===Part-1=== Part2 (Posted on http://groups.yahoo.com/group/uttorshuri/message/1093) Prelude: [This is first part of two messages. In this post I wish to focus on women's views and remarks on feminism issues. The next one will focus on women on gender issues (like biological and sexual differences b/w men and women etc, topics not directly related to feminist debate, although are certainly relevant). All the stuff in this message are direct quotes from well known women of stature who have written or spoken in print or other media. Even though some of those quotes may be cited in some books written by male authors, the quotes themselves belong to women. Exact references are provided.] The word feminism conjures up a noble idea of the struggle by women against the gender based discrimination, persecution, and inequity that have been perpetrated on women througout history and continues in various degrees in all societies still today. Viewed in this very general and broad sense of the term feminism, all sensible people, men or women are champions of "feminism". After all discrimination, persecution, inequity are morally wrong, regardless of whether the basis for such wrongs be gender, race, language, religion whatever. Yet a 1997 poll revealed that 70% of women do not consider themselves as feminists although they agree with every major feminist position (The exact source of this poll result will be quoted later). What can explain this apparently contradictory result? Feminism is not a simple unambiguous concept anymore, at least in USA. There are some aspects of contemporary feminism that many women do not agree with. That is why they do not wish to be identified with a blanket label of feminist. Here are the some of the various factions of feminism that have been catalogged in the FAQ of alt.feminism and other databases: Affirmative-Action Feminism Amazon Feminism Anarcho-Feminism Christian Feminists Constructionist Feminism Cultural Feminism Difference Feminism Dominance Feminism Erotic Feminism Eco-Feminism Equity Feminism Femicommie Feminazi Feminism and Women of Color Gender Feminism Hegemonic Feminism Individualist, or Libertarian Feminism Lesbianism Liberal Feminism Libertarian or Individualist Feminism Individualist, or Libertarian Feminism Marxist or Socialist Feminism Material Feminism Matriarchal Separatist Feminism Moderate Feminism Pop-Feminism Pod Feminist Post-modernist Feminism Pro-Family Advocates Pro-Life feminists Pro-Sex Feminists Radical Feminism Resenter (angry at men) Feminism Survivor-Feminism Total Rej (total rejection) Feminism Victim Feminism It is interesting to see such a proliferation of factions within feminism. But academic discussions/debates on feminism broadly divide feminism into two categories: (1) Equity feminism (2) Gender Feminism (The above categories were introduced by feminist writer Christina Hoff Sommers in her book "Who Stole Feminism?") The reason many women are unwilling to be seen as feminists is because they have issues with some aspects of gender feminism, and since the term feminism is too broad and includes gender feminism, hence their uneasiness with being labelled as a feminist. My present article is not about the non-controversial aspect of feminism that aims to reddress the inequities and against female gender. Instead I will present some interesting quotes and views (some controversial) of women and feminists themselves on gender and feminism issues, some of them in response to controversial views of many gender feminsists. This side of feminism in USA, not being usually discussed in posts related to feminism, my present article will help to provide a more complete picture. From here on until the end it will be just quotes from books and and magazines. No quotes should be credited to me, so my request to those who like to pick on authors for quotes that don't belong to them, please pick on the original authors If you have any issues with the quotes. 1. Sarah Boxer in "One casualty of the women's movement: Feminism", NY Times, December 14, 1997 says that most women do not consider themselves as feminists (about 70% in 1997) yet they agree with every major feminist position. 2. From p-171, "Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature" by Steven Pinker : In a 1975 dialog, Simon De Beauvoir said "No women should be authorized to stay at home to raise her children, women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that choice. 3. From p-339, Blank Slate - Pinker: Both Wendy Shalitt in her book "A return to Modesty: Discovering the lost virtue" and Danielle Crittendon in her book "What our mothers didn't tell us: Why happiness eludes modern women", advise women "to marry young, postopone their careers, and care for children in traditional marriages" 4. F. Carolyn Graglia in her book "Domestic tranquility: A brief against Feminism" theorized that women's maternal snd sexual instincts are being distorted by the assertiveness and analytical mind demanded by careers. (From Blank Slate - Pinker) 5. Marian Kester Combs, a freelance writer for Washington Times & Chronicles wrote in "Estrogen Poisoning" in Chronicle, May, 1997 that "feminists are out to destroy femininity and motherhood. She contends that feminism should be called masculinism as thats what the feminists are trying to aquire, traits like dominance, aggression, profanity etc. 6. Suzanne Fields in "Warriors or Damsels in Distress?", The washington Times, may 19, 1997 argues against women in combat forms in military. Says "its a double standard of feminists to advocate such roles. They(feminists) want female soldiers to be seen as too weak to stand up to male superiors who harass them but strong enough to battle enemies. If a woman soldier cannot kick a male soldier where it hurts when he attackes her sexually, how can we expect her to protect herself, and her buddies against an eneny soldier?" 7. Feminist Gloria Steinhem said of fellow feminist Camile Paglia: "Her calling herself a feminist is like a Nazi saying they are not anti-semitic" (In Camile Paglia, "Crying Wolf" Salon magazine, February 7, 2001) 8. From p-352-353, Blank Slate - Pinker: The article "Parity as a goal sparks bitter battle" (C. Holden, Science, July 21, 2000, p-380) quotes from a presentation at the National Academy of Engineering by social scientist Patti Hausman who said that the reasons why more women don't choose careers in Engineering is because they don't WANT TO. Patti Hausman's above observations were corroborated by Linda Gottfredson who said: "On average, women are more intersted in (dealing with)people and men with things" "Glass ceiling theory has been refuted largely by women themselves, like Hausman, Godfredson, Judith Klinefeld, Cathy Young, Camille Benbow, economist Jennifer Roback, Felice Schwartz, Diana FurchtgoltRoth, & Christina Stolba, legal scholars Jennifer Braceras" (My Note: Glass ceiling theory says that women face an invisible barrier in climbing up the corporate ladder beyond a certain level) 9. In "Women's Figures: The Economic Progress of Women in America", published by American Enterprise 1996, Diana Furchtgott-Roth and Christine Stolba disputes the allegation of widespread discrimination and provide statistics to back it up, refers to the allegation as an attempt to promote victim status of women. 10. Susan Au Allen, in April 1, 1997 issue of "Vital Speeches of The day", explains wage gap as being due to "personal choices". In 1992, she says that 75% of M.S. & PhD in Education went to females, 86% of M.S & PhD in Engineering went to males. Average monthly slary for Education field is $3048, and for Engineering majors is $4045, a wage gap of $1001, obviously due to personal choice. 11. From http://www.equityfeminism.com/bookstore/ceasefire.html : "Into this fray steps Cathy Young whose book Ceasefire argues that men and women aren’t all that different after all and that many of the problems often described in the media as men’s or women’s problems are, in fact, problems common to all humanity regardless of sex. As Young aptly puts it in the title of her first chapter, "Men are from Earth, Women are from Earth." That in many circles this is still a fundamentally radical idea is testament to how pervasive sexual stereotyping in all its varieties remains.." 12. From: http://www.uccs.edu/~cwetheri/GRT/FSWE.html : "We have a system of quality control in scholarship. It is called criticism. This has broken down when it comes to feminist research. Scholars are not correcting the faulty research for fear of appearing illiberal or "sexist." This has done terrible harm already." ( - Christina Hoff Sommers ) 13. The title of the book by Christina Hoff Sommers: "The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism Is Harming Our Young Men" says it all, no quote is needed. 14. Daphne Patai writes in the introduction "Redefining the World" of her book "Heterophobia: Sexual Harassment and the Future of Feminism": "Women claim to be equal partners when that suits them, and claim to be entitled to special consideration when that suits them." "They insist on autonomy in maintaining or aborting pregnancies, but at the same time they determine the fathers' duties -- and rights, if any. Women claim child support. They can either demand or impede fathers' continuing involvement with their offspring, as the women see fit. [Do men have any reproductive rights?] The result is that women have advantages over men in child custody suits, having learned to use the legal system to readily get protection orders against men (on the flimsiest provocation) when that suits their purposes, just as they have learned to use charges of child sexual abuse and domestic violence." (Note: According to the editorial board of the publisher, Heterophobia is "A devastating expose of the way academic feminists are driving their wedge between men and women.") 15. From pages 409-410, "Sex: A Natural History" by Joan Allen Rodgers: "For one thing most men do not rape or beat their wives. For another, women under certain - but rarely sexual circumstances are equally or more violent toward spouses that are men. "But the facts are that half of all spousal murders in US are committed by wives and not all of them are in response to physical abuse by men. The 1985 National Family Violence Surevy supported by the National Institute of mental health shows that women and men are physically abusing each other in roughly equal numbers, and that women often use weapons to make up for their relative physical advanatge. A study on family violence published in 1986 in the Journal of Marriage and Family found that 1.8 million women assaulted by husbands and boyfriends, but 2 million men were assaulted by wife or girlfriend. The study also found that mothers abuse their children twice as often as do fathers in some surveys, and one reason this seems so shocking is because men who are taught to be manly are terrified to admit they have been abused by women, so their numbers are vastly underrated." 16. Elinor Buckett in "The Right Women" (1998) says feminist movement is over (Since it has succeeded) and says its no longer bought by majority women anymore. Women are not oppressed as the feminists clamour. She says signs of victory are all over. In newspapers,.. Women's rejection of feminism should not be a cause of dismay, it should be a cause of celebration. 17. Mona Charen in Women's Quarterly, Spring '98 writes against feminists view and contends that biology is repsonsible for gender traits, not culture. 18. In "Mystery dance: On the evolution of Human Sexuality", p-15, Lyn margulis says that as many Social Darwinists, politicians and some academics have misused the idea of innate biological differences to justify sexism and racism, causing feminists and liberals to dismiss biology. But to reject evolutionary biology because of the excesses of some of its invokers, she says is like throwing away the pearl because it is surrounded by a strong-smelling seaweed entangled oyster. 19. It was a woman political activist Phyllis Schlafly who formed a foundation called stop the ERA (Equal Rights Amendment)! In her book, "The Power of Positive Woman" she argues that women are not prepared to handle equal responsibility as men as they are not as strong as men and they cannot afford to lose the protective labor laws favouring women that would disappear if ERA was passed. 20. It is an irony that ERA has never been passed due to lack of non-ratification by majority US states even though it was passed by a male majority congress! Even women suffrage, which was passed in 1920 was opposed by a woman, Phyllis Bissell, a social reformer and lecturer. 21. From pages 79-80 of "Sex: A Natural History" by Joan Allen of Rodgers: "Survey shows that women disapproves casual sex far more than men, but still participate in it, a double standard that belies the biological roots of our stone age ancestors and is perhaps a frustrated bow to social conventions and male dominated social structures. ... "After all, in evolutionary terms, women, at least in developed world, have just as many resources or access to resources as men nowadays." 22. Marianne Williamson in her book "Women's Worth", p-63 says "Most of us want a masculine man, but there's no way to have one unless we become feminine woman". 23. Daylle Deanna Schwartz, in her book "All men are Jerks until proven otherwise", p-93 says: "Although women may hesitate to admit it, many of us love sex far more than just the emotional gratification. Our reluctance to acknowledge the basic natural pleasure is related to messages that have taught us that its unladylike to enjoy sex too much" 24. Then there are some women on the extreme end of the spectrum, who are inspired by Biblical passages and sincerely believes that happiness in marriage can only come through submission of wives to their husbands! Christina McClelland wrote in the Moody magazine (July/August 1998 issue) titled "The Ugly 'S' word" quoting biblical passages and citing her own happy marriage argues that submitting to the husband is the best guarantee for peace in the house. - Aparthib ===Part-2=== (Posted on http://groups.yahoo.com/group/uttorshuri/message/1131) In this second part of women on feminism I will cite some further quotes and views of women on women, covering various aspects of gender and sex. A. Some Quotes and views pertaining to the myth of women's innocence: 1. Patricia Pearson in her book "When She Was Bad : Violent Women & the Myth of Innocence" refutes the innocent image of women and exposes the dark side of women. Here is an excerpt from Amazon's editorial review: "Women commit the majority of child homicides in the United States; more than 80 percent of neonaticides; an equal or greater share of severe physical child abuse; an equal rate of spousal assault; about a quarter of child sexual molestations; and a large proportion of elder abuse...The rate at which infants are murdered by women in the U.S. is higher than the rate at which women are murdered by men." With carefully researched facts, fascinating case histories, and incisive argument, Patricia Pearson succeeds in demolishing the myth that women are not naturally violent." Larissa MacFarquhar wrote about the book in The New Yorker: She is a good reporter, and--no doubt in anticipation of conventional feminist objections--she has done the work necessary to back up even her most inflammatory ideas. 2. Journalist Kate Fillion wrote two books refuting some myths about female superiority in many aspects. Her book "Lip Service: The Truth About Women's Darker Side in Love, Sex and Friendship" was a best seller. Here is an excerpt from the editorial review: "Most of us are so accustomed to thinking of women and men as psychological opposites that we don't even notice that our actual experiences contradict our beliefs." With this powerful introduction, Kate Fillion launches Lip Service, the #1 bestseller that explodes the myth of female virtue. Women are not morally superior to men, she argues, nor should they want to be." In her other book "Lip Service: The Myth of Female Virtue in Love, Sex, and Friendship" Kate Fillion tries to explode some more myths. Here is an excerpt from the editorial review by Donna Seaman: Journalist Fillion believes that we would all be much better off emotionally and culturally if we would stop paying lip service to that stale old myth about men and women being psychological opposites. According to our society's "sexual script," women are the "intimacy experts," adept at communicating and at love, hence morally superior. Men, by contrast, are reticent to a fault and reluctant to forge relationships. These absurd generalizations, Fillion argues, have become "barriers to equality." In an attempt to dismantle them, Fillion interviewed more than 100 women and men about everything from friendships to relationships, fantasies, sexual harassment, and the difference between rape and unwanted sex...This dose of reality is a healthy alternative to books, for instance, that describe men and women as creatures from different planets. As far as we know, we're all earthlings, splendid in our diversity." 3. On p-182 of "Sex on the Brain", author Deborah Blum writes: "Women can be violent too! A women shot her husband because he was on the phone too long and refused to hang up." 4. P.S: This one doesn't strictly belong to the thread of discussion, as it is not about women on women, but simply about women, but is just stated as an addendum because it is related to all of the above. This is about a gruesome tale of a woman's dark side from our own backyard, as reported recently in the Bangladesh Dailies: From Daily Janakantha of Dhaka, dated August 20, 2003 (Also appeared in The Daily Manab Zamin) : A young women (Yasmin Begum) strangled to death the 7 year old child Jyoti of a woman in retaliation against the woman for trying to prevent Yasmin from having an affair with Jyoti's uncle. This happened in Pagla Nandalapur village of Fotulla Thana. Yasmin abducted Jyoti while she was on her way to Arabic lesson with the Imam of the mosque. She then took Jyoti in Wapdarpool area and strangled him. She hid the dead body in water hyacinth. At about 11 pm police recovered Jyoti's body. Yasmin has confessed to the murder and police have also arrested her accomplice Shuchona. B. Women on Women's Sexuality: 1. On p-93, of Anatomy of Love - Helen Fisher: "All these data certainly lead one to suspect that women avail themselves of illicit lovers with relish, perhaps even as avidly as men" On p-94 of Fisher(op cit) : "You may wish to argue that these women (and women in many other cultures) all engaged in prostitution for purely economic reasons. But many say they like the sexual variety. And the women who pursue this vocation are not alone. The animal kingdom is rife with loose females." On p-95 of Fisher(op cit): "There is no evidence whatsoever that women are sexually shy or that they shun clandestine sexual adventures. Instead both men and women seem to exhibit a mixed reproductive strategy: Monogamy and adultery are our fare" 2. On p-122 of "What's Love got to do with it?" by Meredith Small: "The difference between men and women in sexuality is not natural, i.e it is not true that men are genetically coded to have more sex than women, but simply a product of sexual repression by males, a policy that developed to control paternity ; without repression women would presumably have sex as often and with as many partners as men" Meredith Small, op cit : "Women would be as interested in sex had they not had to fear a male stranger." On p-157, Meredith Small(op cit): "In the short term, when women have the opportunity and freedom, I maintain that women are just as interested in sexual partners, and frequent sex, as men". "both men and women compromise between two conflicting impulses." 3. On p-352 of her book "Sex: A natural History", Joan Ellison Rodgers says: "Every sexual anthropologist, from Alfred Kinsey to Helen Fisher, has concluded that given a level social playing field and absence of severe punishment, women, not men are the promiscuous sex, seeking variety. 4. On p-381 of Sex: A natural History : "April Gorry of UCSB conducted studies of female white tourists (sex tourism) in Carribbean found that women were more promiscuous there, choosing men of lower status than themselves, prioritizing male appearance etc. 5. On p-174 of "Female Sexuality" by Marie Bonaparte : "there is a slight masochism in women, which impels her to welcome and to value some measure of brutality on the man's part." 6. In her book "The Psychology of Women" (Two volumes) Helene Deutsch says : "Masochism, narcissism, and passivity are the three key characteristics of the female personality." (an entire chapter is devoted to female masochism) C. Women on Man-Woman relationship: 1. On p-89 of "Women's Worth", author Marianne Williamson: "We don't think about being kind and caring, we think about how we can hook a man. We don't think about his fears and problems, we think of our own and how we can get him to solve them. We don't think about him period - but about his money, his job, or his connections. 2. On p-124 of Anatomy of Love - Fisher: "Women are more interested in the status of a potential lover than his physical appearance." 3. Dr. Laura Allen, dept of Neuroendocrinology, UCLA: "Women want money, men want youth and beauty" (From p-209, Gender Shock - Phyllis Burke) 4. p-124, Deborah Blum, in "Sex on the Brain": "Monogamy requires fair and equal partnership. The stereotype "Men breadwinner, women as housekeepers" is not consistent with monogamy." 5. On p-28 in "The Manipulated Man" - Esther Vilar: "What besides money, can bind a women to a man?" D. Women on Women (various aspects): 1. On p-117, Sex: A natural History : "Women have diffuse brain organization, in which some of the language capability reside on the right as well, as a result her feelings flow into words, his are clogged in the left brain. He feels the same feeling, he just can't get them out so easily." 2. On p-255, Sex on the Brain, Deborah Blum: Women are far more likely to "nuke" a strong woman than a man is, says psychologist Laurie Reidman of University of Minnesota. 3. On p-17, The Manipulated Man - Esther Vilar: "It is true that women gets progressively more elegant, more well-groomed, more "cultured", but her demands on life will always be material, never intellectual." 4. p-45, Vilar (Op cit): "Women are Stupid" 5. p-18, Vilar (Op cit): "But In our time women are no longer subject to the will of men. Quite the contrary. They have been given every opportunity to win their independence and if, after all this time, they have not liberated themselves and thrown off their shackles, we can only arrive at one conclusion; there are no shackles to throw off." (My note: Vilar's book was written in 1972) 6. Women on Esther Vilar: Julie Myerson (In Mail on Sunday) commented on Vilar's Manipulated Man: "A wonderfully witty and intelligent kick in the pants for feminism." 7. In her Article "In Defense of Man", Heather Roscoe, former weekly columnist of American Partisan : "Why men would ever want to live with most women the way they've been acting these last few decades is beyond me." (From Spintech magazine, August 12, 2000, http://www.spintechmag.com/0008/hr0800.htm) My Epilog: Everything thus far has been only quotes and excerpts from various sources. This may be disappointing to some who find relish in attacking me personally judging from some reactions to my earlier posts in past. One may still raise the cynical questions as to what is the point of it all. First. I must point out that I do not necessarily agree with EACH AND EVERY quote or views cited. So what is the lesson from all this? Many sensitive men have recognized the dark side of males and acknowledged gender inequity perpetrated on women, and have joined the equity feminists in ending this inequity. In affirming the equality of men and women some feminists (gender) have gone overboard and have taken a political position of female superiority, denying the reality of women's dark side. This approach to feminism isolated many well meaning male participants in the struggle for equality and undermines the overall strength of the struggle Its no surprise that this has made so many equity feminists concerened and caused them to react. They contend that true equity should base on equal accountability of both genders. Equality should not be based on a hypothetical assumption of superiority of one gender, or demanding a priviledged position for one over another or denying any dark side of one gender. Neither should it be based on a comparison between genders vis a vis vices or virtues, or asserting irrelevant differences, or citing difference that do not exist nor is supported by science. It should be only based on an intent to redress the wrongs and emphasizing equality (of rigthts and human potentials). Because of the legacy of our evolutionary past, women have been wronged by men in a "collective" sense. Individually though,there can be instances of the reverse. This collective wrong can be and is being rectified more and more by proper wiring of our brain through gene-culture coevolution. But to assert a moral superiority of one gender over another is to deny the insights of biology. At the bottom, either male or females are propelled by the same selfish genes. Genes may have resorted to sexual differentiation as one strategy for their replication, but genes do not have sexes themselves. - Aparthib