|
|
|
Talking Back: An Index of Talk.Origins Claims
This is a response to Talk.origins frequent and nonsensical claims
about creationists and their non-sequitarian “refutations.” Their
claims are vacuous, false, and often misrepresent the true creationist
position.
They have often demonstrated their unwillingness to maintain
intelligent definitions of evolution (See ‘New
Definition of Evolution?’) and have proven their willingness to
stoop to any level in order to win, even accusing creationists of
blatantly false things, such as racism and lying (See ‘Major Misrepresentation’). Furthermore,
it is what Talk.Origins doesn’t say that is also dishonest (See ‘Talk.Origins:
Deception by Omission’).
This is a point-by-point refutation of every single claim in their
‘Index to Creationist Claims.’ This will be done in the style and
organization of Talk.origins.
Talking Back: An Index
to Talk.Origins' Claims
If you have
written a rebuttle to an article or claim on the 'Index to Creationist
Claims,' send it to us via the Feedback
page and you will recieve full credit for it directly at the top of
the page which features your article or rebuttle.
|
