Now Playing: Jim Roll--"Another Lover (I Never Had)"
I recently watched the first series of The Duchess of Duke Street (1976), a fictionalization of the life of Cockney chef and hotelier Rosa Lewis ("Louisa Trotter" on the show), and her amorous and commercial adventures (and those of her guests) in Edwardian England. It was created by John Hawkesworth, one of the people behind Upstairs, Downstairs, and starred the lovely, wonderful Gemma Jones (Oliver Reed's relatively virtuous girlfriend in The Devils, Mrs. Dashwood in Ang Lee's Sense and Sensibility, and Renee Zellweger's mother in Bridget Jones' Diary), whose work I will now make a point of seeing--not only is she a terrific actress, but she reminds me of a girl at the Baton Rouge Barnes and Noble for whom I used to have a fondness. The series climaxes with Louisa's goofball on-and-off aristocratic love interest being married off to some colorless bourgeoise, and was really quite heartbreaking.
So thank heavens I watched the last episode right before Star Wars, Episode III: Revenge of the Sith (2005). I was in the mood for something mindless and consoling, and the movie for which some people waited twenty-five years sounded like just the ticket. Now that I've seen God knows how many other movies in the intervening years since Star Wars first came out, it's rather alarming how large the flaws in this whole mythology loom. After I discovered Doctor Who, I never really had the same interest in Star Wars--all the special effects money in the world won't compensate for the ability to write dialogue. I stopped caring about the whole thing, by and large, by the time I entered high school. While I, like most of the industrialized world, was curious about what the prequels would bring, I didn't fret over it.
The movie was a terribly lopsided bag, some genuinely good stuff swamped by the sheer weight of the thing. The special effects were glitzy and overwhelming, making one wish CGI had never been invented (almost, anyway--for a primer on how the technology should be used, watch Shaun of the Dead; some of the effects are revealed on the hilarious DVD commentary, the funniest bits courtesy of Dylan Moran). One of the things I always like when watching the original Star Wars is how natural many of the effects look in comparison to some of the other stuff done at the time (and since), Logan's Run and Battlestar: Galactica being good contemporary examples. In Revenge of the Sith, it's all very tinny and obviously fake, and detracts considerably from an already beleaguered story.
I was astonished anew at the wretchedness of the dialogue. The original Star Wars, with the continual wisecracks between the characters, had some great moments, but I think once Lucas decided to take the whole thing seriously on screen (I couldn't stop giggling at the initial prologue for Revenge of the Sith, which would look great on the back cover of the thirteenth volume of some roleplaying-game-derived novel series), he either shot himself in the foot or simply forgot how to write (providing fuel for the idea that he'd had himself hermetically sealed into Skywalker Ranch for fifteen years, only emerging for The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles--which, to do him justice, was a great idea). The jokes are tragically limp, reminding me of Nixon wielding a yo-yo. The expository dialogue is particularly brutal, sounding like notes taken for an eighth-grade history paper on "The Decline of the Galactic Republic": "Palpatine felt uneasy about the Jedi Council." "I feel... uneasy about the Council." Jan Morris suggested once that this might have been how G.A. Henty wrote his Victorian boys' thrillers, and it's fun to see how little things have changed, even when one's dealing with imaginary history. I know it's hard to sell political and economic chicanery in a movie like this, but at least try and dress it up, for heaven's sake. It's entirely possible that I've been spoiled by the ready availability of Deadwood at the local library, but that only explains so much.
It's unfortunate, too, because the dialogue obscures some surprisingly good moments and acting. The sight of the various Jedi commanders throughout the Republican armies cut down by budding stormtroopers is genuinely moving. Professional sourguts Christopher "Who is this 'Dracula' you speak of?" Lee shows up for a bit as Count Dooku, and... honestly, people, the fact that he can "do his thing" at all at eighty-three is pretty impressive. Samuel L. Jackson glowers as Mace Windu, and does what he can with little. Natalie Portman is rather wasted, mostly fidgeting and fretting for poor Anakin in a variety of costume-design travesties. Ewan MacGregor's good, but he's unexpectedly outpaced by Ian McDiarmid and Hayden Christensen. McDiarmid's Palpatine turns into a great reptilian villain in Sith, revealing himself as an enemy of the Jedi and then drawing Anakin into his diabilical clutches. I hear Christensen caught a lot of flak for his performance as Anakin, but given that he plays an already annoying teenager beset by mommy issues and given a ludicrous amount of power, I think he does awfully well.* I'm not being facetious--that's how I always read Anakin.
The good thing is that it's over. Nobody can be hurt by mistaken decisions or fruitless fifteen-year filming gaps taken by Lucasfilm ever again, right?
*It doesn't hurt that I have considerable goodwill towards Christensen. He took the flaming pile of shit that was Life as a House and, with Jena Malone, made it almost tolerable. I heard Shattered Glass was pretty good, too.
Posted by Charles J. Microphone
at 2:31 PM EDT
Updated: 6 May 2006 2:48 PM EDT
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink | Share This Post
Updated: 6 May 2006 2:48 PM EDT
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink | Share This Post