|
The first encounter - - - will the game live up to the hype? The worst thing - for me, anyway - would be a resounding loss for Kasparov. I keep my fingers crossed and begin to observe.
GM Garry Kasparov
(2847) - Deep_Junior
(Computer) (2500)
|
My
take on this game? I watched the whole game on the
X3D site. The choice of the Slav/Semi-Slav by Black should have done well. (Fritz did very well from classical positions against Kramnik.) But Kasparov counters with the ultra-sharp play, 7.g4!?. ( Maybe - '!!' If he had lost this game, I am sure everyone would have roundly condemned this move! ) But Kasparov has come well-prepared ... the experts tell me the computer was OUT of its {computer} book before move ten!! Move 13 was possibly new, I could not find this move in any of my books, my database or any on-line database. (Hillarp-Petersson had previously played 13.Kb1.) I thought b5 was a gross blunder. (At that level.) An Internet student of mine has a brand-new (Pentium IV) computer and was running Fritz 8.0. He said the computer already considered White to be clearly better. In any case, I feel ...b5; definitely made White's job easier. Kasparov played very sharply and accurately. The move 17...Re8???; must have been the result of some type of power surge or a hole in the program. After this move, the computer has ZERO chance of defeating a player of Kasparov's caliber! The game did NOT live up to the hype. But I warned everyone, Kasparov will come prepared armed to the teeth. All holes in the opening book will be discovered. Any trends or tendencies of the program to play poorly in certain types of positions or endgames will also be fully exploited. ( I wonder if there is any truth to the rumor that hundreds of Russian Masters were given computers and Junior 7.0, and asked to play games against the computer program? { ---> To look for any possible weakness.} ) Hype and rumor aside - this match is looking like a blowout. Of course, I predicted the same thing when Kramnik was far ahead of Deep Fritz, I will be more cautious this time. I think a final score of 4-2 is completely reasonable ... at least up to this point. (I first drafted the above paragraph about a week before the match was to begin.) Kasparov
wins game one against computer
|
The main page (X3D) for this match will be here.
I
need your help. Click here to
find out how you can keep this
a web site that everyone can enjoy.
This page was last updated on 06/16/06 .
(Clicking on this will take you to the page that covers the
next
game.)
Copyright (c) A.J. Goldsby I
Copyright (©) A.J. Goldsby, 2002 - 2004 & 2005.
Copyright (©) A.J. Goldsby, 2006. All rights reserved.