What the Scholars Say on Mawlid
Imam Al Suyuti : In Al hawi lil fatawi, Al Suyuti wrote
a special chapter entitled, "The Good Intention in
Commemorating the Mawlid," at the beginning of which
he said, "There is a question being asked about
commemorating the Mawlid of the Prophet in the month
of Rabi' al Awwal: What is the religious legal ruling
in this regard? Is it good or bad? Does the one who
celebrates get reward or not?' The answer according to
me is as follows: To commemorate the Mawlid, which is
basically gathering people tooether, reciting parts of
the Quran, narrating stories about the Prophet's birth
and the signs that accompanied it, their serving food,
and afterwards departing is one of the good
innovations; and the one who practices it gets
rewarded, because it Involves venerating the status of
the Prophet e and expressing joy for his honorable
birth."
Ibn Taymiyya: Ibn Taymiyya's opinion about Mawlid from
the Collected Fatwas, Majma' Fatawa ibn Taymiyya, Vol.
23, P. 163 and his lqtida' al-sirat al-mustaqim, p.
294-295, Section entitled: "The innovated festivities
of time and place" (ma uhditha min al-a'yad
al-zamaniyya wa al-makaniyya): And similarly what some
people innovate by analogy with the Christians who
celebrate the birth of Jesus, or out of love for the
Prophet and to exalt him, and Allah may reward them
for this love and effort, not on the fact that it is
an innovation... To celebrate and to honor the birth
of the Prophet and to take it as an honored season, as
some of the people are doing, is good and in it there
is a great reward, because of their good intentions in
honoring the Prophet.
Ibn Kathir: says in his book Mawlid Rasul Allah on p.
19 "The Night of the,Prophet's birth is a
magnificient, noble, blessed and holy night, a night
of bliss for the believers, pure, radiant with lights,
and of immeasurable price."
Hafiz Ibn Hajar al-Haythami: In the same source
previously mentioned, Suyuti said, "Someone asked Ibn
Hajar about commemorating the Mawlid. Ibn Hajar
answered, 'Basically, commemorating the Mawlid is an
innovation that has not been transmitted by the
righteous Muslims of the first three centuries.
However, it involves good things and their opposites,
therefore, whoever looks for the good and avoids the
opposites then it is a good innovation.' It occurred
to me (Suyuti) to trace it to its established origin,
which has been confirmed in the two authentic books:
al Salihain. When the Prophet arrived in Medina he
found that the Jews fast the day of 'ashura; when he
inquired about it they said, 'This is the day when
Allah I drowned the Pharaoh and saved Moses, therefore
we fast it to show our gratitude to Allah .' From this
we can conclude that thanks are being given to Allah
on a specific day for sending bounty or preventing
indignity or harm. What bounty is greater than the
bounty of the coming of this Prophet , the Prophet of
Mercy, on that day?" "This is regarding the basis of
Mawlid. As for the activities, these should consist
only of things that express thankfulness to Allah ,
such as what has been previously mentioned: reciting
Qur'an, eating food, giving charity, reciting poetry,
praising the Prophet e or on piety which moves hearts
and drives them to do good and work for the
Hereafter." These are the derivations that those
opposed to Mawlid call false conclusions and invalid
analogies.
Imam Mohammed bin Abu Bakr Abdullah al Qaisi al
Dimashqi: He wrote Jami' al athar fi mawlid, Al nabiy
al mukhtar, Al lafz al ra'iq fi mawlid khayr al
khala'iq, and Mawlid al sa'ada fi mawlid al hadi.
Imam Al 'Iraqi: He wrote Al Mawlid al heni fi al
mawlid al sani.
Mulla 'Ali Al Qari: He wrote Al mawlid al rawi fil
mawlid al nabawi.
Imam Ibn Dahiya: He wrote Al Tanweer fi mawlid al
basheer al nadheer.
Imam Shamsu Din bin Nasir al Dimashqi: He wrote Mawlid
al sa'ada fi mawlid al hadi. He is the one who said
about the Prophet's e estranged uncle, Abu Lahab,
"This unbeliever who has been disparaged, 'perish his
hands', will stay in Hell forever. Yet, every Monday
his torment is being reduced because of his joy at the
birth of the Prophet . How much mercy can a servant
expect who spends all his life joyous about the
Prophet and dies believing in the Oneness of Allah ?"
Imam Shamsu Din Ibn Al Jazri: He wrote Al nashr fil
qira'at al 'ashr, 'urf al ta'reef bil mawlid al shareef.
Imam Ibn al Jawzi Imam Ibn al Jawzi: said about the
honorable Mawlid, "It is security throughout the year,
and glad tidings that all wishes and desires will be
fulfilled.”
Imam Abu Shama Imam Abu Shama (Imam Nawawi's
shaykh):
in his book al ba'ith ala Inkar al bida' wal hawadith
(pg.23) said, "One of the best innovations in our time
is what is being done every year on the Propliet's
birthday, such as giving charity, doing good deeds,
displaying ornaments, and expressing joy, for that
expresses the feelings of love and veneration for him
in the hearts of those who are celebrating, and also,
shows thankfulness to Allah for His bounty by sending
His Messenger the one who has been sent as a Mercy to
the worlds."
Imam al Shihab al Qastallani (al Bukhari's commentator): in his book Al mawahib al ladunniya
(1-148) said, "May Allah I have mercy on the one who
turns the nights of the month of the Prophet's e birth
into festivities in order to increase the suffering of
those whose hearts are filled with disease and
sickness." There are others who wrote and spoke about
Mawlid, such as Imam al Sakhawi, Imam Wajihu Din bin
'Ali bin al Dayba' al Shaybani al Zubaidi, and many
more, which we will not mention due to the limited
space available.
From these many evidences, it should be clear by now
that celebrating the Mawlid is highly commendable and
allowed.
Surely we cannot simply shrug off as heretics the
scholars and dignitaries of this nation who approved
the commemoration of the Mawlid and wrote countless
books on the subject. Are all these scholars, to whom
the whole world is indebted for the beneficial books
they have written on Prophetic sayings, jurisprudence,
commentaries, and other sorts of knowledge, among the
indecent who commit sins and evil? Are they, as those
opposed to Mawlid claim, imitating the Christians in
celebrating the birth of Jesus? Are they claiming
that the Prophet e did not convey to the nation what
they should do?
We leave answers to these questions
up to you. We must continue to examine the errors
which those opposed to Mawlid utter.
They say, "If celebrating the Mawlid is from the
religion, then the Prophet c would have made it clear
to the nation, or would have done it in his lifetime,
or it would have been done by the Companions." No one
can say that the Prophet e did not do it out of his
humbleness, for this is speaking evil of him, so they
cannot use this argument.
Furthermore, that the Prophet e and his Companions did
not do a certain thing does not mean they made that
thing prohibited. The proof is in -the Prophet's
saying, "Whoever establishes in Islam, a good
practice...... cited earlier. This is the strongest
evidence that gives encouragement , to innovate
whatever practices have foundations in religious law,
even if the Prophet and his Companions did not do
them. Al Shafi'i said, "Anything that has a
foundation in religious law is not an innovation even
if the Companions did not do it, because their
refraining from doing it might have been for a certain
excuse they had at the time, or they left it for
something better, or perhaps not all of them knew
about it."
Therefore, whoever prohibits anything based on the
concept that the Prophet did not do it, his claim has
no proof and must be rejected. Thus, we say to the
rejecters of Mawlid: based on the rule you have
attempted to found, that is, that whoever does
anything that the Prophet e or his Companions did not
do is committing innovation, it would follow that the
Prophet e did not complete the religion for his
nation, and that the Prophet e did not convey to the
nation what they should do. No one says this or
believes this except a heretic defecting from the
religion of Allah 1.
To the doubters of Mawlid we
declare, "Based on what you say, we convict you," for
you have innovated in the basics of worship a large
number of things that the Prophet e did not do nor did
his Companions, the Generation after the Companions,
or the Generation after them.
For instance: Congregating people behind one Imam to
pray salat al tahajud after salat al tarawih, in the
two Holy Mosques and other mosques. - Reciting the
prayer of completion of the Qur'an in salat al tarawih
and also in salat al tahajud. - Designating the 27th
night of Ramadan to complete reading the entire Qur'an
in the two Holy Mosques. - A caller saying, after
salat al tarawih, in the Qiyam prayer, "May Allah
reward you.” The saying: "Oneness of Allah Is divided
into three parts: Oneness of Godhood; Oneness of
Lordship and Oneness of of the Names and Attributes."
Is this found in a hadith, the statements of the
companions or the statements of the four imams? -
Founding organizations which did not exist in the time
of the Prophet, such as Islamic universities,
societies for committing the Qur'an to memory, and
offices for missionary work.
Courtesy of Muslim Publications.