Music For All! -- Chris || Post in the forum
After an email like the following, I thought that I would upload just a few MP3s and see how many people download them.
Dude, what is this shit? You have all these links in your MP3 section for various bands, yet when you enter the link and you have the MP3 song list, non of them have a hyperlink to a MP3 file, hell they just don't have anything. What is the point to have these song lists if they don't do shit? Is it just your way of being a complete ass or what?
See, the main problem with such places like Angelfire are that they don't give you much space, and not much bandwidth to work with. I uploaded an mpeg to a geocities account a while back and crashed it, so what would I do with mp3s? The same thing obviously.
Neil Young - Ohio | 2.8MB
Less Than Jake - Malt Liquor | 3.3MB
Bush - The Chemicals Between Us | 3.3MB
Tom Petty-Last Dance With Mary Jane | 4.2MB
Vast - Free | 4.4MB
Sorry, I could not upload any Backstreet Boys, N*sync, and Brittany Spears, my space was limited and I had to choose the most deserving artist. And if you baboons crash that place I don't know what to tell you other then "thanks!"
Heck, if it does well enough I think I'll make it a weekly thing... different ones once a week.
Why The Heck Not? -- Chris || Post in the forum Time Magazine has worked up the guts to even think about making bin Laden the Time Man of the year.
Just wait a second, before we get all worked up about this and cry foul, what exactly does it take for someone to be a Time Man of the Year?
For each of the past 71 years, TIME has picked the single person (man, woman, group or even idea) who, for better or worse, has most influenced events in the preceding year. Who will be named this year? Alan Greenspan? Hillary Clinton? Tony Blair? For some clues about the selection process, check the Man of the Year Facts below or visit the Man of the Year archive -- then cast your vote!
Yup, it clearly says "for better or worse" and clearly this is for worse. The only reason why he would be on that cover is because he is the one responsible for the killing of 4,000 Americans. People would be outraged if they put Hitler as the man of the year, and I can honestly tell you that Time will be given a beat down from the families of those that lost loved ones.
Think about it, they're telling us that all we have to do is kill enough people and we'll be on the most famous magazine cover. I hope that's not the message that they want to send out, because that's basically what I'm thinking right now.