Background of Jummas & CHT |
|
1. British Period(1787-1947):Similar to other indigenous peoples of the world, the
Jumma people were also independent before the British
colonial period. The British annexed the CHT area in 1860
and created an autonomous administrative district known
as "The Chittagong Hill Tracts" within the
undivided British Bengal. In 1900, the British enacted
the Regulation 1 of the 1900 Act in order to protect the
Jumma people from economic exploitation of non indigenous
people and to preserve their traditional sociocultural
and political institutions based on customary laws,
common ownership of land and so on. Throughout the
British colonial period the 1900 Act functioned as a
safeguard for the Jumma people, prohibited land ownership
and migrations of non indigenous peoples in the CHT. In
1947, Indian subcontinent was partitioned on the basis of
religion, Pakistan for Muslims and secular India for non
Muslims and Muslims alike. Despite 98.5% of the
population of the CHT were Jummas and thus non Muslims,
the Pakistani leadership conspired and the Boundary
Commission of Great Britain ceded the CHT to East
Pakistan (now Bangladesh) in violation of the principles
of partition and against the wishes of the Jumma people.
The Jummas vehemently protested against the decision, but
to no avail. On 15 August, 1947 the Chakma youths under
the leadership of Sneha Kumar Chakma hoisted tricolor
Indian fag at Rangamati, capital of the CHT and in the
southern CHT at Bandarban the Marmas who have cultural
similarity with Burma hoisted Burmese fag. Six days later
the Indian flag at Rangamati was lowered by the Pakistani
Army at gun point 2. Pakistan Period(1947-1971):From the very outset the Pakistani Government looked
at the Jummas with an eye of suspicion for being anti
Pakistani during the partition. Jummas were discriminated
in jobs, business and education. During the Pakistani
rule, the Government of Pakistan amended the 1900 Act
several times against the wishes of the Jumma people in
order to find a legal excuse for migration of non
indigenous people into the CHT. It deliberately ignored
the fact that the 1900 Act was an indispensable legal
instrument for ensuring the safeguard of the Jummas, and
that it could not be amended without mutual agreement. On
contrary, Pakistani Government interpreted the 1900 Act
as a legacy of British colonial administration which
helped separating the CHT from the rest of the country.
The predicament of the Jumma people began with the
building of a hydroelectric dam in the early sixties
which flooded 1,036 Square Kilometers of land, submerged
40% of the best arable land and displaced 100,000 Jummas
from their ancestral homes. 3. Bangladesh Period(1971- Present):After nine months of war of independence with
Pakistan, Bangladesh emerged as an independent state on
16 December 1971. During the war of independence it was
alleged that the Jummas in general remained indifferent
to the cause of war against Pakistan. Soon after the
Pakistani army withdrew, the Mukti Bahini (liberation
forces of Bangladesh) went on rampage against the Jummas
in the CHT. On 15 February 1972, a delegation of the
Jumma people led by M.N. Larma, called on Prime Minister
Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and submitted a written memorandum
with four point charter of demands consisting of 1)
Autonomy for the CHT, 2) Retention of the CHT Regulation
1900, 3) Recognition of the three kings of the Jummas, 4)
Ban on the influx of the non Jummas into the CHT. Prime
Minister Sheikh Mujibur Rahman categorically rejected
these demands. In March 1972, M.N. Larma formed Jana
Samhati Samiti (JSS), later a military wing the Shanti
Bahini was added to it. 4. Arrests, Tortures and Kidnapping:In the name of counter-insurgency the Jummas have
often been detained and tortured by the army. Thousands
have perished in the armed encounters, extra-judicial
executions, tortures, rapes and so on. Bangladesh
security forces often resorted to mass detention and
torture of the helpless villagers and left many of them
crippled for life. For further consolidating their
authority over the villagers, security forces have
uprooted villages and forcibly kept them in so called
"cluster villages" (known as concentration
camps), where they live under constant supervision of the
military. 5. Bangladeshi Settlers:In the late 1970s President Zia sponsored migration of
Bangladeshi settlers into the CHT, providing land grants,
cash and rations. This programme was not made public at
the time, and its existence was denied by the
representative of the government. Now the government
acknowledges that there was a programme of sponsored
migration. Bangladeshi settlers, with the connivance of
the almost totally Bengali administration, have been able
to take over land and even whole villages from the
Jummas. By 1981 the Bangladeshis made up nearly one third
of the total population of the CHT. 6. Forcible Conversion and Religious Persecution:Forcible conversion is considered as a state sponsored
method of assimilation. Al-Rabita, a Saudi
government funded NGO, is the main Islamic missionary
organisation active in the region, backed by the
military, it is entrusted with the Islamisation of the
region. The Jammat-i-Islam, an Islamic fundamentalist
party works actively with the military in the CHT. The
number of mosques and madrashas(Islamic schools) are
rapidly increasing in the area. Apart from
proselytisation, there have been religious persecution in
the form of violation and destruction of religious places
of the Jummas by the Bangladesh military. In 1986, within
a period of eight months 54 Buddhist temples have been
destroyed and 22 Hindu temples were burnt down by the
Bangladesh military. 7. Massacres:Since 1980 there have been 13 major instances of massacre of the Jummas by the Bangladeshi settlers and the Bangladeshi security personnel. These are:
8. The CHT Treaty:The Jana Samhati Samiti (JSS), the political platform of the Jumma people signed a treaty with the Bangladesh government on 2 December, 1997. The treaty failed to safeguard the survival of the Jumma people. The Bangladesh government did not have the sincere desire to solve the problem of the CHT. The treaty had rather been used by the Bangladesh government as a facade to impress the donor countries. The treaty does not address the fundamental problem of the Bangladeshi settlers and the militarisation of the CHT, it rather legalizes the settlers in the CHT. More:
Sources:
|