Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
LINKS
ARCHIVE
« March 2005 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
Open Community
Post to this Blog
Tuesday, 8 March 2005
RE Administrative Decisions and Review Board
February 25, 2005

Administrative Decisions and Review Board
Attention: Larry Guno, Chairperson
New Aiyansh, BC V0J 1A0

Dear Sirs/Madam:

This letter will acknowledge receipt of the ?written reasons? from your office dated February 24, 2005. We were informed following the receipt of the Final Order that the ?written reasons? were to be received by the 3 applicants in a matter of two days. The two days turned into exactly 21 days and I have no clue why it took so long.

At this time, I need to understand why the issue of the missing/lost/stolen ballot box was not dealt with as an illegal activity. I want to know why your Board did not push for Edward Allen to bring forth to the candidates a copy of the police report that Sgt. Kevin Jones gave to him. The New Aiyansh police detachment informed me that Ed had the copy and when I first asked Ed about it, he asked me, ?How soon do you need it?? The next day, after talking with legal counsel, he told me that he did not have it. To ease my own curiosity, the RCMP gave to me the file number and now, I requested the full report from Access to Information and, it may take some time from Ottawa but we need to see it. Apparently, I don?t know the truth to the rumor that the box was found behind the high school in New Aiyansh a few days later. Were the elections staff and security cross-examined? They all know something that we don?t know, but, eventually, we will find out. We live in a small place and my business is everyone?s business.

The issue of the inappropriate documents that Rhonda Peal presented for the six candidates is also avoided in your document. Why is it that something so illegal as Rhonda forwarding falsified documents can be just randomly overlooked? Matthew Bright Jr. is the person that I am referring to and I had several pieces of evidence to prove my case and that was never brought up. I want to know why? I did not attend the second day of the hearing and I would like to have that part of the meeting extracted, where this issue was brought up. WSN claims that they did not have sufficient evidence to fire Rhonda Peal at their last meeting and that amazes me, what else does she have to do or not do in order to get her out of this difficult position? In Greenville, a petition is being circulated and names are being signed to ask for her resignation or dismissal as soon as possible. We will not tolerate employees who think that they are invincible. This holds true also for people serving in high-position offices and it takes people to vote them in and we can also vote them out.

I am looking out now for Rhonda Peal to publish her list of qualified candidates and this time, her Criminal Record Checks should be all legal and not falsified as the first time. Once I see Matthew Bright Jr. listed, I will forward my Form 1 to your office to declare him not a qualified candidate and I have more than enough reasons and evidence. I will follow up with a telephone call to request to Sgt. Lovell, Terrace R CMP, and an update on the matter.

I am aware that your positions with the Review Board are very difficult and I commend you for your efforts and past work accomplished. Keep up the good work and one day, we may not see a need for such a Board when we all are treated equally and accountable to. Have a nice day.

Sincerely,

Anonymous


Posted by blog2/nisgga at 11:39 PM
Updated: Friday, 18 March 2005 10:17 AM
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post

View Latest Entries