Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
REVOLUTIONS- biking in NJ
Tuesday, 17 October 2006
Sharing the road
Topic: RANTING&RAVING
10/17/06

"Share the road". You hear the expression over and over again, on t-shirts (I have one), on bumper stickers, from the lips of roadies and bike messengers and the local dude on the singlespeed. But what does this actually mean?

The concept is often misconstrued by both cars and bicyclists -- to the detriment of both.

Cyclists often think that this means they can take up the whole road, or that cars have to stop for them, regardless of who has the right of way. This is not true, and riding as if it were is one of the reasons intolerant drivers keep on justifying their intolerance.

Drivers, on the other hand, don't acknowledge the concept at all, or if they do, they simply see it as "don't run over the bicyclists" or otherwise intend them harm. This is well and good, as no one wants to be run over or harmed, but just as the common misconception of bicyclists is too broad, the idea that "sharing the road" is limited to not committing a vehicular homicide is far too narrow.

What "share the road" actually means is that bicycles are vehicles like cars. They are supposed to be on the street and are entitled to no more -- or less -- consideration that the driver of a automobile.

This doesn't mean a bicylcist has the right to swerve into oncoming traffic. But it does mean that cars coming out of, say, a driveway, have an obligation to stop for the bicyle, just as they would a car.

Sadly, this often doesn't happen. The driver sees the bike, pulls out in front of it anyway, thinking either "oh, he can stop," or "why should I wait for a bicycle?" both these thoughts are based on the fact that the bicycle doesn't have a internal combustion engine. If that 20 lb bicycle was a 20 ton truck, you can bet your grandma's pushup bra the driver would wait rather than risk a collision.

So what can be done?

The concept has to be named, and understood. T-shirts and bumper stickers are great for naming concepts, but not for explainign them. Anyone, for instance, can put a "share the road" bumper sticker on their car. But how many can articulate just what it means and why it's important? That is the issue. Cyclists are often angry -- and justifiably so -- by idiots driving cars that nearly kill them. However, how can you by angry at someone for failure to grasp a concept that you yourself are unable to articulate, beyond a bumper sticker slogan?

Cyclists demand recognition of their place on the road -- with good reason. But they should also realize what this entails. Riding in a safe manner, as part of traffic. Not riding the sidewalk. Not riding on the wrong side of the street. Using lights after dark. Every one of these behaviors is not only unsafe but also reinforces the idiots idea of what constitutes bicylcing norms. Every fool riding an expensive road bike on the sidewalk is telling drivers that that's where bikes belong -- on the sidewalk. The bicycle is a vehicle, and it belongs on the road. Not the sidewalk, path or park (the exception being mountainbikes or cross bikes, which are offroad vehicles).

What to do? Cyclists who ride in ways that aren't keeping with traffic out of fear need to take back their place on the streets. Don't let cars crowd you over or onto the sidewalk. Ride as part of traffic. And then you can demand others "share the road" with you. But only if you are willing to share it with them.

Most bicyclists are perfectly willignt o share the road with cars, provided they aren't piloted by maniacs. Are car drivers willing to have the same regard for bikes?

- Elvis

Posted by Elvis at 2:33 PM EDT
Permalink | Share This Post
Bucks County by Bike
Topic: RIDE REPORT
10/17/06

Having been riding for several weeks with the crowd from the Scotch Plains bike shop, The Bike Stand, I took my Lemond -- rebuilt with old-school downtube shifters -- on the Covered Bridges ride, a 63 mile trip through rural Bucks Co., PA. It was an excellent ride and there were several thousand people in attendance, most of them experienced cyclists. I saw Cannondales, Raleighs, Orbeas, Treks, and numerous other new bikes, as well as a few other steel Lemonds. There was also a great deal of vintage steel lugged frames, and the winding roads and decent amount of hills made the ride exciting -- and a visual treat. I am not ashamed to say that towards the last ten miles I became somewhat tired, despite riding daily on my track bike and taking my Lemond on 40-60 miles weekend rides. But it was a good fun ride, and that night I slept the sleep of the just.

- Elvis

Posted by Elvis at 2:26 PM EDT
Permalink | Share This Post
Monday, 10 July 2006
GT fixed geat mtb -- for the town
Mood:  caffeinated
Topic: RIDE REPORT




Took the road parts off my GT mtb frame, and built it up like this: v brake up front, 26" mtb rims, 42x16t gearing. The perfect around town bike, after the fashion of the old-school messenger (pre fixed gear/track) bicycles, when they old rode rigid mtb's for urban use. Around town, this thing shines, though waiting on street tires the knobbies are slower than I want to be.

- Elvis

Posted by Elvis at 11:50 PM EDT
Updated: Monday, 10 July 2006 11:53 PM EDT
Permalink | Share This Post
Friday, 7 July 2006
The Ross is reborn...
Mood:  caffeinated
Topic: tales from the garage


My Song

Built up a new Ross yesterday, while listening to the above... it's good ridin' tunes. The ross is white with several layers of clearcoat. Hope the paint lasts. This thing handles sweet on the street and the old 3-speed cranks give it that "old school" look.

- Elvis

Posted by Elvis at 8:55 AM EDT
Permalink | Share This Post
Monday, 19 June 2006
Folding in MA -- the fix goes on!
Mood:  caffeinated
Topic: RIDE REPORT


Took my fixed gear Dahon -- rebuilt -- to MA this past weekend. Only got in an hours ride but it was fun, Brookline is full of cars and trucks and trolley tracks...

- Elvis

Posted by Elvis at 9:32 AM EDT
Permalink | Share This Post
Friday, 9 June 2006
skewed statistics: bikes vs. cars
Mood:  caffeinated
6/9/06 - Reviving some thoughts on the issue I began thinking about the truth: do bikes cause most bike related "accidents" or is there really some merit to the idea that cars, pedestrians, etc. are careless around bikes and non-observant?

The following article from msnbc.com about a cyclist hit and killed in Lexington, KY, is informative:

"A Lexmark employee was hit by a car and killed Wednesday morning while riding his bike to work.

The incident happened around 6 a.m. in Bourbon County. Police say Joshua L. Shaw of Bourbon Countywas driving a car down Hutchinson Station Road near Royal Oak Farm when he hit 61-year-old Bruce Ostermeier. Ostermeier was pronounced dead at the scene at 6:51 a.m.

Police closed Hutchinson Road between Bethlehem Road and Bryan Station Road until around noon while they were investigating the incident.

Drugs and alcohol are not suspected factors in the incident, and no charges are expected to be filed against Shaw."

No drugs or alcohal were involved -- and no charges filed. Why? It is obvious that no drug or alcohol charges would be filed, since drugs and alcohol were involved, but why no charges? Unless the guy on the bike is riding against traffic the driver was clearly at fault. The "I didn't see him" argument only works if one believes drivers don't have an obligation to be observant of their surroundings. They do.

Yet, drivers can basically kill any one of us and walk away scott-free.

And the news media is happy to oblige, providing not even the most basic details about the crashes, such as: Did the cyclist have a blinking light, if so, why didn't the driver see him? Was the driver speeding, was the cyclist riding on the right side of the road? No answer is provided because all the article says, in a nuthell, is that at such and such a time this man killed this man with his car and hasn't been charged with anything.

When cyclists then begin debating amongst themselves, the issue of statistics come up, with many asserting that most crashes are caused by cyclists themselves. But if we assume cyclists to mean what most of us mean when we say "cyclist" -- meaning NOT those people who ride against traffic, etc. but regular road users -- then it becomes clear most of the accidents are not the cyclist's fault. However this is based only on our definition of cyclists, who largely obey traffic laws and have a right to be on the road, and at such aren't at fault. It cannot, however, be based upon much statistical analysis of news-report incidents, for the incidents are reported so poorly, as in this example above, as to be meaningless.



Posted by Elvis at 8:34 AM EDT
Permalink | Share This Post
Tuesday, 6 June 2006
pista!pista!pista!
6/6/06 - The world is supposed to end in 10 minutes tonite so I'll be quick..... replaced the chopped alu ergo drop bars on my Pista with narrow steel drops (also chopped slightly) as shown below. Then after the pic was taken added black griptabe where the rubber mtb grips are shown... Vaya con dios me compadres!

- Elvis

Posted by Elvis at 11:51 PM EDT
Permalink | Share This Post
Thursday, 1 June 2006
Tales from the batcave.... er, garage...
Mood:  caffeinated
Topic: RIDE REPORT
6/01/06 - the other day I stripped the panel ("BIANCHI") decals off my pista, leaving the tiny decals -- the"pista" on the top tube and the headbadge, as well as the two small stickers near the bb welds. I then clearcoated over it tho I had to use several coats. The texture isn't perfect but it shines up nice.

The only other mod was to tighten the chainring bolts which were a tad loose, and install plastic frameguards -- a small patch on the downtube where the barrel adjuster of the front brake kept threatenign death to the chrome finish, and a long one on the nondrive side chainstay to guard against nicks from rocks and stuff. Under this one I put a few tiny stickers such as "No stinkin gears" and the "lucky strike" bullseye logo.

Then came the bmx project. With a thunderstorm blockin' me in from my evening ride, I took an old bmx bike and set to work. I'd been toying w/ the idea for some time and finally did it: built a
fixedgear bmx bike! Freewheel removed off of another bmx r. wheel as my freewheel removal tool won't fit over the extra large axle of the stock rear wheel. 18t (only one I had to spare) track cog screwed right on. No lockring.

No brake lever yet but kept the brake and cable intact so the cable end is rubber banded to the handlebar. Bike only has a rear brake and it's mounted on the chainstays so I'm keeping that one, esp in light of the lack of a lockring -- tho as I said my fixed mtb runs no lockring (and only a f. brake) with no problemos... Seatpost is absurd 25.6mm and barely long enuff. Seat is a junk find like the bike. Thing is all black except for rim sidewalls and seatpost.

I assume this'll go in the wrong thread on the bicycle fora (such as www.fixedgeargallery.com/forum), but just for sh!ts and giggles it should be fun. I figure the low gear/wheels makes a brake almost pointless and I'll probably be able to ride backwards on it... not sure if it's practical but building it beats doing those number crossword puzzles ev'ryone's into...
- Elvis

Posted by Elvis at 8:17 PM EDT
Permalink | Share This Post
Friday, 26 May 2006
Words of sanity...
"We must never accept being denied the use of the roadway, and we must never accept facilities that prevent the roadway from being improved for cycling. In every case that one can think of, cycling on a properly-designed roadway with adequate width for the traffic it carries, is better for cyclists than any other system. The idea that a significant amount of transportation will be done by politically correct people who have been enticed by false promises of safety to ride on slow and dangerous bike paths deserves all the jeering it receives. Basing the national cycling program on such a pathetic hypothesis is a scientific disgrace.
- John Forester , Author "Effective Cycling""

quoted as it appeared in the Probicycling (http://probicycle.com/) website. Something to consider everytime the gov't, or activists, propose relegating bikes to seperate paths that go nowhere.

- Elvis

Posted by Elvis at 10:04 PM EDT
Permalink | Share This Post
Old skool new tech - the Pista evolves
Mood:  caffeinated
Topic: tales from the garage
5/25/06 - One of my fav girl's fav expressions about something that changes is "it evolved - like a pokemon". My knowledge of pokemon is limited to discarded happy meal contents I pass on the street while riding my bike, but it is safe to say the Pista has evolved.

The bike began with the stock bars and stem. At first I flipped the stem, even fiddled with an extra half spacer (made from a threaded fork fitting) to raise the bars for a more comfortable position. Then on a whim I check out the FGG (www.fixedgeargallery.com) and see a reference to the OST (Old Skool Track) website which I visit time to time. The OST site has some things that are impractical in my humble opinion -- obscenely angled track stems and other bike features which, while they keep to the aesthetic of the culture, can hardly be comfortable for all day riding. And yet...

On a whim I use one of the shims I got from Oscar in Chatham to install a 1 1/8" stem on the narrower Pista steerer. Upside down. The stem came off a mountainbike and low and behold, the resulting handlebar position looked a lot lower than with the flat stock stem. In fact it was only a tad lower. And felt more responsive! A full test ride will be needed for an effective Ride Report on the subject but it may be I've discovered the hidden secret of that sect of fixed gear riders dubbed "old skool"...?
- Elvis

Posted by Elvis at 12:15 AM EDT
Permalink | Share This Post

Newer | Latest | Older