THE DAILY TRAVESTY | News Issue
The Daily Travesty
 
29 May 2000            email
Vol. 1, Issue 92        on the web
 
Lots of news in this issue.  Hmmm, I didn't find any of this in the Post...
 

 
REALLY OLD SHIT, MAN
 
May 23, 2000 - Archaeologists in Syria have uncovered the ruins of a 6,000-year-old city that suggests the rise of cities and civilization occurred earlier than previously thought.  Scientists from the University of Chicago's Oriental Institute found a protective city wall under a huge mound in northeastern Syria known as Tell Hamoukar. The wall and other evidence indicated a complex government dating back at least 6,000 years.

Until the discovery last year, the only cities uncovered by archaeologists dating back to 4000 B.C. were in Sumeria, between the Tigris and the Euphrates rivers in an area that is now Iraq.

The discovery at Hamoukar, dating from the same period, suggests that ideas behind cities may have predated the Sumerians, according to McGuire Gibson of the Oriental Institute.

"We need to reconsider our ideas about the beginnings of civilization, pushing the time further back," said Gibson, who plans to present the findings this week in Copenhagen, Denmark, at the International Conference on the Archaeology of the Ancient Middle East.

Gibson said that if Hamoukar was developing into a city at the same time the Sumerians were doing the same things, then archaeologists may have to consider if those ideas came from an even earlier culture.

Gil Stein, a Northwestern University archaeologist who specializes in the same region and time period, said in today's Chicago Tribune he thinks the find is significant.

"Traditionally, scholars had viewed southern Mesopotamia as the area where urbanized states first developed, before spreading to less advanced areas," he said.

This summer, the archaeologists will continue to dig in the hopes of finding portions or royal palaces and temples - structures that would confirm that the site is that of a previously unknown early civilization.
 
c/o Associated Press
 

 
ASTRONOMERS BAFFLED BY MYSTERIOUS NEW OBJECT

By John Maynard and Jamie Stensrud
April 24, 2000

A new object dubbed XTE J1118+480 appeared seemingly out of nowhere on March 29th this year and has been the subject of much debate.  When describing this new object, Robotic Optical Transient Search Experiment scientist Jim Wren of Los Alamos Laboratories and Ron Remillard of MIT have described it as "a mystery", "a beast" and as "a slow moving searchlight." These unique comments set this discovery apart from other routine discoveries of new objects. Consequently, this particular discovery stands out like a red flag, simply because it has left astronomers in a baffled state.
 
Why are astronomers baffled?  They say this new object looks like a black hole but does not behave like a black hole.  It looks like a pulsar but it does not behave like a pulsar.  In the rush to assign some kind of significance to this new object, individuals from outside the scientific community have been quick to assign their own interpretations of this baffling new object.  So far we have heard, or read that:

*   The signal being sent from this new object is a mathematical code (Contact anyone?).
*   It is tied to Hale-Bopp and the companion.
*   The object is a massive dead comet being guided toward earth.
 
Observed Behavior: The following evidence has come to light regarding this object:

*   XTE J1118+480, appeared seemingly out of nowhere on March 29th, and has been subject to much debate over its nature.
*   TMG has learned that this object also appeared in January, at which time it brightened, remained steady for a few hours, then faded.
*   It seems to pulse, with an apparent time of approximately four hours
between pulses, or the interval between brightness peaks.
*   This object is not located in the plane of the galaxy, where the vast majority of stars are located, but rather above it.
 
What It Could Be: If XTE J1118+480 is not a black hole or a pulsar, what could it be?  The possibilities include:

*   A new Burster-type object (a family of objects which emit bursts of energy at regular intervals), or some new kind of previously unknown object.
*   It could be an extremely ancient pulsar, which may account for its location outside the plane of the galaxy.
*   More likely, it's something we've never come across before and are struggling to fit it into our current understanding of the universe.

This site has a great photo of the object location:
http://www.millenngroup.com/repository/galactic/baffled.html
 

 
BIODEMOCRACY [an excerpt]
 
The four year food fight by European consumers and farmers is slowly but surely driving genetically engineered (GE) foods and crops off the EU [European] market, the largest in the world.  US corn exports to the EU have fallen from $360 million a year to near zero, while soybean exports have fallen from $2.6 billion annually to $1 billion--and are expected to fall even further as major food processors, supermarkets, and fast-food chains ban GE soy or soy derivatives in animal feeds.  Canada's canola exports to Europe similarly have fallen from $500 million a year to near zero.  Meanwhile Brazilian exporters are doing a brisk business selling "GE-free" soybeans to European buyers, and organic food is booming throughout the industrialized world.  On May 18 the latest in a series of GE scandals rocked Europe as a major rapeseed (canola) seller, Advanta Seeds, a division of biotech giant AstraZeneca, admitted that genetic drift from gene-altered canola fields in Canada had contaminated certified "non-GE seed" export shipments to Britain, France, Germany and Sweden.

Consumer rejection of gene-foods is steadily spreading to Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, India, and a host of other nations, including the United States and Canada.  Japan and South Korea-where public concern is rising--have the biotech industry extremely worried, since these two nations alone buy $11.3 billion of US agriculture exports every year.

Gene-foods and patents on living organisms have become hot button political issues in India, Thailand, Malaysia, Brazil, Mexico, and the Philippines.  At recent international conventions such as the Biosafety Protocol meeting in Montreal in January and the UN Codex Alimentarius meeting in Ottawa in May, the US government has become increasingly isolated in its "no
labeling, no safety-testing" position.
 
Fearful that the global backlash against gene-foods is spreading to the U.S.,  Monsanto, Aventis, Novartis, Dow, BASF, Zeneca, DuPont, and the Biotechnology Industry Organization have launched a $50 million a year public relations campaign to confuse and mislead the American public.

Fronting for the Gene Giants, the so-called Council for Biotechnology Information has paid for cheery "biotech is great" national television ads, launched a Web site <www.whybiotech.com>, opened a consumer information hotline, carried out focus groups and polls, and enlisted prominent scientists and public figures (including Andrew Young, ex-ambassador to the United Nations and former Nobel Prize winner Dr. James Watson) to serve as messengers for pro-biotech propaganda.  According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch on April 4, the Council says it may spend as much as $250 million on the campaign over the next five years. In the CBI's opening national TV ad, the narrator tries to equate the potential benefits of GE crops with the more widely accepted uses of biotechnology in medicine.

Based upon in-depth interviews and focus groups with American consumers, the Council for Biotechnology Information has begun to hammer home the following points--all of which of course are false:

* GE foods have been thoroughly tested by U.S. government agencies and
found to be safe.

* Biotechnology increases the nutritional content of foods, makes them
taste better, and can help feed the world's hungry.

* GE crops reduce the use of toxic pesticides.
 
Only 15% of consumers are aware that the majority of supermarket foods already contain genetically engineered ingredients. Two-thirds of Americans say they are "concerned" about biotechnology issues.  Forty-eight percent say they oppose any use of "genetic modification" in food production.
 
More information is available here.
 

That's not the beginning of the end   That's the return to yourself   The return to innocence
                                      E n i g m a