Constitutional?
CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW ESTABLISHING RELIGION,
NOR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION
"SO HELP THEM GOD"
because:
In God They Trust.
But why did not our Founding Mothers? get our Founding Fathers to instead legislate the morality of:
"The Supreme Court/The Attorney General/The President/The Appeals Court/etc. shall make no law establishing church/temple/mosque/cathedral/etc. nor prohibiting the free exercise of church/temple/mosque/cathedral/etc.?
Whatever.
Limit it to "Congress" and to "religion."
What the heck?
Do YOU interpret the First Amendment of the Constitution to discriminate or nondiscriminate for the Devil:
"Government shall make no law establishing Christianity/Christians/saints/church/Christian-religion....nor prohibiting the free exercise of ANTI-Christian/saints/Bible/church godless-secular non-religious religion."
or instead...
Do YOU interpret the First Amendment of the Constitution to discriminate or nondiscriminate for the Lord:
"Government shall make no law establishing ANTI-Christian/saints/Bible/church godless-secular non-religious humanistic-cult religion...nor prohibiting the free exercise of genuine Christian/saint/church/Scriptural religion".
It's your choice.
Most on the broad and easy road leading to destruction will choose the former to conform to the pressure and popularity of Satan. Few on the hard and narrow road to life will take the persecution and carry their cross in choosing to follow the latter.
The question is whether we will love and hate for Jesus, or instead love and hate for Satan.
[To love and hate for Jesus is righteousness either way, but to love and hate for Satan are both love and hate crimes].
