*** dobla = repetitions of the Lord's Prayer
During entrance into the "Perfect" Community, a ritual called the Tradito, the postulant is asked, ""Do you promise that henceforth you will eat neither meat nor eggs, nor cheese, nor fat, and that you live only from water and wood (i.e vegetables and fish) ,that you will not lie, that you will not swear, that you will not kill, that you will not abandon your body to any form of luxury, that you will never go alone when it is possible to have a companion, that you will never sleep without breeches and shirt and that you will never abandon your faith for fear of water, fire or any other manner of death?" , to which he or she responds, "Yes." (Lyons Ritual)

Persecution of the Albigenses
That the Albigenses theology was aberrant would be an understatement. The Roman Catholic Church, felt it necessary to eliminate the heretics by whatever means necessary. No credible historian can deny that there were cruelties and abuses that occurred during these periods, however, it must be remembered that heresy during the Middle Ages was felt to be a crime against the state, and a sin punishable by death. By today’s standards, the measures taken against them can still only be called excessive, something for which the Pope John Paul II recently apologized for.

Unfortunately, there are aspiring historians who, in their desire to prove apostolic succession, look to any group that was suppressed by the Catholic Church as if that is proof enough of their apostolicity. They will claim that because these groups opposed the Church, the only historical record remaining is written by those who were biased against the groups in the first place. This is not necessarily true, as Baptist historian McGoldrick writes:
“However, enough primary material produced by both the sectarians themselves and by their enemies has survived, so that an informed judgment about their beliefs is still possible. Spokesmen . . . have tended to dismiss documents produced by opponents of the sects as hopelessly prejudiced and therefore unreliable. As we intend to show, this contention is not always valid, for we possess documents of Roman Catholic or Eastern Orthodox origin that have been cross-checked for accuracy. When two or more hostile sources who have had no evident contact with one another related the same account, there is a very high degree of probability that the account is substantially correct.” (9)
McGoldrick, a Baptist who would have no reason to defend the Catholic Church, contends that the inquisitors were “quite honest” in their evaluation, and their charges of heresy “show a restraint that increases the likelihood of their legitimacy” (10). It should be noted that Pope Lucius III first attempt to counter this heretical group did not involve the Church, but secular authorities, in his decree Ad Abolendam (11), and McGoldrick also notes that there were times when, much like during the Spanish Inquisition, “atrocities were perpetrated by civil authorities without resort to inquisitorial proceedings” (12). Pope Innocent III followed suit by recommending that those deemed heretics be handed over to the secular authorities:
"Let those condemned be handed over to the secular authorities present, or to their bailiffs, for due punishment...Let secular authorities, whatever offices they may be discharging, be advised and urged and if necessary be compelled by ecclesiastical censure, if they wish to be reputed and held to be faithful, to take publicly an oath for the defence of the faith to the effect that they will seek, in so far as they can, to expel from the lands subject to their jurisdiction all heretics designated by the church in good faith." (27)
Furthermore, the consequence of holding heretical views were not immediately met with bloodthirsty torture and mayhem; according to the decrees from the 4th Lateran Council, they were to have their goods confiscated, clerics were to be removed from their orders, they were not allowed access to the sacraments or Christian burial - do any of these sound like the bloodbath Nate Barker would have you believe? It should also be noted that violence occurred on both sides; for example, it actually wasn’t until papal legate Peter of Castelnau was murdered by nobles who supported the Albigenses that Pope Innocent III called for a Crusade (13). In Italy the Albigenses set fire to churches in Brescia and assassinated the Bishop of Mantua (14).

Conclusion
There are two ironies here. The first is that Nathan Barker is not alone in claiming apostolic succession from the Albigenses. There are many Baptists who make this same argument (15), J.M. Carroll (16), E.H. Broadbent (17), Plymouth Brethren, Ellen G. White founder of Seventh Day Adventistism (18), Dave Hunt (19), Eric Svendsen, and countless other evangelical “remnant” groups. With so many different groups with different theologies all claiming the same apostolic succession from the Cathars/Albigenses, it becomes highly unlikely that such a common link exists.

The second irony is that the Albigenses were so non-Christian in their beliefs that one wonders why anyone would want to claim a link with them. While members of the Catholic Church practiced violent intolerance, virtually all Christians, including Protestants, agree that the Albigensian heresy was an especially loathesome. Here are some selected quotes, most from those who have no sense of loyalty to Catholicism at all:
“Cathar belief, just like Bogomilism, to which it was heir, upset the structure of sacramental life in favour of one rite of supreme importantce, the consolamentum; replaced a Christian morality by a compulsory asceticism, which made faults consist rather in a soiling by matter than an act of will, eliminated redemption by refusing to admit the saving power of the crucifixion; and rejected the Trinity in favour of a subordination of two persons to the Father. Cathars could not admit that Christ was God - an angel, perhaps, or a son of God, but still not equal with the Father. Nor could they logically admit that he was man, with a body like that of other men. So the hinge of Christian belief, the Incarnation, was destroyed. Radical dualism went still further in its destruction of the pillars of Christian belief, and can hardly be regarded even as an extreme Christian heresy. With its belief in two gods and two creations, it might almost be described as another religion altogether.” (20)

“a dark night which came down with the weight of lead and with the coldness of ice upon the mind and the heart, a chancre of death which ate at all the luminous and elevated faculties of the human soul, a deadly folly that choked the joy of living and made existence here below like a bad dream” (21)

“the above description of Albigense beliefs and practices . . . shows conclusively that the Cathar movement was a major threat which the Catholic authorities had to combat.” (22)

“The contrary charge, that Catharism would have extinguished the human race by its denunciation of sexual intercourse is more logical…” (23)

“"However much we may deprecate the means used for its (Catharism) suppression and commiserate those who suffered for conscience' sake, we cannot but admit that the cause of orthodoxy was in this case the cause of progress and civilization. Had Catharism become dominant, or even had it been allowed to exist on equal terms, its influence could not have failed to prove disastrous (24)."
Final Comparison of Albigenses and 2x2
Beliefs 2x2'sAlbigenses
Origin late 19th Century11th Century
God One God 1 good God, 1 evil God
Matter good evil
Marriage approved sinful
Reincarnation no yes
Baptism necessary evil
Incarnation generally accepteddenied
Crucifixion accepted denied
Resurrection accepteddenied
Jesus' Humanity acceptedan illusion
Salvation through worker's gospel via initiation rite
Christian? yes NO!


(1) Nate Barker, Topics in Bible, http://sites.hsprofessional.com/hobarker/HistoricaI2.html
(2) Gui, Bernard, "Sentence on Peter Auterius", Book of Sentences, A.D. 1693
(3) Pierre dex Vaux de Cernay, "Historia Albigensis,", in Peters, Heresy and Authority, 123; cf. "Letter of Henry, Abbot of Clairvaux, A.D. 1178
(4) Kenneth Scott Latourette [Baptist]: A History of Christianity: vol. 1: Beginnings to 1500 (NY: Harper & Row, 1953, pp. 454-455):
(5) Jaroslav Pelikan [Lutheran], The Growth of Medieval Theology (600-1300) (Univ. of Chicago Press, 1978, pp. 238-241):
(6) The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church [Anglican] (ed. F.L. Cross, 2nd ed., ed. F.L. Cross & E.A. Livingstone, Oxford Univ. Press, 1983, "Albigenses," p. 31):
(7) Catholic Encyclopedia, Albigenses The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume I Copyright © 1907 by Robert Appleton Company)
(8) The Age of Faith, Will Durant [secularist] (NY: Simon and Schuster, 1950, pp. 771-772):
(9) McGoldrick, James E., Baptist Successionism: A Crucial Crusade in Baptist History, Scarecrow Press, Inc., Maryland, 1994, pp 2-3.
(10) ibid., p 60.
(11) Lucius III Ad Abolendam (De Haereticis, cap. ix), [A.D. 1184]
(12) McGoldrick, p 66
(13) Laux, Church History, TAN Books and Publishers, Inc., Rockford IL; 1989, p 353.
(14) Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie, Montaillou: The Promised Land of Error, tr. Barbara Bray (New York: George Braziller, 1978)
(15) Cramp, Baptist History, p 104.
(16) Carroll, The Trail of Blood
(17) Broadbent, The Pilgrim Church, (London: Pickering and Inglis, 1931)
(18) White, Ellen G. The Great Controversy
(19) Hunt, Dave The Woman Rides the Beast (Harvest House, 1994) pp 254-55.
(20) Lambert, Medieval Heresy, 125-26.
(21) Kurth, The Church at the Turning Points of History, p 68.
(22) McGoldrick, p 65.
(23) Strayer, Joseph R., The Albigensian Crusades (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1971), p. 35
(24) (Lea, Inquisition of the Middle Ages (New York, s.d.), p 106 I, 89-208, 563-83; II, 290-315, 569-87,
(25) Wakefield, Walter L. and Evans, Austin P. Heresies of the High Middle Ages (New York, 1969)
(26) From Raynaldus, "Annales," in S. R. Maitland, trans., History of the Albigenses and Waldenses, (London: C. J. G. and F. Rivington, 1832), pp. 392-394.
(27) 4th Lateran Council, canon 3.


| back|

© Copyright Clay Randall, 2001