Lambda the Ultimate Weblog Topics
Last Updated 07/17/2012

Posts By: barrkel

  Date    Post    Topic  
06/11/2012Higher sightsGoogle Blockly Lets You Hack With No Keyboard
12/24/2011Monads are a way of2 Misconcepts About Functional Programming (relating to context and monad)
12/24/2011I think many people get too2 Misconcepts About Functional Programming (relating to context and monad)
11/15/2011Module "polymorphism"Is the Expression Problem Fundamental?
10/13/2011PyramidsDennis Ritchie passed away
10/14/2011Lack of artificeDennis Ritchie passed away
10/14/2011The nastiest bit (apart fromDennis Ritchie passed away
10/15/2011for-loopDennis Ritchie passed away
10/10/2011Java's use-site varianceGoogle's Dart announced
10/10/2011Intellisense comes virtuallyF# type providers
09/27/2011Azul JVMRedesigning the Mozart virtual machine
05/23/2011There's certainly a paradoxRob Pike: Public Static Void
05/23/2011I think your narrativeRob Pike: Public Static Void
05/23/2011A combination of both. ARob Pike: Public Static Void
05/23/2011For too many programmers,Rob Pike: Public Static Void
05/23/2011It reminds us of theRob Pike: Public Static Void
06/07/2011I wrote a comment bringing up the network effectRob Pike: Public Static Void
05/15/2011Programs that rely on tailWhy is tail call optimization an issue in GC'd languages?
05/16/2011That sounds somewhat likeWhy is tail call optimization an issue in GC'd languages?
05/17/2011You're assuming: (a) that aWhy is tail call optimization an issue in GC'd languages?
05/14/2011For posterity...Kleisli Arrows of Outrageous Fortune
03/05/2011Feedback EffectsLeveled Garbage Collection
03/09/2011Interestingly, in theMiddle History of Logic Programming
03/09/2011C# does not have a linearMiddle History of Logic Programming
02/26/2011Contentious statement:InfoQ video + transcript of Rob Pike on Go
02/27/2011I'm not actually arguing inInfoQ video + transcript of Rob Pike on Go
02/28/2011C# doesn't use a constrainedInfoQ video + transcript of Rob Pike on Go
02/28/2011Types describe assumptionsInfoQ video + transcript of Rob Pike on Go
03/01/2011[BK]After all, getting aInfoQ video + transcript of Rob Pike on Go
03/01/2011I once designed a languageInfoQ video + transcript of Rob Pike on Go
02/15/2011Having anonymous methods, orExtending Syntax from Within a Language
02/16/2011Well, Lisp, Racket etc. areExtending Syntax from Within a Language
02/23/2011This "arbiter" source ofMonads vs. Actors
02/24/2011I've spent a bunch more timeMonads vs. Actors
01/15/2011This older presentationguy steele on how (not) to think of parallel programming
01/09/2011Your statement is a hugeFast Compilers
12/20/2010This guy has some version ofAzul's Pauseless Garbage Collector
11/15/2010Mildly irritated by the snarkA Preliminary Survey on Functional Programming
10/31/2010Interop with native code andAsynchronous Programming, Monads and Continuations in C#, F# and Scala
10/31/2010The trouble is thatAsynchronous Programming, Monads and Continuations in C#, F# and Scala
11/01/2010Can you clarify what youThe Myths of Object-Orientation
11/01/2010It looks like the magicThe Myths of Object-Orientation
11/02/2010Three modulesThe Myths of Object-Orientation
10/11/2010Delphi.Design Principles Behind Smalltalk
09/06/2010If you renamed the "main"Dependency injection via parameterized types (?!)
08/27/2010You'll find discussion ofTheoretical Computer Science StackExchange Beta now open
07/26/2010I wouldn't agree with yourThe Mirah Language
05/30/2010I wonder how well thisThe Resurgence of Parallelism
04/22/2010I think that's a terribleSeeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages
04/24/2010Clarification requestSeeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages
04/24/2010I think that's a far tooSeeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages
04/24/2010This is ironic, because theSeeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages
04/24/2010I think this isn't reallySeeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages
04/24/2010The idea of computationalSeeking thoughtful criticisms of functional programming and languages
04/22/2010This is a situation where IHow can C Programs be so Reliable?
04/21/2010The kinds of failure thatHow can C Programs be so Reliable?
04/09/2010One cannot meaningfullyiPhone PL lockdown
04/12/2010There are more reasonableiPhone PL lockdown
03/30/2010I'm a fan of exceptions,Go's proposed panic/recover exception-like mechanism
04/01/2010Bottom line: I'm not goingGo's proposed panic/recover exception-like mechanism
04/01/2010I was wondering what blogGo's proposed panic/recover exception-like mechanism
04/01/2010Endless backwardGo's proposed panic/recover exception-like mechanism
04/02/2010I agree; it would be betterGo's proposed panic/recover exception-like mechanism
01/03/2012The reason checkedGo's proposed panic/recover exception-like mechanism
01/03/2012Integration and breaking changesGo's proposed panic/recover exception-like mechanism
01/04/2012Same domain, different approachGo's proposed panic/recover exception-like mechanism
01/03/2012Self-evident to the point of tautologyGo's proposed panic/recover exception-like mechanism
03/26/2010I think people are tooWill data-intensive computing revolutionize programming languages?
03/26/2010I think PLT folkWill data-intensive computing revolutionize programming languages?
03/24/2010var q = from b in blahFirst-class environments. Discuss. ;)
03/17/2010Missing the pointOn the (Alleged) Value of Proof for Assurance
03/18/2010Perhaps my perspective isOn the (Alleged) Value of Proof for Assurance
06/19/2010Re SGLR applied to lexerOn the (Alleged) Value of Proof for Assurance
03/11/2010Depending on how distant theHave tracing JIT compilers won?
02/18/2010How practical?Small PL Thought Experiment
02/11/2010Uppercase keywordspurposeful retrograde language design
02/07/2010To save others the inconvenience of copy and paste for an urlWhy prolog is by far the best, most productive, easiest programming language
12/08/2009Modern IDEs track edit history independentlyDifferentiating Parsers
12/08/2009Reparsing is fineDifferentiating Parsers
12/08/2009As I've said elsewhere inDifferentiating Parsers
12/08/2009By type-check, I meanDifferentiating Parsers
12/08/2009IDE doesn't need incremental parsingDifferentiating Parsers
12/09/2009If you have a language thatDifferentiating Parsers
12/09/2009I know my experience isDifferentiating Parsers
11/19/2009Delphi, FWIWStatically typed Pratt parsers
11/01/2009Perhaps I read you wrong...Seeking broad survey of wide range of concurrency idioms
09/19/2009TestingTurning every module into a functor automatically?
09/20/2009DittoTurning every module into a functor automatically?
08/10/2009Practical implicitionsA Veriļ¬ed Compiler for an Impure Functional Language
05/20/2009Almost all informationalWolframAlpha
01/22/2009Forgive my ignorance, but ...Tony Hoare / Historically Bad Ideas: "Null References: The Billion Dollar Mistake"
01/22/2009Yes, it's the complexity ofTony Hoare / Historically Bad Ideas: "Null References: The Billion Dollar Mistake"
01/22/2009That's cleared that up for meTony Hoare / Historically Bad Ideas: "Null References: The Billion Dollar Mistake"
01/22/2009"sample value" is justTony Hoare / Historically Bad Ideas: "Null References: The Billion Dollar Mistake"
01/23/2009The sample value must be aTony Hoare / Historically Bad Ideas: "Null References: The Billion Dollar Mistake"
01/23/2009he was saying that null wasTony Hoare / Historically Bad Ideas: "Null References: The Billion Dollar Mistake"
01/23/2009"Memory resources into firstTony Hoare / Historically Bad Ideas: "Null References: The Billion Dollar Mistake"
01/23/2009Of course they're notTony Hoare / Historically Bad Ideas: "Null References: The Billion Dollar Mistake"
01/23/2009Thank you for pointing outTony Hoare / Historically Bad Ideas: "Null References: The Billion Dollar Mistake"
01/24/2009You haven't told me anythingTony Hoare / Historically Bad Ideas: "Null References: The Billion Dollar Mistake"
01/24/2009the part of this that has meTony Hoare / Historically Bad Ideas: "Null References: The Billion Dollar Mistake"
01/25/2009I have a fair amount ofTony Hoare / Historically Bad Ideas: "Null References: The Billion Dollar Mistake"
01/23/2009Maybe == null for referenceTony Hoare / Historically Bad Ideas: "Null References: The Billion Dollar Mistake"
01/22/2009He basically punts on theTony Hoare / Historically Bad Ideas: "Null References: The Billion Dollar Mistake"
01/22/2009From what I could brieflyTony Hoare / Historically Bad Ideas: "Null References: The Billion Dollar Mistake"
01/22/2009Almost all languages'What Are The Resolved Debates in General Purpose Language Design?
06/09/2007Uh, that won't workECMAScript Edition 4 Reference Implementation
07/14/2006Can't open PDF docs?computerhistory's History of LISP
02/11/2009I've arrived here whileLtU: blog not forum!
05/25/2006Different LanguageSoftware ideals and history
05/26/2006But thenSoftware ideals and history
10/25/2009LSP exists at the design levelThe Next Mainstream Programming Languages
04/11/2005Smaller is betterLanguage Design 101

LtU Topic Index Sorted by Date LtU Topic Index Sorted by Topic LtU Index of Post Authors Zipped LtU Archive


Chris Rathman/ Chris.Rathman@tx.rr.com