A New and Complete Periodic Table of the Elements: Part A
The existing Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) explanation of the Periodic
Table as described by Richard Feynman in his three volume "Lectures on
Physics" is used as base reference then abandoned for an improved
approach. The new approach will not only allow better experiment design,
prediction and data analysis, but will permit clear mechanical visualization
and much broader held understanding.
Richard Feynman would surely agree the periodic table descriptively
documents the mechanics, the machinery of the atom as fundamental building
block of visible matter as verified by practical experience through
experiments. The central task is to descriptively document the mechanics in a
much better way without invalidating but rather greatly extending practical
experience. Once must say after thoroughly reading Feynman, his great
contributions are especially appreciated because he was almost as stubborn in
insisting on mechanical visualization as the author!
The Establish-Scientist Reader should go ahead to Part B [https://www.angelfire.com/wi/HolisticScience/NuPtabl2.html]
and briefly review Tables 5-5 and 5-6 and the discussions there first. If one
is then turned on instead of off, come back and re-start Part A to read in
earnest.
The growth spiral logarithmic fractal of Table 5-3 is here generalized to
apply to a spherically symmetric dark matter pre-organized fluid space at the
atomic level. As previously described and illustrated in the first few text
pages of this chapter and in Figures 5-1 through 5-3, each dark matter
pre-formed shell around the newly defined original atomic core nucleus may
become populated with binding electrons to eventually become fully bound to and
thereby extend the boundary of that core nucleus. The core nucleus is here
called the maximum density center of gravity (MDCOG). Each new-growth neutron
shell surrounding the original core nucleus has metamorphosed from a proton
shell. It takes 1/h orbiting electrons in each of two orthogonal directions
within the shell to bind it as a solid proton shell of visible matter mass pts.
A neutron shell is then one which has a final third, in-out oriented electron
orbit ring binding of each of its visible mass pts to that entire concentric
sequence of shells forming the MDCOG.
Revisit here also that every atomic core MDCOG has a final Inner Grain
(IG) mass pt that is the same size as the one packing the outermost shell of
the MDCOG, but the IG is non-rotating. That is, the Cosmic Sensor of
Singularity as an IG R-size mass pt, has maximum energy density in terms of the
surface vibration energy alone, with no effective rotational motion on the part
of its embedded G-size (Higgs particle) mass pts said to be dynamically forming
its surface. The Inner Grain (IG) is the central indivisible mass pt and
Universal Source Oscillator within the atom that reflects in-out oriented,
"Strong Force" binding electrons back outward. The IG surface vibration must precisely
reflect the coming and going of helical path Higgs particles as they reach and
immediately turn to leave the surface of the IG. The premise level atomic
machinery of the IG was introduced on the second page of this chapter and is
illustrated in Figure 5-1.
To the outside world, the atom as a whole is a dynamic mass pt and
gravity field entity, and is the fundamental measurable oscillator (or
radiator) responsible for radiation. It is here shown in detail that what ever
happens to the atom as a whole, is
precisely registered in a synchronous
way at three spherical surface locations, at (1) the IG, (2) the MDCOG and, (3) the outward
connecting-radiating interface, the c-boundary. How can this be? One must see
that the atom as a whole is itself a complex mass pt, and as a mass pt, it must
continually adjust its dynamic shape, average radius and spin speed to fit into
and mark ambient energy density for the space it occupies. This mass pt feature
applies to every inwardly and outwardly nested mass pt; in a spherically
concentric way without limit in the inwardly direction of small, and outwardly
in the direction of large with both a symmetry and asymmetry that is determined
by the way visible matter vibrates and is sewn together by orbiting helical
path radiation. The radiation binding energy is always in multiples of electron
rings whose indivisible mechanical (kinetic) energy is the flow of Higgs
particles that form a helical string and move at the absolute maximum speed of
vmax » 236c.
Energy crosses the atom's "visible" surface from both inside
and outside. The term visible as applied to the outer surface of the atom,
means that our measurement and experience of the atom is a direct reflection of
the dynamics, the measurable energy states of its "event horizon"
surface. That surface is the c-boundary of the atom; the radius from the IG and
from the MDCOG at which an electron would be required to be in stable circular
orbit at a speed of c. The atom is that unique mass pt nested ensemble whose
boundary is always an event horizon for radiation because it is the source
oscillator of all radiation; as documented in the established spectra, and as
incompletely but usefully described by quantum electrodynamics (QED). One is
referring, of course, to the descriptions given by Richard Feynman in his
3-volume "Lectures On Physics", wherein QED limitations are
repeatedly exposed along with its many great capabilities as a set of practical
tools.
Completely compatible with QED as a set of practical tools, one may
beneficially view the c-boundary of the atom as its visible surface that
undulates, or vibrates constantly to mitigate and facilitate the passage of
energy both inward and outward. By concentrating on the meaningful and
measurable undulations of the atom's outer surface, one may then cease to
speculate in detail about quantum numbers and electron spin in the complex way
of QED. "Why would one want to do that, ask the mathematical elite!?"
How about, "because no true scientist has ever said they really understood
the current theory in a satisfying mechanical way, not even Bohr or
Feynman." That is, the author is totally convinced that all the complex
but workable mumbo jumbo of quantum mechanics is successful but unnecessary and
extraordinarily complex fantasy. Beyond Bohr's and Feynman's great workable but
incomplete comprehension of the dynamics of the atom, lies mechanical and fully
visualizable truth as displayed on the pixel-like screen of the atom's outer
boundary.
Once the undulations in the c-boundary of the atom are understood, one
also understands and is able to visualize and provide descriptive detail at an
extended periodic table level. The true internal and external dynamics will
then be seen to exist quite mechanically real and always in reflective
synchronicity. One will then also see that the relative mass given by the
quantity, A, in the periodic table, is a relative measure of the ground level
surface energy state for the given element in three dimensions. Outer
surface undulations are small changes in the absolute volumetric mass of the
atom as a generic and most fundamental mass pt ensemble. One will return to the
atom as undulating mass pt and gravity field after an epistemological
derivation of a new approach to experimental knowledge; a badly needed re-start
in how to come to know things in a mechanically scientific way.
Why Einstein did not finish his theory
Though far beyond everyone else in his understanding of physical reality,
Einstein by his own admission never finished his unified theory. His
revolutionary energy matter relation E = Mc2 that reflected his
intimate understanding of how the electrons stored in the atom could be released
as radiation was destined to save the modern world from destruction by Hitler.
For that reason alone, he fully deserves the “Person of the Century” award
recently bestowed by CBS and TIME. But
Einstein did not really like the Bohr model of the atom, and would have happily
accepted the theory given herein had it been presented to him. Why? Because it
would not only have fulfilled his image of God as held by his Little Finger,
but it would have handed him the full equivalent of his Cosmological Constant
so he could have stopped the silly upshot one here calls Big Bang.
The right hand side of Einstein’s famous Tensor-crouched [one likes the
accidental term!] field equation, G = 8pT, for calculating the
instantaneous curvature of spacetime, G , in terms of the Stress Tensor, T,
would have had an entirely different formulation. The essential elasticity or
gravitational potential at each point in spacetime is continuously variable as
crudely indexed by T would not have gone along with any of the false-dogma-ridden
math of Gauge Symmetry and “Superspace”.
There could never be any true real-world solutions; so Plato could come out of his cave and find
out what is really going on that he is sorely missing! A Plato or Einstein in
full touch with reality would not have been able to accept the partly-hidden
assumptions behind the Euler-Lagrange equations, Hamilton’s Principle, Fermat’s
Principle in Optics, the basic notion of the Variational Principle, Liouville’s
Theorem, the notion of infinitesimal contact canonical transformations, and the
Lorentz transformation. The basic mathematical ideas behind wave mechanics and
the notions of metric tensors, and the dynamic surfaces of spacetime were and
are mechanically false; in spite of their UH-given ability to predict. The wave
equation developed on the principle of separation of variables is totally
dependent on variable independence as stated in the derivation of the
Laplace equation! Boundaries and eigenvalues of mathematical physics when
placed into physical reality as part of so called “solutions” are mechanically false because all fundamental
parameters of real world experimental physics are closely coupled!
Like everyone else, Einstein simply did not mechanically understand the
dynamic structure of the atom as visible matter mass pt and gravity field. His
energy matter relation could predict like crazy within the very serious limits
of experimental design and control, measurement and data analysis using
worn-out math, but would never represent physical truth at either the local or
global levels of reality. As a gross but good-enough-for-prediction estimate,
his dividing Mc2 by Ö(1 – v2/c2),
was indeed the simplest way to properly index the quantum-like dynamics of the
elastic continuum’s pt to pt character. The problem is that one thus introduces
singularity at the ends of big and small as the basis for all causality! The
dispersion factor, df = (v/c)4 as defined herein
avoids all that by multiplying Mc2 and having the dimensions
of 1/M. The mass object traveling near or at the speed of c is free of the
nonsensical mass increase without limit. Mass at the radiation origin becomes
pure number and is uniformly and helically dispersed as radiation in the three
dimensions of space as it makes its way outward along a radial from the source.
One is reminded of the Steven W. Hawking statement as given in
“Gravitation” by Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, Box 34.3, quote, ”The view has
been expressed that singularities are so objectionable that if the Einstein
equations were to predict their occurrence, this would be a compulsive reason
for modifying them. However the real test of physical theory is not whether its
predicted results are aesthetically attractive but whether they agree with
observation. So far there are no observations which would show that
singularities do not occur.” One feels
like Ronald Reagan, when in debate and under attack in a way that could only
evoke the response, “There they go again!”. Once brainwashed by underlying
false math-ideology, an expert opponent of broadly held and used common sense
logic compulsively assumes his circle of knowledge is bigger than that of most
everybody else and is able to utter pompous circularities of thought as though
they were gospel truth!
Had the author been able to respond to Hawking’s statement in real time,
he would have said, “Since when have you become the God of what humans are capable of observing and
empirically recording at the level of each living cell and its DNA? To that
majority of humanity still in touch with their innate sense of logic, a
singularity is by gut-level, Little Finger, God level definition, an indelible
prima facie falsity for Christ’s Sake! To think and write that those who feel
and think contrary to your statement,
are merely hung up on aesthetics is grossly insulting! You and your camp of
followers are not the only ones capable of interpreting what they observe!” The
author believes in his guts that Einstein could never have uttered such a
statement.
Interpretation of experiment data more important than design, setup
and conduct
So far in the history of science, we have designed, conducted and
analyzed experiments based on fundamental physics and math model dogma that is
mechanically false. Yet we have no choice but to apply mechanical laws as best
we know and feel how to; i.e., not only in the mind as a conscious thought
process, but with the best feel or intuition of one’s Little Finger -as the
author likes to say, one’s GUT. Newton, Einstein and others with whose work the
author is familiar, knew dogma needed an overhaul. They tried to change the
state of affairs, and made great progress in that they improved our ability to
predict in a numerical way. However, to the very extent that they were
successful in showing how to predict numbers, they helped us loose contact with
our innate common feel. In fact, with Einstein’s mind boggling success, modern
science replaced the empirically derived common sense of evolution (including
Einstein’s Little Finger) with abstractionist paradigms that only the
mathematically elite could understand.
The feel that was lost in the highly successful abstraction
process was an automatic built-in ability to mechanically simulate, by
visualization using the mind’s eye, precisely what must be happening "out
there"; seemingly separate from and independent of our own existence and
predictable by repeated experiment.
Many scientists of note never let go of that sense of feel because they
could not do so.
From the experiments now being conducted involving radiation or waves as
the source of all mechanical force, and from experiments with the application
of Newton’s gravity law as applied to the attractive force between equal
masses, the first real and desperately needed revolution in science is about to
begin at the level of experiments in fundamental physics. By
"experiment", one here means "using radiation, especially
visible spectrum light, to measure in a radiation-filled-environment; to
mechanically track and mentally and physically feel what is happening to cause
the spectral shifts in wavelength and in the relative density of re-radiation
that one is recording. By “fundamental”
it is meant that one recognizes that atoms and molecules are the sources and
sinks of all radiation and using radiation to measure their behavior requires
basic mechanical understanding of what radiation is and how the atom and
molecule act as such prolific radiators and absorbers of it. The very meaning of fundamental in this
context is not yet discovered; so techniques for proper experimentation and
data analysis do not exist for fundamental physics! Thus, one must here try to
re-invent the wheel so to speak, so that new basic understanding is possible.
Fundamental physics is all about the mechanics of mass pts, just as it
was in the 19th century, except that the mass pt is highly dynamic,
literally “alive”, infinitely dual-nested as a fluid contiguity (a la Planck’s
Principle and Bell’s Synchronicity), and thus totally redefined. Since one is focused on the fundamental
components of visible matter as source and sink for all radiation energy, the
defining surfaces of these components must be seen as being fully packed by
spinning mass pts of radius, R, whose own surfaces are defined by smaller
spinning mass pts of radius, G. The varying radius, R, for the carrier visible
matter mass pt is the varying physical width of a single communications
channel, where 1/h (one turn’s worth of) translating G size mass pts (here
named Higgs particles) represent the fundamental information bit-frame, or wave
packet. The energy transfer as information either spreads out in space from
R-size mass pt to R-size mass pt (an entropy represented by the redshift
phenomenon as measured), becomes more concentrated ( blueshift phenomenon),
else is of constant radius because it is in circular orbit about the local
MDCOG. So the apparent molecular
density of re-radiation is a final, spatially integrated snapshot at the
receiver end of a channel. That snapshot is a function of (1) the average
finite aperture or opening of the detector, and (2) the relative intensity of
radiation as determined by the spatial concentration (# per unit surface area)
of molecule-sized pumping actions at the source.
The energy from far away stars gets to mostly spread out (redshifts), and only re-condenses (blueshifts) for the final short relative distance to the Earth from the edge of the Milky Way galaxy. Most of the spreading out is compensated for by the inevitable condensing as the light comes back into the galaxy and to the surface of the Earth. It is the difference in outward and inward travel (relative to the galactic level MDCOG) that results in net redshift. That difference manifests itself precisely in the size of the radiating molecule level matter at the source versus at the receiver; which we mistakenly perceive as ‘redshift’ due to universal expansion.
The re-radiating molecule-equivalent gets as big as ten to the 10
centimeters or roughly equal in radial distance to the speed of light in
intergalactic space. But by the time light comes into our Galaxy, the radiation
molecular mass pt size is reduced again to on the order of .2 centimeter. As
the light reaches the receiver at the surface of the Earth, the molecular sized
radiator in the detector is on the order of ten to the minus 5 centimeter. As
the light left the surface of a far away brightly burning star, the radiating
molecular size was likely on the order of ten to minus 3 centimeter in radius;
a factor of ten to the two bigger on the average, than the radiator at the
receiver for the same type of molecular matter. The source and sink atoms are
of course proportional in size to the source and sink molecules. More energetic
or hotter ambience means bigger c-boundary radii for atoms and molecules.
The energy-exchange information one is seeking in the lab is happening in
real time at the molecular level as driven by the atomic level. Real time
energy transfer events, traveling from the defining surfaces of the subject
visible mass objects to the functional molecules of the optical detector(s) by
which we measure, is happening at the speed of light. Both for Stars and
ordinary objects in the lab, "visible" means real time
light-mechanical touching between source and receiver; this elementary truth
that radiation consists of contiguous (touching) helical strings of Higgs
particles being pumped (literally extruded) from source atoms to receiver
atoms, cannot be overemphasized! The described contiguous real time energy
exchange defines physical reality at the local level as we actually experience
it!
There is neither any standing still anywhere, nor any standing separately
and independently, and especially no universal inflating balloon type expansion
that accelerates in speed with distance. In perfect nested synchronicity, as a
closed but "Infinitely Alive Oneness" that we mistakenly call "An Expanding Universe"(our
particular cosmos, actually) and the defining surfaces of all visible objects,
are vibrating or breathing in and out with a displacement proportional to the average distance to the
dark matter driving MDCOG. That is, the average radius of the statistical
number of G-size mass pts located an average distance, R, from the center of
the visible matter mass pt they discretely define, are vibrating as well as
rotating to the tune of R/G = 3(c-squared). This Universal Harmony (UH)
equation is the "mass pt local", 1-axis c-boundary energy state whose
tightly coupled, discrete-distance incrementing, continually pulsing changes
are benevolently hinged to the note of "c". Kepler’s Universal
Harmony, Newton’s Instantaneously Applied Gravity Force, Planck’s Principle and
Bells Synchronicity are all about this single underlying truth; space is fluid
such that everything is mechanically interconnected.
Fluid Truth is measurable because pertinent energy transfers are
continuous in space and of constant speed and acceleration. As we learn how to
see/feel clearly with light, the characteristic drum beat of the source becomes
faithfully reproduced at the receiver, because we know both ontologically and
in ultimate scientific detail, how energy and momentum are universally
conserved as a sensual touching process.
It is all that beautifully simple; in a mechanical gut and
cerebral feeling way that one calls "spirituality"! Tags like
"non local" and "nonlocality" are "warm fuzzy
confusions" that "the chosen few" can share in a shallow,
individually tuned way. The same applies to "Soul-Making" and they
add nothing to the generic meaning of either "synchronicity" or
"spirituality. One finds the new theory provides a warm and non-fuzzy (you
might say "commonly clear and deeper") marriage of "gut and
cerebral feeling"; at the species level.
As relatively macroscopic entities in terms of integrated space and time,
we are benevolently stuck with sampling across an always modulating aperture, a
inevitable process of nested averaging.
Determinism is no less deterministic because our "formal or
experimental limits of sight" always implies a conceptual blurring at some
scalar regime level; as a necessary but non-mysterious snap-shot-driven
uncertainty of position (space) and speed (time). At the local mass pt level,
UH lets reality be as deterministic as a digital (discrete) clock; because that
too is what a mass pt is in every sense of the Einstein-like phrase,
"local proper time".
Remember that field-centered maximum density mass pts as MDCOGs are
nested in reflective synchronicity, in every dark and visible matter mass pt.
Black hole MDCOGs are therefore literally everywhere like a nested dot matrix
or pixel-like underlayment that is very dynamic. But for experimental
measurement purposes, there is a common-single-operative-absolute reference
MDCOG, the ARMDCOG, whose gravity field immerses and provides the scaling for
the entire reference frame of space that the experiment properly encompasses.
The pre-requisite and pre-existing ARMDCOG dynamically structures all
experiment-pertinent space. By "experiment-pertinent space" one means
that a 3-D rectangular and polar coordinate set of axes are pre-specified.
Those axes are origin-anchored in the ARMDCOG, whose radius serves as a
discrete, finite radius, maximum density mass pt = math pt that is an
indivisible central location in "experiment-pertinent space". The
radius of the ARMDCOG pre-specifies via the logarithmic growth spiral, a
specific scalar marking, a non-linear gradient, for the incrementing of
distance along each of the radially oriented coordinate axes.
The axes triad is fixed within the ARMDCOG from outer surface to the
Inner Grain (IG); but the space inside the ARMDCOG is for experiment
measurement purposes, a single mass pt = math pt. That maximum density mass pt
= math pt is a separate and distinct internal "universe" or
experiment-pertinent space which is not operative for purposes of the present
experiment except as an indivisible finite radius, causative origin and
location, whose reference number is Unity or 1 on all three axes. There is no
such thing as a location of 0,0,0, because that would allow fractional steps
along the axes without limit which is neither mechanically possible nor of
interest here. The real triad of axes locations , x, y, z for a given point on
a subject space curve must share the tightly coupled rhythm of UH.
Of equal importance is the fact that the axes have an outer, finite
"end-point" for radiation measuring purposes that marks the
"c-boundary"; that precise distance from the ARMDCOG that marks the
location where the dark matter structure, namely a shell of R-size mass pts, is
rotating about each of the axes at a linear speed of c. The individual R-size
mass pts, the embedded G-size dark matter mass pts forming the outer surface of
the R-size mass pt, and the three coordinate axes themselves, are all locked
into that c-boundary shell so everything measurable is moving in synch relative
to each other at the speed of c.
The central idea here for experiment design and analysis purposes, is to
realize that "seeing" via the pulsing process of radiation is a
fundamental mechanical (force applying) process. By mechanical, one literally
means "touching". When we use our eyes to drive in traffic, we are
mechanically touching everything around us with our eyes via the continual
pumping of energy by radiating sources. Energy impinges on the retina and gives
us a real time infinity of very useful and vitally necessary tactile
information for our safe travel though the fluid of space; which is constantly
filled with a lot other visible matter with which we might otherwise fatally
collide. We only "collide in a destructive way" as visible matter
with other visible matter, which means automatically and biologically that we
are able to sense its presence and track its relative movement else we would
not be here. The “something” with which we do not collide but which is ever
passing through us is not unnoticed; we feel it waking and
sleeping as universal gravity. Ontological knowing is as real as gravity!
The invisible changes of the visible surfaces of the radiating sources
are nevertheless encoded in recorded light data. The finer grain dynamic
texture of what we are seeing is being told to us also; all we have to do is
consciously look for it in an effective way. Our physical presence as cellular
level instinctively mechanized whole, reliably picks up the pertinent upshots
of such small-scale dynamics automatically. After all, those small-scale
dynamics of radiation energy exchange are modulating the gravity force we feel
with every cell of our body.
Thanks to Universal Harmony (UH) as Rational And Benevolent But Ever
Ruling God, we are able to do all of this course and fine grain seeing and
mechanical feeling continually as a matter of elementary biological and psychic
survival – mostly and mercifully by automatic or instinctual processes; in each
of our self-replicating, 3D-fractal genes in every living cell.
Proper scientific education and training must sadly start over again;
which is why this reading must be so tedious. But there is a pot of gold at the
end, so hang in there if you can. Eventually the single Global University of
Holistic Science will be available free to everyone on the Internet. Those
reading with comprehension here will become the first part-time-volunteer
Global Professor's Emeriti. Successful industry will learn to regard with the
highest respect and salary, those who hold degrees from this new 21st Century
institution of higher scientific education.
In the meantime, one must here attempt by concrete example to formulate
the proposed Experimenter’s Rule and make it mechanically very clear.
Looking for the Experimenter’s Rule
Using simple algebra, one lets the relationship between frequency, f,
wavelength, 2pR, and speed, v,
be expressed f = v/2pR. One now
concludes that the change in frequency, Df,
is a function of change in either v or R or both. In so call free space here defined
as the c-boundary of visible matter at the atomic and molecular levels as
complex mass pts, and at the c-boundary of all pertinent dark matter mass pts,
the speed v = c by definition of the term "c-boundary". One has just
said that what we have previously called free space or the vacuum of space is
non existent and that it really has to be viewed as "where ever light
travels at the constant speed of c", which is another definition of
c-boundary. When v = c, a constant, one then writes for change in frequency, Df ~
1/DR, where the change is
redshift if Df has a minus sign
or frequency is reduced, and blueshift when the sign is positive. When DR is an increase in radius, Df is a decrease in frequency and minus, and
vice versa.
Now the 64 dollar question definition of DR! Mechanically as radiating atomic source, DR has to represent the change in radius of a
given visible matter mass pt as it re-radiates the h amount of energy as an
oscillator; whose instantaneous discrete location is a momentary absolute event
address in fluid space. But the radiation our instruments are capable of
receiving is that which emanates from the more volatile molecules that are
formed by statistical quantities of atoms. In other words, both at the visible
matter source and visible matter sink, the frequency that is registered and
recorded correlates directly with molecular level mass pt radiators and only
indirectly (a nesting level or two removed) from the atom as the standard
spectral origin and ultimate sink. The supermolecule formed by the shared orbit
electrons emanating from the c-boundaries of atoms whose nuclear MDCOG have a
growth radius on the order of ten to the minus 8 centimeters, must have a
radius on the order of one centimeter! That means the frequency of radiation
from that source must register at about that ten to the ten cps, or numerically
equal to the speed of light. This molecule radiator case corresponds to
background radiation, or is from molecules whose average radius is on the order
of ten to the minus 2 cm (wavelength of .2cm). One will see the mechanical
detail of this later. For now, the DR
one must look for is associated with the changing radii of radiating molecules
as R-size visible matter mass pts, not the source atoms making up the molecule.
The DR one is looking for
then is the change in the average molecular R-size mass pt radius as
compared to that which exists here on Earth when we precisely confirm the speed
of light, c, by calibrated and extrapolated measurement. There are certain
standard conditions for such measurement of course because we cannot actually
create the so called vacuum of space (c-boundary) condition. But consistent
measurement under set "standards" yields predictable results, and
there is indeed an average visible mass pt radius for measuring the passage of
light here on the surface of planet Earth. You can get an idea what it must be
by solving f = c/2pR, where R is
the average radius of a visible molecular R-size mass pt at the average
replacement sphere (c-boundary) radius of the Earth. That radius is R = equal
to whatever so that one gets the frequency of yellow light (about 5.45x ten to
the 14 cps) or the center frequency of the visible spectrum. Why? Because of
our calibrated "tuning" of instruments based on what we see here on
the surface of the Earth.
If we lived on another celestial body at closer average distance to the
cosmic MDCOG, the average energy density of our atomic and molecular mass pts
would be uniformly higher as a function of how much nearer than here on Earth.
A higher average ambient density means a larger average c-boundary radius and
therefore lower average frequency of atomic and molecular radiation. The
dominant or central visible spectrum color for our instrument eyes to
biologically see would then be redshifted appropriately relative to that here
on Earth. The mechanical reason being that the average atom has a higher ground
energy state and therefore greater MDCOG and c-boundary radius growth
corresponding to that ground state. The upshot is that the closer to the cosmic
MDCOG, the lower the average frequency of the molecular level radiation one
needs to be able see, and track the all-important relative motion of close-by
visible matter. More importantly from the viewpoint of interpreting the meaning
of the apparent redshift of light from far away stars as it arrives here on
Earth, on the outskirts of our cosmos, it is quite honestly silly to believe
that the redshift is due to universal expansion, or Big Bang.
Think about it mechanically. That is, using a simple and ordinary sense
of logic. Light has to be continually pumped through physical space for us to
continually be able to see, record it, to feel it in real time, with our
sensing instruments in a direct way- no matter how far or close! By feeling it,
one means automatically dig all the signal out of the noise based on one’s own
biomatter and its preprogrammed processing ability with respect to stimuli; a
processing that uses a genetically supplied reference data base that is
empirically proven by species survival.
Science is a tall order for genetic (intuitive) common sense first and
last; in order for us to be here at all! The pre-requisite absolute reference
has to pre-exist at birth and can be faithfully registered and utilized in the
analysis of data as an automatic internal process at both the
individual and collective human physiology levels. The result is strong-force
ontological knowing, as well as strong-force empiricism at the species level.
It is the ever-operative presence of UH as rational God in each and every one
of us. And now we can model it as well as automatically know it.
We can also not know something if is summarily rejected by
that most trustworthy (survival proven) inner voice that most of us have. The
precious inner voice actually gives one an innate feel that says with one’s
guts, “do not learn (mentally eat)
stuff, even it works numerically, when it does not taste/make good sense and
may poison and generally mess up your survival in the long run”. It used to be
said that to be a scientist, one had to be a natural (gut level) skeptic. Now
one is expected to routinely swallow dogma whole without asking any gut-evoked
questions at all!
If we drive over to a given light source in space, and find that it is
still pumping energy at us, we can destroy ourselves for real by running into
it. So the first thing we want to learn how to do is steer around it with our
space probes and that is a piece of cake as long as we take good "seeing
instruments" along for the ride. But of course we need to know how much
propulsion energy for how much payload weight to get to the light source. So we
start guessing distance based on relative brightness and the apparent
orbital track of the source, with a general map of the large scale structure of
the celestial sphere (the constellations) in mind. Well, we have been guessing
relative distance terribly wrong since Edwin Powell Hubble made his famous plot
(1923) and came to the wrong conclusion. This Famous Experimenter’s tragic but
successful wrong interpretation of data happened less than 30 miles from where
the author is sitting at this moment in Newhall, CA - at the Mount Wilson
Observatory near Pasadena. Had the experimenter been sufficiently broad in his
analytic perspective in analyzing the star data, and in better touch with his
ancestors, the author likes to think an Inner Voice would have spoke to him and
said, in a way that could not be denied, "But it does not make good
sense!"
Now the author is able to say this about Hubble for two reasons: (1) he
greatly respects his work and expertise, (2) and knows first hand as Hubble
himself did, that no one is infallible. Here in a brief true story poem is what
the author is talking about; written in 1974:
Whispers of Id
From the depths of my troubled soul one night, pushed upward though
dreamless sleep, a message of ominous portent did my Sudden-Awareness keep.
The voice of a Presence Within spoke with great authority and light, and
left suspended in air, these haunting words of the night.
"Arouse Precious Hopes gone to sleep; tell them what they want to
know. Let go the ones you cannot Keep, and Nurture those that need to
grow."
The stanza I slowly repeated as though the words were mine, and a cascade
of vented feeling followed each enchanted line.
An overwhelming sense of relief with these cryptic words came through,
and I knew I must respond to words that Rang So True.
From that Fateful night until now, I have found an Inner Peace. By giving
Life to the Hopes I can, and to the rest, a Kind Release.”
The secret Hope that one is technically or otherwise fully grown and
invincible is the biggest no-no of scientific research and of life in general;
it deserves kind (to everyone), and self-enabling release. In the Early Einstein, a very real and
simple humbleness was more than sufficient for incredible relative success. Today,
with the concrete-like base-encrusting false dogma that Einstein innocently
helped to create, a logically relentless, strong emotion jack-hammer feels much
more proper!
The experimenter’s rule that the author is rather urgently formulating
and attempting to quickly broadcast is all about how to do better in the future
so that science does not continue in such a sad state of affairs! Scientific incumbency must of course
strongly resist going backwards! As a successful
complete-systems-architect-oriented scientist and engineer, one had to kick
technical ass (including the behinds of superiors) for 30 years to get the job
done. There is no longer another way. In gut-honestly-felt (intuitive-proper)
terms, the experimenter’s rule is easy; UH Says Believe Mechanically In
And Thereby Insist on Feeling What You See!
Dear Reader, please figure out how to turn the real time frequency
modulation of pumping atomic sources into a tactile (touching) sense; an
ability to literally feel the dynamic texture of the pumping source material –
at both the atomic and molecular levels. The retina sensibly “feels” light in
the visible part of the spectrum, but all the individual cells of the body
sensibly feel the entire spectrum of energy impact. We are fully conscious of
that feel when the intensity begins to damage the cells or interfere with
normal functioning. Those same cells continually feel and re-act to the
positively curved passage of dark matter as gravity force. That is,
cell-binding forces are continually re-acting to maintain, function, and
posture.
If one does not understand what the author is saying here, their mind is
stubbornly refusing to do so out a primal sense of ego survival that has
absolutely nothing to do with the search for truth. Guaranteed!
The author was assigned to the highest priority technical tasks of his
company for most of 30 years and is here reminded of the times some
over-educated pompous ass would say in a technical meeting; “I do not want to
hear that!” to which the response, without loosing a beat, was “Ah Gee, that’s
too damn bad!” And the author’s not always silent afterthought was – “So get
the hell out of the way!” The smart ancient Greeks used to say, “the question of
fair play (of being ultimately nice or polite) just begins to enter when the
pressure of necessity is somewhere near equal. Well, the pressure of necessity
for a life saving rescue of physics and math is off the damn scale! Figuratively and literally! Those few able
to see the truth clearly through all the fog of current dogma are going have to
be permanently powerful and temporarily mean-as-shit; as the Untouchables
of Holistic Science (UHS)!
The instruments we use are molecular matter both for detection and
emission and their carefully calibrated capabilities result from appropriate
"tuning" of the molecular vibratory environments involved. That tuning
is done here on the Planet Earth and assumed to hold constant if and when we
put those instruments in a controlled environment outside the surface of the
planet, or in a specially insulated (controlled) laboratory environment at or
near the Earth’s surface. The relative energy and mass of visible mass pts,
beginning with the atom, will then be seen to tell all through the dynamics of
their Mass Pt Two-Set structure as a self-defining, always undulating outer
surface that depends on the status of the central MDCOG. That central MDCOG’s
growth radius then determines the radius of the c-boundary that radiates to the
outside world.
The ever present, predictable, visualizable, Local Two-Set
mechanics of dark and visible matter c-boundaries is an ongoing underlying process
here called and math modeled as Universal Harmony (UH).
Newton’s gravity law as derived from Kepler’s Laws, represents a clever
normalization of the attractive-force mode of Supergravity; but it only works
good when the orbit motion of one of
the two masses is being locally dominated by the mass of the other, and the two
masses must be commonly immersed by the cosmic gravity field. As soon as the
masses approach equality, and one is not immersed and significantly controlled
by the other’s gravity field, the gravity force law is no longer applicable.
The only mechanically feasible reason that the mass of one is multiplied by the
other is that one of them is sufficiently larger so as to dominate in terms
of dark matter absolute motion that
completely immerses all the atoms of the other, and imparting a force
proportional to the atom’s mass. Only then does each unit of mass of the one
serve to sum its circulating dark matter force onto every one of the atoms of
the second mass in a near-equal way. When the masses are near equal and small,
it is difficult to conceive any measurable mutual force actions on all the
atoms involved. Per Einstein’s gravity, they would each have to cause near
equal energy transporting undulations in the abstract field with the causative
mass distribution changing accordingly. Larger equal masses are called for and
this has been indicated to the author in messages from Dr. Sarkadi.
Allowing small changes in the masses (that is, in their internally stored
energy) due to cyclic energy exchange is akin to an on-off weak chemical bonding. While such smaller scale energy re-distribution
dynamics can be explained with QED or fluid space theory, ordinary gravity law
seems definitely inadequate.
The test of the fluid space vision should prove very simple by
suspending two suitably large equal
masses near each other at the same height in a properly controlled environment.
The suspension cables should be of equal length and long enough to allow close
proximity and theoretical contact with measurable force due to mutually
attractive gravity. The experiment must
be such as to contain and nullify the effects of coriolis and electrostatic
influences, and be immune to any known measurable disturbance of the Earth’s
local vertical.
The proposed experiment, if feasible, would serve to verify the upshot of
the previous experiments with smaller near-equal masses, and would
substantially verify the severe limitations in applying the attractive gravity
force law.
What the Sarkadi-Bodonyi expriments did measure is a kind of
"modulation on pulse" equivalent to that which may be said to be due
to mutual electrodynamic gravity between two masses as a result of the plus and
minus effects on each other as volatile energy/mass entities immersed by the
same dominant gravity field; where the instantaneous field location of one of
the masses is changing cyclically with respect to the other. With electronic
measurement, they are seeking to calibrate the fine grain influence of the
presence of a fixed mass on the swing extent of a similar moving mass. In other
words, they are measuring the push and pull effect of the fixed mass on the
swing arc of the moving mass; with no dynamic control of the energy states of
the atoms and molecules making up the masses.
At the atomic and molecular electrodynamic-state level, it is the
electron as particle that must be seen as the orbiting and ever-perturbing
field object; in the full sense of Kepler and Newton. But the experimental
phenomenon worth measuring is really about what is happening in real time to
the self-defining surfaces of the atoms and molecules as they dynamically
makeup the mass objects placed under laboratory controlled conditions. The
Experimenter’s First Rule of "do some good in the name of holistic
science" will here be translated into a proper Periodic Table from and to
which all Experimenters cyclically travel. An experiment that is not consistent
with the new table may make money and fame, but it ill serves science in the
long run; so stay tuned, and there is more and better everything!
Viewing the Sarkadi-Bodonyi experments in fluid space terms
Figure 5-xx [ https://www.angelfire.com/wi/HolisticScience/dsfig2.html]
shows the Sarkadi-Bodonyi plot of measured ''delta pendulum displacement"
vs the ratio of target mass sizes, said to be due to the attractive force
between small and nearly equal masses. The mass on the pendulum is in
calibrated cyclic motion with respect to the fixed target mass. The curve's cusp
or smooth drop in displacement where the masses approach equal value, is the
first mentioned effect of a repulsive force as opposed to an attractive one.
The experiment measurement apparatus is able to see this transient negative
force buried in the noise only for the case of equal masses. Why? Because when
the masses are equal, the effect of the force of repulsion results in an
elimination of the noise of measurement!
One here attempts to explain.
The mechanical meaning here appears unmistakable if one is focused on the
energy-giving-and-mitigating dynamics of an immersing dark matter fluid space.
The small and equal mutual attractive force (with only the moving mass on the
pendulum able to move in response to attraction or repulsion) has given way to
the dark matter mechanical energy transfer dynamics between the two masses
involved at the point of closest approach. For each such closest approach when
the masses are equal, there is a change, a mutual quieting, of differential
undulations (difference of vibrations) of the defining , mass-holding, outer
surfaces. The result is that the instrumentation sees no net effect on pendulum
displacement due to attractive gravity! In other words, the systematic
measurement noise with an anti-gravity direction is precisely offset by a
synchronicity of fluid space equilibrium with respect to the vibration of the
visible matter involved. All the fluid gear chain of sending (radiating ) and
receiving (detector apparatus) mass pts are ringing in harmony because there is
nothing left to mitigate by the transfer of energy!
In electrodynamic and kinetic terms, the moving mass has directed excess
energy that impinges on the equal fixed mass but is reflected back and is not
absorbed. From the kinetically limited viewpoint of the pendulum, it is simple
air molecule interactive friction loss proportional to speed squared. The
mitigation of universal harmony (UH) is to take away or hide in the realm of
dark matter, the excess energy of the moving equal mass. Now if the excess
energy of the relative motion were to somehow approach the speed of light,
there is a much different energy transfer result; the whole experiment set up
would come apart and the entire set of nested gravity fields would be
undergoing a drastic identity destroying and creating process. But for slow
relative motion of the pendulum, it is simply dark matter (Higgs particle)
energy absorption, a quite acceptable and quiet mitigating change in the
dynamics of the underlying invisible fluid. UH tends to be supportive of energy-transfer-peaceful,
or conflict-free, equality between closely adjacent visible matter objects;
both organic and inorganic. Things are indeed much quieter that way, and
adjacent visible matter entities as mass pts neither have to explosively shrink
or expand in real time to accommodate a passing meteor so to speak.
The author knows in an excruciatingly painful way about the effects of
human aura's (self-defining dynamic outer surfaces) in close proximity; we too
are complex mass pts and gravity fields! He has one Son, forever unnamed, who
is so out of tune with his father, that when they stand close to one another,
things get instantly explosive all by themselves as a matter of UH; both
emotionally, and electrodynamically, including occasional sparks of electricity
and other obvious levels of thermodynamic and chemical exchange! We both have
learned the hard way to simply stay at arm's-length-plus and still care and
laugh a lot.
We humans tend to be unconsciously very aware of the lack of equality and
synchronicity as to vibratory (breathing in and out) energy states of each
other when standing or moving close. And more to the point here, when there is
close equality and synchronicity of aura's, we tend, like all life forms, to
procreate or build together instead of mutually destroy! Dear reader it is all
due to a benevolent but ever ruling UH as immersing fluid and rational God!
That God is very forgiving of near-perfect matches, actually insists on small
differences and on MDCOG and attending field-extent growth. But if differences
are too large, it forces a new, more harmonious identity of wholes. Though
improbable, it can become Armageddon everywhere on Earth and not just in
the Balkans; so lets try to see and work together. One Alternate Reality at a
time for almost all humans, please!
In fluid space theory, one thing is for certain per Newton's concept of
equal and opposite force; the dark matter circulating (Higgs particle) fluid
that imparts the force of attractive gravity is intimately interactive with and
continually immerses the two visible matter objects. As those objects approach
one another, the common energy imparting dark matter fluid which intimately and
instantaneously immerses them both,
makes them swim and vibrate like Bell's bells in synchronicity somewhat
automatically! Thus one rationalizes the cusp of quieting in the data at the
point of equal masses. So Dr. Sarkadi you can blame it on Bell’s Inequality.
The second, more logic-exciting effect displayed by the data lies in the
fact that the smoothed curve goes back up as the target mass becomes less than
the moving mass, then appears to project onto the vertical delta displacement
axis at a value of unity for the theoretical instance where there is no second
mass at all! In this case, unity means one times ten to the minus four meters!
This prompted the author to suggest a systematic error on the order of ten to
the minus four meters! What could this second curiously asymmetric and
unexplained effect mean in fluid space terms? One here postulates that the
mitigating fluid of space allows a natural redshifting of the underlying and
dominant vibratory (thermal and kinetic) force that is present.
The larger supermolecules of the air have a now-dominate vibratory force
involving mass object breathing displacements on the order of ten to the minus
four centimeters. Instrumentation is likely removed from the point of closest
contact of the two masses by a factor of ten to the two (100) in the direction
of detecting longer wavelengths in the pertinent fluid medium vibratory motion.
Ok, one may ask, so what? But in a seamless fluid space, the separation
of the instrument within the common dominant gravity field is a standoff
perspective with respect to average distance to an MDCOG, due entirely to molecular
makeup. This means that the vibrations of the fluid medium as that fluid
contiguously impacts the detection apparatus, are fluid-gear shifted in
frequency! In other words, the makeup and placement of the measuring instrument
is necessarily such that the natural lengthening of wavelength of the telltale
vibratory energy is on the order of 100 times that of its wavelength as it
leaves the surfaces of the two objects. The result is a systematic noise bias
at about the average level of measurement sensitivity; so the ambient molecular
vibration of ten to the minus four centimeter displacement is transmuted by the
fluid mass pt gears of space in its travel to the relatively macroscopic
measurement apparatus such that the wavelength of the system noise becomes 100
times longer to get to ten to the minus four meters!
It sounds and feels like a big logical stretch but it fits the author's
theory; because (1) interactive fluid is continually adjusting in terms of mass
pt rotation and vibration to mark ambient energy density for the space volume
occupied, and (2) this results in measured redshift of energy transfers between
visible matter objects as the telltale energy travels, on the moving average,
outward from the atomic source maximum density centers of gravity (MDCOGs) in
order to get to the detecting apparatus. Removing this bias lets the plot go to
negative energy displacement levels as target mass approaches equality where
repulsive force arises, then to a displacement of zero when target mass goes to
zero. It certainly makes better sense as an interpretation of the general shape
of the data; even if one wants to dismiss the numbers all together. One thus
concludes that the experiment inadvertently verifies the fluid space theory.
The same conclusion is here said to apply to similar but much more vivid
re-interpretations of the famous Black Body Radiation (Ultraviolet
Catastrophe), Michelson-Morley, Hubble and Background Radiation plots of
experimental data. In each instance, true meaning is in the shape, the
distinctive character of the data, not its numerics. Truth is indeed
non-dimensional; a matter of profound and tightly coupled relationships between
dimensionless ratios - like the M/m of the Sarkadi plot.
In effect, Newton's Universal Gravity Constant as a macroscopic or gross
normalizing approximation of a Unified Force Theory law cannot be refined in
accuracy by ordinary mechanical experiments because the inescapable constant
vibratory or thermal energy exchange levels pertinent to the visible matter involved,
cause the commensurable smaller mass levels to dynamically change at a level
that continually interferes with the intent of the experiment. The Cavendish
torsion balance works for an approximate verification of Newton’s Gravity
Constant because the masses differ enough that one can be said to be immersing
the other in its stronger gravity field. One is reminded of reading somewhere
that the torsion balance experiment can be shown to involve a temporary
repulsion when masses are brought together and every science student has felt
very strongly both the attractive and the repulsion force of two magnets (as
fields) when their poles are brought close to one another. Every hunk of
ordinary atomic matter can become temporarily magnetized to some extent just by
what is happening around it.
Most import in this fluid space vision is that fact that Newton’s Gravity
law does indeed depend for ordinary matter on most if not all of the causative
mass residing as a point-like mass at the center, here called a finite spinning
black hole MDCOG with a field identifying finite radius. The field
structure outside the MDCOG out to the visible c-boundary of a visible matter
object is volatile and capable of loosing and gaining internal electron energy almost
without limit. So when visible matter mass objects are forced to come close
together whether big or small, their volativity differences, like those of
individual atoms, lead to energy exchanges and new larger and smaller entities
not covered by the simple two-fold application of Newton’s laws. That is, the
attempt to follow and measure the energy exchanges leads to intractable ‘hidden
parameters’ problems. In the upshot by ignorance alone , one simply
allows the hidden redshift of molecular sized radiation of energy from
statistical quantities of atoms to totally obscure sensitive experiment data!
In his most recent papers, Dr.Sarkadi cleverly proposes letting the
universal gravity constant vary slightly in the manner G’ = G(1 – e),
where e
varies by less than some arbitrary small amount so as to compensate for the
apparent changes in the two masses of the mass objects under test. Fluid space not only specifies that the mass
of a visible matter object is mostly at its center but is by the reflective
symmetry of UH also in the density of the mass pts defining its outer visible
surface. The mass changes effect both the radius of the central mass of radius,
R, and the radius of the G-size mass pts defining the tangible (visible) outer
surface of mass objects. As gravity fields themselves, whose visible outer
surface is vibrating to the rhythm of energy transfer inward and outward, the
mass objects under test are indeed of a dynamic geometry. Not all of those
dynamics are under experiment control, but may very well be calibrated out of
the system noise. When bringing these objects as complex gravity fields and
larger mass pts together close up, one forces new synchronous dynamics at both
the outer surfaces of all the nested and nearby gravity fields
involved, and at all their point-mass-like MDCOGs. While
abstraction offered by G’ = G(1 - e) may allow extension of
Newton’s Gravity law, it does not
assist understanding. It would help greatly to use (G ± DG)
and (R ±
DR)
on opposite sides of the field equation, and then define “solutions = workable average values of the
deltas”; as vibration displacements of the atomic c-boundary surface
level mass pts whose radii are G and R, which vibrations serve to transmit
the energy one is measuring at the molecular surface mass pt level.
The experiments by Sarkadi and Bodnyi are therefore an important marking
of a measurement limitation in applying the classical gravity law and remind
that the desired levels of precision in ordinary mechanics will ultimately
require a different approach to controlling and measuring mechanical force. It
is already routinely that way in the semiconductor industry but it is not being
currently recognized as gravity law application of another, supergravity theory
kind.
Back to the periodic table : Newton's laws at the atomic and
subatomic levels
What does such mechanical limits of classical gravity law application
have to do with redefining the periodic table? Because the periodic table is
the result of experiments whose data have never been interpreted correctly. And
because the author feels strongly that a lot of current experimentation reminds
one in a way that cannot be denied, that mechanical measurement is not limited
to nor dependent on what we normally think of as mechanical law; wherein relatively
macroscopic experiment props, tools and instruments are employed in
measurement. Radiation itself as the other mode of supergravity is
rather the ideal mechanical vehicle and math model for detection and
measurement of energy-change mechanics at all energy transfer and visible mass
pt size levels; as long as we remember to adjust the data for the natural
redshift due to mostly outward-from-atomic-MDCOG travel to get to the light
detector/receiver. This kind of application expansion is what quantum mechanics
naturally and correctly attempted as it developed in the twentieth century. But
it lost its way in complex if beautiful and workable abstraction that is
without true mechanical foundation. The new periodic table changes that, and
allows experimenters to much better understand what they are doing and how to
properly interpret data.
It seems obvious enough. To know visible matter, one needs to know
individual molecules and atoms making up the matter. All of which leads to wanting
to see clearly what happens inside the atom, to its internal energy in the form
of orbiting electrons; whose count gets much more prodigious than currently
realized.
In an immanently practical way using the new theory, the detailed
mechanical rhythms of the periodic table can be vividly shown to be the
ultimate meaningful foundation for all measurable mechanics from quark to
cosmos. That is, ultimately if one chooses, they can do most of if not all the
work of celestial mechanics through the observation over time of the way the
radiating atoms of the stars and other measurable objects are behaving as
determined from the changes in electron-ring-energy emission and absorption
spectra.
O yeah, you say, "prove it"! And so one shall in many ways.
One here seeks to assure the reader that (1) all interactions between
atoms and all other visible matter objects, and (2) between the objects and the
interstice space dark matter mass pts that keep them separate and synchronously
intact in a fluid space, are both reflected in surface energy state changes.
Because of the built-in synchronicity of Universal Harmony along with its
dynamic reflective symmetry, we only need to model, and can only measure and
experience, the happenings between atoms that may be said to be touching
through the dynamic process of shared-orbit electrons. That is, all atom to
atom interactions are both the result and the cause of orbit sharing of one or
more electrons of that volatile family of electrons whose orbits are
periodically carrying their energy to the c-boundary of the subject atom. The
visit of an electron to the c-boundary is the "Undulatory Event" of
the moment at a given G-size mass pt location in that c-boundary.
In our dynamic math model of the atom, its current energy state is the
"steady state" or average summary expression of the undulations; the
vibrations of its defining surface. The visits of internally orbiting
electrons contribute directly to the strength with which the atom's surface is
being bound or hardened by the helical path mechanical stitching of Higgs
Particles locked in tandem spiral motion. This motion subscribes a helical path
around and along a beaded string of mass points that form a closed loop we call
an orbit. The net force of stitching of Higgs Particle helical strings of
electron motion give it a scalable degree of tangibility in terms of hardness;
referred to here as the Ionization Energy. Ionization Energy is the amount of
controlled (bombardment) energy from the outside required to free (release) an
internal electron that is periodically visiting the c-boundary.
Variations in surface vibration in atoms not actively involved in an
ongoing chemical process may be said to be caused by changes in the storage and
distribution of internal energy in the form of orbiting electrons that visit
the c-boundary and therefore agitate the mass pts forming that boundary. The
ground energy states of the atomic elements as given in the periodic table
should therefore be represented by a number of electrons and their orbit
distribution; which is precisely what quantum mechanics does. The question
being addressed and answered here is whether the quantum mechanics
representation as an ongoing workable model is also mechanically correct or
close thereto. Since orbiting electrons identified by the periodic table
quantum numbers do not have specific average orbit radii, nor does the ground
state atom as a whole, the quantum mechanics model is clearly quite incomplete
in a mechanical sense. The abstract meanings and their contrived arrangements
with respect to quantum numbers and electron spins suffice to predict but not
to explain the why and how in a way that can be satisfactorily visualized.
Fluid space theory does both.
Using the fractal expression of Table 5-3, one lets the spiral arm or
shell number i, tell of the UH-incrementing way by which the shells become
populated with orbiting electrons. One must remember that for the neutron
shell, each R-size mass pt forming it has 3 orbiting electrons pulsing (in
perfect phase) through it. Yet for the growth neutron shell around the original
atomic core of radius, Ra0, the number of internally stored
electrons representing the releasable increments of atomic radiation is equal
to 1/h. That is, only 1/3 of the total number populating the neutron shell, the
in-out oriented ones, are releasable. The other orthogonal pairs are
interlocked with one another in a way that causes them to be immediately
replaced upon release by ordinary means of growth and decline. The automatic
replacement is by the n = Z electrons that reach into the nuclear proton
shells.
Before a fully populated proton shell becomes a neutron shell by becoming
locked to the core by the in-out oriented Z electrons, it goes through a growth
process whereby it may alternately store and release a limited number of
electrons not yet locked by an orthogonal partner; such a proton shell is then
said to leave an open slot via which an electron may alternately come and go in
a deep (negative valence) way in an orbit-sharing (as chemical bonding)
arrangement with another atom. A less
deep and more typical (positive valence) way of molecular bonding via the
sharing of electrons, is when the outer
visible surface defining electrons, the free Z = n electrons, of two or more
atoms are sharing orbits.
For all atoms in the periodic table above hydrogen and helium, there are
multiple partially populated proton shells. The new periodic table must parse
the active proton shells and all active outer visible surface-defining
electrons within the gravity field of each atom; in a way that explains the
laws of chemistry as just other manifestations of a unified force. Defining the shell number of the logarithmic
growth spiral so that it represents the proper UH-driven incrementing of shell
growth, by well-known increments of energy state change for each atom, provides
the needed parsing mechanism. The information on the internal geometry of the
orbiting electrons is given by the fractal way the core is growing in radius as
measured by A, and by applying one’s imagination as driven by UH.
One assumes the two dimensional fractal formula of universal harmony must
surface- store a hologram-like blueprint specifying a self-regenerating 3-D pregeometry. The numerical value of the
shell number, i, must then be viewed as containing embedded or nested
information. As a radial distance
measure from the MDCOG in a force field with its own built-in, nonlinear,
discretely stepping coordinate system, the precise distance measure as a whole
number and fraction in decimal notation for a given field, is viewed as a
construction comprised of a set of discrete-interval growth marks. The growth
marks are of increasing depth like the growth rings of a tree, or more to the
point here, like the increasingly heavier arms of the growth spiral; therefore
shell number, i, proceeds in a non-linear manner and contains nested
dimensional components called electrons.
One will show that the essentially infinitely small fractional value,
i =
h2 represents an
oscillator stored mass of h; corresponding to one electron in a single proton
shell just outside the atomic
MDCOG. When i reaches a value of one,
it means that a growth neutron shell has been formed; because as the
logarithmic growth spiral fractal shell number, i must multiply 1/h, the number
of electrons said to be releasable from one 3-axis-populated shell. It will be developed that the atomic number,
n is equal to the whole number in i, plus one. That is, when i equals 1 plus a
fraction, n must be equal to 2; indicating that helium has one growth neutron
shell plus two fractionally populated proton shells. The fractional part of i
is the scalar representation of the electrons populating the two proton
shells.
Armed with the following premises, one should now be able to piece the
puzzle: (1) the atom must emit or absorb one electron orbit ring quantum at a
time, (2) the effective core nucleus is fashioned of neutrons and protons as
electron-populated 3-D shells (3) a neutron shell has an electron ring passing through
each of its 1/h2 mass pts in 3 orthogonal directions and is strong
force bound to the original atomic core (4) a full proton shell has 2/h
electrons, or 1/h orthogonal pairs at the moment it turns into a neutron shell,
and (5) in the plane of the fractal, a nearly full proton shell must be assumed
to have the same impact on the magnitude on the growth of i as a neutron shell,
but is rotating with respect to the core, (6) the Z electrons are driven
(positioned) by proton shells.
One must first parse the whole number of 1/h packets as growth neutron
shells and then decide how the fraction indexes the collective electron
population of the proton shells; the number of proton shells being equal to the
atomic number, n.
As one tries to describe this visualization of the detailed mechanics of
the atom, the author finds a news article in the LA Times entitled, “Holograms
Are Us”, by Times Science Editor K.C. Cole. He has interviewed the well known
physicist Leonard Susskind of Standford University, who is expressing his views
about the discovery of a set of new
equations that appear to accurately describe the universe –as full of
hologram-stored information. The upshot of Susskind’s discussion, as summarized
by both he and Cole is that “ a two dimensional surface can contain all the
information needed to reproduce a three-dimensional solid”. Well, that is
precisely what one is doing here; parsing the 3-D-embedded blueprint
information contained in the one dimensional fractal spiral arm or shell
number, i. The article makes it clear that the top physicists now know that all
the information stored in the interior, the “bulk” of a visible object is
somehow encoded in its boundary surface.
As Susskind so importantly points out in the article, “We are far from knowing in detail how to
translate back and forth between the surface and the bulk”. One here visualizes
the n = Z electrons as the Information Shuttle (IS) between the “bulk” core of
the atom and its c-boundary surface as displayed to the outside world.
By the electron and shell parsing process being described here, one is
able to see and model clearly, i.e. in ultimate mechanical detail, just what
the surface embedded holographic information is, and precisely how it gets into
the measured values we gather from consistent experimentation.; which means
that when we really understand the mechanics of the atom, we see four closely
coupled things: (1) that UH not only embeds in the object’s visible outer
surface all that we ever need to formally or intuitively know about its
infinitely nested dark matter interior, but (2) the undulations in the outer
boundary (as absorption and emission events) tells us all we need to formally
and intuitively know about how the electron-discrete changes to
the interior bulk are communicated to the outside and visa versa, (3) we then see the rhythm and 3-D geometry
by which the proton shells build and turn into neutron shells in growing the
core nucleus, and finally, (4) we see how the 3-D nucleon (neutron and proton)
growth process projects into the plane of the growth spiral fractal and the
scalar value of A.
Why we desperately need to “Intuitively’ as well as “Formally” know
things
In hopes of persuading the reader that the new science here described is
not only worthwhile but inevitable, one reminds everyone that current
scientific theory really stinks to high heaven for a whole lot of good
people. On that note, one is reminded
that many if not all of the original Prussian-German group who dominated
physics during the 19th century and into the first three decades of
the 20th, liked to brag about their understanding of what we
humans need to know and it did not include anything that was immeasurable
and therefore not predictable by technician-mentality scientists. The author wants to free everyone;
scientists, philosophers and poets all, to not only be anxiously able and
willing but insist on seeing clearly why and how something is measurably
so. Please consider the following from
the Master of Curiosity, Richard Feynman and his “Lecture Series on Physics”.
Volume I, Chapter 38 “The
Relation of Wave and Particle Viewpoints”, headings 38-4 The Size of the Atom,
and 38-5 Energy Levels, show clearly just how far arrogant-technician-mentality
science = QED had brought us by 1963.
In 38-4, first sentence, “ We now consider another application of the
uncertainty relation, Eq.(38.3). It must not be taken too seriously; the idea
is right but the analysis is not very accurate.” Then immediately following Eq.
38.13, near the end of 38.4: “What does a negative energy mean? It means that
an electron has less energy when it is in the atom than when it is free.” Now
Feynman had cleverly used a QED notion that he did not really believe in to
“independently” derive the Bohr radius for hydrogen; whose general magnitude as
an atom had been well established as belonging to the angstrom scalar regime.
The Bohr radius of 5.28x10-9 cm, is the QED-derived radius of the
atom in its lowest or ground energy state. In fluid space theory, one will show
that the c-boundary of the hydrogen atom is ra1 = (1/hc2)Ra1
= (1/hc2)A1Ra0 = (1.67919918216x105)(1.00794)(2.243928162x10-14)
= 3.79792027297x10-9 cm. Now Feynman would not quibble over the
difference in radius here, for he writes, after using the derived Bohr radius
to calculate the ionization energy, 13.6 ev, “We have no reason to think that
it is not two or three times this –or half this – or (1/p)
times this, because we have used such a sloppy argument. However, we have
cheated, we have used all the constants in such a way that it happens to come
out the right number. This number, 13.6 electron volts, is called a Rydberg of
energy; it is the ionization energy of hydrogen. So now we understand why we do
not fall through the floor.”
His mind was suddenly pre-occupied, quite understandably, with the much
larger nagging questions of quantum physics like how does an atom with only one
or just a few electrons orbiting its
nucleus keep from being crunched under outside pressure. Not having a good
mechanical answer either in the front or back of his mind, he leaps from
hydrogen to statistical quantities of all kinds of atoms and goes on to say,
“As we walk, our shoes with their masses of atoms push against the floor with
its mass of atoms. In order to squash the atoms closer together, the electrons
would be confined to a smaller space and, by the uncertainty principle, their
momenta would have to be higher on the average and that means high energy; the
resistance to mechanical compression is a quantum-mechanical effect and not a
classical effect.”
By using the expression “quantum-mechanical” at this junction in this
way, one suddenly sees Red Buttons happily singing, “Strange Things are
Happening!” and he is beating Feynman’s bongo drums as he does his dance!
Feynman, as he must, is vaguely referring here, among other
things, to the fact that in quantum mechanics charged things like electrons and
protons rather mysteriously but for real repel one another, as well as attract
one another as in an ordinary gravity sense. After mentioning the trouble of
classical physics (physics without QED) in explaining why the atom does not
crunch under pressure, he writes, “--but never mind, we have the right
way out, now! (maybe.)”. Then says, “Incidently, although we have no reason to
understand it at the moment, in a situation where there are many electrons, it
turns out that they try to keep away from each other.
”In reading Feynman for the 3rd and 4th times, the
author tried desperately to see where the best mind that had been put forward
on quantum electrodynamics was coming from --in his understanding of the
mechanics of the atom. The author’s
struggle to find a data-compatible way to parse measured relative mass with
respect to the growth of stored electrons in the atom, led the author to
searching through everything that Feynman had to say in a plain language way
about the how and why of energy states; because the author found, repeatedly,
that he is very good at it! But in 38-5, entitled “ Energy levels”, the author
came away sadly with the following consternation. The author’s comments are in
brackets [ ].
The one-page 38-5 heading starts out, “We have talked about the atom in
its lowest possible energy condition, but it turns out the electron can do
other things [meaning other than just circling around in a constant way in a
particular orbit]. It can jiggle and wiggle in a more energetic manner, and so
there are many possible motions for the atom .” [but what is he seeing as the
mechanical coupling between the jiggling wiggling electron and the atom as a
whole??] He goes on to state the basics of what is meant by energy states,
emphasizing that the designated “excited” energy states, E1, E2, etc do not
remain in that state forever. “Sooner or later it drops to a lower state and
radiates energy in the form of light. The frequency of the light that is
emitted is determined by conservation of energy plus the quantum mechanical
understanding that the frequency of light is related to the energy of light by
Eq. (38.10) [ the uncertainty relation]. Therefore the frequency of the light
which is liberated in a transition from Energy E3 to E1
(for example) is w3 = (E3 – E1)/h, (38.14)“ He
then writes about sum and difference relationships in characteristic spectra.
[38.14 is the deterministic photon energy relation Ep = hf applied to an energy drop that is turned
into a photon. But one has to be talking about one electron, the hydrogen
electron, else there are multiple electrons involved and/or multiple atoms and
we get into radiation sum and difference statistical milieu at the undulating
c-boundaries between atoms and molecules – the subject here is the atom and its
particular set of characteristic energy states.]
Again the author desperately asks, where is the necessary mechanical
coupling between the Z electron(s) and the radiating atom and how did the atom
get to the higher energy state in the first place? What is the quantum
mechanics point here? After further wandering statements about the Ritz
combination principle and the inadequacy of classical mechanics, he goes on to
make it clear that quantum physics does not explain radiation in a mechanical
way either. The last paragraph under this heading is given verbatim below so
the reader can decide for themselves that either the author is a dummy and
cannot read well, or Feynman does not know what he is talking about in his guts
and does not have the feel he himself seems to require to be lucid. It could of
course be some of all three.
“We have talked about quantum mechanics as being represented by
amplitudes which behave like waves, with certain frequencies and wave numbers.
Let us observed how it comes about from the view of amplitudes that the atom
has definite energy states.” [with this ending, he tells us we just started –
he knows he has not gotten anywhere yet and he is compulsively honest!] “This
is something we cannot understand from what has been said so far [see !], but
we are familiar with the fact that confined waves have definite frequencies.”
[ok, but sound and radiation are
different phenomenon?] “For example, if sound is confined to an organ pipe, or
anything like that, there is more than one way that the sound can vibrate, but
for each such way there is a definite frequency. Thus an object in which the
waves are confined has certain resonance frequencies.” [waves of what? For
sound we know it’s a gaseous liquid of compressed and decompressed air
molecules-- what is the fluid media for the waves of radiation for Christ’s
Sake!? – and what is the mechanism of confinement that creates the
resonances and gives us tangible scalar handles for our notions of frequency
and amplitude? Those are the begging questions whose answers we all feel
mechanical-hunger for!] Finally he writes, ”And since the general relation
exists between frequencies of the amplitude and energy, we are not surprised to
find definite energies associated with electrons bound in atoms.” [not surprised,
and not nearly satisfied mechanically!]
Richard Feynman was way above everyone else in explaining modern physics–
if he could not find the mechanical feel needed here, nobody of his genre can.
Could it be because his best teachers were more lost than he was in the
disconnected array of crudely workable but phony dogma? Feynman’s penetrating
questions as a student must have been close to insufferable! He brilliantly goes just beyond where the
dogma-by-rote takes him in every direction, and lets us vividly see the serious
limitations at every juncture. The author is richly indebted to him for helping
show the way to a new and complete theory: namely, in finding that the media
for radiation has to be the “live” field of dark matter mass pts whose absolute
motion structures and confines (loosely encapsulates) fluid space as an
infinitely nested paisley of spherical gravity fields -- and in finding causal
black hole MDCOGs everywhere (as Feynman himself jokingly and vaguely suggested
once), and seeing inside the gravity fields of atoms and molecules, that the
dark matter field structure is made rigid in varying degrees by electron-rings
of helical path radiation.
It can not be overemphasized: a nested synchrony of electron helical path
radiation also binds (structures) atoms into molecules and molecules into
substances to provide the amazing variety of visible matter confinements.
Quantum electrodynamics is indeed a practical tool set, but it is not right
as Feynman repeatedly suggests ; in that it does not provide
acceptable local-reality vision for energy/mass transfer as radiation and the
author has not found anyone who understands it as mechanics! For 30 years as an
engineering manager and supervisor concerned with multiple-discipline technical
detail, in basic research papers,
technical requirements for complex systems design, detailed build-to
specifications and elaborate fail-safe plans for development and tests, he
feels over-qualified to pronounce quantum mechanics, ”usefully clever technical
garbage”. He invites anyone and everyone to shoot him down if they can! But
they must first realize that theory as described herein clearly identifies and
gives ultimate mechanical substance to Feynman’s electron jiggling and
wiggling; to cause the variety of energy states of the atom. The n = Z
electrons are capable of being more than just standard electron-rings alright,
but not by jiggling and wiggling in the manner of either quantum mechanics or
String Theory, as one will clearly see.
As an immanently practical but grossly limited scientific outlook, QED
grew to become logically silly and powerfully arrogant; such arrogance is to be
expected of the aggressively-capable but broad-education-limited laboratory
technician who works by extensive rote, but not of broadly and deeply educated
scientists. Because of prolonged lack of oversight, of properly disciplined
scientific and engineering supervision, we now have another and more dangerous
kind of arrogant technician – the hacker-brilliant programmer that knows nor
respects any peer, and whose ego demands hidden trap doors that only they know
about, and the human spirit is finding once again that the power to predict and
control without adequate understanding (with its gut level instinctive/cultural
caution) not only corrupts absolutely, but has quickly broadcast an insidious
danger for the human race!
A philosophical bent that began to take hold in the late
19th Century is the seminal cause of philosophically-putrid science
in the late 20th. Prediction success without adequate understanding of why and
how resulted in an explosive period of technology development, beginning in Germany in the 1930’s.
Logically crippled but arrogant science became a technology monster that would
innocently engulf Planet Earth in an irremovable constant threat of instant
Armageddon, both physically and psychically. So please guys and gals, we need a
way out -- so open up your bright minds to the longer term possibilities
offered here on a scientific-intuitive-religious-logical platter, with
revolutionary new prediction promise!
Clarifying the
interdependent fundamental parameters of the periodic table
Very poetically, the “eye”, or the i , of the fractal expression must be resolvable into mechanical
components whose simple sum is a measure of the total 3-D distributed amount
(the necessary dark-matter-fluid-media volumetric confinement) of the internal energy of an oscillator (the
individual atom). That internally stored energy is releasable (extrudable) into
c-boundary interstice space traffic. That is, since the atomic oscillator must
radiate or absorb one electron-ring, or orbiting electron, one turn about
1-axis at a time, one can write for measured relative mass of the atom, A = (1
+ h )i/h = (1 +h)x
where x = i/h = the absolute number of
growth electrons.
The value of A for a given element in the periodic table is viewed as a
measure of the fundamental or ground state of excitation of the atomic
oscillator. The parameter, x, is the number of releasable growth electrons
orbiting inside the envelope of the atom, and varies in a limited and rhythmic
way for the allowable energy states above ground level as recorded for each
element; yet n = Z remains fixed for the higher energy states of each
element. This implies that certain rate
ratios of electron in and out traffic can occur that will raise the amount
of energy above ground to certain
levels that are characteristic of the particular element.
All release and absorption of electron energy occurs at the c-boundary by
definition; so that the quantum amount of energy, equivalent mass and speed of
transfer per one turn of the atom’s c-boundary about 1-axis, is fixed per
electron. The number of electrons being absorbed in sequence (in tandem), and
the number of them coming back out in tandem cannot be the same for a given
elevated energy state, and the number that adds to the quantity x, must exist
somewhere in a steady state way that must show up in three places; (1) at the
c-boundary, (2) at the core and (3) at the Z electrons that shuttle the energy
changes back and forth!
Conclusion: since the number of n = Z electrons remains constant for the
given atom, their average energy level must vary significantly as those atoms
go into higher energy states. Thus the Z electron is a variable payload energy
shuttle!
It is already recognized that energy leaving and entering the given atom
in the table does vary significantly with ambient temperature, and it is
recognized that this energy flux is radiation as measured in energy “packets”,
hf, called photons. What is not yet recognized are 7 other mechanically
important things; (1) the electron is a photon where f = vmax/2pRan at the
atomic MDCOG and f = c/2prcn at the c-boundary , (2) the typical atom continually absorbs
and emits prodigious numbers of electrons with characteristic rhythms, (3) a
rhythmic sequence of electron emissions and absorptions by multiple atoms
inside a molecule constitutes the chemical bonding of those atoms (4) whether
inside the atom or the molecule, the electron-ring, orbit-frames or packets are
made up of Higgs particles traveling in a helical string path, (5) a rhythmic
sequence of absorbed and emitted electrons must contiguously touch one another,
i.e, integrate into one continuous helical string of Higgs particles, as they
come and go from atomic and molecular c-boundaries to/from the core protons
shells on the “coat tails” of shuttling n = Z electrons, (6) extra incoming
electrons joining in tandem with the Z electrons may be partially or totally
absorbed by proton shells, (7) a given energy state above ground level for a
given atom is a characteristic amount
of “Z-coat-tailing” that fills the elastic-capacity of the protons
shells for temporarily holding electrons.
Now one can see in a mechanically clear way what Feynman wanted to show
with his frequency calculation equations 38.14 through 38.17. The photon energy equation he was using as a
base, hf = E as measured, applies to the energy passing a given mass pt = math
point in space per unit of time for a single ray of light or radiation. A ray
of light must be made up of a sequence of contiguous photons, and the speed of
energy travel though the given mass pt location in one-turn-quantums, h, is
measured as the constant, c. One necessarily looks for the needed variation in
frequency as a variation in the length of the photon as a wavelength and mass
pt perimeter. In other words, the radiation that is traveling along a
re-radiating contiguous chain of mass pts will register at the detection point
according to the size of the re-radiating mass pt = math point marking the
detection location; which oscillator size must locally yield the frequency. The
notion of frequency is now f = E/h = c/2pr, where r is the average
radius of the radiating mass pt = math pt said to be marking the indivisible
measurement location or event address in space. One hears the mind’s door
slamming shut for just about everybody but the author! But this is precisely
where the fluid space theory boils down to one simple bit of elementary
mechanics that satisfies, at once, the Universal Harmony of Pythagoras and
Kepler, Wheeler’s “A implies B”,
Plank’s Principle, and Bell’s bells.
This mass-pt-local vision gets rid of “nothing and zero”, “infinite density”, and “infinite undensity”.
The fundamental oscillator that radiates energy is a spherical energy-surface
with a spinning causal black hole at the center. The outer c-boundary surface
is being maximally spun (occupied by an electron-ring quantum of energy) about
one axis so that the constant 1-axis energy (v2) of one turn of the
mass pt is passed on to the next mass pt in line because it cannot absorb it by
changing radius (shrinking) and spin (rate of rotation). The indivisible,
variable radius mass pt = math pt is of course a unit of mass in an absolute
dark matter sense, and precisely occupies contiguously and as a perfect,
“living” sphere, every ponderable event address (location) in spacetime.
As mass pt, every living address in space instantly adjusts radius and
spin about each of three axes to mark ambient energy density. So at any given
moment, an event address mass pt, as dark matter, is sitting there with its
c-boundary interfacing with the outside world. When a photon comes along that
represents maximum density in an adjoining c-boundary interstice space, it just
keeps on going as automatic dark matter mass pt re-radiation. If the mass pt is
an ordinary visible matter atom or molecule with a radiating/absorbing MDCOG
inside, then there is a question of absorption and re-radiating in variable
proportions indicative of internal electron growth status.
Energy is transported from one mass pt address to another in contiguous
infinity. The incrementing event-address steps, the adjacent math points along
the line of a ray of light, are finite-width graduation marks on the local
ruler of space. The local spacetime gradient of the mass pt = mass pt
graduation marks defines the ray-local field; i.e., that field having a
built-in coordinate system for local measurement.
As incredible as it may seem, it is the size of the radiating mass pt
marking the absolute location of measurement that determines the frequency of
radiation! That mass pt = math pt location, is for our measuring instruments
always, a mass pt that contains a statistical quantity of lightly-bound atoms
and an encapsulating c-boundary radius that defines the molecule in real time!
The Planck Principle pf Universal Connectivity and Bell’s Synchronicity keeps
the given molecule in scalar step with the constituent radiating source atoms
per established spectra.
Our measurements always involve a 2-D aperture (an limited crossection of
space) whose real world thickness in not infinitesimal but equal to the
diameter of the local visible matter mass pt = radiating molecule! There can be
as many (but not one more) rays passing through the aperture simultaneously and
in phase as there are mass pt molecules filling the aperture in a contiguous
(fully packed) manner. The size of the molecule and its radiating frequency is
caused by the characteristic rhythm of the constituent atoms as they
alternately absorb and emit one turn electron-rings of energy into the
c-boundary interstice spaces, the neutral gravity “vacuums” of space that
dynamically defines their tangible boundaries. Atoms excited above their ground
state (n = Z = constant) level, are
rhythmically absorbing and emitting with the emitting part not keeping up with
the absorbing so that their energy level is raised temporarily, and when the
increased electron storage level drops, it can only do so by emitting more
electrons per unit of time for a while to join the milieu of radiation in the
surrounding c-boundary interstice spaces; that same milieu that provides the
light-force binding of the atoms to dynamically form the radiating molecules.
While constant in number for a given element of the table, the n = Z
electrons are of variable average energy as necessary to explain the known
excited energy states.
At the core, the electron with a mass of h is traveling in an orbit at
the absolute maximum linear speed of vmax »
236c, so that its kinetic energy is h(vmax)2. At the
c-boundary, one has here formulated and visualized as fundamental
definition, that the kinetic energy of one electron is hc2. No one
should be surprised to find; (1) that the precise formula for the c-boundary of
an atom whose MDCOG radius is Ran, is rcn = 1/hc2Ran
= (1.67919918216x105)Ran, (2) that depending on location
between c-boundary and core, two
electrons traveling in tandem have a kinetic energy that ranges from 2hc2
to 2h(vmax)2, and (3) that three electrons have 3hc2,
and so on, and (4)that outside the atom, the tandem joining of electrons exists
without practical limit as to the helical-path-contiguous number; always in the
c-boundary interstice (neutral gravity) spaces between atoms and molecules, (5)
the average speed of an in-out oriented Z-electron is significantly higher than
c, and slows only slightly with increased mass while kinetic energy increases
by the square.
One therefore proposes that the average Z electron, in
tandem-helix-shuttling of kinetic energy to/from the MDCOG from/to the
c-boundary, actually varies in kinetic energy proportional to the measured
ionization energy, Wi . Specifically, the new periodic table will
show that the ionization energy in electron volts is proportional to a
dimensionless ratio of (1) the kinetic energy of the average n = Z electron as
it orbits within the atom, (2) to the kinetic energy of the average electron as
it impinges at the c-boundary as particle directed from the outside. Where S is the energy state and v is the
average speed of the Z electron, one proposes that WSn = k(vSn)2/c2, where k is a proportionality constant with
the dimensions of electron volt (ev). Because it is simplest, will work great,
and makes good mechanical sense, one assigns k = (1 ± p)
as a relative Z-electron mass in terms of electron volts. The p measures the temporary cyclic increase and
decrease in mass of the Z electron in driving the elevated state. One can then
explain the established energy states and spectra for atoms in a much simpler
and fully mechanical way to hopefully please at least those who appreciate
Feynman’s great work.
Because our measurements are necessarily taken according to an
established set of standard conditions involving statistical quantities of
atoms, one is stuck with the notion of a typical or standard atom that may or
may not actually exist. In addition,
the fluid-gear redshift under standard measurement conditions is not
calibrated. Nevertheless, consistency of measurement is readily available and
yields the established mass value me = .91093897x10-27
= .137477903775(h) with a kinetic
energy value of mec2. Viewed as radiation energy (hf),
the absolute versus standard electron measures must differ in frequency by a
factor of 1/.137477903775 = 7.27389618678, with the electron as it exits the
c-boundary of its oscillator atom having the higher frequency and smaller
c-boundary radiator.
The real atom as oscillator maintains the absolute energy of
electron-ring quantum radiation absorption and emission at it’s c-boundary by
its frequency and radius marching in lock step to produce the constant we
called the speed of light; that is, per 2prf = c. After all, this is the definition of
c-boundary and the fundamental character of the atom as a mass pt that must
adjust its rate of energy absorption and release, radius and spin to fit into and mark ambient energy density. The
smallest c-boundary atom, hydrogen, has a fundamental (ground state) emission and absorption frequency of, fa1 = c/2prc1 = c/2p(1.67919918216x105)Ra1
= c/(1.05507196291x106)A1Ra0
=c/(1.05507196291x106)(1.00794)(2.24392816158x10-14) =
c/(2.38630368523x10-8) =(2.99792458x1010)/(2.38630368523x10-8
) = 1.25630471869x1018 cps. Nature provides a cut-off frequency for
visible matter and gives our Cosmos a particular scalar regime of existence; as
long as object identity is maintained in real time by fractal patterns of
fluid-motion-defined existence.
Note that c-boundary ambiance is the mechanically necessary
neutral gravity point between adjacent atoms being held apart by nested
granular dark matter; dark matter with non radiating black hole MDCOGs without
end in the direction of small in terms of radius and spin. The “ultraviolet
catastrophe” that shook physics in the late 19th century and caused
a terribly wrong turn, was real but inconsequential and immeasurable. One now
calls it “the infinite energy of the
vacuum” to paraphrase standard model language.
We definitely do not need to know in a detailed formal way that which is
forever immeasurable and invisible by definition, but intuitive “knowing” of
IT as God-Given-Benevolence and Rule, is of immeasurable value, and most
precious to our everyday sense of mechanical feel as scientists.
Fluid space model language precisely locates all the missing matter of
the universe and eliminates both Big Bang and Big Crunch with clear mechanical
certainty, in infinite logical detail. Species-level Science, as currently held
at a mathematically elite level, must know its limitations; i.e., know when to
back up, when to hold it and when to fold it! God does indeed plays cards with
the universe, but the deck is benevolently stacked by universal harmony (UH).
One could call it a Universal Operating System (OS) that allows genetically
installed, strong-force cultures with a minimum of the “necessary evil” call
Government. A strongly evolving culture is capable of building into every
descendant in every cell of their body, a set of safe instinctual defaults; for
empirically based quality survival without practical limit!
The same thing is said intuitively and logically in a Poem ….
New Psalm of Life (On God as OS = Operating System)
“Oh Great OSness all around, lift my spirits to higher ground, where the
PC and I dream dreams. Not for just the I in me, but for each cell and it’s
Genes, where still lives my Ancestry.
The voices of one Soul are there, as stored emotions left to warn when
Life’s Road dead-ends somewhere. They tell of Dangers in the Storm; finding new
life with each heeding, always in times of great needing.
At last I feel the Larger Why. Its not just for you and I, or just tricks
and tips from the past, but OS-chosen Safest Routes, User-Tuned and
Future-Cast, freeing all of Default Doubts.”
[continue@Part B]https://www.angelfire.com/wi/HolisticScience/NuPtabl2.html]
