CHRISTIAN SENSE
By: TOM SMIKOSKI
A publication devoted to making sense out of the twenty-first century.
PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION
Statement of Brenda Pratt Shafer, R.N.
(Made before the Subcommittee on the
Constitution, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives. Hearing on The
Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act (HR 1833) March 21, 1996
Mr. Chairman and honorable members of the Judiciary Committee, I am Brenda Pratt Shafer.
I am here before you, at the request of the Committee, to relate to you my experience as
an eyewitness to what is now known as the partial-birth abortion procedure.
I am a registered nurse, licensed in the State of Ohio, with 14 years of experience. In 1993,
was employed by Kimberly Quality Care, a nursing agency in Dayton, Ohio. In September, 1993,
Kimberly Quality Care asked me to accept assignment at the Women's Medical Center, which is
operated by Dr. Martin Haskell. I readily accepted the assignment because I was at that time
very pro-choice. I had even told my teenage daughters that if one of them ever got pregnant
at a young age, I would make them get an abortion. They disagreed with me on this, and one
of them even wrote an essay for a high school class that mentioned how we differed on the
issue.
So, because of the strong pro-choice views that I held at that time, I thought this assignment
would be no problem for me.
But I was wrong. I stood at a doctor's side as he performed the partial-birth abortion
procedure-- and what I saw is branded forever on my mind.
I worked as an assistant nurse at Dr. Haskell's clinic for three days-- September 28, 29, and
30, 1993.
On the first day, we assisted in some first-trimester abortions, which is all I'd expected to
be involved in. (I remember that one of the patients was a 15-year-old-girl who was having her
third abortion.)
On the second day, I saw Dr. Haskell do a second-trimester procedure that is called a D & E
(dilation and evacuation). He used ultrasound to examine the fetus. Then he used forceps to
pull apart the baby inside the uterus, bringing it out piece by piece and piece, throwing the
pieces in a pan.
Also on the first two days, we inserted laminaria to dilate the cervixes of women who were
being prepared for the partial-birth abortions-- those who were past the 20 weeks point, or
4 1\2 months. (Dr. Haskell called this procedure "D & X", for dilation and extraction.) There
were six or seven of these women.
On the third day, Dr. Haskell asked me to observe as he performed several of the procedures
that are the subject of this hearing. Although I was in that clinic on assignment of the agency,
Dr. Haskell was interested in hiring me full time, and I was being given orientation in the
entire range of procedures provided at that facility.
I was present for three of these partial-birth procedures. It is the first one that I will
describe to you in detail.
The mother was six months pregnant (26 1/2 weeks). A doctor told her that the baby had Down
Syndrome and she decided to have an abortion. She came in the first two days to have the
laminaria inserted and changed, and she cried the whole time. On the third day she came in to
receive the partial-birth procedure.
Dr. Haskell brought the ultrasound in and hooked it up so that he could see the baby. On the
ultrasound screen, I could see the heart beating. As Dr. Haskell watched the baby on the
ultrasound screen, the baby's heartbeat was clearly visible on the ultrasound screen.
Dr. Haskell went in with forceps and grabbed the baby's legs and pulled them down into the
birth canal. Then he delivered the baby's body and the arms-- everything but the head. The
doctor kept the baby's head just inside the uterus.
The baby's little fingers were clasping and unclasping, and his feet were kicking. Then the
doctor stuck the scissors through the back of his head, and the baby's arms jerked out in a
flinch, a startle reaction, like a baby does when he thinks that he might fall.
The doctor opened up the scissors, stuck a high-powered suction tube into the opening and
sucked the baby's brains out. Now the baby was completely limp. I was really completely
unprepared for what I was seeing. I almost threw up as I watched the doctor do these things.
Mr. Chairman, I read in the paper that President Clinton says that he is going to veto this
bill. If President Clinton had been standing where I was standing at that moment, he would not
veto this bill.
Dr. Haskell delivered the baby's head. He cut the umbilical cord and delivered the placenta.
He threw that baby in a pan, along with the placenta and the instruments he'd used. I saw the
baby move in the pan. I asked another nurse and she said it was just "reflexes."
I have been a nurse for a long time and I have seen a lot of death-- people maimed in auto
accidents, gunshot wounds, you name it. I have seen surgical procedures of every sort. But in
all my professional years, I had never witnessed anything like this.
The woman wanted to see her baby, so they cleaned up the baby and put it in a blanket and
handed the baby to her. She cried the whole time, and she kept saying, "I'm so sorry, please
forgive me!" I was crying too. I couldn't take it. That baby boy had the most perfect angelic
face I have ever seen.
I was present in the room during two more such procedures that day, but I was really in shock.
I tried to pretend that I was somewhere else, to not think about what was happening. I just
couldn't wait to get out of there. After I left that day, I never went back. These last two
procedures, by the way, involved healthy mothers with healthy babies.
I was very much affected by what I had seen. For a long time, sometimes still, I had nightmares
about what I saw in that clinic that day.
That's why, last July, I wrote a letter to Congressman Tony Hall of Dayton, in support of the
bill, telling what I had seen. And that led to me being asked to tell others what I'd seen,
just as I am doing here today.
HOME
