Col. Tom McKenney USMC (Ret.)
The following is a series of articles
written by Tom McKenney and published in Citizens' Intelligence Digest,
the Newsletter of Citizens for Honest Government.
Citizens' Intelligence Digest
October 1996 Issue
Subject: October Colonel's
by Lt. Col. Tom McKenney,
Since my participation in the publication of the book The Clinton
Chronicles, I have gotten to know
retired Col. Eugene Holmes, the ROTC Commander to whom Bill
Clinton lied in the summer of
1969 in his last dishonest maneuver to avoid military service
during the Vietnam War. Col. Holmes
and I have become close friends, and he is one of the finest
men I have ever known.
You may remember that, after promising Col. Holmes that he would
immediately enroll at the
University of Arkansas and after being admitted to the ROTC
program there, Clinton quickly left for
England, without a word to Col. Holmes, to organize anti-American
After drawing a high number in the draft lottery that assured
him of protection from the draft, Clinton
wrote that now-infamous letter to Col. Holmes in which he admitted
that he had lied, that he "loathed
the military," and that he admired those who had refused to
fight for their country. The Clinton camp
thought that all copies of that letter had been destroyed, but
one survived. It may be found in
Appendix A of The Clinton Chronicles book.
More than once, Col. Holmes has told me the story of another
young Arkansas man of the Sixties,
one who stands in stark contrast to Bill Clinton and one for
whom Col. Holmes still grieves. His name
was Tim Johnson.
Tim was an outstanding student in the ROTC unit, and because
of this he had his choice of duties
when he graduated. Because Tim had a wife and two small children,
Col. Holmes advised him to
choose a branch of service less dangerous than the infantry.
But Tim stood at attention and replied, "No, sir! I'm going
all the way, sir! Infantry, airborne, special
A few months after graduation - Col. Holmes says it seemed like
only a few days - Tim was killed in
Vietnam and Col. Holmes was attending his funeral. Col. Holmes
wishes he had never met Bill
Clinton. But his heart still aches for young Tim.
Citizens' Intelligence Digest
October 1996 Issue
The Manchurian President:
By Lt. Colonel T.C. McKenney,
There is something strange and profoundly
important going on between Bill Clinton and the People's
Republic of China (which is still called
Red China by many of us military types).
To begin with there is China's "Most Favored
Nation" trade status, recently renewed. This in the face
of China's slaughter of demonstrators
in Tiananmen Square (with still no word of regret); the ongoing
imprisonment, torture and execution of
those with "dangerous" views (free speech, democratic
government, etc.); and her ongoing policy
of forced abortion.
In fact, Red China - where pregnant women
are forced to have abortions up to term, are involuntarily
sterilized, and may be imprisoned, tortured
and murdered for being pregnant more than once - has
the worst record of human rights violations
And then there is the matter of patented
technology, stolen by Red China's espionage apparatus on
an ongoing basis. Clinton's unbelievable
response? He directed the U.S. Patent Office to turn over to
China its entire data base! What was his
expressed rationale for this utterly irrational act? "Now we
won't have to wonder which secrets they
But even more unbelievable, and more dangerous,
is the export of our most advanced naval
technology to Red China.
There is in Washington, D.C., a group
called the Generals' and Admirals' Mess. It is a regular
gathering of officers (both active duty
and retired) of flag rank. They meet regularly, have dinner
together, discuss military and political
affairs, and hear invited, high-level speakers.
Shortly before his suicide death last
year, Admiral Boorda, Chief of Naval Operations, was the
speaker for the flag officers' mess. In
his speech, Boorda reported proudly that our advanced naval
technology - highly classified secret
information for which a foreign nation would pay millions, and for
which any spy would kill - is being voluntarily
given to Red China!
After the CNO's speech was concluded,
Major General John K. Singlaub, USA (Ret.), amazed and
horrified, approached the admiral and
expressed disbelief. After all, China is a sworn enemy of our
nation and all that we represent, and
is the only nation on Earth with the power to be an actual threat
to our existence.
Under certain circumstances, it may be
justifiable to share such secret technology with an Allied
Nation such as Great Britain. But to give
it to an enemy nation is suicidal madness, and an act of
treason for which a member of the Armed
Forces or a private citizen could be executed.
According to General Singlaub, when he
asked Admiral Boorda how such a thing could be justified,
the admiral smiled uneasily and said,
"It is the President's ... the administration's policy."
Nothing in the Clinton administration
"just happens," and I assure you that nothing of significance
happens (at least not more than once)
without the knowledge and personal approval of Clinton
Just what is Bill Clinton up to where
Red China is concerned? This is perhaps the most important
question of this day, and one that has
gone unasked by the establishment media.
Citizens' Intelligence Digest
July 1997 Issue
Freedom Isn't Free
By Lt. Col. Tom McKenney
The battle for Okinawa, fought from April
through June of 1945, was the last major battle of World
War II. It was also the bloodiest battle
of the Pacific campaign. The highest ranking American to die
in the war, Lieutenant General Simon Bolivar
Buckner, the overall commander, was killed in the
closing days of the battle.
There was a good reason for the protracted
ferocity of the fighting. The Japanese knew that if they
couldn't hold Okinawa, the war was lost.
The Japanese have a word for an all-or-nothing situation
upon which everything else depends: tenozan.
They applied this term to their defense of Okinawa
and fought to the death there with unprecedented
The American landing at mid-island on
the west coast was unopposed. It was 1 April, which
happened to be both Easter Sunday and
April Fools Day. Both were portents of what was to come:
the unexpected ease of the push northward,
and the bloody nightmare that was the push south.
Americans clearing the northern half of
the island moved rapidly, encountering generally light
resistance. A few pockets of heavy fighting
yielded surprisingly few casualties. But one of those made
hearts heavy around the world. The beloved
war correspondent Ernie Pyle, who had covered both
the European and Pacific theaters, was
killed in the capture of the small island of Ie Shima off the
Meanwhile, the Navy suffered terrible
losses offshore due to desperation Kamikaze attacks by
Japanese suicide bombers. As the Marines
moved up the coast, they found the beaches awash with
the bodies of dead American sailors. It
was the costliest naval battle in U.S. history.
When the northern half of the island was
secured, the Marine and Army divisions turned southward
and immediately met ferocious, well-coordinated
resistance. It was the beginning of a bloodbath.
Struggle for Sugarloaf Hill
Among the most fiercely defended of the
Japanese strongholds in the south was a group of three low
hills, mutually supporting and honeycombed
with deep tunnels. The key hill in the center looked
something like a loaf of bread. In the
following desperate days, the Marines came to call it Sugarloaf.
The open, rolling terrain approaching
Sugarloaf became a killing field. For almost a week, Marines
fought across the bloody valley and up
the front slope of Sugarloaf, only to die there or be driven
back by by intense supporting fire from
the other two hills and counterattacks out of the tunnels on
Sugarloaf's reverse slope.
A microcosm of the violence and horror
that was the battle for southern Okinawa was the experience
on Sugarloaf of one lanky young Marine
from Illinois, Corporal Jim Day, a squad leader in George
Company of the 2nd Battalion, 22nd Marines.
During those brutal, bloody days and nights,
squads, platoons and companies simply ceased to exist.
Individual officers, sergeants and corporals
gathered anyone around them who was able to walk,
regardless of unit, and organized them
into ad hoc squads and platoons to attack what was before
them. When a man's weapon was disabled,
the weapons of the dead were picked up and used - and
there was no shortage of extra weapons.
Volunteers for Hell
On 14 May, the call came for volunteers
to assist Fox Company, positioned on George's right flank
and badly shot up. Cpl. Day and Pvt. Dale
Bertoli responded and moved into position northwest of
But instead of Fox Company, they found
mostly dead Marines there. A mortally wounded lieutenant
asked Day to take six replacements, just
arrived from the rear, and occupy a what he knew would
be a key position: a bomb crater on the
right slope of Sugarloaf.
Day and Bertoli took the new men and moved
out. One man was killed before they could reach the
bomb crater. Once inside the crater, Day
and his men immediately came under a heavy ground
attack accompanied by artillery fire.
In this initial attack four of the new men were killed; the other
was wounded but lived to be evacuated
It was the beginning of four days and
three nights of uninterrupted hell in and around that bomb
After the inital attack, Bertoli was struck
down with dengue fever and could not function, even to
throw grenades. Cpl. Day fought on alone.
Hearing wounded Marines crying for help to his rear, Day
left the crater, moved through heavy fire
and found four. One by one, he brought them to the relative
safety of the crater, and then went back
for their machine gun and ammunition.
All four of them were subsequently killed
in the crater. McDonald, the wounded gunner, was killed
by cannon fire while helping Day fire
the machine gun during a heavy attack. The same round
destroyed the gun and wounded Day in both
hands, and he was again fighting alone.
Four four days and three nights, Day held
the right flank of Sugarloaf alone against unremitting
infantry and artillery attacks. He was
wounded in both hands, the legs and the groin. During the entire
time, he had no artillery or air support,
for he had no radio.
Although Bertoli couldn't help in the
fight, he refused to leave Day. Delirious from pain and fever, and
incontinent, Bertoli stayed by him until
Counting the Cost
When Sugarloaf was finally secured on
17 May, there were found in the crater 8 dead Marines -
their bodies literally blown to bits by
artillery and mortar fire - and 12 dead Japanese. The bottom of
the muddy crater was filled with blood,
mixed with water from the intermittent cold rain; body parts
floated in it.
On the rim of the crater, and stretching
for 70 yards to the front, were more than 100 dead Japanese.
The air was heavy with the smells of death
and decomposing bodies.
Recently I spoke with Jim Day about what
it was like that last day in the crater of death, 52 years
ago. Now retired Major General Day, ever
the master of understatement when speaking about
himself, replied, "Tom, it was not a pleasant
place to be."
By the time Sugarloaf was secured, the
hill had been blasted into a lifeless, rocky moonscape.
Heroes, most of whom were never recorded;
outstanding leaders, struck down in their prime; and
countless ordinary kids, terrified but
fighting on, had soaked it red with their blood.
In the ferocity of the combat, Day's platoon
leader was killed, and the platoon leader who replaced
him was also killed. His company commander
was wounded and evacuated. Even his battalion
executive officer, battalion commander
and regimental commander were all killed.
In the closing days of the campaign, far
south of Sugarloaf, Dale Bertoli rejoined the fighting and gave
his life for his country. Jim Day was
grievously wounded and medevac'd.
No, freedom isn't free. Only God, and
those who have paid the price for it, really know its
Citizens' Intelligence Digest
September/October 1997 Issue
America's Second War
By Lt.Col. Tom McKenney,
The underlying globalist agenda of the
media elite has surfaced in the History Channel's ongoing
series "Year By Year." In this series'
piece on the year 1943, they used old film footage in the
"newsreel" format, as if we were actually
seeing and hearing newsreels from 1943. The style, and
even the voice of the narrator, were very
But one fatal flaw revealed that these
"newsreels" were faked. In describing the actions of our troops
in the battles of 1943, in every case
the narrator referred to American or Allied troops as "United
What's wrong with doing this? Simply the
fact that there was no United Nations in 1943. It didn't
exist until after the war was over, in
late 1945! Perhaps the UN existed in the hearts and minds of the
globalists, but we the people had never
heard of it at that time.
Why, then, would Roger Mudd and company
commit such a transparent act of dishonest journalism?
It is clearly their intention to rewrite
history so as to condition us to think positively of the UN.
You see, most Americans today are too
young to remember WWII, but the popular perception is
that it was a "good" war - a clear-cut
battle of good versus evil, a war against the tyranny of Hitler,
Hirohito and company, fought for the freedom
of the world.
Therefore, if people can be indoctrinated
to think the Allied victory was a UN victory, then the UN
gains credibility and acceptance that
it doesn't deserve. But why do this . . . what's going on here?
The American Revolution, our War for American
Independence, was fought from 1775 to 1783.
The result was independence for the British
colonies in America, and the founding of our nation as a
unique democratic republic. At a tremendous
cost of blood and individual sacrifice, our new nation
emerged free and independent.
"So what?" you may be thinking, "doesn't
every school boy and girl know this?" No, sad to relate,
every school boy and girl does not know
this. Their grandparents probably knew these things, for
they were taught them at home and in school.
In some cases, this also applies to their parents. But for
a generation or two now, facts and principles
concerning our national history have quietly
disappeared from history books and public
Many children today will not only know
nothing of "Washington's Farewell Address," they may know
little or nothing about Washington himself.
They will not know of Jefferson's proverb, "That
government is best, which governs least,"
nor of Patrick Henry's flaming words, "Give me liberty or
give me death!"
Worse still, they are being taught a distorted
worldview that sees independence, national pride and
patriotism as bad things that must be
stamped out, indeed must be abolished if ever we are to have
peace and social progress in the world.
Meanwhile, there is a growing army of
powerful political and social manipulators whose dream is
establishment of a One-World Government
under the United Nations. These bankers, bureaucrats,
publishers and political leaders work
tirelessly to bring about the emergence of one "global village,"
under the benevolent single power represented
by the UN.
The result is a rapidly growing acceptance
of U.S. participation in UN goals and programs, and a
tendency to surrender control of our foreign
and domestic policies to the UN. While our
ever-weakening Armed Forces are increasingly
placed under foreign UN generals in meddling
"peace-keeping" operations around the
world, our State and Interior departments rush to surrender
vast areas of our national parks, national
forests and private property to "biosphere reserves" under
But what, many wonder, could be wrong
with a World Government? Wouldn't it assure World
The globalists will argue that as long
as individual nations have independence, freedom and power,
they will fight with one another and there
will be wars with their attendant suffering. By contrast, a
World Government would retain all the
power (tanks, guns, etc.) and would enforce peace, putting
an end to wars. Individual nations and
their citizens would be disarmed.
Other "benefits" would include rescuing
the environment from contamination by limiting human
population and forcibly excluding people
from vast areas of what are now state and national parks,
private homes, farms and ranches. The
wealth of the rich nations would be taken and distributed to
the poor nations, eliminating poverty.
This is what they will argue.
But there are inherent, necessary consequences
of such a global utopia. The essential ingredient in
this recipe for peace and justice is the
surrender of national sovereignty.
This would mean (literally) nullifying
the Constitution and snuffing out the American dream of
individual freedom and unlimited opportunity
to learn and achieve. It would almost certainly mean the
end of our rights, as Americans, to own
property, have the children God gives us, keep and bear
arms, assemble, speak and write our opinions,
freely exercise our religious beliefs, etc. There would
necessarily be a UN Police Force (a "Global
Gestapo") without the limitations of police power now
afforded us by the Bill of Rights.
The globalist will reply that such a World
Government could offer the very same guarantees of
personal freedom that our Founding Fathers
codified in our American founding documents. And this
is true . . . theoretically. But the worldview
of leading globalist thinkers is decidedly socialistic -
antithetical to the thinking of our Founding
The obvious and insoluble problem here
is that if such an all-powerful global government should not
be so inclined, there would be no recourse
for the member nations (let alone individual citizens) when
wrongs occur. Individual nations would
have no more ability to change their conditions for the better
than did the individual "republics" of
the Soviet Union under Lenin, Stalin or Gorbachev.
In short, there is this one fatal flaw
in the idea of a global government: it would be an instant
totalitarian government, with ALL the
power, unchallenged on the Earth. The nature of man and the
history of civilization argue conclusively
that totalitarian governments do not nurture and preserve
freedom; rather, they limit and crush
Such a World Government would have no
more assurance of individual freedoms than did those of
Nero, Ghengis Khan, Hitler, Stalin, Pol
Pot or Saddam Hussein. That kind of power has never failed
to produce that kind of corruption and
abuse. Tyrants, once in power, don't voluntarily relinquish
their power; they protect and reinforce
No, the degree to which our national sovereignty
is surrendered to the authority of the UN is the
degree to which our hope of freedom is
gone, most likely forever. It is as simple, and as serious, as
that. And if we the people don't rise
up and stop the process, this is exactly where we are headed.
As the global establishment has grown
stronger, and as knowledge of our nation's history and
traditions has been progressively diluted,
global government is increasingly seen as a noble concept
and patriotism as unenlightened, reactionary
With increasing approval, the globalists
have brought their once secret agenda out into the open.
Things that were once spoken only in private
corporate boardrooms, and in the guarded secret
meetings of the Council on Foreign Relations,
are beginning to be spoken publicly.
Two examples will illustrate this change.
Strobe Talbot is Bill Clinton's long-time
friend. He is pro-Soviet, has lived many years in Russia, and
was Clinton's fellow anti-American activist
during the Vietnam War. A former Newsweek editor,
Talbot became Clinton's Ambassador-at-Large
to the former USSR.
In 1993, the World Federalist Association
presented Talbot with its Norman Cousins Global
Governance Award, for advancing the cause
of global government. In a letter to the Association,
President Clinton expressed glowing approval
of the award, writing (on White House stationery),
"Norman Cousins worked for world peace
and World Government;" Clinton also wished the
Association "future success."
A more recent example of this "out of
the closet" globalism is Walter Cronkite, pipe-smoking pundit
emeritus at CBS-TV, selected in a recent
poll as one of the "most trusted" men in America. In a
Time magazine interview, Cronkite said
that "nations need to see the light and give up sovereignty . . .
it's necessary for One-World Government,
and the only thing that will prevent global war." What
could be more plain?
Are we happy and satisfied with our current
government, the Clinton White House and the
Republican Congress? Of course not! Most
of us feel threatened by the former and betrayed by the
But blessed be God, and thanks to the
visionary wisdom of our Founding Fathers, there is still the
possibility of change. If ever we give
up our national sovereignty, that possibility will be gone.
Citizens' Intelligence Digest
Dreams and the Freedom
By Lt. Col. Tom McKenney
The change agents of the Globalist Left
continue to launch assaults on our constitutional system and
Lincoln observed that "the beliefs and
values of this generation's classroom will become the policies
of the next generation's government."
The radical Left has gained virtually
complete control of the public schools (and the Education
Colleges that train their teachers) and
is turning them into indoctrination centers for global socialism,
moral relativism and New Age paganism:
in short, for the New World Order.
Emphasis on learning basic subjects has
been replaced with self-esteem and politically correct
attitudes. Challenging for individual
excellence is out; mediocrity and group work are in. The goal is
for everyone to be the same. Independent
thinking and initiative are out; the herd mentality and
"group solutions" are in.
Correct spelling and grammar are out;
make-up-your-own is in. Well-educated teachers, imparting
knowledge gained over many years, are
out; the kids teach each other. In fact, teachers are no longer
teachers (really); they are now just "facilitators,"
allowing the children to teach themselves things they
God, of course, is out; spirit guides
and Gaia, the Earth goddess, are in.
It's About Control.
Ultimately, it's all about control of
the children to indoctrinate them. That's why educrats want to start
them before kindergarten - teaching certificates
are now being issued in education colleges for
"Newborn through Primary."
That is why they want year-round schools,
serving breakfast as well as lunch, and school-based
"health" clinics with condoms, birth control
pills and abortion referrals. The family (you remember, a
father, mother and some children, living
together in a house) is an outdated concept. The children are
now "commodities," to be raised by the
Our traditional system consisted of three
levels of education: elementary (grade school), secondary
(high school), and higher (college/university).
It has worked well, despite the experimentation of
educational bureaucrats, relentlessly
trying to "fix" something that wasn't broken. But lately a new
term is being used by educrats: you will
be hearing of something called "post-secondary" education.
When I first heard the term, I thought
it must be just another trendy expression. "Post" is merely Latin
for "after"; therefore, post-secondary
education merely means education that occurs after high
school. And that just means college, right?
Wrong. It doesn't mean that anymore. What
it does mean is perhaps the most sinister threat to our
traditional liberty yet launched by the
New World Order socialists.
The European "Track" System.
The plan is to assign children to educational
"tracks," preparing them for future work careers, chosen
for them by elitist bureaucrats. The tracks
will be assigned very early, with children monitored from
birth. The vast majority will be placed
on a track that will lead to non-academic vocational training -
to put it simply, factory work, construction,
A small number, undoubtedly children of
the controlling elite, will be placed on the track for
academic education leading to college,
thus becoming the controlling elite for the next generation.
This is the European tradition, with its
caste system of peasants and aristocrats, with little upward
mobility. Once a peasant, always a peasant.
Post-secondary is actually vocational
education, but not college or university. Plainly put, it means
trade school. And this is the reason for
the current effort to remove Kentucky's Community Colleges
from the University of Kentucky, for which
they have been feeder schools.
Genuine community colleges are a threat.
You see, as long as we ordinary people have access to
accredited, two-year colleges in our own
communities, then genuine higher education is within our
reach. We can then go on to complete a
degree at a four-year university.
So, their remedy is to remove the community
colleges from the state university system. From
academic institutions offering the freshman
and sophomore years of college, they would become
trade/technical schools, preparing the
tracked workers for their assigned fields.
But how would children be assigned to
a specific track? Simple: the needs of area industries would
determine these assignments to "the workforce."
Everyone would be a part of the planned society,
serving the planned economy, controlled
by the government.
If this reminds you of Hitler and Stalin,
you are perceptive. Under those dictatorships, only the
children of the privileged few were allowed
university education; the masses of peasants were
controlled by the work permit, and by
the Gestapo/KGB. If you did not obey, you got no work
permit, which meant no job, and you became
a beggar or a criminal.
The work permit is already becoming a
reality here in America, through our radicalized public school
system. It is called the "Certificate
of Initial Mastery." If our high school children don't demonstrate
politically correct attitudes and collectivist
values, they cannot obtain a certificate. Without a CIM
they will not be able to get a job; thus
the CIM becomes the work permit of Hitler or Stalin. The
modern Gestapo/KGB is already taking shape
in the form of Clinton's National Police.
Key Words and Catch Phrases.
Related key words and catch phrases include
"workforce" and "school-to-work."
Workforce will be the mass of peasants,
told what line of work they will follow. School-to-work just
refers to the locked-in track system which
will railroad each child into an assigned future.
Now, whenever you hear the need to revamp
our educational system to accommodate the economy,
you will know that you are really hearing
slick propaganda for pervasive government control
reminiscent of George Orwell's Big Brother.
What is lost in such a managed society?
The most precious loss is personal freedom, especially the
freedom to become whatever we can dream,
whatever our abilities and desire will allow us to
No longer would an Abraham Lincoln be
able to work his way out of a dirt-floor log cabin and into
the White House. No longer would a George
Washington Carver be able to climb up from slavery to
become a world-changing scientist and
And more important still, the will of
God and His plan for our individual lives would be found
nowhere in the process.
Yes, it really is this serious and this
real, and it is already underway. If we don't know about it, if we
don't pray, if we don't act, we have no
chance to stop it.
But now you know.
My thanks to Lt.
Col. Tom McKenney, USMC Ret. for his kind permission in allowing me to
present his writings on this website.
is an extension/satellite site of Gunny G's Marines WebSites