The even-during-summertime LOOSE-long-haired "mopheadedness," bare-naked arms, and especially quite-nude legs and/or sockless feet (notably the soles) partially covered with sandals or flip-flops....all seem to be a rather obvious invitation for any general-public man who sees any general-public woman so misattired to gently take her by the hand, firmly lift her up and carry her and lovingly set her down her into the back of his van, get in himself and softly shut the door behind him, quietly but resolutely remove all the rest of the meager clothing still covering her, tenderly fondle her, then passionately fk her thoroughly - climaxing in both-partner, audibly-titillating, full-body, orgasmic eruption ......with all the non-predictable but probably complicated and perhaps overwhelmingly-inconvenient ramifications.

In other words, those human-female perverts, from teenaged and older, who are clearly thus seducing men at random - for whatever denial or doctrines-of-demons excuses of warm temperature, tanning, seasonal fashions and styles (or whatever other irrationalizations), are silently and wordlessly begging any random human male who sees them to commence as-promptly-as-possible genital-insertion intercourse if possible. [And with some of the older guys, increasingly-droopy erectile-dysfunctional "incontinency," flaccidity, and limpidness of the lower probe must be replaced with mere male-digit clitoral massage plus breasts-rubbing]. (Review Numbers 5:18 and II Samuel 13:18 in context using the RSV Bible, along with Proverbs 5:19, chapter 7 of the Song of Solomon, Isaiah 3:17 and 20:4 plus all of chapters 16 and 23 of Ezekiel, plus Jeremiah chapter 2).

It is puzzling (though Paul called it: "the mystery of lawlessness" in II Thessalonians 2:7) WHY such warm-weather exhibitionists display themselves so pornographically to men at large who they are not presently married to (or even engaged with, or even dating)....instead of flaunting themselves to ONLY ONE man alone when in private with him secretly.

For a man to flash himself so as to attract a harem of women is somewhat understandable, being that some of the main Old-Testament patriarchs (such as Abraham, Jacob, Elkanah, David, Solomon, perhaps even Hosea, etc.) had multiple wives and concubines, and even Saint Paul in the New Testament restricted only bishops and deacons to be "the husband of one wife" (in I Timothy 3:2 and 3:12 plus Titus 1:6).

But if a woman belongs to another man while her husband is yet alive, she is Scripturally deemed "an adulteress" according to Romans 7:3, and you might recall the record of how David the Hebrew was given "Michelle" (Scripture calls her: Michal) to David as wife in I Samuel 18:27, which Michelle even saved David's life in I Samuel 19:11-12 but then falsely accused David of murderous abuse to her father in I Samuel 19:17, after which her father gave Michelle to Palti in I Samuel 25:44. But sometime thereafter David asked for her back in II Samuel 3:13-14, but soon Michelle despised David dancing before the LORD and told him so in II Samuel 6:20 and consequently Michelle "had no child to the day of her death" according to II Samuel 6:23 [which implies that Davy did not erotically contact that woman probably defiled by second husband Palti].

Incidently, this webauthor (and other authentic male Christians like him) are not impressed nor deceived by women who sometimes wear chignons and ponytails, long sleeves, non-shortened slacks or long non-slitted skirts, and socks occasionally on some days for certain occasions....but then (with diabolical hit-then-miss lurid and lascivious insanity) surprise-attack with non-expected sexually-harassing mopheadedness, sleeveslessness, short-skirtedness, and sockslessness against trusting men expecting continuous public modesty. As Revelation 3:16 says of such Laodocian types: "Because you are lukewarm and neither cold nor hot, I will spit you out of my mouth." It reminds me of the story of how wicked King Saul told Samuel that he had destroyed ALL that the LORD ordered Saul to destroy in I Samuel chapter 15 as follows:

2 Thus says the LORD of hosts, 'I will punish what Amalek did to Israel in opposing them on the way, when they came up out of Egypt.
3 Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have; do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.'"
4 So Saul summoned the people, and numbered them in Telaim, two hundred thousand men on foot, and ten thousand men of Judah.
5 And Saul came to the city of Amalek, and lay in wait in the valley.
6 And Saul said to the Kenites, "Go, depart, go down from among the Amalekites, lest I destroy you with them; for you showed kindness to all the people of Israel when they came up out of Egypt." So the Kenites departed from among the Amalekites.
7 And Saul defeated the Amalekites, from Havilah as far as Shur, which is east of Egypt.
8 And he took Agag the king of the Amalekites alive, and utterly destroyed all the people with the edge of the sword.
9 But Saul and the people spared Agag, and the best of the sheep and of the oxen and of the fatlings, and the lambs, and all that was good, and would not utterly destroy them; all that was despised and worthless they utterly destroyed.
10 The word of the LORD came to Samuel:
11 "I repent that I have made Saul king; for he has turned back from following me, and has not performed my commandments." And Samuel was angry; and he cried to the LORD all night.
12 And Samuel rose early to meet Saul in the morning; and it was told Samuel, "Saul came to Carmel, and behold, he set up a monument for himself and turned, and passed on, and went down to Gilgal."
13 And Samuel came to Saul, and Saul said to him, "Blessed be you to the LORD; I have performed the commandment of the LORD."
14 And Samuel said, "What then is this bleating of the sheep in my ears, and the lowing of the oxen which I hear?"
15 Saul said, "They have brought them from the Amalekites; for the people spared the best of the sheep and of the oxen, to sacrifice to the LORD your God; and the rest we have utterly destroyed."

Such was the beginning of the demise of Saul, and the rise of David.

So we perceptive Christian men are not fooled by women and girls wearing scarves, parkas, boots, and snowmobile suits during sub-freezing winter months into presuming that they are devoted to holy modesty in their hearts. "All things work together for good to those who love God" (or as Romans 8:28 renders it: "We know that in everything God works for good with those who love him, who are called according to his purpose"). Conversely, all things work for evil against those who arrogantly, indifferently, and rebelliously hate God and His doctrinal directives particularly pertaining to public modesty. That is, evil frigid women who are temporarily dressed modestly do so out of necessity and expediency only for the time being....so they will not freeze to death and thus enable themselves to eventually get more opportunities during future warm days to surprise-attack men over and over as much as they devilishly and demonically can and so wreak as much confusion, irritation, senseless lust, and destruction as their demented deviousness and disobedience can impose against the will of the Lord and His saints.

Therefore, discerning Christian men certainly do not judge by [temporary outward-appaearance modesty] but instead judge [and take precaution according to the complaining-and-grumbling-about-frigid-weather eager-for-warm-weather-immodesty wickedness of the evil] hearts of such human females. Immodesty-desiring women WOULD dress indecently if they COULD....and WILL - when the time comes! In I Samuel 16:7, the LORD put it this way: "Do not look on [his] appearance or on the height of [his] stature, because I have rejected [him]; for the LORD sees not as man sees; man looks on the outward appearance, but the LORD looks on the heart."

The woefully-inadequate and severely-limited quasi/superficial penance of temporary winter-dress modesty, weekly ingestation of eucharists, mouthing repentant liturgy phrases each Sunday morning in church or synagogue (and I am NOT "antisemitic" by so saying!), or self-righteously and infrequently contributing small pittances to various community groups and charities....does NOT make up for such mortal-sin part-time immodesty...nor at all compensate for the horrendous misunderstanding-and-misery-causing, far-reaching, and long-lasting truly-dire consequences from such careless, indifferent, selfish, self-excused, and arrogantly-rebellious indecent-exposure lewdity.

Now, whether or not I have "convicted" you the reader if you are immodestly misdressed yourself, or support such immodest ones with self-righteous, pseudo-"non-judgmental," playing-God-yourself, support-Satan blasphemy....and thus "made you feel bad" and without self-esteem....is irrelevent to both me and the Lord. IF you feel bad because of how dirty and gutterminded YOU are, it is not my fault and we are not to blame. How you feel or not feel is not our concern.

THE final and summary point is for you (and all of us) to simply be CONSISTENTLY dressed modestly when in public as described previously to stop irritating the Lord, myself, and others.

[But even that will not absolve you of past sins of immodesty. JESUS Saves]!

One final thing.

"Abstinence Only" - for most [normal] human beings - is a despicably-sadistic violation against God's prime directive given to our primal parents Adam and Eve to "multiply" (requiring genital intercourse). People cannot legitimately multiply without marriage. Therefore, the buzzword-phrase slogan must instead be: "Abstinence until Marriage." Ah, THAT is acceptable on three grounds:

(1) it by necessity consists of a definite end to a waiting-time period of deprivation
(2) it give couples the mentality to prepare for marriage during that temporary time, and
(3) it culminates in needed sexual fulfilment to the benefit of all society, as it is mandatory obedience to the inerrant KJV and Wesley translation of the Scrivener-Trinitarian Greek New-Testament Text of I Timothy 5:14 which reads: "I therefore want younger women to marry, bear children, manage the house, and give the adversary no cause to revile us." [That is not a requirement for younger-women widows as the two different and separate New-Testament Greek words ne(o)teras and ch(e)ras (that is: younger women and widows, respectively) indicate in First Timothy 5:11 - especially those younger-women widows who get wanton against Christ and want to remarry and so incur condemnation for having violated their first pledge - keeping in mind that (logically) all younger-women widows are younger women but not all younger women are younger-women widows].