As it presently is, and from what I currently understand of the somewhat-secret-contents Obamascare Insurance Overhaul Bill (and I refuse to attach the term "health" to it!) pushed by terror-filled-demon-eyes Pelosi, narrow-mindset Reid, and their ilk....I do NOT support for it - first of all because it is so defective concerning so many aspects, and secondly because there is such a rush to impose something so disasterous against the American people in general, and thirdly because the goal of universal health insurance and health care can singularly be achieved by formulating a new and different bipartisan bill (like Alan Grayson's H.R. 4789) which simply extends not the present government-run pension (called "Social Security") but rather the present government-run health insurance and health care (called "Medicare" and "Medicaid").

Rather than giving the noxious command to force people to buy into health insurance they cannot afford with make-believe government loans, it would be much simpler and preferable for the Obama administration to simply expand the age-range of not only already-established government-option pension called "Social Security" but already-established government-option health insurance and health care called "Medicare" and "Medicaid" funded by bailout-monied big banks, illegal-alien taxes, defunding and taxing Planned Parentlessness (a.k.a. Planned Promiscuity), AIDS/homoqueer groups, evolution educrats, and various voters-bribing sweetheart-earmarks pork.

The present Pelosi-Reid Obamascare Insurance Overhaul Bill is:

(1) too inclusive (forcing private insurance companies to financially destroy themselves by taking on people with known pre-existing conditions),
(2) not inclusive enough (deliberately eliminating more-permanent-than-Executive-Order prohibitions against funding for committing [and not "performing"] abortion homicide),
(3) forces people to get fined by the IRS for not buying private health insurance (when they realistically have no imminent need to do so, whether they are poor or not, or already have their choice of Obamascare-endangered competitive types of insurance coverage now fully functional.....contrasted against Obama's recent Cash-for-Clunkers fiasco).

One of the striking elements running through the deviant immentality of those demoncrats being so rushy, pushy, demanding, insensitive, and intolerant against postponement and delay is the attitude they have of tyrannically overruling and overriding choice - believe it or not.

That is quite evident in their semantics like: "government "option" insurance, thus insinuating that there is instead an attitude of forced tyranny (and in reality absolutely no "option" of non-compliance possible or permittd).

The weaselword "choice" (for what?) ranted by those who decry anti-abortionists as being "anti-choice" is also telling, inferring their actual attitude of forced tyranny, in that what has "choice" specifically to do with abortion homicide only -- being that we choose to do many different things every day, other than contemplating the option of baby murder?

The final proof is that the present Obamascare Insurance Overhaul proposal requires forced fines against those especially younger and healthy adults who would rather pay the proposed IRS fine for not getting insurance than crippling themselves financially with residual monthly health insurance premiums they would be forced to pay (which mandatory premiums would not be reduced but instead increase because the pool of insured will realistically decrease within those remaining large private insurance companies which have not gone belly up because of Obamascare restrictions.

In essence, the Obamascare Insurance Overhaul Bill mandating insurance purchase and fining people by an IRS tax if they do not so purchase such is obviously punitive and not constructive. One cannot force innovation and health improvement by overtaxing people - especially for what they neither realistically want nor imminently need.

Alan Grayson (D-FL) has recently submitted a brief four-page bill (H.R. 4789) for Congressional passage allowing everyone to simply buy into Medicare at cost. Hopefully, such will soon replace (but not be added to) the present Pelosi-Reid Obamascare proposal most everyone is almost up in arms about.

House Democrats know that voting in favor of the Pelosi-Reid Obamascare Insurance Overhaul catastrophe-in-waiting means being ousted out of office come November 2010. Yet at least some Democrats who want to politically please Obama, Pelosi, and Reid more than their homestate constituents in the House of Representatives seemed willing to take the risk. Why?

Look at it from their point of view. They pass Obamascare amidst solidly-unified consensus of a significant majority of American voters suspicious against the noxiously-demanding pro-abortion-homicide-option defects individual mandates of the bill, causing Pelosi/Reid dems to be voted out in November of 2010, giving the GOP frustrated quasi-ownership of Congress, which Obama as President can veto at every move, for starters.

They lose again in 2012 when new taxes appear, and private insurance companies are being forced to go belly up (because of mandatory anti-cost-of-living-adjustment no-premiums-increase and no-deductibles increase along with being burdened into red ink instead of black by Obamascare mandates [ridiculously] requiring them to insure those with known pre-existing conditions), and thus go out of business, causing their clients to lose those trusted personal physicians which were tied into those insurance companies -- leaving people forced by IRS fines and threat of jail time incarceration to buy into an inefficient and mishandled bureaucratic Obamascare's "cash-for-clunkers" replacement-against-Medicare boondoggle insurance socialistically administered by the Obama Administration -- bigger and more expensive and by then more obviously devastating than it appeared it would be two years previously.

That's the huge and extremely-dangerous political and financial gamble almost certainly assuring defeat and loss of democrat control for perhaps even the next 8 years, during which the GOP will have undone anyway most of what Pelosi/Reid had diabolically and unconstitutionally imposed.

IS there a better but realistic way to care for American seniors than dependence upon Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid? Should and (better yet:) can non-employed student children burdened with education and car loans plus mortgages provide income for their aging parents? How about a pie-in-the-sky-by-and-by proposal for aging seniors with Alzheimers, canes, and crutches to start up their own lucrative fast-paced fortune-500 home business or get into complex schemes of investments? And the Sun should rise in the west each morning?

Depriving senior citizens of monthly Social Security checks and Medicare/Medicaid assistance would be a disasterous and inhumane abomination, and in that sense both government-run programs are in no way mere "entitlements" - easily disposed of and which citizens who already paid into them no longer deserve the benefits of.

Controversial social causes of the 20th century; the labor movement, civil rights, feminist movement, gay rights, etc. were brought about by social clamor by those purporting some "crisis" that supposedly required immediate and prompt legislative attention.

But there is no corresponding social clamor presently for universal health care, despite the here-and-there-cited sob stories of a few disease-or-accident-beset women who irresponsibly mishandled themselves or their families into self-imposed predicament.

As General George Patton would say to such twits and their patsies: "You're letting a couple of jack-[dunkeys] sitting in front of a cart on a bridge slow up the entire convoy? What the [Gehenna] is wrong with you?"

Indeed, nearly three in four Americans oppose the Pelosi/Reid replacement against already-convenient Medicare and Medicaid. Unlike the constructive, temporarily-uncomfortable, avant-garde, changes-for-the-better nobility of growing pains in approaching childbirth, the nondeniable and ever-increasing non-popularity of the Pelosi-Reid replacement overhaul monstrosity is FAR different than any initial opposition SEEMINGLY similar when ACTUALLY-beneficial (rather than unilaterally-harmful) Social Security and Medicare were first proposed and enacted back in the 30s and 60s.

Why is reform AGAINST presently-operating popular Medicare and Medicaid so important to socialistic political revisionists like Pelosi, Reid, and even Obama? Because it would fundamentally redefine the relationship between the government and the individual citizen.

When a government "of the people, by the people, and for the people" determines what government leadership should and should not provide for them, everyone is happy. But when government leadership disassociates away from the people and turns a blind eye to the people's wants and needs because of some feminist-sexist deviancy, mental illnesses, prejudicial bigotry, or paranoia of certain officials in charge (presently exhibited by both Reid and especially Pelosi), there is BIG trouble, and public fear that the government benefits (again: NOT "entitlements") the public has come to depend upon can ruthlessly and mindlessly be taken away and replaced with confusing disaster at the frightening whims of godlessly-socialistic government officials.

Generally, only the elderly get really ill, even though that does not mean that younger adults cannot get injured, so most people eventually need some health care. But that has already been made available with Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid. What is needed, to automatically give all non-illegal-alien American citizens health insurance and health care from birth to death, is SIMPLY to extend the age-range for eligibility of already-existing already-government-run Medicare and Medicaid.

The historical parallels of 2010 with the 1930's are many.

During the 1930s, there appeared a handful of candidates for antichrist; Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin -- but the time was not right. There was no State of Israel, no "many" with whom to confirm a peace covenant, no Israeli borders to guarantee. The West was still overwhelmingly influenced by orthodox Christian churches, with Bible reading still in public schools and frequently over the network media, so gross apostasy had not yet come to full bloom.

It doesn't take a genius to connect the dots and see where its all leading.

For example, the recently-publicized pseudo-"official" position of the United States Government represented by the Obama Administration clearly shows disrespect against and not for God's chosen-people Jews -- manifesting itself regarding such things as opposition against and condemnation of anti-"palestinian"-terrorists Benjamin Netanyahu's understandable desire to claim God-apportioned Israeli territory as grounds for Israeli settlements.

On CNN the other night, I heard the Attorney General of Utah counter every excuse (and more!) which news anchor Anderson Cooper suggested as to doomed failure and ineffectiveness of class-action lawsuits [of several Attorneys General in several states against Obamascare's mandate (i.e. requirement) for all American citizens to buy Obama-Administration-controlled health insurance from private insurance companies now required by Obamascare law to function as puppet health-insurance utilities of the Obama Administration operated by inferior-gender Sebelius of HHS].

However, and ultimately, the Attorney General of Utah's intentions are bound to succeed -- whether politicians and bureaucrats of the Obama Administration themselves change and alter accordingly the recently-signed Pelosi/Reid Obamascare Insurance Overhaul Bill to abrogate the Individual Mandate requirement....or instead are eventually overruled by the U.S. Supreme Court to do so (which High Court is presently comprised of a decisive majority of Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, Alito, Kennedy, and others who likely would conclusively decide against Obamascare's hideous and despicable forced-insurance-purchase mandate).

Who knows the election backlash which might happen in 2010 -- although the voters-at-large have short-term memories, soon erasable by incessant and relentlessly-repetitious the Obamanite bullyboy-Chicago-politics propaganda machine and brainwashed network media....exacerbated by anti-Christianity-in-public, nitpicky-about-insignificant-technical-differences, feminist-sexist-obsessed, pouty-and-then-do-nothing, republicrat rinos and off-the-wall teabag independents who talk big and that's all.

There is, above all, Biblically-recorded precedence for promptly and courageously eliminating that Obamascare mandate of everyone to purchase Obamascare-controlled health insurance.....whether or not one enters an American emergency room in some U.S. hospital, is reasonably young and healthy and safe, or not:

Philemon 1:14 .....but I preferred to do nothing without your consent in order that your goodness might not be by compulsion but of your own free will.

Tyrants (such as those of and supporting the forced-Obama-Administration-takeover Obama Administration) throughout history have had a notorious record of invading and then oppressing innocent and hapless people. It started with Satan butting in as non-solicited Tempter in the Garden of Eden, continuing with Cain attacking Abel, paranoic Pharaoh persecuting Hebrew Israelites, assaultive and idolatrous-abominator Canaanites against Joshua, Philistines against David, Ahab and Jezebel greedily assassinating Naboth for his choice vineyard, Japanese expansionists attacking those at Pearl Harbor, Hitler and his Nazis invading and demolishing countries of Europe and elsewhere, insanely-antisemitic moslem jihadists firebombing and decimating NYC Trade Towers, and the latest atrocities of Pelosi/Reid's Obamascare dictating mandatory compliance with forced-or-be-fined Obamascare health-insurance purchase.

For the most part, George W. Bush and his bipartisan-Congress-approved Coalition was justified in militarily forcing antisemitic and anti-American Saddam Hussein out of power (in view of the worldwide foreign-oil-transport disruption Saddam was imposing plus his sheltering of terroristic anti-Israel suicide bombers, non-asked-for SCUD missile launches into Tel Aviv and Haifa during the First Gulf War, not to mention his accumulating resources for development of WMDs).....though Bush was not authorized to either disrupt nor pollute honorable super-modesty culture of islamic women decently attired in hijabs or burkas [although he and his were OK being Christian-soldier missionaries to proselitize muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan and Pakistan away from a ridiculously-mythical "allah" and apocryphal-like satanic-verses Qur'an pseudo-scriptures].

Admirably, the LORD Himself does not force people into faith and belief and obedience -- but instead gently but persistently advises and coaxes them (with sundry words and ways) by enabling them with their God-conceived born-with senses to observe nature with their God-given reason and logic, as they themselves (with God's continuing assistance and empowerment) adjust and work with what they readily perceive as phenomenally-accomodating natural entities He has intelligently designed and provided -- awestruck with created beauty, power, consistency, stability, extensiveness, and indestrucibility. Even when questioning, doubting, disobediently-wayward rebels attempt to ignore, disregard, or maliciously fight against the benign manifestations of the Creator, they only hurt, injure, cripple, or even annihilate themselves in proportion to the severities of their futile and absurd, senseless and mindless, aberrations.

As Creator and Maintainer of Planet Earth, the Almighty Creator not merely has ownership and regulatory rights, but also has the power and intention to consign those who forever want to love, worship, and be around Him to everlasting bliss..... while perpetually consigning those who forever hate, curse, blaspheme, and do NOT want to be around Him ad infinitum to everlasting outer-darkness fiery torment. Such is the fascinating and realistic combination of His conditional love with His conditional hatred both for and against who and what the reader can and should easily deduce.

Right now, one can rather readily ascertain who virulently and sometimes even violently hate and curse the religious right, the Christian right, Christian fundamentalists....whether inside the Church or in politics and government. Thankfully, the Benevolent One will ultimately provide ample opportunity and incentive of much greater opportunity for the diabolically-depraved accursed to continue solitary-confined exclamations of their worthless mouths in Hell.

Obama-Administration cohorts are certainly not the only ones to blame. Every anti-righteously vile and irrational american (small "a") who willfully despised the anti-abortion-homicide and anti-homogay-pervert postulations of Bush Jr. and thus proudly displayed an Obama-Biden bumper sticker on their vehicles, posted an Obama-Biden lawn sign in their yards or windows or doors, contributed money to the Obama-Biden campaign, puffed and promoted him on radio and TV, and/or on Election Day voted him in.....is also at fault and perhaps destined for never-ending eternal destruction. Also under a curse are those goofs (family and friends included) who voted for inferior-gender VP-candidate Sarah Palin, violating:

First Timothy 2:11 Let a woman learn in silence with all submissiveness.
12 I allow NO woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent.
13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve;
14 and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor.
15 Yet woman will be saved through bearing children, if she continues in faith and love and holiness, with sobriety.

An ominous and frightening Divine political and personal curse from Jesus Christ is on and against all such people, including the 219 House members who voted Obamascare into law.....but a wonderful blessing from the Lord on all House Republicans and those 35 House Democrats who voted against it. Exactly how, when, and it what ways that holy and sacred curse and blessing will affect the aforementioned is known in every detail only to God Almighty. And there is no power in existence that can prevent that.

Consider the very nature of the Creator. Though He admittedly was responsible for placing the stumbling blocks of the Tempter and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil in the Garden, the LORD God (whose atoning and redemptive Son became embarrassingly naked when born in a barn and then even more humiliated by being cruelly murdered on some cross) was obviously pro-choice.....in that He did NOT force nor bribe nor arm-twist [in stark contrast to what occurred publicly and privately to get House members to pass Pelosi/Reid Obamascare!] our primal-ancestral parents Eve and Adam to reach out and eat the "Government"-option fatal fruit. Contrast that with Obamascare forcing people to do more than what governmental agents are authorized to insist upon, reminiscent of:

Genesis 41:44 Moreover Pharaoh said to Joseph, "I am Pharaoh, and without your consent no man shall lift up hand or foot in all the land of Egypt."

For a limited group of people, with limited purpose (as when joining a fraternity, club, association, denominational church, etc.), certain initiation and membership particulars are not unusual nor necessarily illegitimate:

Genesis 34:15 Only on this condition will we consent to you: that you will become as we are and every male of you be circumcised.

But when everyone is required by law and thus in essence forced to also do whatever initiation and membership particulars of whatever group or association, the line has been crossed and understandable boundaries have been trespassed and violated:

Acts 15:1 But some men came down from Judea and were teaching the brothers, "Unless you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved."
5 But some believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees rose up, and said, "It is necessary to circumcise them, and to charge them to keep the law of Moses."
7 And after there had been much debate, Peter rose and said to them, "Brothers, you know that in the early days God made choice among you, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe.
8 And God who knows the heart bore witness to them, giving them the Holy Spirit just as he did to us;
9 and he made no distinction between us and them, but cleansed their hearts by faith.
10 Now therefore why do you make trial of God by putting a yoke upon the neck of the disciples which neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear?
11 But we believe that we shall be saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus, just as they will."
13 After they finished speaking, James replied, "Brothers, listen to me.
19 Therefore my judgment is that we should not trouble those of the Gentiles who turn to God,
20 but should write to them to abstain from the pollutions of idols and from unchastity and from what is strangled and from blood.
21 For from early generations Moses has had in every city those who preach him, for he is read every sabbath in the synagogues."

Galatians 2:3 But even Titus, who was with me, was not compelled to be circumcised, though he was a Greek.
Galatians 6:12 It is those who want to make a good showing in the flesh that would compel you to be circumcised, and only in order that they may not be persecuted for the cross of Christ.

What "rights" or "needs" should government provide the governed with? Non-"entitlement"/Non-"welfare" government-option-pension 'Social Security'? Non-"entitlement"/Non-"welfare" already-established government-option health-insurance and healthcare 'Medicare' and 'Medicaid?' Food stamps for lazy freeloaders addicted to work-for-nothing handouts? What should people be forced to accept from the Obama Administration?

It would clearly be unconstitutional for the Obama Administration to require people to breathe, walk, run, stretch, eat, urinate, defecate. It would be ludicrous for the Obama Administration to prohibit people from bathing, yawning, jumping, sneezing and coughing (by themselves), using certain amounts of toilet paper, requiring use of only certain brands of deoderant and toothpaste, etc.

For those who neither own nor drive a car on public roads, Obama-Administration-mandated vehicle insurance purchase would obviously be laughable. For those who do not own a house, Obamanian declaration of mandatory purchase of house insurance would be a sick joke.

But if one drives on public roads, the government who (through public taxes of individuals comprising interdependent cooperative communities and neighborhoods) funded the construction and maintain those roads is justified in setting rules for use for those utilizing such public roads.

Still, (and importantly!): people are NOT required to ride vehicles on public roads.....nor should they be. Nor should they be ordered by the Obama Administration to use only public transit which would only run on major routes and not conveniently to every personal place, nor forced to only use curly lightbulbs, nor forced to build a backyard wind-turbine generator by Obama's environmentalists.

Should people get fined and imprisoned for sneezing, catching a common cold, getting the flu, having fever and diarrhea....or being constipated, burping, and farting in a lavatory? Must they have forced Obama-Administration-run medical insurance for such? Will Obamascare be extended to regulate all sorts of personal health-related and over-the-counter personal selection of medications and treatments? Will Obamanites outlaw suicide, punish home hospice inmates, and victims accidently handicapped with IRS fines?

Study carefully the following futuristic scenario, and see IF you can detect any IRS or other fines imposed precisely and only for people not receiving the 666 Mark of the Beast:

Revelation 13:1 And I saw a beast rising out of the sea, with ten horns and seven heads, with ten diadems upon his horns and a blasphemous name upon its heads.
Revelation 13:4 Men worshiped the dragon, for he had given his authority to the beast, and they worshiped the beast, saying, "Who is like the beast, and who can fight against him?"
Revelation 13:5 And the beast was given a mouth uttering haughty and blasphemous words, and he was allowed to exercise authority for forty-two months;
Revelation 13:6 he opened his mouth to utter blasphemies against God, blaspheming His name and His dwelling, that is, those who reside in heaven.
Revelation 13:7 Also he was allowed to make war on the saints and to conquer them. And authority was given him over every tribe and people and tongue and nation,
Revelation 13:8 and all who reside on earth will worship him, every one whose name has not been written before the foundation of the world in the book of life of the Lamb that was slain.
Revelation 13:9 If any one has an ear, let him hear:
Revelation 13:10 If any one is to be taken captive, to captivity he goes; if any one slays with the sword, with the sword must he be slain. Here is a call for the endurance and faith of the saints.
Revelation 13:11 Then I saw another beast which rose out of the earth; he had two horns like a lamb and he spoke like a dragon.
Revelation 13:12 He exercises all the authority of the first beast in his presence, and makes the earth and its inhabitants worship the first beast, whose mortal wound was healed.
Revelation 13:13 He works great signs, even making [SDI?] fire come down from heaven to earth in the sight of men;
Revelation 13:14 and by the signs which he is allowed to work in the presence of the beast, he deceives those who reside on earth, bidding them make an image for the beast who was wounded by the sword and yet lived;
Revelation 13:15 and he was allowed to give breath to the image of the beast so that the image of the beast should even speak, and to cause those who would not worship the image of the beast to be slain.
Revelation 13:16 Also it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead,
Revelation 13:17 so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the [embedded-implant tattoo?] mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of his name.
Revelation 13:18 This calls for wisdom: let him who has understanding reckon the number of the beast, for it is a human number, his number is: six hundred and sixty-six.

As one can plainly observe, there is no punishment specifically for not receiving the Mark of the Beast. Receiving such will be completely optional: NO forced and mandatory Obamascare-insurance purchase by Americans or anyone else! The only thing is that one will not be able to buy from nor sell to [willfully-marked global inhabitants participating in commerce] without that Mark (whether that involves integration of and enforcement by the Interstate Commerce Commission, Department of Commerce, Securities and Exchange Commission, FDA, HHS, etc.), which Mark would also function (with perhaps Department-of-Homeland-Security, Department of Defense, and FBI cooperation) as a global anti-terrorist/identification-registering Mark of Assured Eternal Damnation:

Revelation 14:9 And another angel, a third, followed them, saying with a loud voice, "If any one worships the beast and his image, and receives a mark on his forehead or on his hand,
Revelation 14:10 he also shall drink the wine of God's wrath, poured unmixed into the cup of his anger, and he shall be tormented with fire and sulphur in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb.
Revelation 14:11 And the smoke of their torment goes up for ever and ever; and they have no rest, day or night, these worshipers of the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of its name."
Revelation 14:12 Here is a call for the endurance of the saints, those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus.

Will those who do not receive the Mark be arrested, jailed, or murdered because they do not receive the Mark? NO! Taking the Mark will be optional (completely unlike mandatory-insurance-purchase Obamascare!). However, such resistors and protesters will be slandered, libeled, reviled, ridiculed, defamed, and blasphemed as subversives, traitors, dangerous extremists, anti-socially hateful, disloyal, unpatriotic, anti-peace warmongers (does all that even now sound familiar with all the hypocritically-hateful-themselves blattering and bellering out accusatory condemnation, emanating like menstrual-diarrhea filth from demonic deviates of the godless Left?).

But, in fact, ARE religious-right/Christian-fundamentalist penitent-saints-saved-by-grace deserving such misrepresentation? Scripture gives the resounding and contrary answer:

Revelation 17:14 states that "they will make war on the Lamb, and the Lamb will conquer them, for He (not she) is Lord of lords and King of kings, and those with Him (not Her) are called and chosen and faithful."