|
|
|
CreationTruths Disclaimer
The websites linked to from
CreationTruths do not all match the opinions expressed or believed by
the staff or writers of CreationTruths. All links to sites outside of
CreationTruths should be approached with the normal internet caution.
CreationTruths links to specific articles on other websites and these
articles are all that is necessarily endorsed by CreationTruths in
public or private.
We do not necessarily agree with all other articles on sites linked to
from CreationTruths and it should be understood that outside of
specific articles linked to CreationTruths is not endorsing or agreeing
with said sites.
Answers In Genesis website:
We agree the most with AiG on nearly every aspect of Creation Science,
except in the area of Geology. While much of their geological
information is perfectly fine and acceptable, CreationTruths feels it
unwise to marry Flood Geology to any particular Pre Flood/Flood/Post
Flood boundary (See 'Assessing Creationist
Stratigraphy with Evidence from the Gulf of Mexico'), and that they
also marry their Flood model on the highly questionable Plate Tectonics
Theory (See 'Forum
on Catastrophic Plate Tectonics' and read the vastly superior
papers by Michael Oard). [NOTE:
CreationTruths feels that Dr. Walt Brown's Hydroplate Theory is far
superior based upon actual evidence--See 'Creationist
Models: The Flood'] We are also somewhat critical of their unseemly
assult on Dr. Kent Hovind of Creation
Science Evangelism, who is a fellow devote and sincere Christian
man trying to spread the news of creation. That said, we can move on to
Hovind's site:
Creation
Science Evangelism website:
We agree with some of what Dr Hovind addresses in his seminars and on
his website, but we disagree with a significant portion. We feel his
continued propogation of the information by the late Seventh-Day
Adventist Ron Wyatt and his organization on Wyatt's "discoveries" of
the true site of the crossing of the Red Sea, the Ark of the Covenant
beneath the Crucifiction site, the true Noah's Ark site on the side of
Mt. Ararat, the site of the Tower of Babel, the true site of Sodom and
Gamorrah, in addition to others. Wyatt has given scanty evidence at
best, which does not withstand scientific investigation, and promises
to reveal the rest of the evidence (which he claimed to have stored in
his garage) when the "time is right," the right time being when angels
visit him again to tell him it is. Wyatt clearly had a Messiah complex
and, if his claims be true, was blessed by God greater than Moses (See 'Amazing ‘Ark’
Exposé — Could this be Noah’s Ark?' and 'Has the
Ark of the Covenant been found?').
Hovind also makes questionable claims about the Pre-Flood atmosphere
and enviroment based upon much of Dr. Carl Baugh's research, which many
creationists suspect may be flawed. Hovind also makes claims to an evil
conspiracy of satan-worshipers bent on world domination, the leader of
which will become the AntiChrist in End Times tribulation to come.
While the evidence for or against a conspiracy is debatable, the idea
that there being a conspiracy (assuming he's correct) does not "prove"
that his Dispensational, Last-Days Madness, Rapture Fever theology is
correct anymore than a Black person being black proves they're of
lesser intelligence. Being of the Reformed tradition, and having
examined the evidence, this author is supremely convinced that Hovind's
eschatology is fatally flawed.
Thank you
The CreationTruths staff
|
