Advertise on PropheZine

The New World Army

GUN CONTROL AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER

Today's "trivia" questions are......

• What are the actual connections between U.S. and Canadian military base closings (and Armed Forces reductions) and the "New World Order," with its accompanying "New World Police Force?"
• Why are a number of these U.S. bases, currently slated to be closed for U.S. military use, currently undergoing expensive renovations and additions? And,
• why is GUN CONTROL suddenly a PRIORITY political issue, with sweeping and accelerating legislative momentum?
  

You can check the following item out very quickly at the Library of Congress, or at any large metropolitan reference library, and I can promise you that it won't be time wasted!

Ask for a copy of VOLUME 9 of the 1982 EDITION (not the current, replacement edition) of the U.S. CODE. Turn to page 554, where you'll find the beginning of PUBLIC LAW # 87-297 (1961). This law was signed by President Kennedy in 1962, has received 18 subsequent updates, and its provisions have been steadily implemented by every President since. IT CALLS FOR THE ELIMINATION OF THE U.S. NATIONAL ARMED FORCES and further declares that "NO ONE MAY POSSESS A FIREARM OR LETHAL WEAPON EXCEPT POLICE AND MILITARY PERSONNEL." The progressive steps in its implementation are:

1. the reduction of the U.S. Armed Forces to 2.1 million personnel.
   
   
2. their irrevokable merger with Russian and Chinese forces,
   in two stages, to form a World Army [50% of total U.S.
   force strength will be merged in the first stage; the
   remaining 50% in the second stage).
   
   
3. the irrevokable surrender of authority over such forces
   to the U.N. Secretary-General [ who alrady has a military
   planning staff of 80 general officers).
   
   
4. THE CONFISCATION OF ALL PRIVATELY-HELD FIREARMS.
   
   

This law is taught and explained in the National War College, and the various U.S. Armed Forces Academies. The New World Order will require an Army: this is it, and presumably the U.S. itself (and Canada!) could then find themselves policed by foreign troops under the U.N. flag. By agreement, THE COMMANDER OF THIS ARMY MUST ALWAYS BE A RUSSIAN! (See below for documentation on this astonishing fact)

The relevant pages and sections are: page 554; page 555 (lower right-hand side of page: defines "disarmament" as elimination of U.S. Forces and calls for absolute restrictions on privately-owned "deadly weapons"); page 557, sections (a) and (d) (again, require U.S. to eliminate its Armed Forces); page 558 deals with "policy formulation" (i.e. the accomplishment of these goals). George Bush said that the passing of authority to the Secretary-General was "in transition"; the Supreme Court has already ruled that the U.S. Constitution and its provisions stand UNDER the U.N. Charter and the Resolutions of the United Nations. The U.S. Armed Forces are acting as the U.N.'s "world policeman" in the interim.

The provisions of this law are further explained in STATE DEPARTMENT PUBLICATION 72-77, which itself is published in unabridged form in the 35-page "BLUEPRINT FOR THE PEACE RACE," published by U.S. ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT AGENCY (PUBLICATION #4, GENERAL SERIES #3, MAY 1962). I'm sure you find this hard to believe, but it's all there in black and white; read it for yourself! The implications are staggering but the multiple military base closings around the U.S take on a new perspective when you see the agenda which that law commits the U.S. government to follow! Another small tip is that new issues of uniforms (e.g. the new Air Force uniform) reportedly have no U.S. insignia. Canadian politicians are operating in lockstep with their U.S. counterparts.

Please do go and read these documents for yourself. It's astonishing, but it's exactly as I've described it to you. NAFTA is a small but vital part of something much bigger!

Don't be misled by the wording of "Policy Formulation" on page 558 in volume 9, U.S. CODE, 1982. It was re-written in 1963 to pacify objectors, and forbids removal of firearms from the populace or reduction in national armed strength "UNLESS IT IS PURSUANT TO THE TREATY-MAKING POWER OF THE PRESIDENT OR AUTHORISED BY LEGISLATION OF THE CONGRESS!" The U.N Charter is regarded as an already-binding treaty, so all that is required is a U.N. Resolution or Congressional legislation to ban all "citizen" armaments. George Bush's father, Preston, helped push this law (87-297) through Congress. One of the experts on it is ex-State Senator Bernadine Smith (Box 1776, HANFORD, CALIFORNIA 93232), who resisted it bitterly, and knows its contents and intent as well as anybody. Or you could just call the National War College and ask innocently for more information on it!


Two interesting footnotes on PUBLIC LAW 87-297 {1961}:

• 200 members of the Trilateral Commission had a late-March, 1993, meeting over several days in Washington, at which they discussed and agreed on the need for (guess what?) A NEW WORLD ARMY and for U.N. SOVEREIGN CONTROL OF INDIVIDUAL STATES' IMMIGRATION POLICIES AND DECISIONS. On the evening of the 28th of March, their representatives dined with key U.S. government officials and presented these "recommendations", and then did the same thing over breakfast the next morning with Clinton. So here it comes! This will lead ultimately to an enormous concentration of power in very few hands.
  
  
• AFT, as the "compliance and enforcement" arm of the Treasury Department (which has a CFR man heading it), has been unlawfully "compelling" gunshop owners across the U.S. to provide the names, addresses and zip codes of all "long gun" (rifle and shotgun) purchasers, when no legal requirement exists for this. They are apparently creating a computerised registry of ALL private weapons across the United States, by locality, street and house. REMEMBER THE CONFISCATION REQUIREMENT FOR ALL PRIVATE WEAPONS EMBODIED IN "A BLUEPRINT FOR THE PEACE RACE" AND IN STATE DEPARTMENT PUBLICATION # 72-77?
  
  THIS LAW IS STILL IN THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE U.S. CODE, ALTHOUGH THE PAGE NUMBERS HAVE BEEN CHANGED. YOU CAN FIND IT FAIRLY EASILY BY CHECKING THE INDEX TO THE U.S.CODE.
  
  
  

Part 2, THE NEW WORLD ARMY
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

THE NEW WORLD ARMY MUST ALWAYS BE HEADED BY A RUSSIAN:

When Alger Hiss (later convicted and executed as a Soviet spy) set up the U.N. with his U.S. State Department colleagues, they established the U.N. DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL AND SECURITY AFFAIRS, which would have jurisdiction over ALL future U.N. military operations. WRITTEN INTO THE FINE PRINT OF THE RULES AND REGULATIONS WHICH GOVERN THE U.N. IS THE RULE THAT THE HEAD OF THIS U.N. DEPARTMENT WILL ALWAYS BE A SOVIET CITIZEN, MILITARY OFFICER, OR PERSON DESIGNATED BY THE SOVIETS. THIS HAS BEEN THE CASE FOR THE PAST 47 YEARS, WITH THE FOLLOWING 14 COMMUNISTS HAVING CHAIRED THAT VITAL U.N. POST SINCE 1946:

1944-49 Arkady Sobolev
1949-53 Konstantin Zinchenko
1953-54 Ilya Tchernychev
1954-57 Dragoslav Protitch
1960-62 Georgy Arkadev
1962-63 E.D. Kiselyv
1963-65 V.P. Suslov
1965-68 Alexei E. Nesterenko
1968-73 Leonid N.Kutakov
1973-78 Arkady N. Shevchenko
1978-81 Mikhail D. Sytenko
1981-86 Viacheslav A. Ustinov
1987-90 Vasilly S. Safronchuk

All were Soviet citizens. If you think that "Communism is dead", you're in for a rude awakening! The names and faces have changed - not the politicians, parties, military hierarchies OR the vast Russian expenditures on military weaponry and material. And if you think that the U.N. ARMY will be benign, you'll quickly reconsider when foreign U.N. troops under, ultimately, Russian command are drafted into your neighborhood to suppress dissent or "restore order" under the New World Order! They'll be armed, and YOU won't.


So you think that this is fanciful? Read this UPI news item, which appeared on 09/08/93.....

RUSSIAN-AMERICAN DEFENCE AGREEMENT CALLS FOR JOINT MANEUVERS WASHINGTON:

The United States and Russia signed an agreement Wednesday on military cooperation that provides for joint military maneuvers by the two former Cold War foes.

The Russian Defense Minister, General of the Army Pavel Grachev, who is visiting Washington, signed the memorandum of understanding with Defense Secretary Les Aspin at a Pentagon ceremony.

The agreement calls for the two sides to hold joint maneuvers that practice peacekeeping techniques.

The agreement also calls for annual meetings between Grachev and Aspin and their successors, exchanges between the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and his Russian counterpart and a bilateral defense working group to formulate projects of Russian-American defense.

"This ceremony demonstrates again that the relationship between our two countries is undergoing historic transformation," Aspin said.

"As President Clinton and President Yeltsin said at their Vancouver summit meeting," he said, "we are establishing a strategic partnership," Aspin said. "It is a partnership in which military and defense relations play a leading role."

"Russia places its highest priority on its cooperation with the United States," Grachev said, "We promise to do all in our power...to realize this agreement."

"The Russian-American ground maneuvers will train the two sides in peacekeeping techniques. The first units to participate will be the U.S. 3rd Mechanized Infantry Division and the Russian 27th Motorized Rifle.

"Both division commanders, U.S. Maj. Gen. Leonard Holder, Jr. and Russian Maj. Gen. Anatoliy Sidyakin, were on hand for the Pentagon ceremony.

" 'Our two commanders, right after the signing of this agreement, will sit down at a table and start working out a whole series of steps to make this all happen,' Grachev said.

"Both Grachev and Aspin said they wanted to establish a "hotline" between their respective defense establishments, although provision for that was not actually in the agreement they signed.

"In addition to joint peacekeeping exercises, the memorandum calls for annual meetings between Aspin and Grachev and their successors, exchanges between the chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff and his Russian counterpart and a bilateral working group to think up more projects for Russian-American military cooperation.

"No date or place for the first joint Russian-American ground maneuver has yet been set.

"Pressed on whether the exercise would be held this year, Grachev noted that the planning time needed for maneuvers of so large a scale would mean that if so, it would probably have to start during the (?)

"The 3rd Division commander," he joked, "said if it's OK with them, we can go to Siberia and hold them there."

One of the best, most detailed and readable books you can find on this is TOWARD A NEW WORLD ORDER, by DON McALVANY (available through any Christian bookstore - Toronto Christian Book Centre (416) 481-4868 stocks it, for example). McAlvany is an ex-Intelligence officer. His McALVANY INTELLIGENCE ADVISOR NEWSLETTER is universally held in high esteem for its readability, accuracy and coverage of forthcoming political, social and economic events (Toronto Christian Book Centre has electronic back issues of this invaluable publication on computer disk at just $3.99 each!). Read, prepare yourself and your family, get involved and ACT to protest and resist the steady erosion of individual rights, privacy and freedom which is the precursor to a New World Order of unimaginable regimentation, control and slavery.

PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE THIS MATERIAL AS WIDELY AS YOU CAN.

If you STILL don't think it's happening...read on....


Part 3, THE NEW WORLD ARMY
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


From UPI, 09/05/94:

By JEFF BERLINER
MOSCOW, Sept. 5 (UPI) U.S. and Russian soldiers Monday set up checkpoints in the strife-torn capital Atlantis, carrying out a U.N. mandate to try to restore order, control a massive influx of refugees, calm a hostile crowd, react to sniper fire, stop a gang of hooligans and manage a weapons handover - a fictional scenario being played out in a training exercise in Russia.

Atlantis is really Totskoye, a military site and town 800 miles (1,280 km) southeast of Moscow, and the 250 troops on each side are participating in Peacekeeper '94, the first joint U.S.-Russian exercises held in either country.

"This is based on the past experience of peacekeepers - ours in Somalia and theirs in Moldova, Tadzhikistan and Georgia,'' Col. Richard Bridges, U.S. spokesman for the exercise, said in a telephone interview from Totskoye.

The scenario being played out at Totskoye involves a U.N.-dispatched peacekeeper force sent to the capital of a country torn by civil war. Russian and U.S. peacekeepers each occupy a sector of Atlantis and man a combined checkpoint in the chaos-ridden but imaginary city while quick-reaction platoons are dispatched to trouble spots to deal with sniper fire and outbreaks of violence.

Peacekeepers must deal with a surge of refugees, attempts by hostile crowds to break through troop lines, hooligans on the loose and the wholesale surrender of weapons.

A separate group of Russian soldiers is acting as hooligans and refugees, making the language barrier a realistic part of the scenario when U.S. peacekeepers confront hooligans whose talk they cannot comprehend. For other parts of the exercise, the peacekeepers are acting in separate sectors of Atlantis or, where they interact, they rely on interpreters. The U.S. side brought two dozen of its own interpreters.

A bilingual manual - "Russian-United States Guide for Tactics, Techniques and Procedures of Peacekeeping Forces During the Conduct of Exercises'' - serves as the guiding document for the maneuvers, and could serve as the basis for real-life joint U.S.-Russian peacekeeping duties, though the exercise will also tell whether the peacekeeping guide needs revision, Bridges said.

Peacekeeper '94 spokesman Bridges, who described himself as a 23-year veteran of the cold war, said it was refreshing to see Russian and U.S. soldiers drilling side by side in preparation for what could become real joint duties.

"Both sides are intent on making this a success,'' Bridges said.

However, not everyone has been pleased by the maneuvers which generated considerable controversy in Russia and calls by communists and nationalists to cancel the operation. Protesters even journeyed to the scene to parade their objections and display "Yankee Go Home'' slogans and sentiments.

The U.S. colonel surprised the protesters, led by strident communist Viktor Anpilov, by inviting them to a meeting for what was described as a frank exchange of views. Bridges said he told Anpilov that the protesters' presence was what democracy was all about, but the two sides parted ways without resolving their political differences. The Russian far left and far right object to U.S. soldiers on Russian soil and see it as a fearful sign of things to come.

However, Anpilov made good on his promise to remove the demonstrators if U.S. military officers met them and the protesters left.

Another visitor set to observe the joint maneuvers, U.S. Defense Secretary William Perry, cancelled his trip to Moscow and his plans Wednesday to go to Totskoye, citing more pressing events. Russian Defense Minister Pavel Grachev still plans to go to Totskoye Wednesday.

The U.S. soldiers come from an infantry regiment based in Schweinfurt, Germany, while their Russian counterparts are from a rifle regiment based in Totskoye.


If you doubt the direction that all of this is leading us in, read the legal testimony of Dr. William R. Pabst of Houston, TX, reproduced by Bill Cooper in his book, BEHOLD A PALE HORSE (ISBN 0929385225; Light Technology Publishing;US$25), which I've summarized below. Dr. Pabst was engaged in suing the US Government back in 1976 over its concentration camp program. Here are some of the salient points from his deposition:

• under martial law citizens have no rights. This was emphasized to police and militia recipients of L.E.A.A. (national police force training) and, before Operation Cable Splicer Three, the Deputy Attorney
  General of California commented that anyone who attacks the State - even verbally - becomes a revolutionary and an enemy by definition. ("Garden Plot" is the code-name for control of the civilian population; "Cable Splicer" the code name for Federal Government-assumed control of State and local governments)
  
  
• An investigation was concluded in November, 1974, by AMERICAN CHALLENGE (a conservative publication), the leftist NEW TIMES, the FUND FOR INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM, and the OZARK SUNBEAM. They concluded that this activity involves the potential creation of a police state by the use of the Pentagon and its computerized intelligence dossiers of thousands of citizens, by the National Guard, state and local police depts., the L.E.A.A., plain-clothes military forces, SWAT teams, and the Dept. of Justice.
  
  
• Brig. Gen. J.L. Julenic, senior Army officer of the Pentagon National Guard Bureau is quoted as admitting: "I know of no state that did not have some form of these exercises within the last year."
  
  
• General Stanley R. Larsen, then-commanding general of the Sixth Army said, at the conclusion of these exercises: "The most serious challenge facing all of us will be the challenge of discharging our 'legitimate responsibilities'....Part of this challenge we must be prepared to deal with; a potentially dangerous portion of our society which, in truth, could well become the domestic enemy."
  
  
• the CABLE SPLICER manual includes instructions on operation of confinement facilities, handling and processing prisoners - including searching, transporting, feeding, housing and handling of the special class of persons called "detainees."
  
  

The plan also specifically includes a proposition for confiscation of privately-owned weapons and ammunition

I urge you to post the episodes of this ongoing series to other newsgroups, computer networks, computer bulletin boards and computer mailing lists. It is also important to post hardcopies on the bulletin boards of campuses, churches, supermarkets, laundromats, etc. -- any place where concerned citizens can read this vital information.

Our people's need for Paul Reveres and Ben Franklins is as urgent today as it was 220 years ago.

John DiNardo

Return to Prophe-Zine #5