An article by Shankar Vedantam describes an interesting psychological trait known as cognitive dissonance quantified in a study by social psychologist Roy Baumeister: “the same people dealing with the same kinds of hurt perceive hurtful actions in entirely different ways, depending on whether they are the ones causing the hurt or the ones being hurt.”
People in the research group felt when they did something that upset or offended others, the effects were less hurtful or lasting than when they themselves were the offended party. Vedantam states this is the main source of conflict “in our personal, professional and political lives.” Yes, we know we do things in our lives that are wrong, but we’re “good people,” so it’s not as bad as when others hurt us. We’re not always so sure they are good people. Their intentions may be more sinister than ours ever were. Of course, this “reasoning” happens largely on a subconscious level.
I guess this helps explain why people of faith sometimes are quicker to identify the shortcomings of others than to see their own. Jesus pointed out how people jumped on the speck in another person’s eye when they had a log in their own.
It seems there are implications in our cognitive dissonance for confession and forgiveness. Following Jesus is not an easy thing to do.
Apparently, it goes against our nature.
Updated: Monday, 9 July 2007 10:22 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
