Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Ziskind v. Ziskind /aka Hart

Miami-Dade Court, 11th Circuit

(the truth is out there)

 

Disclaimer

 

SYBIL HART'S PROPERTY DEEDS

 

 

Reaction to Research Proposal From Texas Tech

February 17, 2002

Read how Sybil Hart’s colleagues at Texas Tech University admit that

“those of us who know her and care about her already know the story.”

Has Sybil Hart revealed the truth about the paternity of her youngest child to every one

except David Ziskind and the Florida Department of Revenue.?

Which story of Sybil Hart’s is the truth?

Only her hairdresser and everyone else know for sure.

David Ziskind knows the truth, but his biological children born of the marriage won’t listen to him.

Evan Marks, attorney for Sybil Hart will not listen to him.

Nancy Blount, Michael Bienstock, William Branch and the Florida Department of Revenue won’t listen to him.

The 11 Judicial Circuit won’t listen to him.

They will only listen to the lies of Sybil Hart.

 

Motion For Extension Of Time In Which To File A Motion For Re-Hearing-Sybil Hart

June 28, 2000

Sybil Hart asks for an Extension of Time to File a Motion For Re-Hearing based on the fact that she

needs to contact her attorney, Evan Marks, but Evan Marks withdrew

from Counsel of Record for Appeal purposes on February 3, 2000.

Told you he’d be back!!!.

 

 

Per Curiam Appellate Reversal of Judgment of Conviction- 3rd DCA

June 21, 2000

 

 

Motion To Withdraw As Counsel Of Record-Evan Marks

February 3, 2000

Notice in Sybil Hart’s letter that she claims the youngest daughter is hers. not "ours,"

and despite her getting over a quarter of a million dollars in November of 1999 from

the sale of the house that was given to her by her parents, she has no money for legal fees.

But the battle rages on and Mr. Marks makes ongoing appearances as Sybil Hart’s counsel, even

in the issue on Appeal that generated this Motion.

 

 

Order on Petitioner's Motion for  Protective Order on Paternity-Sybil Hart

January 13, 2000

The Court does not want to find out the truth, but if it granted a Protective Order, someone must be

afraid of the truth coming out.  If Sybil Hart has nothing to hide, why the need for a Protective Order?

 

 

Judgment of Conviction-Sybil Hart and Evan Marks

March 23, 1999

 

 

Motion for Relief-David Ziskind

March 19, 1999

 

Judge Gross refused to set hearing per Special Set Request

 

 

Motion For Clarification Of Time-David Ziskind

March 10, 1999

 

Notice of Cancellation of Hearing-Jury Trial-David Ziskind

March 10, 1999

 

Motion For Appellate Fees and Costs-David Ziskind

March 10, 1999

 

 

Motion for Attorney Fees-David Ziskind

March 1, 1999

Judge Gross refused to set hearing per Special Set Request

 

Former Husband’s Request for Rehearing of Former Wife’s Motion for Temporary Attorney Fees,

Motion to Vacate Court Ordered Award of Former Wife’s Temporary Attorney Fees,

Motion to Vacate Former Wife’s Motion For Contempt and Sanctions

March 1, 1998 –All the Same Motion-David Ziskind

Judge Gross refused to set hearing per Special Set Request

 

 

Answers to Interrogatories–Sybil Hart Ziskind

Feb. 18, 1999

More financial perjury, ignored by the Court.  How much did Sybil Hart and her father

Paul Hart pay Judge Gross to overlook her true financial status?

Sybil Hart does not disclose the sale of her property for over a Quarter of a Million dollars, nor

the fact that she put the money in a Muriel Siebert (soon to be uploaded) account of over $300,000.00.

Neither doe Sybil Hart disclose that she resigned from the University of Miami on August 24, 1997, less than a week before

she unilaterally moved to Texas with her children. In the Interrogatory she states that she was unemployed.

See the uploaded information from the University of Miami personnel file, and also from

Donald Kahn, Esq., relating to the sale of the property.

The Property Deeds listed below speak for themselves, in a truer fashion

than does Sybil Hart. Sybil Hart, Paul Hart, Evan Marks and Maynard “Skippy” Gross need to be put in jail for

criminal activities for all the financial fraud the committed upon the Court and David Ziskind.

 

 

Former Wife's Objection and Motion for Protective Order

on February 17, 1999

Sybil Hart and her attorney, Evan Marks did not want to disclose the true extent

of the “gifts” she receives from Paul and Paula Hart, nor the amount of co-mingling of funds,

and of course, Sybil Hart with the compliance of Evan Marks, and collusion of Judge Skippy Gross

did not want to disclose the full extent of transfer of property between Paul Hart and Sybil Hart.

What other financial elements has she failed to disclose. How far will her perjury, with the help of Evan Marks,

the 11th Judicial Circuit and the State’s Attorney General’s office

 go to further the fraud perjury on the Court and David Ziskind?

After all, if she did not disclose the fact that her youngest child is not the bio-child of the man she pegged as

father, if she hid her affairs and trysts, financial perjury is only child’s play.

(see Interrogatories Propounded to Former Wife-David Ziskind

November 16, 1998

 

 

Transcript-Motion for Order to Show Cause--Sybil Hart

Feb. 8, 1999

 

 

Order on Former Wife’s Motion for Temporary Attorneys Fees, Suit Monies and Costs-Sybil Hart

Dec. 21, 1998

Did Skippy Gross hear any testimony in the Dec. 4, 1998 hearing, or was he paid off?

 

 

Former Wife’s Affidavit Establishing Former Husband’s Contemptuous Conduct-Sybil Hart

Dec. 18, 1998

Notice that the affidavit is not signed, nor was a signed affidavit ever presented  to the Court.

None of the children or other affected parties were allowed to testify.

It was Sybil Hart’s word only, and as we have seen, she has been very honest about

her finances.  Why would she be less than truthful here?

Notice that Sybil refers to the children as “our daughters”. 

She knows the truth about the paternity of the youngest.

Is this further perjury and lies before the court?

 

 

Former Wife's Objection and Motion for Protective Order-Sybil Hart

Dec. 10, 1998

Read the case cited by Evan Marks in his Motion for Protective Order

The Tom Jones Case-(Sybil Hart is not a Lady)

Notice that this Motion for Protective Order came after the Dec. 4, 1998 hearing

that awarded Sybil Hart attorney fees, based on her perjured financial affidavits.

(Collusion between client, attorney and judge?  Only they know for sure)

 

 

Former Wife's Response To Former Husband's Motion For Contempt-

Sybil Hart and Evan Marks

Dec. 9, 1998

 

 

Transcript of Dec, 4, 1998 Attorney Fees Hearing- Evan Marks

Dec. 4, 1998

 

This is the document that got me involved in David’s Paternity Fraud Case.

(Actually, it was the subpoena served on me two days before.)

Notice how Evan Marks uses David Ziskind’s testimony to ask about my income,

and whether David supports me and my minor daughter,

but ignores Sybil Hart’s testimony that her parents provide her with income.

I was subpoenaed to present all my financial records at this hearing,

yet they never asked me to testify, the Court only took David’s words.

And, notice how outraged Evan Marks seems to be about David

possibly supporting my child (which he is not),

yet Evan Marks thinks that it is perfectly ok to support Sybil Hart’s child,

who has no relationship to David Ziskind, and even though David Ziskind is not the bio-father

of the youngest child born of the marriage, born of an adulterous relationship by

Sybil Hart, and passed off through fraud and lies as the child of David Ziskind.

Can we say Whore or is there another name for a married women who has an affair?

Evan Marks ought to be disbarred and forbidden from ever

practicing law again based on this case.

 

 

Subpoena Duces Tecum for Nadine Mendelsohn-Evan Marks for Sybil Hart

December 25, 1998

 

Does a subpoena such as this violate the law of spousal privilege?

Evan Marks and his cadre wanted to force me to testify against my husband ! ! !.

Evan Marks ought to be disbarred for his actions, and all the cases that he won in court should

be overturned for the party, with damages. 

 

 

Interrogatories Propounded to Former Wife-David Ziskind

November 16, 1998

 

These are the Interrogatories that brought about the

(see Former Wife's Objection and Motion for Protective Order)

Notice of Compliance-Sybil Hart

August 21, 1998

 

 

Order to Restrict Telephone Contact-Sybil Hart and Evan Marks

August 31, 1998

 

 

Financial Affidavit (Perjured)-Sybil Hart

June 24, 1998

Sybil again conveniently fails to mention her property deeds, and the

fact that she sold the property,  despite her having an interest in the property since 1992,

and fails to make any mention of it during the original divorce.

Evan Marks and Judge Gross were in collusion with Sybil Hart and her father

Paul Hart to hide the true financial status of Sybil Hart, and to harass and destroy

David Ziskind, a Paternity Fraud and Financial Fraud Victim. 

The first duty of an Officer of the Court, including Judges and Attorneys, is to the truth.

Evan Marks and Judge Gross have failed miserably in their duty to the Court, and should be disbarred and/or thrown off the bench.

 

 

Former Wife's Motion to Restrict Telephone Contact -Sybil Hart and Evan Marks

June 23, 1998

 

BellSouth Phone Bill-David Ziskind and Nadine G. Mendelsohn

Jun 23-July 22, 1998

 

 

Proof of Paternity-David Ziskind

January 18, 1996

The bio-father of the two oldest children born of the marriage is David Ziskind

 

Proof of Non-Paternity-David Ziskind

October 17, 1995

The bio-father of the youngest child born of the marriage is NOT David Ziskind

 

 

Respondent’s Petition For Modification, etc.

April 21, 1997

 

Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage and Order On Report Of General Master

April 28, 1994

 

 

Report Of The General Master and Notice Of Filing

March 15, 1994

The document speaks for itself

 

 

Sybil Hart's Financial Affidavit of May 23, 1993

May 23, 1993

Notice there is no disclosure about the property which was given to her by her father, Paul Hart.

Also, Lincoln Bay Holding, Sybil Hart’s employer was owned by her parents, Paul and Paula Hart.

No payroll records from Lincoln Bay were ever submitted for accuracy of the above Financial Affidavit.

 

 

Click below To view

SYBIL HART'S PROPERTY DEEDS

If you would like your Paternity Fraud story posted on this page, please e-mail to:

 

Paternity Fraud