Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
Erin's Poetry Tips
« February 2005 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Alliteration
Brevity vs Verbosity
Challenge Anyone?
Cliche
Concrete poetry
Cosmetics
Daily Writing Time
Diction
Enjambment
Flow
Free Verse
Gerunds and Participles
How to Critique
Image Progression
Imagery
Inneundo
Inspiration
K.I.S.S.
Lists and Links
Metaphor and Simile
Metaphysical Poetry
Passive vs Active
Poetic Forms
Poetry vs Prose
Point of View
Politics of Web Poetry
Proofreading
Publication Tips
Quick Tips
Reciprocity
Repetition
Rhyme
Sentence Fragments
Shiftless Tenses
Subject
Synesthesia
The Plan
Title
Vocabulary
Workshopping
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
View Profile
Writing Blogs
Vickie's Writing Place
You are not logged in. Log in
Saturday, 19 February 2005
Enjambment
Topic: Enjambment
1. The continuation of a syntactic unit from one line or couplet of a poem to the next with no pause.

2. the breaking of a phrase, clause or sentence by the end of a line or between two verses.


Enjambment is in contrast with end-stopping,
where each linguistic unit corresponds with the line length.

Meaning flows from line to line, and the reader's eye is pulled forward. Enjambment creates a feeling of acceleration, as the reader is forced to continue reading after the line has ended. However it can also cause some confusion and unnecessary mental pauses within a thought or idea when used in an unusual manner or placement.

T.S. Eliot's poem "Gerontion" is heavily enjambed:

"After such knowledge, what forgiveness? Think now
History has many cunning passages, contrived corridors
And issues, deceives with whispering ambitions"


while Alexander Pope's "An Essay on Criticism", are completely end stopped:

"Nature to all things fix'd the Limits fit,
And wisely curb'd proud Man's pretending Wit:"


Enjambment is another of the poetic devices that can serve good or evil, depending on the writer's usage, and intentions.

When writing about inner-city construction and traffic, creative enjambment may be just the trick, to add that jumpy jarring effect. When writing about a waterfall, one can create the movement and "flow" with enjambment used in a traditional manner. When writing about the serenity of early morning sunrise, end-stopping is probably more effective.

Posted by poetry/emonahan at 12:01 AM EST
Updated: Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:14 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Friday, 18 February 2005
Metaphor and simile
Topic: Metaphor and Simile
Metaphor and simile
Metaphor:
1. A figure of speech in which a word or phrase that ordinarily designates one thing is used to designate another, thus making an implicit comparison.

2. a figure of speech in which an expression is used to refer to something that it does not literally denote in order to suggest a similarity.

3. One thing conceived as representing another; a symbol.

Simile
1. figure of speech in which two essentially unlike things are compared, often in a phrase introduced by like or as.

2. a figure of speech that expresses a resemblance between things of different kinds (usually formed with `like' or `as')

As you see, metaphor and simile are similar. They serve like purposes. Metaphors however are a purer form of symbolism, and leave your reader to make an inference as to the subject of you poem, rather than making it obvious, as does a simile. Metaphors deliver your message with more emotional impact than direct language, or similes. However, be careful not to use cliched metaphors (Life is a roller coaster, etc) or you nullify the effect. Also, when using metaphor in a poem, use the same metaphor throughout. Be consistent and avoid mixed metaphors. To mix metaphors also weakens the effect and weakens the piece by confusing the reader, particularly if the metaphors you choose are vastly different.

Posted by poetry/emonahan at 12:01 AM EST
Updated: Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:17 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Thursday, 17 February 2005
Gerunds and Participles
Topic: Gerunds and Participles
Gerunds and participles are often confused, one for another. Here are the definitions of each and an explanation of their differences.

A gerund is a verb that ends in -ing and functions as a noun, since a gerund functions as a noun, it occupies some positions in a sentence that a noun ordinarily would.

Ex: (direct object/subject)
They do not like my writing.

(subject compliment)
My brother?s favorite hobby is skating.

(object of preposition)
He was suspended for fighting.

Gerunds have one of two effects on writing. When properly used, gerunds can be used effectively to add a sense of movement to poetry. To do this, the writer must pre-think (and often re-think) his choices of frequency and placement.
When overused, or used without forethought, they tend to weaken the piece, because rather than giving the reader a concrete bit of foot placement from which to make the next step, they just whisk the reader along, never giving them a chance to stop and consider the path he?s followed. For a strong piece of poetry, one should use gerunds sparingly, and for a preconceived effect. Let your reader make his own way through the piece, give him time to consider, the opportunity to take in the message.

A participle is a verb that is used as an adjective and most often ends in -ing or ?ed, they function as adjectives, and modify nouns or pronouns.

Ex:
Carrying his bag, he trudged through the snow.
The home, destroyed by fire, was a total loss.
She walks sadly through the whispering forest.

Although often mistaken for gerunds, participles usually don?t weaken a piece to the same degree as a gerund, because they are used as an adjective. Most readers subconsciously understand that an adjective isn?t a necessary part of the sentence as is the subject, and can differentiate the two. However, too many participles take us away from the core of the message we try to convey, and therefore leave us with a weaker result.

In poetry particularly, this is a fine line. We wouldn?t want to say ?She walked through a forest? and try to call it poetry. It isn?t descriptive enough without any modifiers, it lacks the ?art?. The secret lies in being able to judge when enough is enough. Perhaps my advice here should be two-fold (here come the cliches. . . )
?Look before you leap.? and
?All things in moderation.?

Posted by poetry/emonahan at 12:01 AM EST
Updated: Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:18 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Wednesday, 16 February 2005
Cliche:
Topic: Cliche
Cliche:
1. A trite or overused expression or idea.
2. A person or character whose behavior is predictable or superficial.
3. A trite or obvious remark.
4. Anything that has been overused before, or is being overused now, any word or phrase you remember being used a certain way more than once.
5. A time-worn expression which has lost its vitality and to some extent its original meaning.

Example: ?Busy as bees?

Synonyms -
platitude
banality
commonplace

Now, understand that without fail, using cliches in your poetry will serve no purpose other than to weaken it, to bore your reader into turning away.

To use cliches is to use someone else's words rather than your own. There is nothing original or creative about copying someone else. There's also nothing interesting about your results when you do so.

Posted by poetry/emonahan at 12:01 AM EST
Updated: Thursday, 24 March 2005 11:21 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post

Newer | Latest | Older