THERE WAS A BEGINNING AND A BEGINNER

1. First Law of Thermodynamics Supports Creationism
The first law of thermodynamics is the foundational law for all modern science. The First Law of Thermodynamics clearly states that you can turn matter into energy, but you cannot get either matter or energy from nothing. It is obvious that everything is made up of either matter or energy, so it is clear that all matter and energy must come from somewhere. Not one scientific theory can even start to explain the origin of the matter and energy.

2. Second Law of Thermodynamics Supports Creationism
It is a law of nature that everything that has an end likewise has a beginning (and vise versa). We have now discovered the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all of the energy in the universe is decreasing. The energy is and never has been increasing, leading us only to the conclusion that the universe will, one day, run out of energy. The universe must come to an end. So, by going by the natural laws implemented into our universe, we know that since this universe has an end, it is clear that it had a beginning. If there was a beginning, there had to have been a beginner. For example, a pool ball rolls across a pool table. Has the ball always been rolling? No. Will the ball keep rolling forever? No. How did this happen? How did the rolling of the ball begin? Someone hit the ball with a stick. Did the ball just decide one day that it would roll itself across the table? No. Did the ball evolve and grow a brain and roll itself? No. What happened? An intelligent being rolled the ball.

3. Proof That the Universe Indeed Had a Beginning
In 1917, Albert Einstein developed what we know today as the "general theory of relativity", which stated that the universe is expanding in size. In 1929, Edwin Hubble further confirmed that the universe was indeed expanding. The results showed that everything in the universe was moving farther away from everything else. Like ripples in water, constantly growing bigger. (This is where the Big Bang Theory was actually formed, but of course, if the Big Bang Theory is true, who or what started the Big Bang? And if it was a "what" that started the Big Bang, where did that "what" come from? Who created the "what"?) But it is certain the universe did indeed have a beginning, which obviously requires a beginner. A perfect example of the expanding universe and the second law of thermodynamics is when someone tosses a rock or pebble into still, unproductive water. The ripples are caused by an intelligent being. That effect makes the ripples keep expanding in size and finally, it runs out of energy, and the ripples are no more. There was a beginning, it expanded, and then it died.

4. Yet More Proof of a Beginning
In 1992, a group of scientists researching the latest discoveries of the Cosmic Background Explorer, found "ripples" of temperature variations in the background radiation of the universe, proving (like the ripple effect stated earlier) that the universe did have a beginning. It is expanding. And once again, a beginning requires a Beginner.

5. Proof For the Need of a Creator
If Einstein's theory of relativity is correct, which it is, then since the universe is ever expanding outward, the universe must have, at one time, been so compact that it would be microscopic in the beginning. The universe would have--at one point--taken up absolutely no space whatsoever. So then, that would mean there would have been nothingness. We know from the first law of thermodynamics that you can't get the matter and energy needed to make the universe from nothingness. How could natural causes form something like the universe? Even if that somehow miraculously happened by chance that a little microscopic bubble which would ultimately expand into the universe did magically appear, how did that universe expand? And where did the energy and matter needed to form it come from? When I interviewed an atheist on this subject, he was obviously stumped, calling it a "cosmic mystery". It would take more faith to believe in that nonsense than in an omnipotent God who is not bound by space or time, but One who created space and time.

6. Chaos Comes From a Blindly Triggered Big Bang
A random explosion resulting in a perfectly ordered universe is totally illogical. Chaos and destruction, however, are the results of a tremendous "bang" with no overseer. You cannot detonate explosives and expect any kind of order, system, or pattern to erupt from it. The ordered life systems and cosmic systems and meteorological systems and every kind of intelligence or thought or feeling or emotion or any kind of system we see today was the result of an explosion? That is the theory suggested by a random "Big Bang". It is impossible and therefore false.

7. Pure Laws of Physics and Nature Can't Emerge Randomly
For the universe and everything in it to form and expand and function correctly, there must be orderly systems inside that universe, or else it could never survive, let alone begin in the first place. So how could the law of gravity, all laws of physics, and so on, come from an explosion, which should cause chaos? Once again, it must require more faith to believe in such nonsense, than to believe in a rational, orderly God.

8. Unevenly Balanced Universe Requires Limited Existence
The universe is dotted with warmer spots and cold spots. The laws of physics tell us that, to reach a state of balance, warm bodies flow to cold bodies to evenly disperse themselves. We have found that the universe does indeed have warm and cold spots, indicating that the universe is not entirely balanced yet. If the universe had always been around, then it would be completely balanced. The process by which the heat is evenly distributed is still taking place. The universe had a beginning and the effects still last. It is constantly progressing. The universe had a beginning, and that requires a beginner (refer to the pool table example in Statement #2, Second Law of Thermodynamics).