Miami-Dade Court, 11th Circuit
(the truth is out there)
Reaction
to Research Proposal From Texas Tech
February 17, 2002
Read how Sybil Hart’s colleagues at Texas Tech
University admit that
“those of us who know her and care about her
already know the story.”
Has Sybil Hart revealed the truth about the
paternity of her youngest child to every one
except David Ziskind and the Florida Department
of Revenue.?
Which story of Sybil Hart’s is the truth?
Only her hairdresser and everyone else know
for sure.
David Ziskind knows the truth, but his
biological children born of the marriage won’t listen to him.
Evan Marks, attorney for Sybil Hart will not
listen to him.
Nancy Blount, Michael Bienstock, William
Branch and the Florida Department of Revenue won’t listen to him.
The 11 Judicial Circuit won’t listen to him.
They will only listen to the lies of Sybil
Hart.
Motion
For Extension Of Time In Which To File A Motion For Re-Hearing-Sybil Hart
June 28, 2000
Sybil Hart asks for an Extension of Time to
File a Motion For Re-Hearing based on the fact that she
needs to contact her attorney, Evan Marks, but
Evan Marks withdrew
from Counsel of Record for Appeal purposes on
February 3, 2000.
Told
you he’d be back!!!.
Per
Curiam Appellate Reversal of Judgment of Conviction- 3rd DCA
June
21, 2000
Motion
To Withdraw As Counsel Of Record-Evan Marks
February 3, 2000
Notice in Sybil Hart’s letter that she claims the
youngest daughter is hers. not "ours,"
and despite her getting over a quarter of a
million dollars in November of 1999 from
the sale of the house that was given to her by
her parents, she has no money for legal fees.
But the battle rages on and Mr. Marks makes
ongoing appearances as Sybil Hart’s counsel, even
in
the issue on Appeal that generated this Motion.
Order
on Petitioner's Motion for Protective
Order on Paternity-Sybil Hart
January 13, 2000
The Court does not want to find out the truth,
but if it granted a Protective Order, someone must be
afraid
of the truth coming out. If Sybil Hart
has nothing to hide, why the need for a Protective Order?
Judgment
of Conviction-Sybil Hart and Evan Marks
March
23, 1999
Motion
for Relief-David Ziskind
March
19, 1999
Judge
Gross refused to set hearing per Special Set Request
Motion
For Clarification Of Time-David Ziskind
March
10, 1999
Notice
of Cancellation of Hearing-Jury Trial-David Ziskind
March
10, 1999
Motion
For Appellate Fees and Costs-David Ziskind
March
10, 1999
Motion
for Attorney Fees-David Ziskind
March 1, 1999
Judge
Gross refused to set hearing per Special Set Request
Former
Husband’s Request for Rehearing of Former Wife’s Motion for Temporary Attorney
Fees,
Motion to
Vacate Court Ordered Award of Former Wife’s Temporary Attorney Fees,
Motion to
Vacate Former Wife’s Motion For Contempt and Sanctions
March 1, 1998 –All the Same Motion-David
Ziskind
Judge
Gross refused to set hearing per Special Set Request
Answers
to Interrogatories–Sybil Hart Ziskind
Feb. 18, 1999
More financial perjury, ignored by the
Court. How much did Sybil Hart and her
father
Paul Hart pay Judge Gross to overlook her true
financial status?
Sybil Hart does not disclose the sale of her
property for over a Quarter of a Million dollars, nor
the fact that she put the money in a Muriel
Siebert (soon to be uploaded) account of over $300,000.00.
Neither doe Sybil Hart disclose that she
resigned from the University of Miami on August 24, 1997, less than a week
before
she unilaterally moved to Texas with her
children. In the Interrogatory she states that she was unemployed.
See the uploaded information from the
University of Miami personnel file, and also from
Donald Kahn, Esq., relating to the sale of the
property.
The Property Deeds listed below speak for
themselves, in a truer fashion
than does Sybil Hart. Sybil Hart, Paul Hart,
Evan Marks and Maynard “Skippy” Gross need to be put in jail for
criminal
activities for all the financial fraud the committed upon the Court and David
Ziskind.
Former
Wife's Objection and Motion for Protective Order
on February 17, 1999
Sybil Hart and her attorney, Evan Marks did not
want to disclose the true extent
of the “gifts” she receives from Paul and
Paula Hart, nor the amount of co-mingling of funds,
and of course, Sybil Hart with the compliance
of Evan Marks, and collusion of Judge Skippy Gross
did not want to disclose the full extent of
transfer of property between Paul Hart and Sybil Hart.
What other financial elements has she failed
to disclose. How far will her perjury, with the help of Evan Marks,
the 11th Judicial Circuit and the State’s
Attorney General’s office
go to
further the fraud perjury on the Court and David Ziskind?
After all, if she did not disclose the fact
that her youngest child is not the bio-child of the man she pegged as
father, if she hid her affairs and trysts,
financial perjury is only child’s play.
(see Interrogatories
Propounded to Former Wife-David Ziskind
November
16, 1998
Transcript-Motion
for Order to Show Cause--Sybil Hart
Feb.
8, 1999
Order
on Former Wife’s Motion for Temporary Attorneys Fees, Suit Monies and Costs-Sybil
Hart
Dec. 21, 1998
Did
Skippy Gross hear any testimony in the Dec. 4, 1998 hearing, or was he paid
off?
Former
Wife’s Affidavit Establishing Former Husband’s Contemptuous Conduct-Sybil
Hart
Dec. 18, 1998
Notice that the affidavit is not signed, nor
was a signed affidavit ever presented
to the Court.
None of the children or other affected parties
were allowed to testify.
It was Sybil Hart’s word only, and as we have
seen, she has been very honest about
her finances.
Why would she be less than truthful here?
Notice that Sybil refers to the children as
“our daughters”.
She knows the truth about the paternity of the
youngest.
Is
this further perjury and lies before the court?
Former
Wife's Objection and Motion for Protective Order-Sybil
Hart
Dec. 10, 1998
Read the case cited by Evan Marks in his Motion
for Protective Order
The
Tom Jones Case-(Sybil Hart is not a Lady)
Notice that this Motion for Protective Order
came after the Dec. 4, 1998 hearing
that awarded Sybil Hart attorney fees, based
on her perjured financial affidavits.
(Collusion
between client, attorney and judge?
Only they know for sure)
Former
Wife's Response To Former Husband's Motion For Contempt-
Sybil Hart and Evan Marks
Dec.
9, 1998
Transcript
of Dec, 4, 1998 Attorney Fees Hearing- Evan Marks
Dec.
4, 1998
This is the document that got me involved in
David’s Paternity Fraud Case.
(Actually, it was the subpoena
served on me two days before.)
Notice how Evan Marks uses David Ziskind’s
testimony to ask about my income,
and whether David supports me and my minor
daughter,
but ignores Sybil Hart’s testimony that her
parents provide her with income.
I was subpoenaed
to present all my financial records at this hearing,
yet they never asked me to testify, the Court
only took David’s words.
And, notice how outraged Evan Marks seems to
be about David
possibly supporting my child (which he is
not),
yet Evan Marks thinks that it is perfectly ok
to support Sybil Hart’s child,
who has no relationship to David Ziskind, and
even though David Ziskind is not the bio-father
of the youngest child born of the marriage,
born of an adulterous relationship by
Sybil Hart, and passed off through fraud and
lies as the child of David Ziskind.
Can we say Whore or is there another name for
a married women who has an affair?
Evan Marks ought to be disbarred and forbidden
from ever
practicing law again based on this case.
Subpoena
Duces Tecum for Nadine Mendelsohn-Evan Marks for Sybil Hart
December
25, 1998
Does a subpoena such as this violate the law
of spousal privilege?
Evan Marks and his cadre wanted to force me to
testify against my husband ! ! !.
Evan Marks ought to be disbarred for his
actions, and all the cases that he won in court should
be overturned for the party, with
damages.
Interrogatories
Propounded to Former Wife-David Ziskind
November
16, 1998
These are the Interrogatories that brought
about the
(see Former
Wife's Objection and Motion for Protective Order)
Notice
of Compliance-Sybil Hart
August
21, 1998
Order
to Restrict Telephone Contact-Sybil Hart and Evan Marks
August
31, 1998
Financial
Affidavit (Perjured)-Sybil Hart
June 24, 1998
Sybil again conveniently fails to mention her
property deeds, and the
fact that she sold the property, despite her having an interest in the
property since 1992,
and fails to make any mention of it during the
original divorce.
Evan Marks and Judge Gross were in collusion
with Sybil Hart and her father
Paul Hart to hide the true financial status of
Sybil Hart, and to harass and destroy
David Ziskind, a Paternity Fraud and Financial
Fraud Victim.
The first duty of an Officer of the Court,
including Judges and Attorneys, is to the truth.
Evan
Marks and Judge Gross have failed miserably in their duty to the Court, and
should be disbarred and/or thrown off the bench.
Former
Wife's Motion to Restrict Telephone Contact -Sybil Hart and Evan Marks
June
23, 1998
BellSouth
Phone Bill-David Ziskind and Nadine G. Mendelsohn
Jun
23-July 22, 1998
Proof
of Paternity-David Ziskind
January 18, 1996
The
bio-father of the two oldest children born of the marriage is David Ziskind
Proof
of Non-Paternity-David Ziskind
October 17, 1995
The
bio-father of the youngest child born of the marriage is NOT
David Ziskind
Respondent’s
Petition For Modification, etc.
April
21, 1997
Final
Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage and Order On Report Of General Master
April
28, 1994
Report
Of The General Master and Notice Of Filing
March 15, 1994
The
document speaks for itself
Sybil
Hart's Financial Affidavit of May 23, 1993
May 23, 1993
Notice there is no disclosure about the
property which was given to her by her father, Paul Hart.
Also, Lincoln Bay Holding, Sybil Hart’s
employer was owned by her parents, Paul and Paula Hart.
No
payroll records from Lincoln Bay were ever submitted for accuracy of the above
Financial Affidavit.
Click below To view
If you would like your Paternity Fraud
story posted on this page, please e-mail to: