Value-Safety
Criteria-Utilitarianism
Thesis-By regarding what is the greatest good for the greatest number of people, we must look at Safety as a value. Since safety is what the greatest number of people wish to attain, Safety is a very intrinsic value. The right to bear arms is not valued higher than the protection of American society because the majority wishes to have safety.
Does this make sense. I hope so....now it should seem less muddled to you! Just remember, use these techniques to make a kick $%^ thesis:
Ok. This is where we dig a little bit deeper. In a subpoint you are actually explaining your contention. Take a look at this example:
Contention I- Guns Harm the Society
Subpoint A- In America, a majority of accidents are caused by guns
Subpoint B- A majority of homicides are by guns
In these subpoints you are explaining how guns are actually harming the society. You use reasons why the contention is true. It is adding meat to your case. You can use a variety of philosophers and sources to make your case develop.
| Philosophers | Magazines/Newspapers
| David Hume | U.S. News and world report
| Immanuel Kant | Time
| Henry David Thoreau | newsweek
| Herbert Marcuse | Businessweek
| Vandava Shiva | The Economist
| Ralph Waldo Emerson | Forbes
| John Locke | Bloomburg
| Jean Jacques Rousseau | Wall St. Journal
| John Stuart Mill | New York Times
| Abraham Maslow | Washington Post
| Jeremy Bentham | Boston Globe
| Fredrick Nietzche | USA Today
| John Rawls | Dallas Morning News
| Francis Bacon | Chicago Tribune
| |
|---|
Once you have your sources established, from there you can develop the evidence in your case. When using subpoints, remember that they MUST link to your value, criterion, and contention tag line. MANY eggs to put in one basket. However, LD is about linking and showing how you superceed your opponents value, criterion, and contentions.
Finally, I bet you are thinking....whew! This page is FINALLY over....yes. It does take a long time to finally understand the structure of an LD case. I look at is as a long analytical process with many many roads to travel. However, it is very necessary. Here is where we come to a closing. The conclusion is merely a summarization of EVERYTHING in your case. Sounds like a bit much! This is true. However, it isnt as difficult as it seems.
For example, Lets say we are still on the gun control topic:
By looking at the everlasting effects on the society. American's must look toward their safety when evaluating what is the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Since guns are a potential harm to American safety, protection of society outweighs the law of the land in ANY event. As philosopher Thomas Hobbes reasoned, the government has an essential function to preserve the lives of its citizens. Without such protection it is not just for the individual.
Get the jist? Just summarize. Something you have been doing on English papers for years.
Good Luck writing your case! If you need any help check out some of the links on the first page. If you forget about Value or Criterion visit the other Basic Structure for the Novice Page.