Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

As I said in the description of the front cover, this is actually a made for TV movie called "Britannic".

What's funny about the back cover is the description. It's a little hard to read, so I'll retype it here:

"The film has some weak points: historical fact takes a bit of a beating, and the plot suffers from the usual tendency of T.V. movies to give away the plot and the motivations of its characters too soon. Even so, it still turns out to be a very thrilling movie. It succeeds in showing off some new acting talent, and it illustrates how good a TV movie can be, if given time and a good storyline."

This is not a very positive review. Saying bluntly that this film has some weak points is not generally recognized as a winning tactic in encouraging a consumer to invest his time and money on a product. Usually, advertisers try to gloss over any criticism and emphasize the product's good points. Sure, this person does come around in the end and says that the film illustrates how good a TV movie can be, but by this time the possible consumer should have already been turned off by the films "weak points". I give this ad exec very low marks.

It does, however, read as if a regular person wrote this review and it ended up on the back cover by hook or by crook. If this is the case I'm willing to go out on a limb and say that this person was obviously a lunatic.

This movie clearly sucks.

I haven't seen it, haven't heard a word about, and don't know who directed it or who stars in it, but I'll tell you right now to never see this movie. It has terrible written all over it.

Back

Home

Forward