Maurice A. Williams
Author of |
Are you confused with the many contradictory interpretations of
Revelations? Are you still waiting for Hal Lindsey's final war with the Soviet Union,
a twentieth-century war that will end history as we know it? Do you think Tim LaHaye
is more correct in his "Left Behind" series, postponing this final war until the 21st
Century? Are you intrigued aith Hank Hanegraaff's series, "The Last Disciple," proposing,
as I do, that the prophecies were fulfilled during the early Church age? I am! I often wondered why the predictions in Revelations didn't
happen to the people that first heard them. After all, Revelations claims twice that
these predictions would happen soon. I studied many other interpretations and early
history to see if some predictions had already happened. "Revelation and the Fall of
Judea" describes what I found. I found a clue to interpret many visions by
reading J. Massyngberde Ford in the Anchor Bible Series. She pointed out that, today,
many Biblical scholars, after much textural study, believe parts of Revelation came
from John the Baptist. These scholars claim that Chapters four through eleven were
the original part of Revelation and were first preached by John the Baptist. Ford, an
expert in this field, reviewed their evidence and left it unchallenged. Their evidence
is part of the legitimate scholarship conducted on Revelation. These scholars believed that what came from the Baptist was preached by his
disciples for about thirty years. Then a Christian disciple of John the Baptist revised
and added more visions just before A.D. 66. Finally in A.D. 96, John the Evangelist
added the letters to the churches and made the final redaction that we have today.
If this be true, then the early visions are the Baptist's announcement that the Messiah
has arrived and the Baptist's warnings what would happen should his listeners not
accept the Messiah and oppose him. This caught my imagination. If the above were true, then our perception of the
historical events predicted by the visions would shift from modern times to a much
earlier period. Revelation is the most frequently interpreted and least understood book in the Bible.
The average person keeps reading book after book, hoping to get something that
makes sense. The most popular interpretations take the scattered bits of current
events we known and weave them into conformity with Revelation. This is a powerful
way to influence people who are not familiar with first and second century history.
I wondered, if we all knew early events as well as we know modern events, would we
see a better fit with early events than we do modern events. My aim is to contribute an easy-to-read, well researched, interpretation showing
that these early visions were meant primarily for first and
second-century Judeans. I believe that chapters four through sixteen explain who
Christ really is and that those who reject Christ and try to defeat him will themselves
be defeated. I spent many years researching history books and reading more than thirty
commentaries by other authors. As I did, I saw a logical fit of Chapters four through
sixteen with first and second century events as the Church grew and Judaism
declined. I wrote my book for the average reader. I state my case in plain, nontechnical English
so that my audience can easily follow my thinking. I deliberately meet low fog index
(10-11), high readability (60-65% Flesch scale), and medium grade level (8-9
Flesch-Kincaid). I avoid words likely to alienate people already sensitive to certain
words, for example:HOW I WROTE MY BOOK
For source material, I used long direct quotations from the following public domain texts:
I included long quotes so my readers need not consult other books to verify what I say as they read my book. I quote sufficient text to show the quotes in context. I used public domain texts to avoid permission problems quoting long passages from copyrighted material. I hope you like my book.
You can find more information about my book and me on my personal website http://www.geocities.com/mauricewms2003 and in articles I posted in http://www.writing.com and http://www.rosedog.com. I also posted poems on both websites, almost 60 on Writing.com. I have also posted reviews of books on several websites. Much of it is shown in my web page. More can be accessed through a search engine searching for my name within quote or the title of my book within guotes or both within quotes with the word AND typed between them. I hope you like my articles and poems. I hope you contact me either through Writing.com or my web page.