Analysis of Venting and Co2 Use
The only specific venting condition showing a statistically significant effect on crop yield is manual venting, which appears to reduce yield. A couple of other interesting things should be noted. First, even if CO2 is not used and there is no active venting, this does not produce a statistically significant reduction in crop yield. Secondly, when CO2 is not used but constant venting occurs, the positive correlation with crop yield nearly approaches statistical significance, and this correlation (+0.145) is at least as strong as any of the correlations where CO2 is used in some fashion. This may suggest that supplemental CO2 may be a waste of money and effort, and that a one-time investment in a small, low-wattage exhaust fan may be just as productive as long as it is run fairly constantly (at least during the light phase).
Cypher 4 - Co2 and Venting
|
Correlation | Significance |
C=CO2 NOT used, no active venting
|
-.082 | .311 |
D=CO2 NOT used, constant venting
|
.145 | .073 |
E=CO2 NOT used, automatic or timed venting
|
.013 | .875 |
F=CO2 NOT used, manual venting
|
-.226** | .005 |
I=CO2 Generator, flame
|
.036 | .658 |
O=CO2 Generator, chemical, auto vent
|
-.063 | .437 |
S=CO2 Tank, manual release
|
.117 | .150 |
U=CO2 Tank, flow ctrl, sol release
|
.131 | .106 |
V=CO2 Tank, Flow ctrl, sol release, auto vent
|
.094 | .246 |
_-Not Available
|
-.181* | .025 |
|
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level |
||
